Demans Hastalarının Birincil Aile Bakıcılarının Sağlığı Üzerine İkincil Bakım Verenin Etkileri: Fiziksel ve Psikolojik Yönlere Odaklanma

Abstract

Amaç: Dünya genelinde demans hastası sayısı artmakta ve hastalığın erken dönemlerinden itibaren bakım verenlere ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Ancak, birincil bakım verenin yanında ikincil bir bakım verenin bulunmasının birincil bakım verenin fiziksel ve psikolojik sağlığı üzerindeki etkisi net değildir. Bu çalışma, ikincil bakım veren bulunan ve bulunmayan birincil bakım verenlerin fiziksel ve psikolojik parametreler açısından karşılaştırılmasını amaçlamıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu kesitsel çalışma, İzmir’de bir üniversite hastanesinin nöroloji polikliniklerinden alınan 61 demans hastasının birincil aile bakıcısını içermektedir. Katılımcılar, bakım verme düzenlemelerine göre iki gruba ayrılmıştır: tek başına bakım verenler (n=26; %42,6) ve ikincil bir bakıcıyla birlikte bakım verenler (n=35; %57,4). Fiziksel sağlık, Nordic Kas-İskelet Sistemi Anketi (kas-iskelet sistemi bozuklukları), Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi (fiziksel aktivite) ve Yorgunluk Şiddeti Ölçeği (yorgunluk) kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Psikolojik sağlık ise Dünya Sağlık Örgütü Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği-Kısa Formu ve Zarit Bakıcı Yükü Ölçeği ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında psikolojik ölçümler açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Ancak, fiziksel sağlık açısından farklılıklar gözlemlenmiştir. İkincil bir bakıcısı olmayan bakıcılar, bakım verme görevleri nedeniyle günlerinin anlamlı derecede daha büyük bir bölümünü oturarak geçirmiştir (p=0,020). Ayrıca son yedi gün içinde omurga (p=0,05), üst ekstremiteler (p=0,046) ve alt ekstremitelerde (p=0,019) daha fazla kas-iskelet şikâyeti rapor edilmiştir. Sonuç: İkincil bir bakımverenin varlığı, demans hastalarına bakan birincil bakımverenlerin fiziksel sağlığıyla ilişkilidir; ancak psikolojik iyi oluş üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmamaktadır. Bu bulgular, bakımverenlerin sağlıklarını koruyabilmeleri için fiziksel destek sağlanmasının gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır. Özellikle bakımın kültürel olarak aile içinde yürütüldüğü toplumlarda, çok yönlü bakımveren destek programlarına duyulan ihtiyacı öne çıkarmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Bakım veren, demans, fiziksel sağlık, psikolojik iyilik hali, ikincil bakım veren.

Keywords

• Bakım veren
• demans
• fiziksel sağlık
• psikolojik iyilik hali
• ikincil bakım veren

Impact of a Secondary Caregiver on the Well-Being of Primary Family Caregivers of People with Dementia: A Focus on Physical and Psychological Aspects

Abstract

Objective: The global number of people with dementia is rising, requiring caregivers from early disease stages. However, the effect of having a secondary caregiver on the primary caregiver’s physical and psychological well-being is unclear. This study aimed to compare primary caregivers with and without a secondary caregiver in terms of physical and psychological parameters. Material and method: This cross-sectional study included 61 primary family caregivers of people with dementia living in Izmir. Based on their caregiving arrangements, participants were categorized into two groups: those caregiving alone (n=26; 42.6%) and those caregiving with a secondary caregiver (n=35; 57.4%). Physical well-being was assessed using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (musculoskeletal disorders), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (physical activity), and Fatigue Severity Scale (fatigue). Psychological well-being was evaluated with the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref and Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview scales. Results: No significant differences were found in psychological measures between groups. However, physical well-being differences were observed. Caregivers without a secondary caregiver spent a significantly higher percentage of their day sitting due to caregiving tasks (p=0.020). They also reported more musculoskeletal symptoms in the spine (p=0.05), upper limbs (p=0.046), and lower limbs (p=0.019) over the past week. Conclusion: The presence of a secondary caregiver is linked to better physical well-being but does not significantly impact psychological wellbeing among caregivers of people with dementia. These results underscore the need to provide physical support to caregivers to maintain their well-being. These findings highlight the need for multi-faceted caregiver support programs, particularly in contexts where informal caregiving is culturally embedded. Keywords: Caregiver, dementia, physical well-being, psychological well-being, secondary caregiver.

