Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü

Year 2020, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 59 - 76, 17.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.612161

Abstract

Bu araştırma yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamalarının nasıl hizmet odaklı örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışını etkilediğini ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma modeli yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılarak test edilmiştir. İlişkilerin test edilmesinde kullanılan veri dört ve beş yıldızlı otel işletmelerinin işgörenlerinden (n=496) elde edilmiştir. Bulgular temel olarak yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamalarının hizmet odaklı örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde işe adanmanın ve işe gömülmüşlüğün tam aracılık rollerine işaret etmektedir. Bu bulguya göre, bir biriyle uyumlu insan kaynakları uygulamaları işe adanmayı ve işe gömülmüşlüğü artırmak suretiyle hizmet odaklı örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışını artırmaktadır. Bir başka ifadeyle, işe adanma ve işe gömülmüşlük bağımsız ve bağımlı değişken arasındaki ilişkide kilit bağlantı noktalarını oluşturmaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu araştırma, yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamaları ve hizmet odaklı örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki süreçlerine ışık tutarak, alanyazına katkı sağlamaktadır.

References

  • Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A. & Shah, S. I. (2018). Frontline employees’ high-performance work practices, trust in supervisor, job-embeddedness and turnover intentions in hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1436-1452.
  • Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C. & Soane, E. C. (2013). The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model. The international journal of human resource management, 24(2), 330-351.
  • Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • Babcock-Roberson, M. E. & Strickland, O. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of psychology, 144(3), 313-326.
  • Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
  • Bamberger, P. & Meshoulam, I. (2000). Human resource management strategy. London: Published Sage.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Bavik, A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and service-oriented citizenship behavior: A test of dual explanatory paths. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 173-182.
  • Becker, B. E. & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial applications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53–101.
  • Bergiel, E. B., Nguyen, V. Q., Clenney, B. F. & Stephen Taylor, G. (2009). Human resource practices, job embeddedness and intention to quit. Management Research News, 32(3), 205-219.
  • Bettencourt, L. A. & Brown, S. W. (1997). Contact employees: Relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of retailing, 73(1), 39-61.
  • Bettencourt, L. A., Gwinner, K. P. & Meuter, M. L. (2001). A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of applied psychology, 86(1), 29-41.
  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley
  • Borman, W.C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman Ws.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boshoff, C. & Allen, J. (2000). The influence of selected antecedents on frontline staff’s perceptions of service recovery performance. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11(1), 63-90.
  • Bos‐Nehles, A. C., Van Riemsdijk, M. J. & Kees Looise, J. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance: applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers' HRM implementation. Human resource management, 52(6), 861-877.
  • Boxall, P. & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high‐performance work systems: progressing the high‐involvement stream. Human resource management journal, 19(1), 3-23.
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
  • Cable, D. M. & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 875-884.
  • Chiang, Y. H., Shih, H. A. & Hsu, C. C. (2014). High commitment work system, transactive memory system, and new product performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 631-640.
  • Chiu, S. F. & Tsai, M. C. (2006). Relationships among burnout, job involvement, and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Psychology, 140(6), 517-530.
  • Choo, L. S. (2016). A study of the role of work engagement in promoting service‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior in the Malaysian hotel sector. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 35(4), 28-43.
  • Cooke, F. L., Cooper, B., Bartram, T., Wang, J. & Mei, H. (2019). Mapping the relationships between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: a study of the banking industry in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1239-1260.
  • Crossley, C. D., Bennett, R. J., Jex, S. M. & Burnfield, J. L. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1031.
  • Delaney, J. T. & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management journal, 39(4), 949-969.
  • Delery, J. E. & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
  • Demerouti, E. & Bakker, A. B. (2011). The job demands-resources model: Challenges for future research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(2), 01-09.
  • Domínguez-Falcón, C., Martín-Santana, J. D. & De Saá-Pérez, P. (2016). Human resources management and performance in the hotel industry: The role of the commitment and satisfaction of managers versus supervisors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(3), 490-515.
  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Garba, O. A., Babalola, M. T. & Guo, L. (2018). A social exchange perspective on why and when ethical leadership foster customer-oriented citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 70, 1-8.
  • Ghosh, D. & Gurunathan, L. (2015). Do commitment based human resource practices influence job embeddedness and intention to quit?. IIMB Management Review, 27(4), 240-251.
  • Gupta, N. & Sharma, V. (2018). Relationship between leader member exchange (LMX), high-involvement HRP and employee resilience on extra-role performance: Mediating role of employee engagement. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(2), 126-150.
  • Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of management Journal, 44(1), 180-190.
