The Use of Biostimulants in Sustainable Viticulture

Abstract

Viticulture has a very wide application area in the world, which is great importance economically and in terms of human diet. The grapevine is evaluated in many areas, both grapes and leaves contain valuable compounds such as vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, organic acids, fats, proteins etc.. It has become inevitable that sustainable production techniques, the use of new integrated techniques, and sufficient sensitivity to protect human and environmental health have to be applied for viticulture which is of great importance in terms of human diet. Sustainable viticulture includes human and environment friendly production systems. It is seen that biostimulants, in other words bioactivators, are used within the scope of scientific researches and in viticulture applications in sustainable viticulture in the world. Containing organic or inorganic compounds, microorganisms; biostimulants are applicable to leaves, soil or seeds; positively affect plant growth, yield, nutrition, and product quality. It has been determined by various studies that biostimulants increase the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stress conditions and also regulates the soil structure. Biostimulants have been classified by some researchers as humic substances, amino acids and other nitrogenous compounds, seaweed and plant extracts, chitin and chitosan-like polymers, inorganic compounds, beneficial fungi and beneficial bacteria, waste, exudates and extracts of seeds, leaves and roots. Biostimulants have an important place within the scope of sustainable viticulture in areas such as protection of natural resources, especially soil and water, combating erosion and forest fires, ensuring biological diversity, and integrated pest management. The need to increase soil and plant productivity, to create ecological balance, and most importantly to protect the health of humans and other living things, is better seen each day. This need for a sustainable life and healthy continuity of future generations leads scientists and producers to friendly applications such as biostimulants.

Keywords

• Viticulture
• sustainable production
• biostimulants

References

1. Ahmad R, Lim CJ, Kwon SY, 2013. Glycine betaine: a versatile compound with great potential for gene pyramiding to improve crop plant performance against environmental stresses. Plant Biotechnol Report, 7: 49-57.
2. Anonymous, 2019a. https://www.agbiologic.com/products/biological-biostimulants-101/ erişim tarihi: 22.07.2019.
3. Anonymous, 2019b. https://www.eokultv.com/inorganik-bilesenler/9399. erişim tarihi: 10.12.2019.
4. Anonymous, 2019c. https://www.dunya.com/surdurulebilir-dunya/doganin-interneti-mantar-haberi-347891 erişim tarihi: 10.12.2019.
5. Anonymous, 2020a. http://apelasyon.com/Yazi/380-tarimda-surdurulebilirlik erişim tarihi: 23.05.2020.
6. Anonymous, 2020b. https://www.sorhocam.com/etiket.asp?sid=3204&humik-maddeler/ erişim tarihi: 01.05.2020.
7. Anonymous, 2020c. https://insapedia.com/humik-madde-nedir-humik-asit-nedir/ erişim tarihi: 01.05.2020
8. Anonymous, 2020d. https://webders.net/478/canlilarin-yapisinda-bulunan-inorganik-bilesikler.html erişim tarihi: 21.05.2020.