Keywords

• Caregiver
• dementia
• physical well-being
• psychological well-being
• secondary caregiver

References

1. 1. He J, Wang J, Zhong H, Guan C. The effectiveness of multi-component interventions on the positive and negative aspects of well-being among informal caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(12):6973. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19126973.
2. 2. Marshall GA, Amariglio RE, Sperling RA, Rentz DM. Activities of daily living: where do they fit in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease? Neurodegener Dis Manag 2012;2(5):483-91. doi: 10.2217/nmt.12.55.
3. 3. Desai AK, Grossberg GT, Sheth DN. Activities of daily living in patients with dementia. CNS drugs 2004;18(13):853-75.
4. 4. Adana F, Ozvurmaz S, Mandiracioglu A. Burden on caregivers of dementia patients and affecting factors in Turkey: A Systematic Review. JPMA 2022;72(1):108-14. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.2168
5. 5. Gonçalves-Pereira M, Zarit SH, Cardoso AM, Alves da Silva J, Papoila AL, Mateos R. A comparison of primary and secondary caregivers of persons with dementia. Psychol Aging 2020;35(1):20-27. doi: 10.1037/pag0000380.
6. 6. Salfi J, Ploeg J, Black ME. Seeking to understand telephone support for dementia caregivers. West J Nurs Res 2005;27(6):701-721. doi: 10.1177/0193945905276882.
7. 7. Gitlin LN, Hauck WW, Dennis MP, Winter L. Maintenance of effects of the home environmental skill-building program for family caregivers and individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005;60(3):368-74. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.3.368.
8. 8. Ozcan M, Akyar I. Caregivers' experiences of patients with moderate‐stage Alzheimer's disease: a qualitative study. Psychogeriatrics 2021;21(5):763-72. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12736.

