Current Issue

Issue: 21, 6/15/24

Year: 2024

IJOSES is a peer-reviewed journal that started to be published in 2013, and includes authentic research in the field of Social and Education. IJOSES publishes Turkish and English scientific articles twice a year, these publication months being June and December. When it is regarded as necessary, special issues may be published during the year.
In the scope of liberal arts and educational studies, improving and contributing to the educational system is one of the goals of the journal. IJOSES is focused on solving the problems within the educational and social fields, and aims to contribute to eligible scientific research.
IJOSES aims to give priority to the research that detects the situations that may possibly occur today or in the future, or already happened in the past, firstly within our country and then later anywhere in the world. Besides that, it includes an aim to serve to build an educational system where individuals can gain information and skill. Moreover, IJOSES aims to serve the vulgarisation of academic studies that suggest concrete solutions and contributes to the professional growth of teachers and academicians, at all levels of education, from preschool to higher education. IJOSES includes disciplinary and interdisciplinary works with the condition of being related to education and social fields.

The journal, which is published in Turkish and English, includes studies in the social field, with educational and social fields being in the first place, following History, Geography, International Relationships, Public Administration, Law, Political Science, Turkish Language and Literature, Sociology, Public Relations, Philosophy, Religious Sciences, Basic Islamic Sciences, Cultural Studies, etc.

All first time users: Please click on the "Register Now" button in the login section above and enter the requested information. When you register, you must select e-mail as your preferred method of contact. Upon successful registration, you will receive an e-mail message containing your username and password. Should you have any difficulties registering, please contact the editorial office.

All repeat users: If you have already received an e-mail message from us with an assigned username and password, you do not need to register again. Simply enter your access codes into the login frame above and proceed. You do not need to re-register, even if your role changes (e.g., from author to reviewer).

Authors: Please enter your username and password into the designated fields above and log into the system as an "Author." Submit your manuscript and/or track its progress through the system. For detailed guidelines of the manuscript submission process, please download the Author's Manual.

Reviewers: Please enter your access codes into the login frame above and log into the system as a "Reviewer." You may view and/or download manuscripts assigned to you for review and submit your comments for the editor. For further information please download the Reviewer's Manual.

To change your contact information, username or password: Log into the system, select "Update My Information" from the menu above and follow the directions.

Did you forget your password? To have your username and password mailed to your registered e-mail address, please click on the "Send Username/Password" link in the login section and enter the requested information (first name, last name and email address) exactly as you entered it when you registered. If everything matches, the e-mail will be sent.

Author Guidelines

The studies that are sent to be published in the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences [IJOSES], are first examined by the editor or section editors in the terms of their appropriateness to the journal's publication policies. If the study is appropriate to the journal's publication policies, it is then sent to at least two peers for them to assess. In the case of one of the peer's negative assessments, it is then sent to a third peer. If the third peer's assessment is negative, it is then returned to its owner.

The Assessment Process

If you are considering submitting an article to our journal, we are suggesting you examine our journal, the journal's publication policy, and the author guide. Authors should be signed up first to submit work. After the sign-up, via the entry link, you can start the submitting process which includes 3 steps. In the texts that are going to be uploaded to the system, the name and other information should not be included in any way. These informations are later included by the editors before the publication.

The author (s) is responsible for the views and opinions expressed in the texts. All publication rights of the articles that are sent to be published and approved by the publishing council belong to the IJOSES / USEBD Journal. The edicts that are presented in the national or international symposiums can be submitted to the publication in the condition of being stated. The edicts that are presented in the symposiums should not be published.

Every article that is submitted to the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences is checked by the editors in terms of their resemblance and plagiarism, with the usage of similarity programs such as iThenticate, Turnitin, and İntihal. Articles with more than %25 plagiarism are returned to the author without it being taken to the assessment process. If the resemblance is not apparent in the articles or other works to the degree of %25 and above, the studies are sent to the two referees who are experts in the field. In the case of the positive report that is received by referees, the article is published. In the case of one of the referees' negative reports, depending on the content of the report, if it is seen as necessary by the editor, the article is sent to a third referee. If the third referee's report is positive, the article is published, in any other case, it is not published. If the article is not assessed within the time that is given to the referee, the article is sent to another referee.

