Distribution of Water Footprint Components of University Students and Detecting the Factors that Affect Those Components

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 4, 456 - 463, 15.12.2021

Emine Elmaslar Özbaş Tülin Sütırmak Pehlivan H. Kurtuluş Özcan Atakan Öngen Serdar Aydin Sinan Güneysu

https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.4

Abstract

20% of world population face the risk of disease and death due to the lack of access to healthy drinking water. A certain portion of water resources can no longer be used because of being polluted while some other parts pose danger for public health because of substructure incapacity. Water footprint is a remarkably crucial concept in terms of sustainable water management. Within the context of this study, consumption habits of university students and related changes in water footprint values have been investigated. Water Footprint Survey has been administered to participant university students and water footprint profiles of the students have been designed based on water footprint values computed according to survey results. At the end of the conducted analyses in Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Avcilar Campus, mean annual rate of water footprint per person has been computed as 1848.78 m3 for students. Components of this water footprint has been designated as; green water footprint 1329 m3/per person/year, blue water footprint 199 m3/per person/year, grey water footprint 320.78 m3/per person/year. In addition, by transferring the data attained from surveys to IBM SPSS environment, presence and/or absence of a significant relationship between variables has been analyzed. It was then observed that parallel to the rise in students' income level a corresponding climb emerged in general water footprint.

Keywords

Life habits, University campus, SPSS, Water consumption, Water footprint

References

• Aldaya, M.M., Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., Mekonnen, M.M. (2012). In: The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard, Earthscan, London, 53 – 55. Retrieved from https://waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/TheWaterFootprintAssessmentManual_2.pdf
• Allison, D., Lohan, E., Baldwin, T. (2018). The WaterHub at Emory University: Campus Resiliency through Decentralized Reuse. Water Envıronment Research, 2, 187-192. Doi: 10.2175/106143017X15054988926569
• Gu, Y., Wang, H., Xu, J., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Robinson, Z.P., Li, F., Wu, J., Tan, J., Zhi, X. (2019). Quantification of interlinked environmental footprints on a sustainable university campus: A nexus analysis perspective. Applied Energy, 246, 65–76. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030626191930635X
• Hoekstra, A.Y. (2003). Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade. Value of Water Research Report Series, No.12. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, Netherlands, 49-75. Retrieved from https://www.waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/Report12.pdf
• Hoekstra, A.Y., Chapagain, A. K. (2008). Globalization of Water: Sharing the Planet’s Freshwater Resources. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 12-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696224
• Hoekstra, A.Y., Chapagain, A.K., Aldaya, M.M., Mekonnen, M.M. (2009). Water Footprint Manual: State of the Art. Water Footprint Network, Enschede, Netherlands, 20-25. Retrived from https://waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/WaterFootprintManual2009.pdf
• Hoekstra, A.Y., Chapagain, A.K., Aldaya, M.M., Mekonnen, M.M. (2011). The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard. Earthscan, London, UK, 19-68. Retrived from https://waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/TheWaterFootprintAssessmentManual_2.pdf
• Kandananod, K. (2019). The Energy related water footprint accounting of a public organization: The case of a public university in Thailand. Energy Procedia, 156, 149-153. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.120
• Mekonnen, M. M., Hoekstra, A.Y. (2010). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. (UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands) Value of Water Research Report Series, 47, UNESCO-IHE. Retrieved from https://waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/Mekonnen-Hoekstra-2011-WaterFootprintCrops.pdf
• Mirzaie-Nodoushan, F., Morid, S., Dehghanisanij, H. (2020). Reducing water footprints through healthy and reasonable changes in diet and imported products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 23, 30–41. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.04.002
• Natyzak, J.L., Castner, E.A., D’Odorico, P., Galloway, J.N. (2017). Virtual Water as a Metric for Institutional Sustainability. Sustainability, 4, 237-245. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/sus.2017.0004
• Pellicer-Martínez, F., Martínez-Paz, J.M. (2016). Grey water footprint assessment at the river basin level: Accounting method and case study in the Segura River Basin, Spain. Ecological Indicators, 60, 1173–1183. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.032
• TSKB, (2019). Economical Researched Report. Retrieved from http://www.tskb.com.tr/i/content/4201_1_TSKB_2019 _EFR.pdf (in Turkish).
• URL 1: Water Footprint. Retrieved from https://www.abprojeyonetimi.com/su-footprint (in Turkish).
• URL 2: Turkey- Water footprint report. Retrieved from https://wwftr.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/su_ayak_ izi_raporweb.pdf?2720 (in Turkish).
• URL 3: Tomorrows’ Water. Retrieved from https://www.yarininsuyu.com (in Turkish).
• Wang, Q., Ge, S. (2020). Carbon footprint and water footprint in China: Similarities and differences. Science of the Total Environment, 739, 140070. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140070