Araştırma Makalesi

The Attitude of a Critic Accused of Being Nāsibī Towards Shī‘ite-Inclined Narrators: al-Jūzjānī and His Ahwāl al-rijāl

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 24 Nisan 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

The Attitude of a Critic Accused of Being Nāsibī Towards Shī‘ite-Inclined Narrators: al-Jūzjānī and His Ahwāl al-rijāl

Abstract

In his Ahwāl al-rijāl, al-Jūzjānī determined the reliabity of the narrators based on their theological views. This attitude distinguished him from other critics who wrote works in the du‘afā literature. It has been frequently repeated in both classical and modern works that al-Jūzjānī had a prejudice against the Kūfan narrators. In this article, al-Jūzjānī’s criticisms about the Kūfan narrators compared with the opinions of Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Yahya ibn Ma‘īn and Ibn ‘Adī. In addition, these narrators were also researched from Shī‘ite sources. Thus, an attempt was made to determine whether al-Jūzjānī harbored any prejudice against the Kūfan Shī‘ite -inclined narrators. It has been observed that al-Jūzjānī’s evaluations differed significantly from the three Sunnī critics. On the other hand, it has been determined that 91% of the narrators criticised by him are found in Shī‘ī sources and 66% of them are considered reliable or Imāmī. This demonstrates that al-Jūzjānī was successful in determining whether a narrator had adopted Shī‘ite views and whether he had connections with the early Shī‘ite circles.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Abū ‘Abd Allāh. Kitāb al-‘Ilal wa-ma‘rifat al-rijāl (‘Abd Allāh ibn Ahmad). 3 vols. ed. Wasī Allāh ibn Muhammad ‘Abbās, Riyād: Dār al-Khānī, 1422/2010.
  2. Ahmad ibn Hanbal. Suālāt (Riwāyāt Abū Dāwūd). ed. Ziyād Muhammad Mansūr. Madīna: Maktaba al-‘Ulūm wa al-Hikam, 1414/2001.
  3. Âşıkkutlu, Emin. “Mukâribü’l-Hadîs”, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 31/125-126. Ankara: TDV Yayınları, 2020.
  4. Aydın, Nevzat. “Ebû İshâk el-Cûzcânî’nin “Ahvâlu’r-Ricâl” Adlı Eserindeki Tenkit Metodu, Cerh-Ta‘dîl Lafızları ve Delâletleri”. Amasya İlahiyat Dergisi 18/1 (June 2022), 147-181. https://doi.org/10.18498/amailad.1098643
  5. Aydın, Nevzat. “Ebû İshâk el-Cûzcânî’nin Kûfe Ehline Yönelik Cerhlerinin Mezhep Taassubu Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi”, Eskişehir Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 9/2 (September 2022), 62-84. http://doi.org/1051702/esoguifd. 1107347
  6. al-Barqī, Ahmad ibn Muhammad. Rijāl al-Barqī. ed. Khaydar Muhammad ‘Alī al-Baghdādī. Qum: Mu’assasat al-Imām al-Sādiq, 1391/1970.
  7. al-Dhahabī, Abū ‘Abd Allāh Shams al-Dīn Muhammad ibn Ahmad. Mīzān al-i‘tidāl fī naqd al-rijāl. 4 vols. ed. ‘Alī al-Bijāwī. Bayrūt: Dār al-Ma‘rifa, 1383/1963.
  8. Duman, Ayşe Nur. Hadis Rivayetinde Sünnî-Şiî Etkileşimi. Istanbul: İFAV Yayınları, 2024.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Hadis

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Nisan 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Mart 2025

Kabul Tarihi

12 Nisan 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

ISNAD
Aslan, Ayşe Nur. “The Attitude of a Critic Accused of Being Nāsibī Towards Shī‘ite-Inclined Narrators: al-Jūzjānī and His Ahwāl al-rijāl”. İslam Medeniyeti Araştırmaları Dergisi 10/1 (01 Nisan 2025): 192-216. https://doi.org/10.20486/imad.1652185.


Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.