The articles are only submitted by the open journal system.

* Cases such as name similarities, surname changes, names that consist of Turkish letters, different spellings, and institution changes may create problems in publication/citation searches that are made by the name of the author. This is why it is important for researchers to obtain their depictor identity/number (ID). For this reason, it is required for all of our writers to register for ORCID. It is recommended that our authors should request their ORCID information and include this information in journals/articles since Orcid is going to be used to ensure standardization and in the joint studies that are going to be carried out with YOK. ORCID is the abbreviation of Open Researcher and Contributor ID. ORCID is a 16- digit, numbered URI that is compatible with the ISO Standard (27729), which is known as International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI). You can create a free registration for an individual ORCID at .

*Authors should upload their articles to the system after they write or edit their writings according to the journal article template.

*APA 6 style should be used in the in-text citations and references. In order to obtain information about the APA 6 style, please use the next link.

The studies that are sent to the journal, if it is possible, should not exceed the 10.000-word limit, and books and other introductions should not exceed the 1.500-word limit. For the articles, it should be noted that they should not be under the 5.000-word limit. Furthermore, Turkish and English abstracts between 150-200 words, should be added to the articles.

*The articles that are uploaded to the system by the authors are reviewed by the editorial board and then decided if it is going to be taken into the assessment or not.

Click for the Copyright Release Form. Telif Hakkı (Copyright Form) Devri için tıklayınız.

Spelling Rules


1. The journal text should be written in Times New Roman type font, with 12 font size, with a 2,5 cm gap from all of the edges, with only one column, with 1 line gap, and in the size of A4.

2. Paragraphs should start with 0,75 indentation, there should be no gap between paragraphs.

3.In the point where stress is needed within the text, it should be done with italics.

4.Before and after the paragraphs, there should be 6 pt gaps.

5.There should be no information about the author within the text.

The Article Title

1. The article title should define the subject of the article, its field, and the limits of its problems clearly.
2. The title should be written in bold, centered, with the expectation of its conjunctions in upper case in its first letters, and 14 font size (Palatino Linotype).


1. At the beginning of every article, there should be a Turkish and English abstract.
2. The abstract should contain the purpose of the article, its important findings, and conclusions.
3. The abstract should be justified and written between 150-200 words.
4. The abstract and keywords should be written in Times New Roman font type, 10 font size, and with single line spacing.
5. In the bottom of the abstract, there should be a minimum of 3, and a maximum of 5 keywords that describe the content of the article.

Title and Sub-titles

1. All titles should be written in Times New Roman font style, with 12 font sizes.
2. In the section titles, the first letters of the words should be upper case, while the others should be lower case, with centered and bold letters.
3. In the section of sub-titles, the first letters of the words should be upper case, while the others should be lower case, with left centered and bold.
4. In the level third or fourth titles, the first letters of the words should be upper case, while the others should be lower case using the paragraph title.
5. The paragraph formalizations are:

Middle Title


Second level sub-title

Third-level sub-title (1 cm indentation) Fourth level sub-title (1 cm indentation) Fifth level sub-title (1 cm indentation)

The Display of Table and Figure/Visual

1. Tables and figures should be prepared to be published and should be used when it is indicated in the text.
2. Tables and the titles of the tables should use Times New Roman, with 10 font sizes, and with single line spacing.
3. In the title of the tables, the first letter of every word should be upper case.
4. The texts in the table should be in single line spacing, with a gap of 0 pt before and after, and should be written in without adding spaces between the paragraphs of the same style.
5. There should be no vertical lines in the table.
6. The width of the lines within the table should be measured according to a width of 1 / 2 pt. 7.Before and after the table, there should be a 12 pt gap.
8. In the display of the title of the table and the number of the table, the number of the table should be bol and left center, and the title of the table should be the normal and left center. E.g.; Table 1.The Informations About the Gender of the Participants
9. In the display of the titles of the figures and visuals, the number of the figure/visual should be bold and centered, and the title of the figure/visual should be normal and centered. E.g.; Figure 1. Turkey Cities Map


1. References should be ordered alphabetically.

2. References should be arranged according to the example that is given below and should be added to the end of the article.


