Süregelen Rekabetler Yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Türk–Rus İlişkilerinin Analizi

Abstract

Bu inceleme makalesinin amacı, Süregelen Rekabetler Yaklaşımı’nın (Enduring Rivalries Approach – ERA) teorik gelişimini ve temel kavramlarını sistematik biçimde ele alarak, Osmanlı–Rus ilişkilerinin uzun dönemli rekabet örüntülerini bu çerçevede değerlendirmektir. ERA literatürü, savaşların ve militarize uyuşmazlıkların büyük bölümünün belirli devlet çiftleri arasında yoğunlaştığını ve bu rekabetlerin zaman, aktör ve konu tutarlılığı içerdiğini savunur. Çalışma, ERA’nın kavramsal temellerini, rekabet türleri ve tipolojilerini, rekabetin nedenlerini (politik şoklar, topraksal anlaşmazlıklar, ekonomik rekabet) ve modellerini (artan, azalan, dış bükey, iç bükey, dalgalı, düz çizgi) ayrıntılı biçimde incelemektedir. Bu çerçeve, Osmanlı–Rus ilişkilerinin yaklaşık beş yüzyıllık dönem boyunca süreklilik gösteren, yapısal olarak gömülü bir rekabet modeli oluşturduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Makale, Türk–Rus rekabetinin ERA'nın öngördüğü değişkenlerle yüksek ölçüde örtüştüğünü ve modern dönemdeki rekabet–işbirliği dengesinin tarihsel temellerini anlamaya katkı sunduğunu ileri sürmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Süregelen Rekabetler Yaklaşımı, Politik Şoklar, Topraksal Anlaşmazlık Türk–Rus İlişkileri, Rekabet Modeli

Keywords

• rusya
• osmanlı
• rekabet
• süregiden rekabet
• topraksal çatışma
• ikili rekabet

An Analysis of Turkish–Russian Relations within the Framework of the Enduring Rivalries Approach

Abstract

Abstract This review article seeks to analyze the theoretical underpinnings and conceptual development of the Enduring Rivalries Approach (ERA) while evaluating the long-term dynamics of Ottoman–Russian ties within this context. ERA literature posits that the majority of wars and armed interstate disputes are concentrated among particular pairs of states, exhibiting consistency in terms of time, actors, and issues. The article systematically examines the fundamental conceptual elements of ERA, encompassing rivalry typologies, temporal and structural variables, causal factors like political shocks, territorial disputes, and economic competition, along with principal evolutionary models (increasing, decreasing, convex, concave, oscillatory, and flat patterns). This analysis reveals that Ottoman–Russian interactions represent a deeply rooted, enduring competition marked by persistent conflict catalysts and structural consistency. The paper asserts that the Turkish–Russian competition closely corresponds with ERA's fundamental principles and provides theoretical insights into the historical underpinnings of modern conflict–cooperation dynamics. Keywords: Enduring Rivalries, Political Shocks, Territorial Disputes, Turkish–Russian Relations, Rivalry Model

Keywords

• Russia
• türkiye
• rivalry
• enduring rivalry
• dyadic rivalry
• territorial conflict

References

1. Aksan, V. H. (2011). Russo–Turkish wars (pre-1878). In The encyclopedia of war. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444338232.wbeow539
2. Azar, E. E., Jureidini, P., & McLaurin, R. D. (1978). Protracted social conflict: Theory and practice in the Middle East. Journal of Palestine Studies, 8(1), 41–60.
3. Brisku, A. (2019, April 26). Ottoman–Russian relations. In Oxford research encyclopedia of Asian history. Oxford University Press. Retrieved December 12, 2025, from https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.001.0001/acrefore- 9780190277727-e-288
4. Cheterian, V. (2023). The empire that would not die: Russia and the former Soviet space. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 14(1), 1–12.
5. Diehl, P. F. (1983). Arms races and escalation: A closer look. Journal of Peace Research, 20(3), 205–212.
6. Diehl, P. F., & Goertz, G. (1995). War and peace in international rivalry. University of Michigan Press.
7. Diehl, P. F., & Goertz, G. (1998). The “volcano” model and other patterns in the evolution of enduring rivalries. In P. F. Diehl & G. Goertz (Eds.), The dynamics of enduring rivalries (pp. 99–125). University of Illinois Press.
8. Diehl, P. F., & Goertz, G. (2000). War and peace in international rivalry. University of Michigan Press. Đidić, A., & Kösebalaban, H. (2021). Assertive bandwagoning in Turkey–Russia relations. Mediterranean Politics, 26(5), 1–23.