  • Gürlek, M. (2018). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun işe adanma üzerindeki etkisinde algılanan dışsal prestijin ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü: otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Turizm İşletmeciliği Anabilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Gürlek, M. (2019a). Hizmet odaklı yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamalarının işgören hizmet performansı üzerindeki etkisinde aracı ve düzenleyici değişkenlerin rolü. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yönetim Organizasyon Bilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Gürlek (2019b). The effects of workplace incivility on turnover intention: the mediating role of job embeddedness. Global Conference on Business and Economics. September 30 - October 3. İstanbul
  • Gürlek, M. & Tuna, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and work engagement: Evidence from the hotel industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 31, 195-208.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. (Second Edition), Guilford Publications.
  • Holtom, B. C., Burton, J. P. & Crossley, C. D. (2012). How negative affectivity moderates the relationship between shocks, embeddedness and worker behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 434-443.
  • Huang, Y., Ma, Z. & Meng, Y. (2018). High‐performance work systems and employee engagement: empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(3), 341-359.
  • James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A. & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational research methods, 9(2), 233-244.
  • Jeong, I. & Shin, S. J. (2019). High-performance work practices and organizational creativity during organizational change: A collective learning perspective. Journal of Management, 45(3), 909-925.
  • Kang, J. & Jang, J. (2019). Fostering service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior through reducing role stressors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2018-1018
  • Kang, H. J. A., Kim, W. G., Choi, H. M. & Li, Y. (2020). How to fuel employees’ prosocial behavior in the hotel service encounter. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 84, 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102333.
  • Kanten, P., Kanten, S. & Gürlek, M. (2015). The effects of organizational structures and learning organization on job embeddedness and individual adaptive performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1358-1366.
  • Karadas, G. & Karatepe, O. M. (2019). Unraveling the black box: The linkage between high-performance work systems and employee outcomes. Employee Relations, 41(1), 67-83.
  • Karatepe, O. M. (2012). Job resources, work engagement, and hotel employee outcomes: a time-lagged analysis. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 25(3), 644-665.
  • Karatepe, O. M. (2013a). High-performance work practices and hotel employee performance: The mediation of work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 132-140.
  • Karatepe, O. M. (2013b). High-performance work practices, work social support and their effects on job embeddedness and turnover intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(6), 903-921.
  • Karatepe, O. M. (2016). Does job embeddedness mediate the effects of coworker and family support on creative performance? An empirical study in the hotel industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 15(2), 119-132.
  • Karatepe, O. M. & Karadas, G. (2012). The effect of management commitment to service quality on job embeddedness and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(4), 614-636.
  • Karatepe, O. M. & Vatankhah, S. (2014). The effects of high-performance work practices and job embeddedness on flight attendants' performance outcomes. Journal of Air Transport Management, 37, 27-35.
  • Kehoe, R. R. & Wright, P. M. (2013). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of management, 39(2), 366-391.
  • Kim, J. & Gatling, A. (2019). Impact of employees’ job, organizational and technology fit on engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-04-2018-0029
  • Kim, S., O’Neill, J. W. & Cho, H. M. (2010). When does an employee not help coworkers? The effect of leader–member exchange on employee envy and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 530-537.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Kusluvan, S., Kusluvan, Z., Ilhan, I. & Buyruk, L. (2010). The human dimension: A review of human resources management issues in the tourism and hospitality industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 51(2), 171-214.
  • Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı (2019). Turizm işletmesi belgeli tesisler listesi. https://yigm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-9579/turizm-tesisleri.html adresinden Mart 2019’da alınmıştır.
  • Lee, J. & Ok, C. M. (2016). Hotel employee work engagement and its consequences. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 25(2), 133-166.
  • Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P. & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of management journal, 47(5), 711-722.
  • Lee, Y. K., Choi, J., Moon, B. Y. & Babin, B. J. (2014). Codes of ethics, corporate philanthropy, and employee responses. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 39, 97-106.
  • Lin, Y. T. & Liu, N. C. (2016). High performance work systems and organizational service performance: The roles of different organizational climates. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 118-128.
  • Liu, N. C. & Lin, Y. T. (2019). High-performance work systems, management team flexibility, employee flexibility and service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1651374
  • Llorens, S., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. & Salanova, M. (2006). Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(3), 378-391.
  • Luu, T. T. (2019). Service-oriented high-performance work systems and service-oriented behaviours in public organizations: the mediating role of work engagement. Public Management Review, 21(6), 789-816.
  • Ma, E. & Qu, H. (2011). Social exchanges as motivators of hotel employees’ organizational citizenship behavior: The proposition and application of a new three-dimensional framework. International journal of hospitality management, 30(3), 680-688.
  • Macky, K. & Boxall, P. (2008). High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: A study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 38-55.
  • Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Koopman, J. & Conlon, D. E. (2015). Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1686-1708.
  • Mihail, D. M. & Kloutsiniotis, P. V. (2016). The effects of high-performance work systems on hospital employees' work-related well-being: Evidence from Greece. European Management Journal, 34(4), 424-438.
