Problem-Based Learning, Its Usability and Critical View as Educational Learning Tools

Abstract

So far the learning process that takes place in several countries, including developed countries, is still dominated by a paradigm which states that knowledge is a set of facts that must be memorized. In addition, the classroom situation is still largely focused on the teacher as the main source of knowledge based on the curriculum. In order to develop a learning system, observation analysis is needed based on the sources of published journal articles. One of the topics we raised in this case was Problem-Based Learning (PBL). The results of the Analysis Review found that Problem-Based Learning is a learning approach that uses real world problems as a context for students to learn about critical thinking and problem solving skills, as well as to obtain essential knowledge and concepts from the subject matter. Problem-based learning is used to stimulate high-level thinking in problem-oriented situations, including learning how to learn.

Keywords

• Gender,Problem Based Learning Model,Students’ Character,Problem Solving Ability

References

1. Ahmad, A., Yin, T. S., Fang, L. Y., Yen, Y. H., & How, K. W. (2010). Incorporating multimedia as a tool into mathematics education: A case study on diploma students in multimedia university. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 594–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.082
2. Ajai, J. T., Imoko, B. I., & O’kwo, E. I. (2013). Comparison of the Learning Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Conventional Method of Teaching Algebra. Journal of Education and Practice , 4(1), 113–136.
3. Argaw, A. S., Haile, B. B., Ayalew, B. T., & Kuma, S. G. (2017). The effect of problem based learning (PBL) instruction on students’ motivation and problem solving skills of physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 857–871. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00647a
4. Azer, S. A. (2001). Problem-based learning: A critical review of its educational objectives and the rationale for its use. Saudi Medical Journal, 22(4), 299–305.
5. Căprioară, D. (2015). Problem Solving - Purpose And Means Of Learning Mathematics In School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191, 1859–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.332
6. Celik, P., Onder, F., & Silay, I. (2011). The effects of problem-based learning on the students’ success in hysics course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.124
7. Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts : report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools under the chairmanship of W.H. Cockcroft. H.M.S.O.
8. Csapó, B., & Funke, J. (2017). The Nature of Problem Solving USING RESEARCH TO INSPIRE 21ST CENTURY LEARNING. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273955-en

