Official registers are records that are kept by public officials and pro-vide information about the contents of the information to the interes-ted persons. Official bills, on the other hand, are the bills which are bound to the official form by the law or the will of the parties and issued by the official persons in accordance with the form specified in the law. The provision of Article 7 of the Civil Code adopted a pre-sumption that the official registers and bills reflect the truth and pro-vided that the opposite of this presumption may be proved by all kinds of evidence. However, the provision of Civil Procedure Law article 201 has brought the obligation to counter-bill. In addition, the provision of Article 204 of the same Code, has considered, the deem or bill which are issued by notary publics, as definitive evidence unless their falsifications were proved, and thus the freedom of evi-dence brought with the provision of Article 7 /II of the Civil Code has become narrowed. A federal civil procedure law exists in Switzerland since 2011. Furthermore, in Switzerland, by this regulation, the party who will prove the opposite of the presumption accepted by law is given the opportunity to prove by any evidence that the official registers and notes are not correct for the sake of convenience. Therefore, the restrictions brought by other rules of Act which narrow the opportu-nity of proving by any evidence in our Country, is incompatible with the spirit and purpose of the provision 7 of the Civil Code.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Subjects | Law in Context |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 30, 2020 |
Submission Date | November 7, 2019 |
Acceptance Date | January 29, 2020 |
Published in Issue | Year 2020 |
Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.