  • Mitchell, R., Obeidat, S. & Bray, M. (2013). The effect of strategic human resource management on organizational performance: the mediating role of high‐performance human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 899-921.
  • Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J. & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of management journal, 44(6), 1102-1121.
  • Murphy, K. S. & Williams, J. A. (2010). Human resource management high-performance work practices and contextual setting: Does industry matter? A comparison of the US restaurant sector to the manufacturing industry. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 13(4), 283-303.
  • Nadeem, K., Riaz, A. & Danish, R. Q. (2019). Influence of high-performance work system on employee service performance and OCB: the mediating role of resilience. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 13.
  • Nasurdin, A. M., Ahmad, N. H. & Tan, C. L. (2015). Cultivating service-oriented citizenship behavior among hotel employees: the instrumental roles of training and compensation. Service Business, 9(2), 343-360.
  • Ng, T. W. & Feldman, D. C. (2009). Occupational embeddedness and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(7), 863-891.
  • Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P. & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel psychology, 61(3), 503-545.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, McGraw- Hill, New York.
  • Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 12: 43-72. Greenwich,
  • Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human performance, 10(2), 85-97.
  • Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M. & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. USA: Sage Publications.
  • Paré, G. & Tremblay, M. (2007). The influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals' turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 32(3), 326-357.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563.
  • Qiu, S., Alizadeh, A., Dooley, L. M. & Zhang, R. (2019). The effects of authentic leadership on trust in leaders, organizational citizenship behavior, and service quality in the Chinese hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 40, 77-87.
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
  • Salanova, M. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116-131.
  • Sardeshmukh, S. R. & Vandenberg, R. J. (2017). Integrating moderation and mediation: A structural equation modeling approach. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 721-745.
  • Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Sekiguchi, T., Burton, J. P. & Sablynski, C. J. (2008). The role of job embeddedness on employee performance: the interactive effects with leader–member exchange and organization‐based self‐esteem. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 761-792.
  • Shaw, J. D., Dineen, B. R., Fang, R. & Vellella, R. F. (2009). Employee-organization exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1016-1033.
  • Snape, E. & Redman, T. (2010). HRM practices, organizational citizenship behaviour, and performance: A multi‐level analysis. Journal of management studies, 47(7), 1219-1247.
  • Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S. & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of management Journal, 50(3), 558-577.
  • Sweetman, D. & Luthans, F. (2010). The power of positive psychology: Psychological capital and work engagement. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 54-68.
  • Tang, T. W. & Tang, Y. Y. (2012). Promoting service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors in hotels: The role of high-performance human resource practices and organizational social climates. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 885-895.
  • Tang, Y. Y. & Tsaur, S. H. (2016). Supervisory support climate and service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality: The role of positive group affective tone. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(10), 2331-2349.
  • Theriou, G. N. & Chatzoglou, P. D. (2009). Exploring the best HRM practices-performance relationship: An empirical approach. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(8), 614-646.
  • Tian, A. W., Cordery, J. & Gamble, J. (2016). Staying and performing: How human resource management practices increase job embeddedness and performance. Personnel Review, 45(5), 947-968.
  • Tsaur, S. H. & Lin, Y. C. (2004). Promoting service quality in tourist hotels: the role of HRM practices and service behavior. Tourism management, 25(4), 471-481.
  • UNWTO. (2018). UNWTO tourism highlights – 2018 edition. Madrid: World Tourism Organization.
  • Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W. & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 37(4), 765-802.
  • Varela González, J. & García Garazo, T. (2006). Structural relationships between organizational service orientation, contact employee job satisfaction and citizenship behavior. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(1), 23-50.
  • Wheeler, A. R., Harris, K. J. & Harvey, P. (2010). Moderating and mediating the HRM effectiveness—intent to turnover relationship: The roles of supervisors and job embeddedness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 182-196.
  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Dollard, M. F., Demerouti, E., Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W. & Schreurs, P. J. (2007). When do job demands particularly predict burnout? The moderating role of job resources. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(8), 766-786.
  • Xiao, Z. & Björkman, I. (2006). High commitment work systems in Chinese organizations: A preliminary measure. Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 403-422.
  • Yung Chou, S. & Lopez-Rodriguez, E. (2013). An empirical examination of service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: The roles of justice perceptions and manifest needs. Managing Service Quality, 23(6), 474-494.
  • Zhang, Z., Wan, D. & Jia, M. (2008). Do high-performance human resource practices help corporate entrepreneurship? The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 19(2), 128-138.
  • Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G. & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206.
  • Zhong, L., Wayne, S. J. & Liden, R. C. (2016). Job engagement, perceived organizational support, high‐performance human resource practices, and cultural value orientations: A cross‐level investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 823-844.