9. Ashraf M, Foolad MR, 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59(2): 206–216.
10. Bekar T 2016. Bağcılıkta atık teknolojisi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(1): 17-24.
11. Bulgari R, Franzoni G, Ferrante A, 2019. Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy, 9(6): 306.
12. Cangi, R., Tarakcioglu, C., & Yasar, H. (2006). Effect of humic acid applications on yield, FruitCharacteristics and nutrient uptake in Ercis grape (V. vinifera L.) cultivar. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 18(2), 1493.
13. Craigie JS, 2011. Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. Journal of Applied Phycology, 23(3): 371–393.
14. Çakmaçı R, 2005. Bitki Gelişimini Teşvik Eden Rizobakterilerin Tarımda Kullanımı. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 36 (1): 97-107, 2005 ISSN 1300-9036.
15. Dagostin S, Schärer, HJ, Pertot I, Tamm L, 2011. Are there alternatives to copper for controlling grapevine downy mildew in organic viticulture?. Crop Protection, 30(7): 776-788.
16. Dos Reis, SP, Lima AM, de Souza CRB, 2012. Recent molecular advances on downstream plant responses to abiotic stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13(7): 8628–8647.
17. Du Jardin P, 2015. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae 196: 3–14.
18. Du Jardin P, 2015. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scienta Horticulturae (Amst.), 196: 3–1.
19. Ersayar L, 2017. Tuz Stresi Altındaki Bazı Üzüm Çeşitlerine Ait Çeliklerde Hümik Asit Uygulamalarının Etkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Van.
20. Ertani A, Cavani L, Pizzeghello D, 2009. Biostimulant activity of two protein hydrolyzates in the growth and nitrogen metabolism of maize seedlings. Journal of plant nutrition and soil science, 172(2): 237–244.
21. Forde BG, Lea PJ, 2007. Glutamate in plants: metabolism, regulation, and signalling. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(9): 2339–2358.
22. Gazioglu Sensoy Rİ, Yılmaz Y, Bas EÖ, Akkopru A, 2019. Bitki Gelişimini Teşvik Eden Bakterilerin Sürdürülebilir Bağcılıkta Kullanım Olanakları. ISPEC III. Uluslararası Tarım Hayvancılık ve Kırsal Kalkınma Kongresi. 798-811.
23. Gutiérrez-Gamboa G, Garde-Cerdán T, Souza-Da Costa B, Moreno-Simunovic Y, 2018. Strategies for the improvement of fruit set in Vitis vinifera L. cv.‘Carménère’through different foliar biostimulants in two different locations. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola, 33(2): 177-183.
24. Guneş N, 2015. Organik Bağcılıkta Syrah Üzüm Çeşidi Fidanlarına Farklı Dozlarda Uygulanan Trichoderma Harzianum ve Bacillus Subtilis'in Tutma ve Gelişme Üzerine Etkileri (Master's thesis, Namık Kemal Üniversitesi).
25. Hadwiger LA, 2013. Multiple effects of chitosan on plant systems: Solid science orhype. Plant Science, 208, 42–49.
26. Iriti M, Picchi V, Rossoni M, Gomarasca Ludwig, N, Gargano M, Faoro F, 2009. Chitosan antitranspirant activity is due to abscisic acid-dependentstomatal closure. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 66(3): 493–500.
27. Katiyar Hemantaranjan A, Singh B, 2015. Chitosan as a promising natural compound to enhance potential physiological responses in plant: a review Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 20: 1–9.
28. Kavak O, 2006. Aşılı Köklü ve Tüplü Asma Fidanı Üretiminde Fidan Kalite Özelliklerine Mikoriza ve Humik Asit Uygulamalarının Etkileri (Doctoral dissertation, Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
29. Khan W, Hiltz D, Critchley AT, Prithiviraj B, 2011a. Bioassay to detect Ascophyllum nodosum extract-induced cytokinin-like activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Applied Phycology, 23(3): 409–414.
30. Khan W, Rayirath UP, Subramanian S, 2009. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. Journal Plant Growth Regul 28: 386–399.
31. Khan ZH, Kahn MA, Aftab T, Idrees M, Naeem M. (2011b) Influence of alginate oligosaccharides on growth, yield and alkaloid production of opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.). Front Agriculture China 5: 122–127.
32. Korkutal I, Bahar E, Gunes N, 2017. Different Doses Effects of Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus subtilis on cv. Syrah: I. Young Plants Performance During Growing Period in Organic Viticulture. 2nd International Balkan Agriculture Congress, Congress Book: 650-657, 16-18 May 2017, Tekirdag.
33. Korkutal I, Bahar E, Teksoz Ozakin T, 2020. Applying Mycorrhizas by Different Methods on Grafted Rooted Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) Sapling Performance and Growth Characteristics. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 33(2): 149-157.
34. Kuwada K, Ishii T, Matsushita I, Matsumoto I, Kadoya K, 1999. Effect of seaweed extracts on hyphal growth of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their infectivity on trifoliate orange roots. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 68: 321–326.
35. Külahtaş B, Çokuysal B, 2016. Biyostimulantların Sınıflandırılması ve Türkiye’deki Durumu. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 31(3), 185-200.
36. Lachhab N, Sanzani SM, Adrian M, Chiltz , Balacey S, Boselli M, Poinssot B, 2014. Soybean and casein hydrolysates induce grapevine immune responses and resistance against Plasmopara viticola. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 716.
37. López-Bucio J, Pelagio-Flores R, Herrera-Estrella A, 2015. Trichoderma as biostimulant: exploiting the multilevel properties of a plant beneficial fungus. Scientia Horticulturae, 196, 109-123.
