Review Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Interactive Futures: The Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Education

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 26, 1076 - 1099

Abstract

Given the abstract nature of mathematics, which often hinders student understanding, digital technologies serve to make learning more accessible and engaging. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of how digital tools are employed in mathematics education, emphasizing theoretical frameworks, application areas, and pedagogical implications. Drawing on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge model and the instrumental orchestration approach, the study examines teachers’ competencies in technology integration and the instructional impact of digital tools. What is more, applications such as augmented reality, dynamic geometry software, and gamified platforms are shown to enhance students' achievement, motivation, and engagement, while mitigating mathematics anxiety. Nonetheless, factors such as limited pedagogical readiness, infrastructure deficiencies, and unequal digital literacy among teachers and students remain significant barriers. The study concludes by recommending strategies for sustainable integration, including improvements in teacher education, content development, and education policy. It urges further research into the instructional potential of emerging digital technologies.

Ethical Statement

Due to the scope and method of the study, ethics committee permission was not required.

References

  • Akkuş, E. B., & Gök, B. (2024). The effect of digital technology tools used in elementary school mathematics teaching on achievement - a review study. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 12(23), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1394932
  • Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194059
  • Chen, Y. C. (2019). Effect of mobile augmented reality on learning performance, motivation, and math anxiety in a math course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1695-1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854036
  • Cirneanu, A. L., & Moldoveanu, C. E. (2024). Use of digital technology in integrated mathematics education. Applied System Innovation, 7, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7040066
  • Çırak, S., & Uygun, T. (2023). The effects of mathematics teaching enriched by technological activities on mathematics achievement of gifted students: An experimental study. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 19(2), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1264051
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  • Dockendorff, M., & Zaccarelli, F. G. (2025). Successfully preparing future mathematics teachers for digital technology integration: A literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(5), 948-979. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2309273
  • Drijvers, P. (2019). Embodied instrumentation: Combining different views on using digital technology in mathematics education. In U. T. Jankvist, Van den M. Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 8–28). Utrecht University and ERME.
  • Drijvers, P., & Sinclair, N. (2024). The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: Purposes and perspectives. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 56, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01535-x
  • Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. C. (2024). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 56(2), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2
  • Ersozlu, Z. (2024). The role of technology in reducing mathematics anxiety in primary school students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), ep517.
  • Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
  • Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799
  • Kaya, D., & Kutluca, T. (2024). E-learning in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis (2012-2022). Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(1), 213-246. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1248777 Kaya D., Kutluca T. & Dağhan G. (2023). Transforming education with augmented reality, metaverse and virtual reality technologies in the 21st century. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(4), 470 - 497. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2023.503
  • Kutluca, T. (2019). The effect on students’ achievements of computer assisted instruction designed for quadratic functions. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 13(2), 347-358.
  • Kutluca, T. & Akran, K. (2025). Realistic mathematics education and integration of digital tools: A model development study for secondary school mathematics education. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 9 (20), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1604874 Mamolo, L. A., & Sugano, S. G. C. (2024). Digital interactive app and students’ mathematics self-efficacy, anxiety, and achievement in the “new normal”. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(5), 427-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231167646
  • McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K. F., Lee, H. S., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers' integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers & Education, 123, 26-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008
  • Ministry of National Education. (2024). Middle school mathematics curriculum (Grades 5, 6, 7, and 8): Türkiye Century Education Model. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/upload/program/2024programmat5678Onayli.pdf
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  • Niess, M., Ronau, R., Shafer, K., Driskell, S., Harper, S., Jhonston, C., Browning, C., Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(88)90271-3
  • OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing.
  • Öztop, F. (2023). Effectiveness of digital technology use in mathematics instruction on reducing students' mathematics anxiety: A meta-analysis. Erciyes Journal of Education, 7(1), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.32433/eje.1068755
  • Öztop, F., & Toptaş, B. (2022). Effectiveness of instructional interventions in reducing mathematics anxiety: A meta-analysis on studies conducted in Turkey. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 23(3), 1324-1347. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1148039
  • Ran, H., Kim, N. J., & Secada, W. G. (2022). A meta‐analysis on the effects of technology's functions and roles on students' mathematics achievement in K‐12 classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 258-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12611
  • Rao, T. S. S., & Bhagat, K. K. (2024). Computational thinking for the digital age: A systematic review of tools, pedagogical strategies, and assessment practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1893–1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10364-y
  • Simsek, A., Clark-Wilson, A., Bretscher, N., & Hoyles, C. (2025). Exploring mathematics teachers’ integration of technology into classroom teaching practice: A focus on geometric similarity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2469865
  • Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: A multidimensional analysis of teacher beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(1), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10072-x
  • Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 281-307.
  • Trouche, L., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Webbing and orchestration. Two interrelated views on digital tools in mathematics education. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: International Journal of the IMA, 33(3), 193-209.
  • Viberg, O., Grönlund, Å., & Andersson, A. (2023). Integrating digital technology in mathematics education: A Swedish case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1770801
  • Weigand, H. G., Trgalova, J., & Tabach, M. (2024). Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 56(4), 525-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9
  • Zeynivandnezhad, F., Mousavi, A., & Kotabe, H. (2020). The mediating effect of study approaches between perceptions of mathematics and experiences using digital technologies. Computers in the Schools, 37(3), 168-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2020.1793050

Interactive Futures: The Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Education

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 26, 1076 - 1099

Abstract

Given the abstract nature of mathematics, which often hinders student understanding, digital technologies serve to make learning more accessible and engaging. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of how digital tools are employed in mathematics education, emphasizing theoretical frameworks, application areas, and pedagogical implications. Drawing on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge model and the instrumental orchestration approach, the study examines teachers’ competencies in technology integration and the instructional impact of digital tools. What is more, applications such as augmented reality, dynamic geometry software, and gamified platforms are shown to enhance students' achievement, motivation, and engagement, while mitigating mathematics anxiety. Nonetheless, factors such as limited pedagogical readiness, infrastructure deficiencies, and unequal digital literacy among teachers and students remain significant barriers. The study concludes by recommending strategies for sustainable integration, including improvements in teacher education, content development, and education policy. It urges further research into the instructional potential of emerging digital technologies.