How Do High-Performance Human Resources Practices Affect Service-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior? The Mediating Role of Work Attitudes

Year 2020, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 59 - 76, 17.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.612161

Abstract

This research aims to reveal how high-performance human resources practices affect service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. Structural equation modeling was used to test the research model. The data used to test the relationships were obtained from employees of four and five-star hotel (n = 496). The findings mainly indicate full mediating roles of job embeddedness and work engagement in the effect of high-performance human resources practices on service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. According to this finding, a set of internally consistent HR practices increase service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior by increasing job embeddedness and work engagement. . In other words, job embeddedness and work engagement are key links in the relationship between independent and dependent variables. As a result, this research contributes to the literature by shedding light on the relationship processes between high-performance human resources practices and service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior.

References

  • Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A. & Shah, S. I. (2018). Frontline employees’ high-performance work practices, trust in supervisor, job-embeddedness and turnover intentions in hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1436-1452.
  • Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C. & Soane, E. C. (2013). The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model. The international journal of human resource management, 24(2), 330-351.
  • Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • Babcock-Roberson, M. E. & Strickland, O. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of psychology, 144(3), 313-326.
  • Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
  • Bamberger, P. & Meshoulam, I. (2000). Human resource management strategy. London: Published Sage.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Bavik, A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and service-oriented citizenship behavior: A test of dual explanatory paths. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 173-182.
  • Becker, B. E. & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial applications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53–101.
  • Bergiel, E. B., Nguyen, V. Q., Clenney, B. F. & Stephen Taylor, G. (2009). Human resource practices, job embeddedness and intention to quit. Management Research News, 32(3), 205-219.
  • Bettencourt, L. A. & Brown, S. W. (1997). Contact employees: Relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of retailing, 73(1), 39-61.
  • Bettencourt, L. A., Gwinner, K. P. & Meuter, M. L. (2001). A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of applied psychology, 86(1), 29-41.
  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley
  • Borman, W.C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman Ws.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boshoff, C. & Allen, J. (2000). The influence of selected antecedents on frontline staff’s perceptions of service recovery performance. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11(1), 63-90.
  • Bos‐Nehles, A. C., Van Riemsdijk, M. J. & Kees Looise, J. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance: applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers' HRM implementation. Human resource management, 52(6), 861-877.
  • Boxall, P. & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high‐performance work systems: progressing the high‐involvement stream. Human resource management journal, 19(1), 3-23.
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
  • Cable, D. M. & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 875-884.
  • Chiang, Y. H., Shih, H. A. & Hsu, C. C. (2014). High commitment work system, transactive memory system, and new product performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 631-640.
  • Chiu, S. F. & Tsai, M. C. (2006). Relationships among burnout, job involvement, and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Psychology, 140(6), 517-530.
  • Choo, L. S. (2016). A study of the role of work engagement in promoting service‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior in the Malaysian hotel sector. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 35(4), 28-43.
  • Cooke, F. L., Cooper, B., Bartram, T., Wang, J. & Mei, H. (2019). Mapping the relationships between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: a study of the banking industry in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1239-1260.
  • Crossley, C. D., Bennett, R. J., Jex, S. M. & Burnfield, J. L. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1031.
  • Delaney, J. T. & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management journal, 39(4), 949-969.
  • Delery, J. E. & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
  • Demerouti, E. & Bakker, A. B. (2011). The job demands-resources model: Challenges for future research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(2), 01-09.
  • Domínguez-Falcón, C., Martín-Santana, J. D. & De Saá-Pérez, P. (2016). Human resources management and performance in the hotel industry: The role of the commitment and satisfaction of managers versus supervisors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(3), 490-515.
  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Garba, O. A., Babalola, M. T. & Guo, L. (2018). A social exchange perspective on why and when ethical leadership foster customer-oriented citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 70, 1-8.
  • Ghosh, D. & Gurunathan, L. (2015). Do commitment based human resource practices influence job embeddedness and intention to quit?. IIMB Management Review, 27(4), 240-251.
  • Gupta, N. & Sharma, V. (2018). Relationship between leader member exchange (LMX), high-involvement HRP and employee resilience on extra-role performance: Mediating role of employee engagement. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(2), 126-150.
  • Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of management Journal, 44(1), 180-190.
