Research Article

Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions

Volume: 4 Number: 3 September 15, 2020
Zishan Gul *, Faizan Qureshi , Zafar Jamal
EN

Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions

Abstract

The present research work was conducted to find out the most suitable inter and intra spacing for Greenhouse transplantation of in vitro grown potato plantlets in peat moss soil in order to get maximum seed potato yield. There were nine different combinations of inter and intra row spacing (30x15, 30x10, 10x15, 20x5, 30x5, 10x5, 20x15, 10x10, 20x10cm) in completely randomized design. Regarding vegetative growth, maximum plant height i.e 59.01 cm, 58.92 cm, 57.01 cm was observed at 30cmx5cm, 20cmx5cm, and 10cmx5cm, respectively. Greater number of minitubers in each tuber category i.e. large, medium and small were obtained at greater inter and intra plant spacing , whereas the maximum average tubers yield per plant (165.0g) were recorded at spacing of 30cm x15cm followed by the spacing 20cm x10cm where the average yield per plant was 145.38g. It was concluded that the plant spacing of 30x15cm is the best for potato plantlets transplantation in the greenhouse benches in order to get maximum minituber yield. 

Keywords

Inter and intra plant spacing, Potato, Growth parameters, Minituber yield

References

  1. Ahmad, I., Iftikhar, S., Soomro, M.H and Aslam, M. (1991). Investigation of powdery scab of potato in Pakistan CDRI-PSPDR, PARC, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 1-2.
  2. Arega, A., Tekilen, A., Solomon, T and Tekile, B. (2018). Effect of inter and intra row Spacing on Tuber Yield and Yield Components of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Guji zone, Southern Ethiopia. Journal od advancements in plant science. 1: 1-11.
  3. Chandra,R., Birhman, R.K. (1994). In vitro micropropagation in relation to pedigree in potato. J. Indian Potato Assoc. 21(1&2):87.
  4. Demo, P., Low W.J, Mwenye, J.O. (2007). Potato production in Malawi: strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. African potato association conference proceedings, Alexandria, Egypt. 7, 339-345.
  5. Demo, P., Pankomera P, Connel, L. T, Khumar, N. (2009). Potential of potato farming in improving the livelihoods of small scale farmers in Malawi. African crop science conference proceedings, Uganda: Afr. Crop Sci. Soc. P.9. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20133232452
  6. Essah, S.Y.C. and Honeycutt, C.W. (2004). Tillage and seed-sprouting strategies to improve potato yield and quality in short season climates. American Journal of Potato Research, 81, 177-186. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02871747
  7. FAOSTAT. (2008). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Database. Retrived from http//faostat.fao.org
  8. GOP, Govt. of Pakistan. Ministry of Finance 2016-17. Economic survey of Pakistan 2016-17. Economic advisor’s wing, Islamabad. Retrived from http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_1617.html
  9. Gulluoglu, L. and Arıoglu, H. (2009). Effects of seed size and in row spacing on growth and yield of early potato in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research.4 (5):535-541. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20093175520
  10. Hani, N.M.B., Said, J.A., Al-Tabbal, Haddad, M.A., Aldalin in, H.K, Al-Fraihat, Alhrout, H.H., Hasan, H.S . and Aldabbas, F.M. (2018). Effect of plant density on water use efficiency and quality of potato (Solanum Tuberosum L. Cv. Spunta) in the Jordan valley. Journal of Agricultural Science. 10: 203-214.
APA
Gul, Z., Qureshi, F., & Jamal, Z. (2020). Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 4(3), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
AMA
1.Gul Z, Qureshi F, Jamal Z. Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2020;4(3):271-277. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
Chicago
Gul, Zishan, Faizan Qureshi, and Zafar Jamal. 2020. “Growth and Minituber Yield Response of Potato Plantlets in Micropropagation to Different Plant Spacing under Greenhouse Conditions”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 4 (3): 271-77. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5.
EndNote
Gul Z, Qureshi F, Jamal Z (September 1, 2020) Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 4 3 271–277.
IEEE
[1]Z. Gul, F. Qureshi, and Z. Jamal, “Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions”, int. j. agric. environ. food sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 271–277, Sept. 2020, doi: 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5.
ISNAD
Gul, Zishan - Qureshi, Faizan - Jamal, Zafar. “Growth and Minituber Yield Response of Potato Plantlets in Micropropagation to Different Plant Spacing under Greenhouse Conditions”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 4/3 (September 1, 2020): 271-277. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5.
JAMA
1.Gul Z, Qureshi F, Jamal Z. Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2020;4:271–277.
MLA
Gul, Zishan, et al. “Growth and Minituber Yield Response of Potato Plantlets in Micropropagation to Different Plant Spacing under Greenhouse Conditions”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, Sept. 2020, pp. 271-7, doi:10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5.
Vancouver
1.Zishan Gul, Faizan Qureshi, Zafar Jamal. Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2020 Sep. 1;4(3):271-7. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5