9. 9. Basu I, Mukhopadhyay S, Maulik N. Family caregiving in dementia: caregivers' mental health and nature of caregiving. Antrocom: Online Journal of Anthropology 2020;16(2): 201-12.
10. 10. Van Der Heide I, Heins M, Verheij R, Van Hout HP, Francke A, Joling K. Prevalence of health problems and health-care use in partners of people with dementia: Longitudinal analysis with routinely recorded health and administrative data. Gerontology 2022;68(4):442-52. doi: 10.1159/000517163.
11. 11. Small JA, Geldart K, Gutman G. Communication between individuals with dementia and their caregivers during activities of daily living. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias 2000;15(5):291-302. doi: 10.1177/153331750001500.
12. 12. Rahman A, Anjum R, Sahakian Y. Impact of caregiving for dementia patients on healthcare utilization of caregivers. Pharmacy 2019;7(4):138. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7040138
13. 13. Cipriani G, Borin G. Understanding dementia in the sociocultural context: A review. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2015;61(2): 198-204. doi: 10.1177/0020764014560357.
14. 14. Gorostiaga A, Etxeberria I, Salaberria K, Kortabitarte I. Primary and secondary caregivers of people with dementia (pwd): Differential patterns and implications for psychological support. Healthcare 2022;14;10(6):1102. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061102.
15. 15. Kahraman T, Genç A, Göz E. The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into Turkish assessing its psychometric properties. Disabil Rehabil 2016;38(21): 2153-60. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.
16. 16. Figueiredo LC, Gratão ACM, Barbosa GC, Monteiro DQ, Pelegrini LNdC, Sato TdO. Musculoskeletal symptoms in formal and informal caregivers of elderly people. Rev Bras Enferm 2021;75(2):e20210249. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0249.
17. 17. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, Tokgozoglu L. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills 2010;111(1):278-84. doi: 10.2466/06.08.PMS.111.4.278-284.
18. 18. Jacob L, Smith L, Jackson SE, Shin JI, Haro JM, Vancampfort D et al. Informal caregiving and physical activity among 204,315 adults in 38 low-and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study. Prev Med 2020;132:106007. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106007.
19. 19. Armutlu K, Korkmaz NC, Keser I, Sumbuloglu V, Akbiyik DI, Guney Z, Karabudak R. The validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 2007;30(1):81-5. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3280146ec4. PMID: 17293726.
20. 20. Eser E, Fidaner H, Fidaner C, Eser SY, Elbi H, Göker E. (1999). WHOQOL-100 ve WHOQOL-BREF’in psikometrik özellikleri. Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji (3P) Dergisi. 1999;7(2), 23-40.
21. 21. İnci F, Erdem M. Bakim verme yükü ölçeği’nin Türkçe'ye uyarlanmasi geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2006;11(4),85-95.
22. 22. World Health Organization [Internet]. Physical Activity [Accessed date: 15 June 2023]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity
23. 23. Lindsay RK, Vseteckova J, Horne J, Smith L, Trott M, De Lappe J, et al. The prevalence of physical activity among informal carers: a systematic review of international literature. Sport Sci Health 2022;18:1071–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-021-00893-x
24. 24. Ptomey LT, Szabo-Reed AN, Vidoni ED, Washburn RA, Gorczyca AM, Little TD et al. A dyadic approach for a remote physical activity intervention in adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers: Rationale and design for an 18-month randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2020;98: 106158. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106158.
25. 25. Roepke SK, Mausbach BT, von Känel R, Ancoli-Israel S, Harmell AL, Dimsdale JE et al. Relations between personal mastery, chronic caregiving stress, and multiple dimensions of fatigue. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009;24(12):1453-62. doi: 10.1002/gps.2286.
26. 26. Gersdorf R. Positive aspects of caregiving may be associated with reduced fatigue in dementia family caregivers. J Gerontol Nurs 2021;47(3):8. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20210209-01.
27. 27. Chang Y-P, Lorenz RA, Phillips M, Peng H-L, Szigeti K. Fatigue in family caregivers of individuals with dementia: associations of sleep, depression, and care recipients' functionality. J Gerontol Nurs 2020;46(9): 14-18. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20200527-01.
28. 28. Riska A, Mansoer WWD. Being a Caregiver for a Husband with Alzheimer’s: A Phenomenological Study. In 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021). Atlantis Press 2022;980-88. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220404.155.
29. 29. Kai A, Ishii S, Ishii T, Fuchino K, Okamura H. Factors Associated with Caregiver burden and depressive states among family caregivers of patients admitted due to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2022;51(3):262-70. doi: 10.1159/000525354.
30. 30. Riffin C, Van Ness PH, Wolff JL, Fried T. Multifactorial examination of caregiver burden in a national sample of family and unpaid caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67(2):277-83. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15664.
31. 31. de Rotrou J, Cantegreil I, Faucounau V, Wenisch E, Chausson C, Jegou D et al. Do patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease benefit from a psycho‐educational programme for family caregivers? A randomised controlled study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011;26(8):833-42. doi: 10.1002/gps.2611.
32. 32. Lee M, Ryoo JH, Crowder J, Byon HD, Wiiliams IC. A systematic review and meta‐analysis on effective interventions for health‐related quality of life among caregivers of people with dementia. J Adv Nurs 2020;76(2):475-89. doi: 10.1111/jan.14262.
33. 33. Pothiban L, Srirat C, Wongpakaran N, Pankong O. Quality of life and the associated factors among family caregivers of older people with dementia in Thailand. Nurs Health Sci 2020;22(4):913-20. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12746.
34. 34. Wakui T, Saito T, Agree EM, Kai I. Effects of home, outside leisure, social, and peer activity on psychological health among Japanese family caregivers. Aging Ment Health 2012;16(4):500-06. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.644263.
35. 35. Tulek Z, Baykal D, Erturk S, Bilgic B, Hanagasi H, Gurvit IH. Caregiver burden, quality of life and related factors in family caregivers of dementia patients in Turkey. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2020;41(8):741-49. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2019.1705945.
36. 36. Hsieh PL, Lee YC, Yang SY, Lin YL, Huang YR. Association between work content and musculoskeletal disorders among home caregivers: a cross-section study. Ind Health. 2022;60(6):514-24. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0160.
37. 37. Garcia‐Ptacek S, Dahlrup B, Edlund AK, Wijk H, Eriksdotter M. The caregiving phenomenon and caregiver participation in dementia. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019;33(2), 255-65. doi: 10.1111/scs.12627.