Hint Sinemasında İnsan Benzeri Yapay Zekâ: Kültürel Anlatılar, Etik Boyutlar ve Posthüman Perspektifler

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Hint sinemasında insan benzeri yapay zekâ (AI) karakterlerinin temsilini inceleyerek, bunları film çalışmaları, kültürel analiz ve AI etiği kesişim noktasında ele almaktadır. Küresel bilim kurgu genellikle AI'yı özerklik, isyan ve teknolojik endişe merceğinden tasvir ederken, Hint sineması bu anlatıları dharma (kozmik görev), seva (özverili hizmet) ve melodramatik gelenek gibi kültürel olarak yerleşik ahlaki çerçeveler aracılığıyla yeniden şekillendirmektedir. Niteliksel, yorumlayıcı bir metodoloji kullanarak, araştırma Enthiran (2010), 2.0 (2018), Ra. One (2011), Android Kunjappan Version 5.25 (2019) ve Anukul (2017) gibi bir dizi filmi analiz etmektedir. Bu filmler, fiziksel, bilişsel ve duygusal olarak insana benzeyen özelliklere sahip insansı yapay zekayı tasvir ettikleri için seçilmiştir. Bulgular, bu filmlerin yapay zekayı sadece teknolojik bir yenilik olarak değil, ahlaki uyum, ilişkisel taahhütler ve topluma hizmetten kaynaklanan meşruiyete sahip etik aktörler olarak kurguladığını göstermektedir. Yapay zekayı tanıdık sosyo-kültürel bağlamlara yerleştirerek, Hint sineması hem küresel post-insan söylemine katılıyor hem de iş birliği, karşılıklı sorumluluk ve ekolojik uyumun insan-makine ilişkilerini şekillendirdiği alternatif bir vizyon sunuyor. Makale, Hint sinemasının yapay zekâ anlatılarının Batı merkezli endişelerin ötesine geçtiği ve teknolojik geleceği müzakere etmek için kültürel temelli modeller önerdiği sonucuna varıyor.

Keywords

• Hint Sineması
• Yapay Zekâ
• İnsanötesi
• İnsansı Robotlar
• Bilim-Kurgu Sineması

Human-like Artificial Intelligence in Indian Cinema: Cultural Narratives, Ethical Dimensions, and Posthuman Perspectives

Abstract

This study examines the representation of human-like artificial intelligence (AI) characters in Indian cinema, situating them within the intersection of film studies, cultural analysis, and AI ethics. While global science fiction often depicts AI through the lenses of autonomy, rebellion, and technological anxiety, Indian cinema reframes these narratives through culturally embedded moral frameworks such as dharma (cosmic duty), seva (selfless service), and the melodramatic tradition. Using a qualitative, interpretive methodology, the research analyzes a selection of films—including Enthiran (2010), 2.0 (2018), Ra.One (2011), Android Kunjappan Version 5.25 (2019), and Anukul (2017) were chosen for their portrayal of humanoid AI with physical, cognitive, and emotional human-like traits. The findings indicate that these films construct AI not as mere technological novelty but as ethical agents whose legitimacy derives from moral alignment, relational commitments, and service to the community. By embedding AI within familiar socio-cultural contexts, Indian cinema both participates in global posthuman discourse and offers an alternative vision in which collaboration, mutual responsibility, and ecological harmony shape human–machine relations. The paper concludes that Indian cinematic narratives of AI extend beyond Western-centric concerns, proposing culturally grounded models for negotiating the technological future.

Keywords

• Indian cinema
• artificial intelligence
• posthumanism
• humanoid robots
• science fiction

References

1. Aronson, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and art: The impossible avant-garde? University of Chicago Press.
2. Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacra and simulation. Éditions Galilée.
3. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1981)
4. Benjamin, W. (2008). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction (H. Zohn, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published 1936)
5. Boden, M. A. (2006). Mind as machine: A history of cognitive science (Vols. 1–2). Oxford University Press.
6. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.
7. Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2019). Film art: An introduction (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
8. Buckland, W. (2000). The cognitive semiotics of film. Cambridge University Press.

9. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901). Curran Associates. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165
10. Cieply, M. (2019, October 25). The ethics of resurrecting dead actors. The Hollywood Reporter. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/
11. Coleridge, S. T. (1817). Biographia literaria. Rest Fenner.
12. Crary, J. (2013). 24/7: Late capitalism and the ends of sleep. Verso Books.
13. Elsaesser, T., & Hagener, M. (2015). Film theory: An introduction through the senses (2nd ed.). Routledge.
14. Gates, B. (2023, March 21). The age of AI has begun. Gates Notes. https://www.gatesnotes.com/
15. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
16. Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Summerfield, C., & Botvinick, M. (2017). Neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence. Neuron, 95(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.011
17. Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter (G. Winthrop-Young & M. Wutz, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1986)
18. Krauss, R. (1999). Reinventing the medium. Critical Inquiry, 25(2), 289– 305. https://doi.org/10.1086/448883
19. Lipovetsky, G., & Serroy, J. (2009). The globalization of screens: Culture, capitalism, and cinema. Polity Press.
20. Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.
21. Manovich, L. (2019). AI aesthetics. Strelka Press.
22. McCorduck, P. (2004). Machines who think: A personal inquiry into the history and prospects of artificial intelligence(2nd ed.). A. K. Peters.
23. Metz, C. (1974). Film language: A semiotics of the cinema. Oxford University Press.
24. Mulvey, L. (2006). Death 24x a second: Stillness and the moving image. Reaktion Books.
25. Nichols, B. (2010). Introduction to documentary (2nd ed.). Indiana University Press.
26. Prince, S. (1996). True lies: Perceptual realism, digital images, and film theory. Film Quarterly, 49(3), 27– 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1213468
27. Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., & Chen, M. (2022). Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with CLIP latents. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.06125
28. Roose, K. (2018, June 1). The end of movies as we know them? AI takes over Hollywood. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/
29. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
30. Shankar (Director). (2010). Enthiran [Film]. Sun Pictures.
31. Shankar (Director). (2018). 2.0 [Film]. Lyca Productions.
32. Steyerl, H. (2009). In defense of the poor image. e-flux journal, 10. https://www.e￾flux.com/journal/10/61362/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/
33. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
34. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433– 460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
35. Virilio, P. (1994). The vision machine. Indiana University Press.
36. Žižek, S. (2002). Welcome to the desert of the real. Verso Books.