The
author uploads his / her manuscript to the journal by taking into consideration
the guideline. Each submitted manuscript is first reviewed by the technical
evaluation team. The manuscript that is suitable for evaluation is reviewed by
the editor after being checked for plagiarism. After reviewing the manuscript,
the editor may reject the work, request revision, or proceed to the peer review
process. In the peer review process, a field editor can be assigned as managing
editor, or the editor can manage the process itself. In the reviewer evaluation
process, the two reviewers are assigned to receive their opinions. Information
such as authors names or institutions of authors is not shared with these
reviewer. The opinions of the reviewers is purely to help the editor decide. The
opinion of the reviewers does not ensure that the manuscript is published or
not. The managing editor may take the opinion of more than two reviewers if he
considers it necessary. In accordance with the opinions of the reviewers, the managing
editor may accept the work, request revision or reject it. Accepted studies are
reviewed by the language editors to determine whether proofreading is required.
If proofreading is not required, the manuscript is sent directly to the content
editor to start the publishing phase. If proofreading is required, the author
provides proofreading and manuscript is then sent to the content editor.
All the contents of this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License (From September 2022) and available as full open access.
© Copyrights of all contents published in this journal are retained by their authors, but the journal (JOMAT) retains the exclusive right of first publication and dissemination.