  • Gürlek, M. (2018). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun işe adanma üzerindeki etkisinde algılanan dışsal prestijin ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü: otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Turizm İşletmeciliği Anabilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Gürlek, M. (2019a). Hizmet odaklı yüksek performanslı insan kaynakları uygulamalarının işgören hizmet performansı üzerindeki etkisinde aracı ve düzenleyici değişkenlerin rolü. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yönetim Organizasyon Bilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Gürlek (2019b). The effects of workplace incivility on turnover intention: the mediating role of job embeddedness. Global Conference on Business and Economics. September 30 - October 3. İstanbul
  • Gürlek, M. & Tuna, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and work engagement: Evidence from the hotel industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 31, 195-208.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. (Second Edition), Guilford Publications.
  • Holtom, B. C., Burton, J. P. & Crossley, C. D. (2012). How negative affectivity moderates the relationship between shocks, embeddedness and worker behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 434-443.
  • Huang, Y., Ma, Z. & Meng, Y. (2018). High‐performance work systems and employee engagement: empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(3), 341-359.
  • James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A. & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational research methods, 9(2), 233-244.
  • Jeong, I. & Shin, S. J. (2019). High-performance work practices and organizational creativity during organizational change: A collective learning perspective. Journal of Management, 45(3), 909-925.
  • Kang, J. & Jang, J. (2019). Fostering service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior through reducing role stressors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2018-1018
  • Kang, H. J. A., Kim, W. G., Choi, H. M. & Li, Y. (2020). How to fuel employees’ prosocial behavior in the hotel service encounter. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 84, 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102333.
  • Kanten, P., Kanten, S. & Gürlek, M. (2015). The effects of organizational structures and learning organization on job embeddedness and individual adaptive performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1358-1366.
  • Karadas, G. & Karatepe, O. M. (2019). Unraveling the black box: The linkage between high-performance work systems and employee outcomes. Employee Relations, 41(1), 67-83.
  • Karatepe, O. M. (2012). Job resources, work engagement, and hotel employee outcomes: a time-lagged analysis. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 25(3), 644-665.
  • Karatepe, O. M. (2013a). High-performance work practices and hotel employee performance: The mediation of work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 132-140.
  • Karatepe, O. M. (2013b). High-performance work practices, work social support and their effects on job embeddedness and turnover intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(6), 903-921.
  • Karatepe, O. M. (2016). Does job embeddedness mediate the effects of coworker and family support on creative performance? An empirical study in the hotel industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 15(2), 119-132.
  • Karatepe, O. M. & Karadas, G. (2012). The effect of management commitment to service quality on job embeddedness and performance outcomes. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(4), 614-636.
  • Karatepe, O. M. & Vatankhah, S. (2014). The effects of high-performance work practices and job embeddedness on flight attendants' performance outcomes. Journal of Air Transport Management, 37, 27-35.
  • Kehoe, R. R. & Wright, P. M. (2013). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of management, 39(2), 366-391.
  • Kim, J. & Gatling, A. (2019). Impact of employees’ job, organizational and technology fit on engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-04-2018-0029
  • Kim, S., O’Neill, J. W. & Cho, H. M. (2010). When does an employee not help coworkers? The effect of leader–member exchange on employee envy and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 530-537.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Kusluvan, S., Kusluvan, Z., Ilhan, I. & Buyruk, L. (2010). The human dimension: A review of human resources management issues in the tourism and hospitality industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 51(2), 171-214.
  • Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı (2019). Turizm işletmesi belgeli tesisler listesi. https://yigm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-9579/turizm-tesisleri.html adresinden Mart 2019’da alınmıştır.
  • Lee, J. & Ok, C. M. (2016). Hotel employee work engagement and its consequences. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 25(2), 133-166.
  • Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P. & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of management journal, 47(5), 711-722.
  • Lee, Y. K., Choi, J., Moon, B. Y. & Babin, B. J. (2014). Codes of ethics, corporate philanthropy, and employee responses. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 39, 97-106.
  • Lin, Y. T. & Liu, N. C. (2016). High performance work systems and organizational service performance: The roles of different organizational climates. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 118-128.
  • Liu, N. C. & Lin, Y. T. (2019). High-performance work systems, management team flexibility, employee flexibility and service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1651374
  • Llorens, S., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. & Salanova, M. (2006). Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(3), 378-391.
  • Luu, T. T. (2019). Service-oriented high-performance work systems and service-oriented behaviours in public organizations: the mediating role of work engagement. Public Management Review, 21(6), 789-816.
  • Ma, E. & Qu, H. (2011). Social exchanges as motivators of hotel employees’ organizational citizenship behavior: The proposition and application of a new three-dimensional framework. International journal of hospitality management, 30(3), 680-688.
  • Macky, K. & Boxall, P. (2008). High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: A study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 38-55.
  • Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Koopman, J. & Conlon, D. E. (2015). Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1686-1708.
  • Mihail, D. M. & Kloutsiniotis, P. V. (2016). The effects of high-performance work systems on hospital employees' work-related well-being: Evidence from Greece. European Management Journal, 34(4), 424-438.