While a reference is shown within the text, a reference link should be used. In the references link, there should be the last name of the author, the publication date of the work, and the page number in the case of direct transfer.

Single Author References Link:

(Akıllı, 2013), (Akıllı, 2013, s. 61), Akıllı’ya (2013) göre, Akıllı’ya (2013, s. 61) göre Two Authors References Link:

(Akıllı & Çalışkan 2013), (Akıllı & Çalışkan, 2013, s. 61), Akıllı ve Çalışkan’a (2013) göre, Akıllı ve Çalışkan’a (2013, s. 61) göre

Three Authors References Link:

(Akıllı, Çalışkan & Uslu, 2013), (Akıllı, Çalışkan & Uslu, 2013, s. 61), Akıllı, Çalışkan ve Uslu’ya (2013) göre, Akıllı, Çalışkan ve Uslu’ya (2013, s. 61) göre,

Four and Five References Link:

In the references where four and five references are apparent, the references link should be like its first mentioned form (Akıllı, Çalışkan, Uslu ve Kurnaz 2013), and in the following parts, it should be given as abbreviated (Akıllı vd., 2013).

Six or More References Link:

In the references where four and five references are apparent, the references link should be like its first mentioned form, and in the following parts, it should be given as abbreviated.

1. In the case where the citation is used to give reference to the same author's more than one work in the same year, the works should be lineup like below: (Akıllı 2013a), (Akıllı, 2013b), (Akıllı, 2013a,2013b)

2. In the case where the citation is used to give reference to the same author's more than one work, the works should be lineup like below; (Akıllı, 2014; Akıllı, 2015)

3. In the case where the citation is used to give reference to the different authors that share the same last name, the works should be given as below. (Akıllı, 2013), (B. Akıllı,2014), Akıllı’ya (2013) göre , B. Akıllı’ya (2014) göre

4. In the case of more than one reference about the same subject, the used references link should be ordered chronologically, and the same date references should be ordered alphabetically according to the name: (Arıcı ve Ungan, 2008; Aytan, 2010; Göçer, 2010; Kurudayıoğlu ve Karadağ, 2010; Karatay, 2011; Dağtaş, 2012; Karadağ ve Kayabaşı, 2013)

5. The abbreviations about the institutions should be given in the first place that it is mentioned and should be used as abbreviations in the following parts: Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü(EGM) – (Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü [EGM], 2012)
6. Legal texts should be displayed as: (Milli Eğitim Temel Kanunu, 1973)


Single Author Book

İnalcık, H. (2015). Devlet-i aliyye: Osmanlı imparatorluğu araştırmaları-1. İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Giddens, A. (2009). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Single Author Translated Book
Freire, P. (2014). Ezilenlerin pedagojisi. (D. Hattaoğlu ve E. Özbek, çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
Lewis, B. (2000). Modern Türkiye'nin doğuşu (M. Kıratlı, çev.). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.

Two Authors Book

Arıcı, A. F. & Ungan, S. (2012). Yazılı anlatım el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Cook, T. D. & Campell, D. T. (1979) Quasi experimentation: Desing & analysis issues for field setting. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company..

Two Authors Translated Book

Cooper, R. & Sawaf, A. (1997). Liderlikte duygusal zekâ. (Çev: Z. Ayman & B. Sancar). İstanbul: Sistem Yayınları.

Three Authors Book

Köklü, N., Büyüköztürk, Ş. & Çokluk-Bökeoğlu, Ö. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik.Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Parris, S. R., Fisher, D. & Headley, K. (2009). Adloescent literacy: Field tested effective solutions for every classroom. Newark: International Reading Assocation.

Edited Book

Çetin, İ. (Edt.) (2010). Dil ve edebiyat öğretim yöntemleri. İstanbul: Nobel..
Coady, N. & Lehmann, P. (Eds.) (2008). Theoretical perspectives for direct social work practice. New York: Springer.

