Functionality of Interfaces in Foreign Language Teaching

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 198 - 221, 30.06.2025

Hafize Güzel Kamacı , Özge Can

https://doi.org/10.71084/ijlet.1652996

Öz

The term interface is related to syntactic structures that are sensitive to different structural situations, and recent studies on second language acquisition have highlighted the term interface because the acquisition of a grammatical phenomenon that requires the gathering of multiple linguistic subsystems or different grammatical modules has some difficulties. This study aims to discuss the functionality of linguistic interfaces in foreign language teaching with the findings of studies within the framework of the Interface Hypothesis, which argues that purely syntactic features can be acquired without encountering any significant problems in second language acquisition; however, it is difficult to talk about a problem-free acquisition in the application of constraints that require interaction between syntactic knowledge and other cognitive areas. Within the framework of the findings obtained from studies that propose a distinction between cognitive areas and structures that include and do not include interfaces and are frequently related to second language acquisition, our study discusses how internal and external interfaces are acquired, what kind of difficulties are encountered in these interfaces, at which points there are disruptions, and at which they function without problems. At this point, our study contributes not only to the theoretical prediction of the linguistic components and the relationships between linguistic and non-linguistic cognitive systems in foreign language teaching, but also to the obtaining of practical outputs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Interface Hypothesis , Internal Interfaces , External Interfaces , Foreing Language Teaching

Yabancı Dil Öğretiminde Arakesitlerin İşlevselliği

Öz

Arakesit terimi farklılaşan yapısal durumlara duyarlı olan sözdizimsel yapılarla ilişkilidir ve ikinci dil edinimi ile ilgili son yıllarda yapılan çalışmalar, arakesit terimini öne çıkarmaktadır; çünkü birden çok dilsel altdizge ya da farklı dilbilgisi modüllerinin bir araya gelmesini gerektiren dilbilgisel bir görüngünün edinimi kimi güçlükler barındırmaktadır. Bu çalışma salt sözdizimsel özelliklerin ikinci dil ediniminde önemli bir sorun ile karşılaşılmadan edinilebildiğini; ancak sözdizimsel bilgi ve diğer bilişsel alanlar arasında etkileşim gerektiren sınırlamaların uygulanmasında sorunsuz bir edinimden söz etmemenin güç olduğunu savunan Arakesit Varsayımı çerçevesindeki çalışmaların bulgularıyla, dilsel arakesitlerin yabancı dil öğretimindeki işlevselliğini tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bilişsel alanlar ile arakesit içeren ve içermeyen yapılar arasında bir ayrım öneren ve sıklıkla ikinci dil edinimi ile ilgili olan çalışmalardan elde edilen bulgular çerçevesinde çalışmamız, içsel ve dışsal arakesitlerin nasıl edinildiği, bu arakesitlerde ne gibi güçlüklerle karşılaşıldığı, hangi noktalarda aksamalar yaşandığı, hangilerinde sorunsuz işlediğini tartışmaktadır. Bu noktada çalışmamız hem dilbilgisi bileşenleri hem de dilsel ve dilsel olmayan bilişsel dizgeler arasındaki ilişkilerin yabancı dil öğretiminde sadece kuramsal açıdan yordanmasına değil uygulamalı çıktıların elde edilmesine de katkı sağlayıcı niteliktedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Arakesit Varsayımı , İçsel Arakesit , Dışsal Arakesit , Yabancı Dil Öğretimi

