Examination on the use of emoticon technique as a communication tool for narrative skills

Year 2019, , 470 - 483, 01.07.2019

Hülya Sönmez

https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.586137

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
Examination on the use of emoticon technique as a communication tool for narrative skills
The aim of this study is to examine how critically and creatively the students express their feelings and thoughts by using emoticons. In the first part, how the students expressed what they read by using emoticons was examined. In order to assess their skills for reading comprehension and the skills for expressing what they understood through emoticons, an achievement test was applied. The second part was reserved for the case study. The case analysis processes (items) were designed based on the case. In the end of the pilot application, both the achievement test and the case analysis processes (items) of the case were reviewed and completed. In actual application the findings suggested that the students were able to comprehend what they read and express their emotions and ideas in a certain context in a critical and creative way by using emoticons. Based on this finding, it has been suggested that emoticons used in many parts of the world should take place consciously in education.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Sönmez, Hülya
Affiliated institution (University)	Muş Alparslan University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.	Yes
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Keywords

Communication tool; students; emoticons; technique

References

• Bruner, J.S. (1973). Organization of early skilled action. Child Development, 44, 1-11.
• Churches O, Nicholls M., Thiessen M., Kohler M. and Keage H. (2014). Emoticons in mind: an event-related potential study. Social Neuroscience, 9 (2), 196–202.
• Creswell, J.W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni (Mesut Bütün ve Selçuk Beşir Demir Çev. Edt.). Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.
• Ganster T., Eimler S. C. and Kra¨Mer, N. C. (2012). Same but different!? the differential influence of smilies and emoticons on person perception. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15 (4), 226-231.
• Gürçayır, S. (2009). “İnternet çağının hiyeroglifleri” ya da evrenselleşen sanal bedenler: msn ifadeleri. Millî Folklor, 83, 111-15.
• Halvorsen. A. (2000). Patterns of emoticon usage in ESL students’ discussion forum writing. Calico Journal, 29(4), 694-717.
• Huang, A. H, Yen, D. C. and Zhang, X. (2008). Exploring the potential effects of emoticons. Information & Management, 45, 466–473.
• Hudson, M., Sylis N., Howser M., Lipsett K., Robinson, W. Pope L. J, Hobby, A. F. and Friedman, D. R. (2015). Examining how gender and emoticons influence facebook jealousy. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(2), 87-92.
• Locke, T. and Daly, N. (2007). The place of politeness ın asynchronous online discussion. Internatıonal Journal of Learning. 13(12), 121-134.
• Oto, S., Pelit, A. and Aydın, P. (2002). Non-concordance in amblyopia treatment: the effective use of ‘smileys’. Strabismus, 10(1) 23–30.
• Siegel, R. M. Anneken, A., Duffy C., Simmons K., Hudgens M., Lockhart, M. and Shelly, J. (2015). Emoticon use increases plain milk and vegetable purchase in a school cafeteria without adversely affecting total milk purchase. Clinical Therapeutics, 37(9), 1938-1943.
• Skovholt, K. and Kankaanranta, A. (2014).The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails: :). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 780–797.
• Vısser, N., Alant, E. and Harty, M. (2008). Which graphic symbols do 4-year-old children choose to represent each of the four basic emotions? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24 (4), 302–312.
• Weiquan, W., Zhao, Z. Y. and Lingyun, Y. Q. (2014). Effects of emoticons on the acceptance of negative feedback in computer mediated communication. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(8), 454-483.
• Wolf, A. (2000). Emotional expression online: gender differences in emoticon use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, (3), 5.