  • Mitchell, R., Obeidat, S. & Bray, M. (2013). The effect of strategic human resource management on organizational performance: the mediating role of high‐performance human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 899-921.
  • Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J. & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of management journal, 44(6), 1102-1121.
  • Murphy, K. S. & Williams, J. A. (2010). Human resource management high-performance work practices and contextual setting: Does industry matter? A comparison of the US restaurant sector to the manufacturing industry. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 13(4), 283-303.
  • Nadeem, K., Riaz, A. & Danish, R. Q. (2019). Influence of high-performance work system on employee service performance and OCB: the mediating role of resilience. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 13.
  • Nasurdin, A. M., Ahmad, N. H. & Tan, C. L. (2015). Cultivating service-oriented citizenship behavior among hotel employees: the instrumental roles of training and compensation. Service Business, 9(2), 343-360.
  • Ng, T. W. & Feldman, D. C. (2009). Occupational embeddedness and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(7), 863-891.
  • Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P. & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel psychology, 61(3), 503-545.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, McGraw- Hill, New York.
  • Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 12: 43-72. Greenwich,
  • Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human performance, 10(2), 85-97.
  • Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M. & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. USA: Sage Publications.
  • Paré, G. & Tremblay, M. (2007). The influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals' turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 32(3), 326-357.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563.
  • Qiu, S., Alizadeh, A., Dooley, L. M. & Zhang, R. (2019). The effects of authentic leadership on trust in leaders, organizational citizenship behavior, and service quality in the Chinese hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 40, 77-87.
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
  • Salanova, M. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116-131.
  • Sardeshmukh, S. R. & Vandenberg, R. J. (2017). Integrating moderation and mediation: A structural equation modeling approach. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 721-745.
  • Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Sekiguchi, T., Burton, J. P. & Sablynski, C. J. (2008). The role of job embeddedness on employee performance: the interactive effects with leader–member exchange and organization‐based self‐esteem. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 761-792.
  • Shaw, J. D., Dineen, B. R., Fang, R. & Vellella, R. F. (2009). Employee-organization exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1016-1033.
  • Snape, E. & Redman, T. (2010). HRM practices, organizational citizenship behaviour, and performance: A multi‐level analysis. Journal of management studies, 47(7), 1219-1247.
  • Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S. & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of management Journal, 50(3), 558-577.
  • Sweetman, D. & Luthans, F. (2010). The power of positive psychology: Psychological capital and work engagement. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 54-68.
  • Tang, T. W. & Tang, Y. Y. (2012). Promoting service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors in hotels: The role of high-performance human resource practices and organizational social climates. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 885-895.
  • Tang, Y. Y. & Tsaur, S. H. (2016). Supervisory support climate and service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality: The role of positive group affective tone. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(10), 2331-2349.
  • Theriou, G. N. & Chatzoglou, P. D. (2009). Exploring the best HRM practices-performance relationship: An empirical approach. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(8), 614-646.
  • Tian, A. W., Cordery, J. & Gamble, J. (2016). Staying and performing: How human resource management practices increase job embeddedness and performance. Personnel Review, 45(5), 947-968.
  • Tsaur, S. H. & Lin, Y. C. (2004). Promoting service quality in tourist hotels: the role of HRM practices and service behavior. Tourism management, 25(4), 471-481.
  • UNWTO. (2018). UNWTO tourism highlights – 2018 edition. Madrid: World Tourism Organization.
  • Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W. & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 37(4), 765-802.
  • Varela González, J. & García Garazo, T. (2006). Structural relationships between organizational service orientation, contact employee job satisfaction and citizenship behavior. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(1), 23-50.
  • Wheeler, A. R., Harris, K. J. & Harvey, P. (2010). Moderating and mediating the HRM effectiveness—intent to turnover relationship: The roles of supervisors and job embeddedness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 182-196.
  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Dollard, M. F., Demerouti, E., Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W. & Schreurs, P. J. (2007). When do job demands particularly predict burnout? The moderating role of job resources. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(8), 766-786.
  • Xiao, Z. & Björkman, I. (2006). High commitment work systems in Chinese organizations: A preliminary measure. Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 403-422.
  • Yung Chou, S. & Lopez-Rodriguez, E. (2013). An empirical examination of service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: The roles of justice perceptions and manifest needs. Managing Service Quality, 23(6), 474-494.
  • Zhang, Z., Wan, D. & Jia, M. (2008). Do high-performance human resource practices help corporate entrepreneurship? The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 19(2), 128-138.
  • Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G. & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206.
  • Zhong, L., Wayne, S. J. & Liden, R. C. (2016). Job engagement, perceived organizational support, high‐performance human resource practices, and cultural value orientations: A cross‐level investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 823-844.
There are 110 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Behaviour-Personality Assessment in Psychology, Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mert Gürlek 0000-0002-0024-7746

