Photosynthetic performance responses in different phyiological development stages of some Brassica juncea genotypes in field condition
Abstract
Keywords
Thanks
References
- Abbate P E, Dardanelli J L, Cantarero M G, Maturano M, Melchiori J R M and Suero E E (2004). Climatic and water availability effects on water use efficiency in wheat. Crop Science. 44(2):474-483.
- Acatrinei L (2010). Photosynthesis rate, transpiration and stomatal conductance of vegetable species in protected organic crops. Lucrari Stiintifice sera Agronomie. 53(1): 32-35.
- Ahmadi A and Siosemardeh A (2005). Investigation on the physiological basis of grain yield and drought resistance in wheat: leaf photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and non stomatal limitation. International journal of agriculture and biology. 7(5): 807-811.
- Azizian A and Sepaskhah A R (2014). Maize response to different water, salinity and nitrogen levels: agronomic behavior. International Journal of Plant Production. 8(1): 107-130.
- Babac M T (2004). Possibility of an information system on plants of South–West Asia with particular reference to the Turkish Plants Data Service (TUBIVES). Turkish Journal of Botany. 28: 119–127.
- CFIA (1999). List of Varieties Which Are Registered in Canada. Variety Section. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canada, Ottawa Farquhal G D, Buckley T N and Miller J M (2002). Optimal Stomatal Control in Relation to Leaf Area and Nitrogen. Silva Fennica. 36(3): 625-637. Fischer R A, Rees D, Sayre K D, Lu Z M, Condon A G and Larqué Saavedra A (1998).Wheat yield progress is associated with higher stomatal conductance, higher photosynthetic rate and cooler canopies. Crop Science. 38:1467–1475.
- Guner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M and Babac M T (2012). Turkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarli Bitkiler). Nezahat Gokyigit Botanik Bahcesi Yayinlari Flora Dizisi I, ISBN: 978– 605–60425–7–7, Istanbul (in Turkish).
- Kayacetin F (2019). Morphological characterization and relationship among some important wild and domestic Turkish mustard genotypes (Brassica spp.). Turkish Journal of Botany. 43 (4): 499–515. Li P, Zhang S, Li F, Zhang S and Zhang H (2017). A phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes elucidates the relationships of the six economically important Brassica species comprising the triangle of U. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 111. Mulligan G A and Bailey L G (1975). The biology of Canadian weeds. 8. Sinapis arvensis L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55: 171–183.
- Nagaharu U (1935). Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Journal of Japanese Botany 7: 389–452.
- Orange M J and Ebadi A (2012). Responses of phenological stages of spring safflower to complementary irrigation. African Journal of Biotechnology. 11(10): 2465-2471.