The section in the Edited Book

Uzun Tulgar, Y. (2010). Edebiyat öğretiminde kullanılan teori ve yaklaşımlar. İ. Çetin (Edt.). Dil ve edebiyat öğretim yöntemleri içinde (s. 45-80). İstanbul: Nobel.

Çeviri Kitapta Bölüm
Creswell, J. (2014). Nicel Yöntemler. S. B. Demir (Ed.), Araştırma Deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları (M. Bursal, Çev.) içinde (s. 155-182). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.

Piaget, J. (1988). Extracts from Piaget's theory (G. Gellerier & J. Langer, Trans.). In K. Richardson & S. Sheldon (Eds.), Cognitive development to adolescence: A reader (pp. 3-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Turkish Article

Aydın, A. (2004). Psikolojide yeni arayışlar ve insan doğası tartışmaları. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1 (1), 23–29.
Article That is Published in a Foreign Language
Winstead Fry, S. & Griffin, S. (2010). Fourth graders as models for teachers: teaching and learning 6+1 trait writing as a collaborative experience. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(4), 283-298.

Notice That is Published in Proceedings Book

Yılmaz, K. (2009). Okul yöneticilerinin örgüt ve yönetime ilişkin abartılar hakkındaki görüşleri. IV. Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi & EYEDDER. 14– 15 Mayıs 2009. Denizli. ss. 496–501.

Notice That is not Published in Proceedings Book or Notice that is Published as Summary Text

Turan, S. (2006). Eğitim yönetiminde paradigmatik dönüşümler (dönüşen bir şey yok). Türkiye’de Eğitim Yönetimi ve Denetimi Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri Toplantısı. 27–28 Nisan 2006. EYEDDER-Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi. Ankara.
Turan, S. (2001). School climate, supportive leadership behavior and faculty trust in Turkish public schools. American Educational Research Association (AERA). April 10–14, 2001.
Seattle Washington, USA.

Unpublished Graduate Education Theses

Arı, G. S. (2003). İşletmelerde güven ve personel güçlendirme ilişkisi: Bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Kamer, M. (2001). Örgütsel güven, örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
Evans, T. J. (1996). Elementary teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of principals leadership style and school social organization. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan.


Türk Dil Kurumu (2005). Türkçe sözlük. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayını.
Türk Dil Kurumu (1975). Felsefe terimleri sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayını. Encyclopedia
Meydan Larousse (1990). Meydan Larousse ansiklopedisi. İstanbul: Meydan Yayınevi. Report or Other Institutional Texts
MEB (2009). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı 2010–2014 Stratejik Planı. Ankara: MEB Yayını.

MoNE (1977). Report by the ministry of national education supervision council. Ankara: MoNE Publications.

Legal Texts Such as Code, Regulations, Covenant

Milli Eğitim Temel Kanunu (1973). Resmi Gazete. Yayım Tarihi: 24.06.1973. Sayısı: 14574. Numarası: 1739.

Web Site

UNESCO. (2013). World Heritage list. adresinden erişildi. (Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2013)UNESCO. (2013).


Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences (Publication Ethical Principles)

The International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences has adopted as a principle to make publications in accordance with the universal publication rules. The International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences is a peer-reviewed journal. In the studies that are prepared in the framework of scientific rules, all of the components of the publication process, publisher, editors, authors, and readers should comply with the ethical principles.
The publication ethics and open-access policy of the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences require all components of the publication process to comply with the ethical principles in the accordance with the open-accessed guides and policies that the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE) published.
In the case of the detection of situations such as, the data that is used in the articles are manipulated, distorted, and fabricated, this situation will be reported through an official channel to the corporate that the article author works and the article will be rejected. Our journal has a right to request output files from the authors in relation to the assessments that are given by the editor(s) and/or by the referees.

The Ethical Responsibilities of The Publisher

The International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences is a nonprofit publication establishment.
The International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences is publishing since 2014 in the framework of universal rules.
The Editors Council of the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences consists of experts in their fields, up country or abroad. Members of the Editorial Council are formed by considering the science branches of social and educational sciences. Editor, depending on the subject of the article, can send an article to the faculty members that are not a member of the Editors Council in order for them to analyze as field editors when it is necessary.

