Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English
Abstract
|
Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt. |
|
Voice onset time as an indicator of interlanguage: Evidence from Turkish-accented English
|
|
|
There is controversy in the literature on language acquisition concerning whether L2 learners develop separate systems for the two languages or they construct a unitary system for both (i.e. interlanguage). Here we investigate whether Voice Onset Time (VOT) can provide evidence supporting one of the two perspectives mentioned. To assess the research question, we asked 16 Turkish speakers of English to produce 30 words (both in Turkish and in English) starting with oral plosives in a prevocalic word-initial position. 8 native speakers of English also produced the same English words to provide us with English VOT norms. A comparison of mean VOT values revealed that Turkish speakers of English produce English /b, d, g/ with VOT values that are intermediate to the short-lag phonetic norm of English and the pre-voiced VOT norm of Turkish. We consider this an indication of the development of interlanguage VOT patterns. |
|
|
Information about Author(s)*
|
|
|
Author 1
|
|
|
Author (Last name, First name) |
Kılıç, Mehmet |
|
Affiliated institution (University) |
Gaziantep University |
|
Country |
Turkey |
|
Email address |
mehmet416@gmail.com |
Department & Rank |
English Language Teaching |
|
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.
|
Yes |
|
Author 2
|
|
|
Author (Last name, First name) |
|
|
Affiliated institution (University) |
|
|
Country |
|
|
Email address |
|
|
Department & Rank |
|
|
Corresponding author (Yes/No) |
|
|
Author 3
|
|
|
Author (Last name, First name) |
|
|
Affiliated institution (University) |
|
|
Country |
|
|
Email address |
|
|
Department & Rank |
|
|
Corresponding author (Yes/No) |
|
|
Author 4
|
|
|
Author (Last name, First name) |
|
|
Affiliated institution (University) |
|
|
Country |
|
|
Email address |
|
|
Department & Rank |
|
|
Corresponding author (Yes/No) |
|
|
|
|
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Arslan, L. M., & Hansen, J. H. (1996). Language accent classification in American English. Speech Communication, 18(4), 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(96)00024-6
- Arslan, L. M., & Hansen, J. H. (1997). A study of temporal features and frequency characteristics in American English foreign accent. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.419608
- Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.37.
- Bright, J. A., & McGregor, G. P. (1970). Teaching English as a second language: Theory and techniques for the secondary stage. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.
- Caramazza, A., Yeni‐Komshian, G. H., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French‐English bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(2), 421-428. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1913594
- Caruso, A. J., & Burton, E. K. (1987). Temporal acoustic measures of dysarthria associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 30(1), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3001.80
- Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner's errors. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
- Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00234.x
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
15 Aralık 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi
12 Kasım 2018
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2018 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4