Peer review evaluation process


The author uploads his / her manuscript to the journal by taking into consideration the guideline. Each submitted manuscript is first reviewed by the technical evaluation team. The manuscript that is suitable for evaluation is reviewed by the editor after being checked for plagiarism. After reviewing the manuscript, the editor may reject the work, request revision, or proceed to the peer review process. In the peer review process, a field editor can be assigned as managing editor, or the editor can manage the process itself. In the reviewer evaluation process, the two reviewers are assigned to receive their opinions. Information such as authors names or institutions of authors is not shared with these reviewer. The opinions of the reviewers is purely to help the editor decide. The opinion of the reviewers does not ensure that the manuscript is published or not. The managing editor may take the opinion of more than two reviewers if he considers it necessary. In accordance with the opinions of the reviewers, the managing editor may accept the work, request revision or reject it. Accepted studies are reviewed by the language editors to determine whether proofreading is required. If proofreading is not required, the manuscript is sent directly to the content editor to start the publishing phase. If proofreading is required, the author provides proofreading and manuscript is then sent to the content editor.