Şanlıurfa İkinci Ürün Koşullarında Bazı İnci Darısı Popülasyonlarının Verim ve Yem Kalite Özelliklerin Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Araştırma, GAP koşullarında bazı inci darısı popülasyonlarının ot verimi ve kalitesinin saptanması amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Tarla denemeleri, Şanlıurfa GAP Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Talat Demirören deneme istasyonunda (Akçakale) 2021 yılında, ikinci ürün koşullarında yürütülmüştür. 22 inci darısı (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) popülasyonu, materyal olarak kullanılmıştır. Popülasyonların bitki boyunun 186.0-300.8 cm, ana saptaki yaprak sayısının 7.83-16.33 adet, bitkideki toplam sap sayısının 3.83-7.33 adet, bitki başına yaş ot veriminin 773.7-2335.0 g, bitki başına kuru ot veriminin ise 338.7-1183.5 g arasında değiştiği saptanmıştır. Ayrıca ham protein (HP) oranının %7.81-12.68, nötral deterjan lif (NDF) oranının %52.42-62.29, asit deterjan lif (ADF) oranının %37.86-44.98, sindirilebilir kuru madde (SKM) oranının %53.85-59.40, kuru madde tüketim (KMT) oranının %1.93-2.31 ve nispi yem değerinin (NYD) 81.40-106.78 arasında olduğu belirlenmiştir. 5581, 8155, 8259, 8350, 8707 ve 8818 nolu popülasyonların ot verimi bakımından; 1834, 7860, 8276, 8288 ve 9157 nolu popülasyonların ise nispi yem değeri bakımından, 8562 nolu popülasyonun ise hem verim ve hem de kalite bakımından ilk sıralarda yer aldığı belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen ot verimi ve ot kalitesi sonuçlarına göre, inci darısının ülkemizin güneyinde ikinci ürün koşullarında kaba yem açığının kapatılması için çok yüksek potansiyele sahip alternatif bir tür olabileceği görülmektedir. Ancak ot verimi ve kalitesi bakımından öne çıkan bu materyallerin, GAP veya benzeri ekolojik koşullara sahip bölgelerde yürütülecek uzun süreli çalışmalar ile verim ve özellikle de silaj kalitesi bakımından gerçek potansiyellerinin ortaya konulması gerekmektedir.

Keywords

• İnci darısı (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br)
• Kalite
• Ot verimi
• Popülasyon

Determination of Yield and Forage Quality Characteristics of Some Pearl Millet Populations in Şanlıurfa Second Crop Conditions

Abstract

The research was conducted to determine the forage yield and quality of some pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) populations under GAP conditions. Field trials were carried out in 2021 as a second crop at the Şanlıurfa GAP Agricultural Research Institute Directorate Talat Demirören experimental station (Akçakale). A total of 22 pearl millet populations were used as material. The results showed that plant height ranged from 186.0 to 300.8 cm, the number of leaves on the main stem ranged from 7.83 to 16.33, and the number of stems per plant ranged from 3.83 to 7.33, fresh forage yield per plant varied between 773.7 and 2335.0 g, while dry forage yield ranged from 338.7 to 1183.5 g. In terms of forage quality, crude protein (CP) content ranged from 7.81% to 12.68%, neutral detergent fiber (NDF) from 52.42% to 62.29%, acid detergent fiber (ADF) from 37.86% to 44.98%, digestible dry matter (DDM) ratio from 53.85% to 59.40%, dry matter intake (DMI) from 1.93% to 2.31%, and relative feed value (RFV) from 81.40 to 106.78. Populations numbered 5581, 8155, 8259, 8350, 8707, and 8818 ranked highest in terms of forage yield; populations 1834, 7860, 8276, 8288, and 9157 had the highest relative feed values; and population 8562 ranked among the top for both yield and quality. Based on the results for forage yield and quality, pearl millet appears to be a highly promising alternative forage crop for closing the roughage deficit under second crop conditions in southern Turkey. However, the real potential of these promising materials especially regarding silage quality needs to be validated through long-term studies conducted in GAP or ecologically similar regions.