9. Culclasure, B. T., Longest, K. C., & Terry, T. M. (2019). Project-based learning (Pjbl) in three southeastern public schools: Academic, behavioral, and social-emotional outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(2), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1842
10. Diani, R., Herliantari, H., Irwandani, I., Saregar, A., & Umam, R. (2019). The Effectiviness of SSCS Learning Model: Its Impact on the Students’ Creative Problem-Solving Ability on the Concept of Substance Pressure. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 9(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v9n1.p%25p
11. Diani, R., Irwandani, I., Al-Hijrah, A.-H., Yetri, Y., Fujiani, D., Hartati, N. S., & Umam, R. (2019). Physics Learning through Active Learning Based Interactive Conceptual Instructions (ALBICI) to Improve Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v5i1.3469
12. Frost, L. A., Hyde, J. S., & Fennema, E. (1994). Chapter 2 Gender, mathematics performance, and mathematics-related attitudes and affect: A meta-analytic synthesis. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(06)80026-1
13. Habibi, B., Hartinah, S., Umam, R., Syazali, M., Lestari, F., Abdurrahman, A., & Jauhariyah, D. (2019). Factor Determinants of Teacher Professionalism as Development of Student Learning Education at School of SMK PGRI in Tegal City, Indonesia. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 6(2), 125–134.
14. Hartinah, S., Suharso, P., Umam, R., Syazali, M., Lestari, B. D., Roslina, R., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Teacher’s performance management: The role of principal’s leadership, work environment and motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 9(14), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.038
15. Huda, S., Sholikhakh, R. A., Bina, N. S., Lestari, F., Habibi, B., & Suharso, P. (2019). Effect of Application Smart Circuit Learning Media to Mathematics Learning Outcomes : A Case Study of Islamic School Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(September), 699–715. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.597053
16. Huda, S., Tsani, I., Syazali, M., Umam, R., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The management of educational system using three law Auguste Comte : A case of Islamic schools. Management Science Letters, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.9.018
17. Komala Sari, F., Syazali, M., & Farida. (2016). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran (Modul) berbantuan Geogebra Pokok Bahasan Turunan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 135–151.
18. Leder, G. C. (2019). Gender and Mathematics Education: An Overview. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_13
19. Lestari, F., Saryantono, B., Syazali, M., Saregar, A., Jauhariyah, D., & Umam, R. (2019). Cooperative Learning Application with the Method of Network Tree Concept Map : Based on Japanese Learning System Approach. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.471466
20. Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem Solving in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40730-2_1
21. Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Macmath, S., Wallace, J., & Chi, X. (2009). Problem-Based Learning in Mathematics - A tool for Developing Students’ Conceptual Knowledge. The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat.
23. Maskur, R., Syazali, M., & Utami, L. F. (2019). Islamic-Nuanced Calculus Module with Open-Ended Approach in Real Number System Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012081
24. Maulidi, I., Apriliani, V., & Syazali, M. (2019). Fungsi Zeta Riemann Genap Menggunakan Bilangan Bernoulli. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v2i1.3589
25. Mawaddah, Ahmad, A., & Duskri, M. (2018). Gender differences of mathematical critical thinking skills of secondary school students. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012054
26. Midgett, C. W., & Eddins, S. K. (2001). NCTM’s Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: Implications for Administrators. In NASSP Bulletin I (Vol. 85).
27. Murti, E. D., Nasir, N., & Negara, H. S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis : Dampak Model Pembelajaran SAVI ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar Matematis. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v2i2.4072
28. Nite, S. (2017). Using Polya’s Problem Solving Process in the Mathematics Classroom to Prepare for Taks. In Pedagogy and Content in Middle and High School Mathematics (pp. 233–235). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-137-7_51
29. Noviyanti, F., Sugiharta, I., & Farida, F. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis : Dampak Blended Learning Menggunakan Edmodo. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v2i2.4035
30. Özreçberoğlu, N., & Çağanağa, Ç. K. (2018). Making it count: Strategies for improving problem-solving skills in mathematics for students and teachers’ classroom management. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/82536
31. Pagander, L., & Read, J. (2014). Lisa Pagander Is Problem-Based Learning ( PBL ) An Effective Teaching Method ? Är PBL en Effektiv Undervisningsmetod ? Linköping.
32. Prabowo, A., & Sidi, P. (2012). Memahat Karakter Melalui Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
33. Prastowo, R., Huda, S., Umam, R., Jermsittiparsert, K., Prasetiyo, A. E., Tortop, H. S., & Syazali, M. (2019). The Effectiveness Of Environmental Geophysical Learning In Developing Academic Achievement And Conceptual Understanding Of Electrodynamics: Applications Geoelectric Using Cooperative Learning Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 8(2).
34. Rahmawati, R., Lestari, F., & Umam, R. (2019). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Learning in the Use of Learning Modules Against Student Learning Outcomes. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(3), 233–240.
35. Ramadhani, R. (2017). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMA Melalui Guided Discovery Learning Berbantuan Autograph. JPPM, 10(2), 72–81.
36. Ramadhani, R. (2018). The enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability and self-confidence of students through problem based learning. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.13269
37. Ramadhani, R., & Narpila, S. D. (2018). Problem based learning method with geogebra in mathematical learning. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3.2 Special Issue 2).
38. Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Syazali, M. (2019). The Effect Of Flipped-Problem Based Learning Model Integrated With LMS-Google Classroom For Senior High School Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young, 7(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.548350
39. Raymond, K. (2018). M Is Not Just for STEM: How Myths about the Purposes of Mathematics Education Have Narrowed Mathematics Curricula in the United States. Education Sciences, 8(47), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020047
40. Soedjadi. (2000). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia: Konstatasi Keadaan Masa Kini Menuju Harapan Masa Depan. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
41. Steiner, H.-G. (1985). Theory of Mathematics Education (TME): an Introduction*. 11–17.
42. Sumarni, S., Ramadhani, R., Sazaki, Y., Tria, R., Andika, W. D., & Prasetiyo, A. E. (2019). Development of “ Child Friendly ICT ” Textbooks to Improve Professional Competence of Teacher Candidates : A Case Study of Early Childhood Education Program Students To cite this article : Sumarni , S ., Ramadhani , R ., Sazaki , Y ., Astika , R , T ., An. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(September), 643–658.
43. Suriati, S. (2019). Analisis Prestasi Belajar Matematika : Dampak Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think-Pair-Square Ditinjau dari Aktivitas Belajar. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v2i2.4374
44. Syahrir, S., Syazali, M., Masykur, R., Amrulloh, M. A., Sada, H. J., & Listiani, B. (2018). Calculus Module for Derivative Application Materials with an Islamic Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach. IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics, 1155. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012079
45. Syazali, M., Putra, F. G., Rinaldi, A., Utami, L. F., Widayanti, Umam, R., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Partial correlation analysis using multiple linear regression: Impact on business environment of digital marketing interest in the era of industrial revolution 4.0. Management Science Letters, 9, 1875–1886. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.6.005
46. Zhu, Z. (2007). Gender differences in mathematical problem solving patterns: A review of literature. International Education Journal, 8(2), 187–203.