Analysis of Theses Conducted with Mathematics Teachers on Education of Gifted Students in Türkiye

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 4, 239 - 250

Fatma Erdoğan , Pelin Güler Aygün

Abstract

Mathematical giftedness refers to an individual’s capacity to easily generalize mathematical knowledge, develop original solution strategies, and interpret the world through a mathematical perspective. The role of teachers is a decisive factor in enabling mathematically gifted students to maximize their potential. Besides, studies on research trends, which are considered the most effective way of defining a field, have gained particular importance in today’s academic landscape. Accordingly, the purpose of this research is to analyze graduate theses indexed in the National Thesis Center of the Council of Higher Education (NTCCHE) that were conducted with mathematics teachers on education of gifted students under eight categories: year, type, paradigm (approach), model, sample type, sample size, data collection tool, and research topic. In this study, a qualitative research approach was adopted, and thematic content analysis (meta-synthesis). The study included theses published between 2009 and 2024. Accordingly, this research was carried out on 17 theses conducted with mathematics teachers in the field of gifted education. The data were collected through document analysis. The findings indicate that the studies were predominantly conducted at the master’s level, employing qualitative and descriptive methods, with a teacher-centered focus and small-scale samples. The theses mainly concentrated on the development of programs, activities, and scales, while student-centered topics were found to be more limited. While this emphasis strengthens the practical orientation of the field, it also highlights the need for greater attention to student-focused dimensions such as creativity, problem-solving, and self-regulation.

Keywords

Giftedness , post-graduate theses , mathematics teachers , mathematics education

References

• Ayvacı, H.Ş., & Bebek, G. (2019). A study on the thematic investigation of conducted theses on gifted and talented students in Turkey. PAU Journal of Education, 45, 267-292. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE.2018.233
• Beumann, S., Weber, D., & Benölken, R. (2025). Identifying and fostering giftedness in students with disabilities–potential barriers in ıdentification and support from a mathematics educational perspective: Sarah Beumann et al. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10587-2
• Bilgic, S., & Baloğlu, M. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of research on giftedness and mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2236611
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge Falmer.
• Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education and Science, 39, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3412
• Çavuş-Erdem, Z. (2023). Thematic analysis of studies on gifted students in the field of mathematics education. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 10(3), 235-258.
• Forster, N. (1994). The analysis of company documentation. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Ed.), Qualitative methods in organizational research, a practical guide (pp. 147-166). SAGE publication.
• Erdogan, F., & Gul, N. (2022). Reflections from the generalization strategies used by gifted students in the growing geometric pattern task. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 9(4), 369–385.
• Erdoğan, F., & Gül, N. (2023). Gifted Students’ repeating patterning skills and cognitive demand levels. Kocaeli University Journal of Education, 6(1), 70-95. http://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.1221801
• Gürlen, E., Özdiyar, Ö., & Şen, Z. (2019). Social network analysis of academic studies on gifted people. Education and Science, 44(197), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7735
• İnan, E., & Mert-Uyangör, S. (2022). A thematic analysis of theses prepared on mathematics education with gifted and talented students in Türkiye. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 19-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.22.127.9.6
• Jawabreh, R., Danju, İ., & Salha, S. (2022). Exploring the characteristics of gifted pre-school children: Teachers’ perceptions. Sustainability, 14, Article 2514. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052514
• Kardeş, S., Akman, B., & Yazıcı, D. N. (2018). Analysis of theses in the field of gifted and talented. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 11(3), 411-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.353279
• Karp, A. (2010). Teachers of the mathematically gifted tell about themselves and their profession. Roeper Review, 32(4), 272-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2010.485306
• Karp, A. (2017). Some thoughts on gifted education and creativity. ZDM, 49(1), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0838-8
• Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. University of Chicago Press.
• Leikin, R. (2021). When practice needs more research: The nature and nurture of mathematical giftedness. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 53, 1579-1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01276-9
• Lv, S., He, Y., Xiong, B., & Wu, Y. (2024). Stress in Chinese teachers who teach the mathematically gifted: A qualitative perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1388236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1388236
• Michalak, R. (2022). Teachers’ experiences in working with cognitively gifted students. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 11(2(22)), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2022.1122.08
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Mora, M., Ramírez, R., Gutiérrez, A., & Jaime, A. (2024). Traits of generalization of problem solution methods exhibited by potential mathematically gifted students when solving problems in a selection process. ZDM- Mathematics Education, 56, 1257-1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01625-4
• Smedsrud, J. H., Nordahl-Hansen, A., & Idsøe, E. (2022). Mathematically gifted students’ experience with their teachers’ mathematical competence and boredom in school: A qualitative interview study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 876350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876350
• Özdemir, D., & Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2025). From Which Aspects Do Differentiated Tasks Nurture Mathematically Gifted Students?. Journal of Advanced Academics, 36(3), 493-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X251325326
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2009). The translation of teachers’ understanding of gifted students into instructional strategies for teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9138-7
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Samnia-Hammod, H., & Paz-Baruch, N. (2024). Self-regulated learning while solving mathematical problems among mathematically gifted and talented students’. High Ability Studies, 35(2), 201-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2024.2374715
• Tortop, H. S. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of the in-service training program for the education of the academically gifted students in Turkey: A case study. Journal for the Educaiton of the Young Scientist and Giftedness, 2(2), 67–86.
• Uzunboylu, H., Akçamete, G., Sarp, N., & Demirok, M. (2022). Primary schoolteachers’ opinions about gifted education programmes in distance education. Sustainability, 14(24), Article 17031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142417031
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). A clarion call for access and attention to the needs of children of poverty. Parenting for High Potential, 3.
• Yazgan-Sağ, G. (2024). Thoughts of prospective mathematics teachers on educating mathematically gifted students. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 16(4), 116–119.