Kaynakça

• Ayoun, D. (2007). French applied linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford University Press.
• Belletti, A., Bennati, E. & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 25(4): 657-689.
• Borik, O. (2009). Morphology-Semantics Interface: Dealing with Aspect. York Papers in Linguistics 2.10: 22-45.
• Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
• Can, Ö. (2005). Türkçede ayrık yapılar (Yüksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
• Can, Ö. & Oktar, L. (2006). Türkçede ayrık yapılar: bir sınıflandırma çalışması. Dilbilim Araştırmaları, 11-17.
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1),1-47.
• Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. & Anderson, B. (1997). The interpretive interface in L2 acquisition: the process-result distinction in English-French interlanguage grammars. Language Acquisition. 6(4): 297-332.
• Elordieta, G. (2008). An overview of theories of the syntax-phonology interface. ASJU. 42(1): 209-286.
• Erguvanlı-Taylan, E. (1984). The function of word order in Turkish. University of California Press.
• Erguvanlı-Taylan, E. (2000). ‘Türkçede fiil yapıları ve anlam.’ Dilbilim Araştırmaları, 5, 30-50.
• Erguvanlı-Taylan, E. (2003). ‘Türkçede anlatım ve ifade biçimleri.’ Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, 14(1), 102-115.
• Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A. & Handley, S.(2004). The story of some: everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 58(2): 121-132.
• Galani, A., Hicks, G. & Tsoulas, G. (2011). Morphology and its interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Gillingham, G. (2007). Not every implicature is computed by default: investigations into the effect of linguistic context on the rate of computation of scalar implicature. (Yayınlanmamış Onur Tezi). Montreal: McGill University.
• Goad, H., White, L. & Steele, J. (2003). Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48, (ss. 243–263).
• Goad, H. & White, L. (2004). Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: effects of L1 prosodic structure. Eurosla Yearbook 4 (ss. 119-145). Editörler Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Michael Sharwood Smith, Antonella SoraceveMitsuhiko Ota. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Goad, H. & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A Prosodic Approach. Second Language Research. 22(3): 243-268.
• Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: a comprehensıve grammar. Londra: Routledge.
• Güzel, H. & Can, Ö. (2021). ‘Arakesit varsayımı çerçevesinde it-ayrıklarının öğretimine yönelik malzeme tasarımı.’ International Journal of Language Academy 9, no. 2 (2021): 1–20.
• Hertel, T. J. (2003). Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order. Second Language Research. 19(4): 273-304.
• Haznedar, B. & Schwartz, B. D. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 21(ss. 257-268). Editörler Elizabeth Hughes, Mary Hughes ve Annabel Greenhill. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
• Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Los Angeles: University of California.
• İşsever, S. (2003). Information structure in Turkish: The word order-prosody interface. Lingua. 113(11): 1025-1053.
• Kaisse, E. M. (1985). Connected speech: the interaction of syntax and phonology. Michigan: Academic Press.
• Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
• Karadağ, B. M. (2022). Anlambilimde güncel çalışmalar. Littera Turca Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 8(3), 1999–2007.
• Küçüksakarya, E. (2020). Dilbilgisinin temel bileşenleri ve arakesitler. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22 (1), 33-60.
• Lozano, C. (2006). Focus and split-intransitivity: the acquisition of word order alternations in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research. 22(2): 145-187.
• Lardiere, D. (1998). Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research. 14(1): 1-26.
• Lieberman, M. (2009). Necessary interpretation at the syntax/pragmatics interface: L2 acquisition of scalar implicatures. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Mind Context Divide: Language Acquisition and Interfaces of Cognitive Linguistic Modules. University of Iowa.
• Loerts, H.,Wieling, M., & Schmid, M. S. (2013). Neuter pronoun resolution in Dutch: A visual world paradigm study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 32–48.
• Mackay, R. (2011). Language and intercultural communication in the new era. Routledge.
• Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 7(2): 125-142.
• Montrul, S. & Rodríguez-Louro, C. (2006). ‘Beyond the syntax of the null subject parameter: A look at the discourse-pragmatic distribution of null and overt subjects by L2 learnersof Spanish’. Paper presented at The Romance Turn, Universidad Nacional de Educacióna Distancia (Madrid).
• Noveck, I. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicatures. Cognition. 78(2): 165-188.
• Ramchand, G. & Reiss, C. (2007). The oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Glass, W. (1999). Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research. 15(2): 220-249.
• Prévost, P. & White, L. (2000a). Accounting for morphological variation in L2 acquisition: truncation or missing inflection? The acquisition of syntax: issues in comparative developmental linguistics (ss. 202-234). Editörler Marc-Ariel Friedemann ve Luigi Rizzi. Harlow: Longman.
• Rothman, J. & Slabakova, R. (2011). The mind-context divide: on acquisition at the Linguistic interfaces. Lingua. 121(4): 568-576.
• Satterfield, T. (2003). Economy of interpretation: patterns of pronoun selection in transitional bilinguals. Effects of the Second Language on the First (ss. 214-233). Editör Vivian Cook. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
• Slabakova, R. (2007). Scalar implicatures in L2 acquisition.Proceedings of the 31st Annual BUCLD (ss. 576-584). Editörler Heather Caunt-Nulton, Samantha Kulatilakeve I-hao Woo. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
• Slabakova, R. (2009). Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua. 120(10): 2444-2462.
• Sorace, A. (2003). Near-nativeness. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (ss. 130-151). Editörler Catherine J. Doughty ve Michael H. Long. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Sorace, A. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. Syntax and variation: reconciling the biological and the social (ss. 55-80). Editörler Karen P. Corrigan ve Leonie Cornips. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
• Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 1(1): 1-33.
• Sorace, A. & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research. 22 (3): 339-368.
• Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism. 13(2): 195-210.
• Tsimpli, I. M. & Sorace, A. (2006). Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. 30 (1): 653-664.
• Uzun, A. (2020). Arakesitler: tanım, türler ve işlevleri. Dilbilim Araştırmaları, 15 (2), 45-67.
• White, L. (2003a). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.6 (2): 129-141.
• White, L. (2003b). Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• White, L. (2008). Definiteness effects in the L2 English of Mandarin and Turkish speakers. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (ss. 550-561). Editörler Harvey Chan, Heather Jacob ve EnkeleidaKapia. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
• White, L. (2009). Grammatical theory: interfaces and L2 knowledge. The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (ss. 49-65). Editörler William C. Ritchie ve Tej Bhatia. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
• White, L. (2011). Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua. 121(4): 577-590.
• White, L. (2011). The interface hypothesis: how far does it extend? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 1(1): 108-110.
• Wilbur, R. B. (2010). The semantics–phonology interface. Sign languages: A Cambridge Language Survey (ss. 357-382). Editör Diane Brentari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.