Publication Date April 17, 2020
Submission Date August 27, 2019
Acceptance Date January 7, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Gürlek, M. (2020). Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü. İş Ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.612161
AMA Gürlek M. Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. April 2020;7(1):59-76. doi:10.18394/iid.612161
Chicago Gürlek, Mert. “Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü”. İş Ve İnsan Dergisi 7, no. 1 (April 2020): 59-76. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.612161.
EndNote Gürlek M (April 1, 2020) Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi 7 1 59–76.
IEEE M. Gürlek, “Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü”, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 59–76, 2020, doi: 10.18394/iid.612161.
ISNAD Gürlek, Mert. “Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü”. İş ve İnsan Dergisi 7/1 (April 2020), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.612161.
JAMA Gürlek M. Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. 2020;7:59–76.
MLA Gürlek, Mert. “Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü”. İş Ve İnsan Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, pp. 59-76, doi:10.18394/iid.612161.
Vancouver Gürlek M. Yüksek Performanslı İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları Hizmet Odaklı Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışını Nasıl Etkiler? İş Tutumlarının Aracılık Rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi. 2020;7(1):59-76.

Cited By







 

 

                                                                          Creative Commons Lisansı


İş ve İnsan Dergisi (e-ISSN 2148-967X) Creative Commons Alıntı-LisansDevam 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.