References

  • Akkuş, E. B., & Gök, B. (2024). The effect of digital technology tools used in elementary school mathematics teaching on achievement - a review study. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 12(23), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1394932
  • Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194059
  • Chen, Y. C. (2019). Effect of mobile augmented reality on learning performance, motivation, and math anxiety in a math course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1695-1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854036
  • Cirneanu, A. L., & Moldoveanu, C. E. (2024). Use of digital technology in integrated mathematics education. Applied System Innovation, 7, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7040066
  • Çırak, S., & Uygun, T. (2023). The effects of mathematics teaching enriched by technological activities on mathematics achievement of gifted students: An experimental study. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 19(2), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1264051
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  • Dockendorff, M., & Zaccarelli, F. G. (2025). Successfully preparing future mathematics teachers for digital technology integration: A literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(5), 948-979. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2309273
  • Drijvers, P. (2019). Embodied instrumentation: Combining different views on using digital technology in mathematics education. In U. T. Jankvist, Van den M. Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 8–28). Utrecht University and ERME.
  • Drijvers, P., & Sinclair, N. (2024). The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: Purposes and perspectives. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 56, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01535-x
  • Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. C. (2024). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 56(2), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2
  • Ersozlu, Z. (2024). The role of technology in reducing mathematics anxiety in primary school students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), ep517.
  • Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
  • Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799
  • Kaya, D., & Kutluca, T. (2024). E-learning in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis (2012-2022). Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 25(1), 213-246. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1248777 Kaya D., Kutluca T. & Dağhan G. (2023). Transforming education with augmented reality, metaverse and virtual reality technologies in the 21st century. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(4), 470 - 497. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2023.503
  • Kutluca, T. (2019). The effect on students’ achievements of computer assisted instruction designed for quadratic functions. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 13(2), 347-358.
  • Kutluca, T. & Akran, K. (2025). Realistic mathematics education and integration of digital tools: A model development study for secondary school mathematics education. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 9 (20), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1604874 Mamolo, L. A., & Sugano, S. G. C. (2024). Digital interactive app and students’ mathematics self-efficacy, anxiety, and achievement in the “new normal”. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(5), 427-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231167646
  • McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K. F., Lee, H. S., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers' integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers & Education, 123, 26-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008
  • Ministry of National Education. (2024). Middle school mathematics curriculum (Grades 5, 6, 7, and 8): Türkiye Century Education Model. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/upload/program/2024programmat5678Onayli.pdf
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  • Niess, M., Ronau, R., Shafer, K., Driskell, S., Harper, S., Jhonston, C., Browning, C., Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(88)90271-3
  • OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing.
  • Öztop, F. (2023). Effectiveness of digital technology use in mathematics instruction on reducing students' mathematics anxiety: A meta-analysis. Erciyes Journal of Education, 7(1), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.32433/eje.1068755
  • Öztop, F., & Toptaş, B. (2022). Effectiveness of instructional interventions in reducing mathematics anxiety: A meta-analysis on studies conducted in Turkey. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 23(3), 1324-1347. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1148039
  • Ran, H., Kim, N. J., & Secada, W. G. (2022). A meta‐analysis on the effects of technology's functions and roles on students' mathematics achievement in K‐12 classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 258-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12611
  • Rao, T. S. S., & Bhagat, K. K. (2024). Computational thinking for the digital age: A systematic review of tools, pedagogical strategies, and assessment practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1893–1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10364-y
  • Simsek, A., Clark-Wilson, A., Bretscher, N., & Hoyles, C. (2025). Exploring mathematics teachers’ integration of technology into classroom teaching practice: A focus on geometric similarity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2469865
  • Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: A multidimensional analysis of teacher beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(1), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10072-x
  • Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 281-307.
  • Trouche, L., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Webbing and orchestration. Two interrelated views on digital tools in mathematics education. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: International Journal of the IMA, 33(3), 193-209.
  • Viberg, O., Grönlund, Å., & Andersson, A. (2023). Integrating digital technology in mathematics education: A Swedish case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1770801
  • Weigand, H. G., Trgalova, J., & Tabach, M. (2024). Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 56(4), 525-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01612-9
  • Zeynivandnezhad, F., Mousavi, A., & Kotabe, H. (2020). The mediating effect of study approaches between perceptions of mathematics and experiences using digital technologies. Computers in the Schools, 37(3), 168-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2020.1793050
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Mathematics Education
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Fatma Erdoğan 0000-0002-4498-8634

Early Pub Date September 16, 2025
Publication Date October 21, 2025
Submission Date April 2, 2025
Acceptance Date June 16, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 13 Issue: 26

Cite

APA Erdoğan, F. (2025). Interactive Futures: The Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Education. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(26), 1076-1099.

download13894         13896   13897 14842      3365633655


Creative Commons License


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.