9. Geller, D. S. (1993). Power differentials and war in rival dyads. International Studies Quarterly, 37(2), 173–193.
10. Gochman, C., & Maoz, Z. (1984). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28(4), 585–616.
11. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1992). The empirical study of international conflict. Lynne Rienner.
12. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1993). Enduring rivalries: Theoretical constructs and empirical patterns. International Studies Quarterly, 37(2), 147–171.
13. Golmohammadi, V. (2021). Russia, Turkey and the post-Western era. Insight Turkey, 23(1), 45–62.
14. Hale, W. (2023). Turkish foreign policy 1774–2023. Routledge.
15. Hensel, P. R. (1996). Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and militarized interstate disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(1), 43–73.
16. Hensel, P. R. (1999). An evolutionary approach to the study of interstate rivalry. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 17(2), 1–26.
17. Hensel, P. R., & Sowers, T. (1998). Territory, sovereignty, and escalating interstate conflict. In P. F. Diehl (Ed.), The dynamics of enduring rivalries (pp. 15–44). University of Illinois Press.
18. Hosking, G. (2001). Russia and the Russians: From earliest times to 2011. Penguin Books.
19. Isachenko, D. (2021). Russia–Turkey relations in the 21st century. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(3), 1–20.
20. Inalcık, H. (2017). The Ottoman Empire and Europe, Kronik Books.
21. Klein, J., Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (2006). The new rivalry dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 43(3), 331–348.
22. Leanca, G. (2020). The Ottoman Empire and Europe from the late Westphalian order to the Crimean system: The ‘Eastern Question’ revisited. Relações Internacionais, 8(4), 110–132. https://doi. org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2020v8.n4.p110
23. Levy, J. S., & Ali, S. (1998). From commercial competition to strategic rivalry: Anglo–Dutch relations in the seventeenth century. In P. F. Diehl & G. Goertz (Eds.), The dynamics of enduring rivalries (pp. 29–52). University of Illinois Press.
24. Mantran, R. (1995). Osmanlı İmparatorluğu tarihi (Cilt II). Adam Yayınları.
25. Mor, B. (2003). Power, strategy and security: Theoretical considerations. Security Studies, 13(2), 25–45.
26. Ortaylı, İ. (2004). Ottoman studies. Bilgi University Press.
27. Öniş, Z., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2016). Turkey and Russia in a shifting global order: Cooperation, conflict and asymmetric interdependence. Third World Quarterly, 37(1), 1–20.
28. Petrović, E., & Mijatović, M. (2023). Treaty of Karlowitz: (Un)successful Ottoman diplomacy and its impact on Serbia. In E. Onay (Ed.), Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs at the centenary of the Republic: Centuries of diplomatic practices (Proceedings Book, pp. 39–51). Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
29. Rudkevich, A., Colaresi, M., & Weeks, J. (2013). Interrupted rivals: A reassessment of rivalry termination. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(3), 459–487.
30. Stinnett, D., Tir, J., Diehl, P. F., Schafer, P., & Gochman, C. (2001). The Correlates of War Project militarized interstate dispute data, version 3.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 18(1), 123– 144.
31. Thompson, W. R. (1995). Principal rivalries. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39(2), 195–223.
32. Uzunçarşılı, İ. H. (1995). Osmanlı tarihi (Cilt IV, 2. kısım). Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları.
33. Vasquez, J. (1993). The war puzzle. Cambridge University Press.
34. Yakushev, M. M. (2018). Diplomatic relations between Russia and the Ottoman Empire in the second half of the eighteenth century. Russian Studies in History, 57(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10611983.2018.1586390