Keywords

• Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br)
• Quality
• Forage yield
• Population

References

1. Abd El-Lattief, E. A. (2011). Growth and fodder yieldof forage pearl millet in newly cultivated land as affected by date of planting and integrated use of mineral and organiz fertilizers. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 3(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2011.35.42
2. Abdulhakeem, A., Ahmed, F. O., Omoniyi, A. M., Kayode, O. I., & Yusuf, D. O. A. (2019). Genetic diversity studies for morphological traits in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) landraces of Northern Nigeria. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 07(02), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2019.7.2.0070
3. Anonim (2021a). GAP Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Laboratuvarı, Toprak Analiz Sonuçları, Haziran-2022, Şanlıurfa.
4. Anonim (2021b). T.C. Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı, Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü, Şanlıurfa İli İklim Parametreleri. https://mgm.gov.tr/?il=%C5%9Eanl%C4%B1urfa. [Erişim tarihi:15 Haziran 2022].
5. Asungre, P. A. (2014). Characterisation of of pearl millet millet [Pennisetum glaucum, (L), R. Br.] germplasm in Ghana [Msc Thesis]. Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana. https://ir.knust.edu.gh/handle/123456789/6659
6. Aswini, M. S., Ganesan, K. N., Ezhilarasi, T., & Sivakumar, S. D. (2022). Genetic studies on association and inter-relationship of green fodder yield and fodder quality traits in hybrids of fodder pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.]. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 35(19), 1975-1983. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i193749
7. Athoni, B. K., Ishwar, B., Pattanashetty, S. K., & Guggari, A. K. (2016). Genetic diversity for yield and its component traits in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.]. International Journal of Scinece and Nature, 7(4), 795-798.
8. Babiker, S. A., Khair, M. A. M., Tahir, I. S. A., & Elhag, F. M. A. (2015). Forage quality variations among some Sudan pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) collection. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 5(4), 293-298. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2015/12575