The Responsibilities of the Editors Council of the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences

• The Editors Council of the Journal is responsible for all of the articles that are submitted to the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences, in fact, from all of the processes after its publication and the editors' council is aware of this responsibility. This responsibility requires independent decision-making from all personal gain and only thinking about public welfare in the decisions that are being made about the journal. The relationship between the publisher and the Editors Council is based on the independence principle, all of the decisions that are going to be taken by the editors are independent of the publisher and the other person and establishments.
• The Editors Council of the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences is in an effort to always develop the journal and elevate the publication quality.
• The Editors Council of the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences ensures the determination and implementation of the journal policies such as publication, blind review, the assessment process, ethical principles, etc.
• The Editors Council of the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences protects the copyright of the article author that has been published in the journal.
• The Editors Council of the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences is responsible for taking precautions in relation to the situations such as intellectual property rights, non-scientific-ethical behaviors, plagiarism, and reference (attribution) gangsterism in the process of article and journal publication process.
• The Editors Council of the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences keeps records of every article, and correspondence about the journal, written or printed, through Dergipark and its own means.

The Ethical Responsibilities of the Editors, Editors Facilitators and Field Editors

• Editors make effort to compensate for the information needs of the referees, author(s), researchers, and readers, give feedback when it is necessary, make corrections in the publishing process and behave accordingly to the principle of clarity in subjects where an explanation is a need.
• Editors are attentive to the authenticity of the article, and its contributions to the scientific literature, reader, researcher, and operators while deciding on the publication of the articles.
• Editors consider the authentic value of the article, its contribution to the field, the validity and trustworthiness of its research method, the clarity of its verbalism, and the purpose and extent of the journal while making a positive or negative decision about the article.
• Editors, if the submitted articles do not have a significant issue, consider the articles in the pre-evaluation stage, be attentive to the positive referee suggestions, and if it does not have a serious problem won't change the decisions that were taken by the previous editor(s).
• Editors perform the blind review and evaluation process policies which is present in the journal's publication policies, keep the referees' identity information classified, and make sure that every article is assessed in a non-biased way and assessed within its time.
• Editors send the articles by being attentive to the professionality of the field editors and referees and they support the evaluations to be made non-biased and independent.
• Editors, in order for a non-biased evaluation of the article, consider the conflict of interest-unity of interest between the referees and author(s).
• Editors are in the search of the creation of a wide range of referees, that are in a state of constant update.
• Editors block evaluations that are not aligned with academic etiquette and are non- scientific.
• Editors make sure that journal publication processes are aligned with publishing policies and guides, inform those whore are involved in the process about the developments of the publishing policies and prepare a training program if it is necessary.
• Editors are in effective communication with everyone who is involved in the publication process and organize meetings periodically.
• Editors make sure that the personal data are protected in the evaluated journals; they protect the personal data of the author, referee, and readers.
• Editors; are attentive to the protection of the rights of humans and animals in the article, they care about the documentation of the open confirmation of the article's participants, if the ethical council approval about the journal's participants shows that they are not allowed in experimental researches, they reject the article.
• Editors take precautions for malpractice. If it is suspected that malpractice may be the case, they share the data about the subject through an objective investigation.
• Editors make sure that the error, desultoriness, or misleadings in the articles are corrected.
• Editors protect the intellectual property right of the published articles, and in the case of its breach, they defend the rights of the journal and the author(s). Also, they take necessary precautions about the articles' contents in terms of whether it is breaching other publications' intellectual property rights or not; they make the originality- similarity audit.
• Editors are attentive to the critics that are intended for articles that are published in the Journal, they give a right to respond to the author(s) of the criticized articles.
• Editors consider the works that contain negative outcomes as well.
• Editors analyze the remonstrances that are related to the Journal and make the necessary explanations.

