An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model

Hatice Durak; Mustafa Sarıtepeci; Hasan Çakır

doi:10.18009/jcer.10737

EN TR

An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model

Abstract

Some shortcomings and failures are experienced in carrying out the in-service training activities for teachers. Failure to provide the continuity of some in-service training of these deficiencies, educational activities other than face-to-service time shortage experienced in training, cannot be integrated in lifelong learning and professional development, lack of in-service training activities capture evenly chance of injury to all the teachers, the in-service training of effectiveness-cost balance It cannot be provided. In this study, which is expected to resolve the glitch in a web-based in-service training model aimed recommended. In the study "Web-Based Teachers In-Service Professional Development Model" proposal is revealed Morrison, Ross and Kemp Model, Dick and Carey Model and Passerini and Granger examined Hybrid Design Model, will be fit for purpose in the training-services of these model components are integrated by selecting and applications

Keywords

Web-based in-service training; professional development; instructional design model

References

Akbulut, Y. (2007). Implications of two well-known models for instructional designers in distance education: Dick-Carey versus Morrison-Ross-Kemp. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 8(2), 62-68.
Akkoyunlu B., Altun A. & Soylu M.Y. (2008). Öğretim Tasarımı, Maya Akademi, Ankara,
Aytaç, T. (2000). Hizmet içi eğitim kavramı ve uygulamada karşılaşılan sorunlar. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 147(25.05), 2006. http://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/147/aytac.htm adresinden erişilmiştir.
Brand, G. A. (1998). What research says: Training teachers for using technology. Journal of staff development, 19, 10-13.
Çakır, H. (2013). İnsan performans teknolojilerinin temelleri. Öğretim Teknolojilerinin Temelleri: Teoriler, Araştırmalar, Eğilimler. Çağıltay, K., ve Göktaş, Y. (Ed.) (2013). Ankara:Pegem Akademi.
Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.
Dick, W. (1996). The Dick and Carey model: Will it survive the decade?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55-63.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992) Teacher development and educational change, in: Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. (Eds), Teacher Development and Educational Change (pp. 1–9). London: Falmer Press.
Kleiman, G. M. (2000). Myths and realities about technology in K-12 schools. Leadership and the New Technologies, 14(10). 1-8.
Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward elearning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54, 506–516.

Marker, W. B. (1999). The professional development of teachers. Scottish education, 915-925.
McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2009). A task–technology fit view of learning management system impact. Computers & Education, 52, 496–508.
MEB (2012a). FATİH projesi hakkında. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/tr/icerikincele.php?id=6 adresinden erişilmiştir.
MEB, (2012b). Derslerde BT kullanımı için öğretmenlere hizmetiçi eğitim. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/tr/icerikincele.php?id=4 adresinden erişilmiştir.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. (2010). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
Muir-Herzig, R. G. (2004). Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers & Education, 42(2), 111-131.
Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and teacher education, 17(1), 15-31.
Passerini, K. & Granger M., J.(2000). A developmental model for distance learning using the İnternet. Computers&Education, 34(1), 1-15.
Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B., & Özdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart?. Computers & Education, 53(2), 368-374.
Şahin, A. E. (2007). A comparison of elementary education teacher candidates' performance in relation to high schools they graduated. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 29, 113-128.
Şimşek, A. (2013). Öğretim tasarımı ve modelleri. İçinde: Çağıltay, K., ve Göktaş, Y. (Ed.) (2013). Öğretim Teknolojilerinin Temelleri: Teoriler, Araştırmalar, Eğilimler. Ankara:Pegem Akademi.
Türel, Y. K. (2012). Teachers’ negative attitudes towards interactive whiteboard use: Needs and problems. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 423-439.
Yıldız, H., Sarıtepeci, M. & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2013). FATİH projesi kapsamında düzenlenen hizmet-içi eğitim etkinliklerinin öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimine katkılarının ISTE öğretmen standartları açısından incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], Özel sayı (1), 375-392.
Yılmaz, H., & Düğenci, M. (2010). Hizmet içi eğitime farklı bir yaklaşım: e-hizmet içi eğitim. XII. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri, 67-74.
Yılmaz, R. A. Y., & Yılmaz, L. S. (2008). Öğretim tasarımı modellerinin karşılaştırılması: Gagné, Brıggs & Wagner Modeli, Kemp, Morrıson & Ross Modeli Ve Seels & Glasgow Modeli. The comparison of the instructional design models: Gagné, Briggs & Wagner Model, Kemp, Morrison & Ross Model And Seels & Glasgow Model. International Educational Technology Conference.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Hatice Durak
BARTIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Mustafa Sarıtepeci
GAZI UNIV
Türkiye

Hasan Çakır
GAZI UNIV
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 28, 2016

Submission Date

June 9, 2016

Acceptance Date

August 23, 2016

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 4 Number: 8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.10737

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA39PP65ZW

APA

Durak, H., Sarıtepeci, M., & Çakır, H. (2016). An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 4(8), 222-248. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.10737

AMA

1.Durak H, Sarıtepeci M, Çakır H. An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model. JCER. 2016;4(8):222-248. doi:10.18009/jcer.10737

Chicago

Durak, Hatice, Mustafa Sarıtepeci, and Hasan Çakır. 2016. “An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 4 (8): 222-48. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.10737.

EndNote

Durak H, Sarıtepeci M, Çakır H (December 1, 2016) An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model. Journal of Computer and Education Research 4 8 222–248.

IEEE

[1]H. Durak, M. Sarıtepeci, and H. Çakır, “An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model”, JCER, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 222–248, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.18009/jcer.10737.

ISNAD

Durak, Hatice - Sarıtepeci, Mustafa - Çakır, Hasan. “An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 4/8 (December 1, 2016): 222-248. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.10737.

JAMA

1.Durak H, Sarıtepeci M, Çakır H. An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model. JCER. 2016;4:222–248.

MLA

Durak, Hatice, et al. “An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model”. Journal of Computer and Education Research, vol. 4, no. 8, Dec. 2016, pp. 222-48, doi:10.18009/jcer.10737.

Vancouver

1.Hatice Durak, Mustafa Sarıtepeci, Hasan Çakır. An In-Service Training Of Teachers On The Model Proposal: Web-Based In-Service Professional Development Model. JCER. 2016 Dec. 1;4(8):222-48. doi:10.18009/jcer.10737