9. Bakheit, B. R., Ali, M. B. M., Rasha Mahdy, E. E., & Kandeel, M. N. (2021). Performance of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) genotypes for forage yield and its components under normal and water stress irrigation. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 52(5), 45-63. https://www.aun.edu.eg/agriculture/ar
10. Buso, W. H. D., França, A. F. S., & Miyagi, E. S. (2014). Bromatological composition and dry matter digestibility of millet cultivars subjected to nitrogen doses. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 66(3), 887-893. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-41626746
11. Çiçek, M., & Yücel, C. (2022). GAP koşullarında bazı inci darı (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) popülasyonlarının ot verimi ve kalitesinin belirlenmesi. MAS Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 7(Özel Sayı), 1143–1159. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7452260
12. Dağtekin, Z. (2019). Çukurova koşullarında bazı bir yıllık sıcak mevsim buğdaygil yem bitkilerinin adaptasyonu üzerine bir araştırma [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
13. Dönmez, H. B., & Hatipoğlu, R. (2024). A research on the forage yield and agromorphological characteristics of some pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) cultivars under second crop conditions in the Cukurova region. Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 27(4), 910-919. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1395888
14. Govintharaj, P., Gupta, S. K., Blummel, M., Maheswaran, M., Sumathi, P., Atkari, D. G., Anil Kumar, V., Rathore, A., Raveendran, M., & Duraisami, V. P. (2018). Genotypic variation in forage linked morphological and biochemical traits in hybrid parents of pearl millet. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 18, 163-175.
15. Hassan, M. U. I., Ahmad, A. U. H., Zamir, S. I., Haq, I., Khalid, F., Rasool, T., & Hussain, A. (2014). Growth, yield quality performance of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) varieties under Faisalabad conditions, Pakistan. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 2215-2223. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.515235
16. Heuzé, V., Tran, G., Hassoun, P., & Sauvant, D. (2015). Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), forage. Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/399). Last updated on September 30, 2015.
17. Jaranyama, P., & Garcia, A. D. (2004) Under-standing relative feed value (RFV) and relative forage quality (RFQ). College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University, USDA.
18. Kumawat, K. R., Sharma, N. K., & Sharma, N. (2019). Genetic variability and character association analysis in pearl millet single cross hybrids under dry conditions of Rajasthan. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 10(3), 1067-1070.
19. Lee, D., Hanna, W., Buntin, G. D., Dozier, W., Timper, P., & Wilson, J. P. (2012). Pearl millet for grain. College of Ag. and Env. Sci., Univ. of Georgia Cooperative Extension. Bulletin #B 1216. http://extension.uga.edu/publications/detail.cfm?num ber=B1216 [Access date: 30 July, 2014].
20. Makarana, G., Yadav, R. K., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., Soni, P. G., Kar, S., & Rajvaidya, S. K. (2018). Fodder and grain quality of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) under cutting management in saline irrigation water. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(3), 1251-1257.
21. Marsalis, M. A. (2012). Millet for forage and grain in New Mexico and West Texas. Guide A-417. https://aces.nmsu.edu/pubs/_a/A417/.
22. Mason, S. C., Maman, N., & Pale, S. (2015). Pearl millet production practices in semi-arid West Africa: a review. Experimental Agriculture, 51, 501-521.
23. Medici, L. O., Gonçalves, F. V., Da Fonseca, M. P. S., Gaziola, S. A., Schmidt, D., Azevedo, R. A., & Pimentel, C. (2018). Growth, yield and grain nutritional quality in three Brazilian pearl millets (Pennisetum americanum L.) with African or Indian origins. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 90(2), 1749-1758. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820170488
24. Morales, J. U., Alatorre, J. A. H., Nieto, C. A. R., & Becerra, J. F. C. (2015). Forage production and nutritional content of silage from three varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) harvested at two maturity stages. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 27(1), 4161-4169.
25. Naoura, G., Sawadogo, N., Djırabaye, N., & Hassane, M. A. (2020). Agronomic performance of improved pearl millet cultivars in southern Chad. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 14(9), 2980-2991. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i9.2
26. Nayak, L., Dalei, B. B., Biswasi, S. K., Pradhan, K., & Acharya, P. (2020). Performance of released hybrid varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) under rainfed condition of Odisha. International Journal of CurrentMicrobiology and Applied Sciences, 9(09), 1799-1804. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.225.
27. Newman, Y., Jennings, E., Vendramini, J., & Blount, A. (2010). Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum): overview and management. Univ. of FL. IFAS Extension. Publication #SS-AGR-337. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ag347 [Access date: July 31, 2011].
28. Özer, M. İ., & Okant, M. (2025). Agro-morphological and forage quality traits of some pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) populations grown under şanlıurfa conditions. Mas Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(1), 12-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15075690
29. Rahal-Bouziane, H., & Semiani, Y. (2016). Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br] landraces from south Algeria: variability, yield components, grain and panicle quality. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(1), 38-46.
30. Rani, R., Khandelwal, V., Ramesh, S. J., Singh, A., & Kumar, V. (2022). Genetic variability and association analysis for dry fodder yield and its component traits in pearl millet inbred. Forage Research, 48(1), 57-61.
31. Rostamza, M., Chaichi, M., Jahansouz, M., & Alimadadi, A. (2011). Forage quality, water use and nitrogen utilization effeciencies of pearl millet (Pennisetum amercanum L.) grown under different soil moisture and nitrogen levels. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 1607-1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.05.014
32. Sayğıdar, M. N., Yucel, C., & Tas, T. (2024). Determination of biomass yield, forage quality and mineral content of pearl millet varieties (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) under semi-arid conditions. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 5(7), 548-556. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1522914
33. Serba, D. D., Perumal, R., Tesso, T. T., & Min, D. (2017). Status of global pearl millet breeding programs and the way forward. Crop Science, 57(6), 2891-2905. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.11.0936
34. Shah, I. A., Rahman, H. U., Shah, S. M. A., Shah, Z., Rahman, S., Ullah, I., & Noor, M. (2012). Characterization of pearl millet germplasm for various morphological and fodder yield parameters. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44(1), 273-279.
35. Sheahan, C. M. (2014). Plant guide for pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center, Cape May, NJ. Published 08/2014.
36. Subbulakshmi, M., Ganesan, K. N., Iyanar, K., Sivakumar, S. D., & Ravichandran, V. (2022). Genetic studies on variability, heritability and traits association for green fodder yield and quality in fodder pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.). Biological Forum An International Journal, 14(2), 1248-1254.
37. Thomas, M, A., Babu, C., & Iyanar, K. 2018. Genetic variability and association studies in pearl millet for green fodder yield and quality traits. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 9(3), 1263-1271. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2018.00158.8
38. Upadhyaya, H. D., & Gowda, C. L. L. (2009). Managing and enhancing the use of germplasm-strategies and methodologies. Technical Manual no.10. ICRISAT, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. 236 p.
39. Yurtsever, N. (2011). Deneysel istatistik metotları. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü Toprak Gübre ve Su Kaynakları Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları Genel Yayın No: 121 Teknik Yayın No 56,800s.
40. Yücel, C., & Yücel, D. (2022). Tarımda değişen yapılar ve beklentiler. İnci darı (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.). Ed. Serap Doğan ve Nazlı Kalender. İksad publishing house, ISBN: 978-625-8323-16- 0, S: 3-46.
41. Zhang, S. J., Chaudhry, A. S., Ramdani, D., Osman, A., Guo, X. F., Edwards, G. R., & Cheng, L. (2016). Chemical composition and in vitro fermentation characteristics of high sugar forage sorghum as an alternative to forage maize for silage making in Tarim Basin China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 15(1), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60939-4