The Ethical Responsibilities of the Referees

In the article evaluation process of the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences, it is applied a two side blind referee principle where the author(s) don't know the referees, and the referees don't know the authors, the referees can't communicate directly with the authors; the article evaluation forms and the wish the correct which is specified on the text is conveyed to the author(s) through journal administration system by the editors. The referees that are going to evaluate the articles that are submitted to the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences should carry these ethical responsibilities:
• Referees should only accept to evaluate the articles that are related to their specialty.
• Referees should do the evaluation in a non-biased and confidential way. Duly by this principle, they should dispel the articles they analyze after the evaluation process, but use them after it is published. Nationality, gender, religious belief, political belief, and commercial concerns should not corrupt the evaluation's neutrality.
• When referees understand a situation of conflict of interest-unity of interest, they should deny to evaluate the article and inform the editors.
• Referees should do the evaluation in alliance with academic etiquette, by using constructive language; and should avoid personal commentaries that involve defamation and enmity.
• Referees should evaluate the article that they accepted to evaluate within the given time.

The Ethical Responsibilities of the Authors

The ethical responsibilities of the author(s)'s that submitted an article to the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences:
• Author(s), should not submit an article that they published or submitted to be published in another place, they should not submit more than one article of their own at the same time to the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences.
• Author(s) should submit authentic articles to the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences.
• Author(s) should do attribution (reference) to the resources that they benefitted from while writing the article, in a correct way and in alliance with the ethical principles.
• The people that did not contribute to the article should not be written as an author, and in an article that is submitted to be published, the processes of changing the apposition of the author of the article, omitting an author, and supplementing an author are should not be suggested.
• They should inform the editors about the people that are in conflict of interest-unity of interest in an article that is submitted to be published.
• If information or crude data is requested from the author(s) related to their articles during the evaluation process, they should present the expected information to the Editors.
• Author(s) should document the verification of the right of use of the data they used in their articles, the allowances related to research-analysis, or the confirmation of the participants that they researched.
• Author(s) should communicate with the editor when they realized an error in the article that is in the process of evaluation or early appearance or their article that is published in a digital setting, for them to inform, correct, or retract.
• The author(s) should obtain the ethics committee approval for studies that require data collection through quantitative or qualitative methods such as experiments, questionnaires, scales, interviews, observations, and focus group studies, which require an ethics committee decision; ethics committee name, decision date, and number should be stated on the first and last page of the article and in the method section, and the document showing the ethics committee decision should be uploaded to the system with the application of the article. In addition, the article should include information about obtaining the informed approval/consent form in the case reports.
• The author(s) should present evidence within the article that is related to them being attentive to the ethical principles in the process of data gathering (for example, getting approval from someone to use their documents such as scale, survey, and photograph). In the article, it should be stated that the article is in alliance with the regulation of research and publication ethics and copyright of intellectual and art products. If the research is conducted on human or animal subjects, it should be informed that the research is conducted in the alliance international notices and guides, etc.
• The ethical council approval is not requested from the author(s) for compliation articles. With that, in the articles that do not require an ethical council decision, the situation of the non-requested ethical council decision should also be included on the journal's first-last page and in the methods section.

Informing the Editor of the Situation That is Not Complying with the Ethical Principles In the Journal of Social and Educational Sciences, unethical behavior that is related to the editors, referees, and authors or in the case of encountering a non-ethical situation relating to
an article that is in the process of evaluation, early appearance stage, or a published one, its intimation to the address through a message will enrich our publication quality.

For the authors that submitted an article to the International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences [IJOSES], in line with the Interuniversity Council Associate Professorship Criteria Frequently Asked Questions 44th Amendment, the wages are charged after the article submission. In order to the start of evaluation processes' of the articles that are sent to the journal, a participation fee is requested for a contribution to the digital print, typesetting transactions, journal employee fee, and other transactions. This fee is collected unrelatedly to the condition of the article's approval/rejection.



INDEX COPERNİCUS [ICI], Eurasian Scientific Journal Index [ESJI], ISAM [Makaleler Veri Tabanı], SOBIAD, Scilit, İdeal Online
tarafından dizinlenmekte.

TÜBİTAK/ULAKBİM(TR) SBVT tarafından izlenmektedir.