Research Article

Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English

Volume: 14 Number: 4 December 15, 2018
EN

Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.

Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English

There is controversy in the literature on language acquisition concerning whether L2 learners develop separate systems for the two languages or they construct a unitary system for both (i.e. interlanguage). Here we investigate whether Voice Onset Time (VOT) can provide evidence supporting one of the two perspectives mentioned. To assess the research question, we asked 16 Turkish speakers of English to produce 30 words (both in Turkish and in English) starting with oral plosives in a prevocalic word-initial position. 8 native speakers of English also produced the same English words to provide us with English VOT norms. A comparison of mean VOT values revealed that Turkish speakers of English produce English /b, d, g/ with VOT values that are intermediate to the short-lag phonetic norm of English and the pre-voiced VOT norm of Turkish. We consider this an indication of the development of interlanguage VOT patterns.

Information about Author(s)*

Author 1

Author (Last name, First name)

 Kılıç, Mehmet

Affiliated institution (University)

 Gaziantep University

Country

 Turkey

Email address

 mehmet416@gmail.com

Department & Rank

 English Language Teaching

Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Write only one corresponding author.

 Yes

Author 2

Author (Last name, First name)

 

Affiliated institution (University)

 

Country

 

Email address

 

Department & Rank

 

Corresponding author (Yes/No)

 

Author 3

Author (Last name, First name)

 

Affiliated institution (University)

 

Country

 

Email address

 

Department & Rank

 

Corresponding author (Yes/No)

 

Author 4

Author (Last name, First name)

 

Affiliated institution (University)

 

Country

 

Email address

 

Department & Rank

 

Corresponding author (Yes/No)

 

 

Keywords

References

  1. Arslan, L. M., & Hansen, J. H. (1996). Language accent classification in American English. Speech Communication, 18(4), 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(96)00024-6
  2. Arslan, L. M., & Hansen, J. H. (1997). A study of temporal features and frequency characteristics in American English foreign accent. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.419608
  3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.37.
  4. Bright, J. A., & McGregor, G. P. (1970). Teaching English as a second language: Theory and techniques for the secondary stage. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.
  5. Caramazza, A., Yeni‐Komshian, G. H., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French‐English bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(2), 421-428. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1913594
  6. Caruso, A. J., & Burton, E. K. (1987). Temporal acoustic measures of dysarthria associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 30(1), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3001.80
  7. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner's errors. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
  8. Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00234.x

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 15, 2018

Submission Date

November 12, 2018

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 14 Number: 4

APA
Kılıç, M. (2018). Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 272-284. https://izlik.org/JA28EG36BZ
AMA
1.Kılıç M. Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2018;14(4):272-284. https://izlik.org/JA28EG36BZ
Chicago
Kılıç, Mehmet. 2018. “Voice Onset Time As an Indicator of Interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-Accented English”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 14 (4): 272-84. https://izlik.org/JA28EG36BZ.
EndNote
Kılıç M (December 1, 2018) Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 14 4 272–284.
IEEE
[1]M. Kılıç, “Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English”, Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 272–284, Dec. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA28EG36BZ
ISNAD
Kılıç, Mehmet. “Voice Onset Time As an Indicator of Interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-Accented English”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 14/4 (December 1, 2018): 272-284. https://izlik.org/JA28EG36BZ.
JAMA
1.Kılıç M. Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2018;14:272–284.
MLA
Kılıç, Mehmet. “Voice Onset Time As an Indicator of Interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-Accented English”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, vol. 14, no. 4, Dec. 2018, pp. 272-84, https://izlik.org/JA28EG36BZ.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Kılıç. Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 1;14(4):272-84. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA28EG36BZ