Research Article

The Attitude of a Critic Accused of Being Nāsibī Towards Shī‘ite-Inclined Narrators: al-Jūzjānī and His Ahwāl al-rijāl

Volume: 10 Number: 1 April 24, 2025
TR EN

The Attitude of a Critic Accused of Being Nāsibī Towards Shī‘ite-Inclined Narrators: al-Jūzjānī and His Ahwāl al-rijāl

Abstract

In his Ahwāl al-rijāl, al-Jūzjānī determined the reliabity of the narrators based on their theological views. This attitude distinguished him from other critics who wrote works in the du‘afā literature. It has been frequently repeated in both classical and modern works that al-Jūzjānī had a prejudice against the Kūfan narrators. In this article, al-Jūzjānī’s criticisms about the Kūfan narrators compared with the opinions of Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Yahya ibn Ma‘īn and Ibn ‘Adī. In addition, these narrators were also researched from Shī‘ite sources. Thus, an attempt was made to determine whether al-Jūzjānī harbored any prejudice against the Kūfan Shī‘ite -inclined narrators. It has been observed that al-Jūzjānī’s evaluations differed significantly from the three Sunnī critics. On the other hand, it has been determined that 91% of the narrators criticised by him are found in Shī‘ī sources and 66% of them are considered reliable or Imāmī. This demonstrates that al-Jūzjānī was successful in determining whether a narrator had adopted Shī‘ite views and whether he had connections with the early Shī‘ite circles.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Abū ‘Abd Allāh. Kitāb al-‘Ilal wa-ma‘rifat al-rijāl (‘Abd Allāh ibn Ahmad). 3 vols. ed. Wasī Allāh ibn Muhammad ‘Abbās, Riyād: Dār al-Khānī, 1422/2010.
  2. Ahmad ibn Hanbal. Suālāt (Riwāyāt Abū Dāwūd). ed. Ziyād Muhammad Mansūr. Madīna: Maktaba al-‘Ulūm wa al-Hikam, 1414/2001.
  3. Âşıkkutlu, Emin. “Mukâribü’l-Hadîs”, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 31/125-126. Ankara: TDV Yayınları, 2020.
  4. Aydın, Nevzat. “Ebû İshâk el-Cûzcânî’nin “Ahvâlu’r-Ricâl” Adlı Eserindeki Tenkit Metodu, Cerh-Ta‘dîl Lafızları ve Delâletleri”. Amasya İlahiyat Dergisi 18/1 (June 2022), 147-181. https://doi.org/10.18498/amailad.1098643
  5. Aydın, Nevzat. “Ebû İshâk el-Cûzcânî’nin Kûfe Ehline Yönelik Cerhlerinin Mezhep Taassubu Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi”, Eskişehir Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 9/2 (September 2022), 62-84. http://doi.org/1051702/esoguifd. 1107347
  6. al-Barqī, Ahmad ibn Muhammad. Rijāl al-Barqī. ed. Khaydar Muhammad ‘Alī al-Baghdādī. Qum: Mu’assasat al-Imām al-Sādiq, 1391/1970.
  7. al-Dhahabī, Abū ‘Abd Allāh Shams al-Dīn Muhammad ibn Ahmad. Mīzān al-i‘tidāl fī naqd al-rijāl. 4 vols. ed. ‘Alī al-Bijāwī. Bayrūt: Dār al-Ma‘rifa, 1383/1963.
  8. Duman, Ayşe Nur. Hadis Rivayetinde Sünnî-Şiî Etkileşimi. Istanbul: İFAV Yayınları, 2024.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Hadith

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 24, 2025

Submission Date

March 5, 2025

Acceptance Date

April 12, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 10 Number: 1

ISNAD
Aslan, Ayşe Nur. “The Attitude of a Critic Accused of Being Nāsibī Towards Shī‘ite-Inclined Narrators: Al-Jūzjānī and His Ahwāl Al-Rijāl”. İslam Medeniyeti Araştırmaları Dergisi 10/1 (April 1, 2025): 192-216. https://doi.org/10.20486/imad.1652185.