Research Article

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION

Volume: 4 Number: 1 January 1, 2018
EN

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION

Abstract

The aim of this study was to introduce a simple, high efficient and less expensive method for isolation of β-Lg from whey. Anion exchange chromatography, pepsin enzyme treatment and ultrafiltration tecniques were preferred for isolation process to compare differences. In addition to, centrifuge ultrafiltration techniques were using for the first time for isolation of β-Lg from whey.  Physicochemical analysis of whey samples indicated that protein and β-Lg content in whey samples changed from 0.07 to 0.8% and 0.24 to 0.29 g/L, respectively. Treatment with the use of pepsin enzyme, anion exchanges chromatography and ultrafiltration techniques, resulted to β-Lg of 1.43, 6.56 and 43.59 folds respectively. Our results showed that ultrafiltration techniques are rapid and efficient that allows high protein yield and has advantages over other methods since it preserves the native structure of β-Lg. Additionally, when the enzymatic hydrolysis was used together with ultrafiltration technique, it was found efficient and pure than the enzymatic hydrolysis together with dialyse membrane. Also this study concluded that pepsin enzyme treatment and anion exchange chromatography are economic methods but they are not efficient enough and very time consuming. However isolation efficiency can be increased the use of isolation methods together.

Keywords

References

  1. Aich, R., Batabyal, S. & Joardar, S.N. (2015). Isolation and purification of beta-lactoglobulin from cow milk. Veterinary World, 8, 621-624.
  2. Bhattacharjee, S., Bhattacharjee, C. & Datta, S. (2006). Studies on the fractionation of β-lactoglobulin from casein whey using ultrafiltration and ion-exchange membrane chromatography. Journal of Membrane Science, 275(1), 141-150.
  3. Bottomley, R. (1991). Process for obtaining concentrates having a high α-lactalbumin content from whey. US Patent, Patent number: 5,008, 376.
  4. Chatterton, D.E., Smithers, G., Roupas, P. & Brodkorb, A. (2006). Bioactivity of β-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin—Technological implications for processing. International Dairy Journal, 16(11), 1229-1240.
  5. Cheang, B., & Zydney, A. L. (2003). Separation of α‐lactalbumin and β‐lactoglobulin using membrane ultrafiltration. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 83(2), 201-209.
  6. Cheang, B., & Zydney, A. L. (2004). A two-stage ultrafiltration process for fractionation of whey protein isolate. Journal of Membrane Science, 231(1), 159-167.
  7. De Wit, J. (1998). Nutritional and functional characteristics of whey proteins in food products. Journal of Dairy Science, 81(3), 597-608.
  8. Elgar, D.F., Norris, C.S., Ayers, J.S., Pritchard, M., Otter, D.E., & Palmano, K.P. (2000). Simultaneous separation and quantitation of the major bovine whey proteins including proteose peptone and caseinomacropeptide by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on polystyrene–divinylbenzene. Journal of Chromatography A, 878(2), 183-196.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Food Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ezgi Demir Özer
NIGDE OMER HALISDEMIR UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD ENGINEERING
0000-0002-3525-5172
Türkiye

Zübeyde Öner This is me
SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD ENGINEERING
0000-0003-2557-0731
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 1, 2018

Submission Date

February 9, 2017

Acceptance Date

July 2, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 4 Number: 1

APA
Demir Özer, E., & Öner, Z. (2018). COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION. Food and Health, 4(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3153/JFHS18001
AMA
1.Demir Özer E, Öner Z. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION. Food Health. 2018;4(1):1-8. doi:10.3153/JFHS18001
Chicago
Demir Özer, Ezgi, and Zübeyde Öner. 2018. “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION”. Food and Health 4 (1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3153/JFHS18001.
EndNote
Demir Özer E, Öner Z (January 1, 2018) COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION. Food and Health 4 1 1–8.
IEEE
[1]E. Demir Özer and Z. Öner, “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION”, Food Health, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.3153/JFHS18001.
ISNAD
Demir Özer, Ezgi - Öner, Zübeyde. “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION”. Food and Health 4/1 (January 1, 2018): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3153/JFHS18001.
JAMA
1.Demir Özer E, Öner Z. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION. Food Health. 2018;4:1–8.
MLA
Demir Özer, Ezgi, and Zübeyde Öner. “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION”. Food and Health, vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 1-8, doi:10.3153/JFHS18001.
Vancouver
1.Ezgi Demir Özer, Zübeyde Öner. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR BETA LACTOGLOBULIN ISOLATION. Food Health. 2018 Jan. 1;4(1):1-8. doi:10.3153/JFHS18001

16339
 

Journal is licensed under a

CreativeCommons Attribtion-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence  14627 1331027042

Diamond Open Access refers to a scholarly publication model in which journals and platforms do not charge fees to either authors or readers.

Open Access Statement:

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Archiving Policy:

27222
 

Archiving is done according to ULAKBİM "DergiPark" publication policy (LOCKSS).