38. Lucini L, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Canaguier R, Kumar P, Colla G, 2015. The effect of a plant-derived biostimulant on metabolic profiling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 182: 124-133.
39. Mancuso S, Azzarello E, Mugnai S, Briand X, 2006. Marine bioactive substances (IPA extract) improve foliar ion uptake and water stress tolerance in potted Vitis vinifera plants. Advances in Horticultural Science, 20: 156 161.
40. Milton RF, 1964. Liquid seaweed as a fertilizer. In Proc Int Seaweed Symp (Vol. 4, pp. 428-431).
41. Morard P, Eyheraguibel B, Morard M, Silvestre J, 2011. Direct effects of humiclike substance on growth, water, and mineral nutrition of various species. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 34(1): 46–59.
42. Parrado J, Bautista J, Romero EJ, García-Martínez AM, Friaza V, Tejada M, 2008. Production of A Carob Enzymatic Extract: Potential Use As A Biofertilizer. Bioresource Technology, 99(7): 2312-2318.
43. Piccolo A, Spiteller M, 2003. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of terrestrial humic substances and their size fractions. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 377(6): 1047–1059.
44. Polat, A. (2006). So4 anacı üzerine aşılı syrah asma fidanlarının büyüme ve gelişmesi üzerine biyouyarıcıların etkileri/The effects of biostimulans on growth and development of syrah vine saplings grafted on so4 rootstock (Doctoral dissertation).
45. Popescu GC, Popescu M, 2018. Yield, berry quality and physiological response of grapevine to foliar humic acid application. Bragantia, 77(2): 273-282.
46. Povero G, Mejia JF, Di Tommaso D, Piaggesi A, Warrior PA, 2016. Systematic Approach to Discover and Characterize Natural Plant Biostimulants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 435.
47. Pretorius JC, 2013. Extracts and compounds from “Agapanthus africanus” and their use as biological plant protecting agents. U.S. Patent No. 8,435,571. 7 May 2013.
48. Rayorath P, Jithesh MN, Farid A, Khan W, Palanisamy R, Hankins SD, Critchley AT, Prithiviraj B, 2008. Rapid bioassays to evaluate the plant growth promoting activity of Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. using a model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Journal of Applied Phycology, 20(4): 423-429.
49. Rouphael Colla G, 2018. Synergistic Biostimulatory Action: Designing the Next Generation of Plant Biostimulants for Sustainable Agriculture. Frontiers Plant Science, 9: 1655.
50. Ryan MH, Norton RM, Kirkegaard JA, McCormick KM, Knights SE, Angus JF, 2002. Increasing mycorrhizal colonisation does not improve growth and nutrition of wheat on Vertosols in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 53(10): 1173-1181.
51. Salvi L, Cataldo E, Secco S, Mattii GB, 2015, November. Use of natural biostimulants to improve the quality of grapevine production: first results. In II World Congress on the Use of Biostimulants in Agriculture 1148 (pp. 77-84).
52. Sánchez-Gómez R, Zalacain A, Pardo F, Alonso GL, Salinas MR, 2016. An innovative use of vine-shoots residues and their “feedback” effect on wine quality. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 37: 18-26.
53. Sharma SS, Dietz KJ, 2006. The significance of amino acids and amino acid-derived molecules in plant responses and adaptation to heavy metal stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57(4): 711-726.
54. Traon D, Amat L, Zotz F, du Jardin PA, 2014. Legal Framework for Plant Biostimulants and Agronomic Fertiliser Additives in the EU; Report for the European Commission; Enterprise & Industry Directorate-General: Brussels, Belgium, p. 133.
55. Turhan Ş, 2005. Tarimda sürdürülebilirlik ve organik tarim. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 11: (1 ve 2), 13-24.
56. Ugolini L, Cinti S, Righetti L, Stefan A, Matteo R, D’Avino L, Lazzeri L, 2015. Production of an enzymatic protein hydrolyzate from defatted sunflower seed meal for potential application as a plant biostimulant. Industrial Crops and Products, 75: 15-23.
57. Vessey JK, 2003. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria as Biofertilizers. Plant Soil, 255: 571–586.
58. Watson R, Fowden L, 1975. The uptake of phenylalanine and tyrosine by seedling root tips. Phytochemistry, 14: 1181–1186.
59. Yakhin IA, Ibragimov RI, Yakhin OI, Isaev RF, Vakhitov VA, 1998. The induced effect of biopreparation stifun on the accumulation of trypsin inhibitörs in potato tubers during storage. Russıan Agrıcultural Scıences, 4: 12–13.
60. Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA., Yakhin IA, Brown PH, 2017. Biostimulants in plant science: a global perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 2049.
61. Yarsan E, Cevik A, (2007). Vektör mücadelesinde biyopestisitler. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, 64(1): 61-70.
62. Yasmeen A, Nouman W, Basra, SMA, Wahid A, Rehman H, Hussain N, Afzal I, 2014. Morphological and physiological response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to natural and synthetic cytokinin sources: a comparative study. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 36(12): 3147-3155.
63. Yilmaz, Y, 2017. Bitki Gelişimini Teşvik Eden Kök Bakterilerinin (Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria) Bazı Standart ve Hibrit Domates (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) Çeşitlerinde Tuz Stresindeki Etkilerinin Araştırılması. Yüksek lisans tezi (basılmamış), Y.Y.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstititüsü, Van.