Research Article

Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics

Volume: 9 Number: 3 September 27, 2025

Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different land use types (quince, almond, wheat, persimmon, cherry, and sour cherry) on soil chemical properties and carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) dynamics in semi-arid calcareous soils. Soil parameters, including pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter (OM), CaCO₃, and macro- and micronutrients (N, P, K, Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn) were analyzed. Multivariate approaches such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA), and correlation analysis were employed to identify patterns across land uses. Results indicated that soil pH remained alkaline (7.59–7.86) and relatively stable among land uses, while EC values suggested a low salinity risk. Soil organic matter was higher in wheat fields (3.13%) compared to orchards (2.14–2.35%), whereas orchard systems supported greater microbial activity, with cherry showing the highest biomass N (39.78 mg kg⁻¹). Wheat soils contained higher levels of available P (35.20 mg kg⁻¹), Fe (7.08 mg kg⁻¹), and Zn (2.48 mg kg⁻¹) than orchards, where micronutrient availability was comparatively lower. PCA and HCA distinguished orchard and annual cropping systems, highlighting contrasting soil fertility profiles shaped by land use. These findings emphasize the role of perennial systems in sustaining microbial activity and the vulnerability of annual systems to organic matter depletion. The study contributes to sustainable soil management by demonstrating how land use influences nutrient dynamics and guides integrated management strategies in calcareous, semi-arid regions.

Keywords

Carbon (C) Dynamics, Nitrogen (N) Dynamics, Land Use Types, Sustainable Soil Management, Soil Properties, Calcareous Soils

References

  1. Aksoy, F., Yıldırım, A., & Demir, S. (2019). Relationships between organic matter content and soil pH (in Turkish language). Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 6(2), 45-58.
  2. Alloway, B. J. (2008). Zinc in soils and crop nutrition (2nd ed.). International Zinc Association; International Fertilizer Industry Association.
  3. Arrobas, M., Conceição, N., Pereira, E., Martins, S., Raimundo, S., Brito, C., ... & Rodrigues, M. Â. (2023). Dolomitic limestone was more effective than calcitic limestone in increasing soil pH in an untilled olive orchard. Soil Use and Management, 39(4), 1437-1452.
  4. Bayramın, I. (2008). Assessing the effects of land use changes on soil sensitivity to erosion in a high land ecosystem of semi-arid Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 138(1–3), 1–11.
  5. Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2016). The nature and properties of soils (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
  6. Bremner, J. M. (1965). Total nitrogen. In C. A. Black (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 1149-1178). American Society of Agronomy.
  7. Cawood. (2023). Soil organic matter: 4% and beyond – the Sustainable Farming Incentive. Retrieved from https://cawood.co.uk/blog/soil-organic-matter-4-beyond-the-sustainable-farming-incentive/
  8. Çelik, M., Kaya, R., & Özkan, S. (2017). Tuzlu topraklarda sodyum birikiminin elektriksel iletkenlik (EC) ile ilişkisi. Tarım ve Su Yönetimi Dergisi, 4(1), 12-22.
  9. de Graaff, M. A., Classen, A. T., Castro, H. F., & Schadt, C. W. (2014). Labile soil carbon inputs mediate the soil microbial community composition and function. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 75, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.001
  10. Dietz, C. L., Jackson, R. D., Ruark, M. D., & Sanford, G. R. (2024). Soil carbon maintained by perennial grasslands over 30 years but lost in field crop systems in a temperate Mollisol. Communications Earth & Environment, 5(1), 360.
APA
Yanardag, İ. H. (2025). Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 9(3), 818-833. https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.3.21
AMA
1.Yanardag İH. Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2025;9(3):818-833. doi:10.31015/2025.3.21
Chicago
Yanardag, İbrahim Halil. 2025. “Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 9 (3): 818-33. https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.3.21.
EndNote
Yanardag İH (September 1, 2025) Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 9 3 818–833.
IEEE
[1]İ. H. Yanardag, “Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics”, int. j. agric. environ. food sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 818–833, Sept. 2025, doi: 10.31015/2025.3.21.
ISNAD
Yanardag, İbrahim Halil. “Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 9/3 (September 1, 2025): 818-833. https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.3.21.
JAMA
1.Yanardag İH. Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2025;9:818–833.
MLA
Yanardag, İbrahim Halil. “Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 818-33, doi:10.31015/2025.3.21.
Vancouver
1.İbrahim Halil Yanardag. Effects of Different Land Use on Soil C and N Dynamics and Soil Chemical Characteristics. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2025 Sep. 1;9(3):818-33. doi:10.31015/2025.3.21