RESEARCH ABOUT VISITOR PERCEPTIONS OF ÇANAKKALE MARTYRS’ MEMORIAL

Abstract

The Martyrs’ Memorial and historical area, located within the boundaries of Çanakkale province and scene of historically important events, is important for all time with significant domestic and foreign visitor potential from Turkey and many other countries. Due to visitor numbers reaching significant amounts, especially in the summer months, the necessity to renovate, develop and ensure sustainability of landscaping infrastructure and furnishings was revealed in line with visitor perceptions. The study applied face-to-face surveys to 100 individuals over the age of 18 years visiting the area. Data obtained from the survey were evaluated with linear regression analysis in the SPSS 15.0 statistical program. The results of the analysis found an R2 value of 0.516, showing that the independent variables of “open and enclosed viewing terraces, car park, furnishings (like pergolas, seating groups, waste bins, digital information panels) and planting” explained 52% of the variation in the dependent variable of “satisfaction rate”. With the ANOVA test, the “p” value of “0.000” was found, indicating that the regression model was significant for the whole study. The VIF value was 3 and above showing no correlations between independent variables and emphasizing that four variables should remain in the model (open and enclosed viewing terraces, furnishings, car park). In conclusion, in line with visitor perceptions, the necessity to include landscaping in the area especially the role of planting as shade and windbreaks, car park, furnishings like pergola, waste bins, digital information panels and seating groups, and open and enclosed viewing terraces was determined. Applications of these appropriate to the day’s conditions and visitor requirements will contribute to visitor satisfaction.

Keywords

• Çanakkale,planning,Martyrs’ Memorial,visitor perceptions

References

1. AKPINAR, A., 2019. Kentsel Yeşil Alanların Kalitesinin İnsan Sağlığı ve Fiziksel Aktivitesi Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi, Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, ISSN:2146-1880, e-ISSN: 2146-698X, Yil: 2019, Cilt: 20, Sayi:1, Sayfa:36-46.
2. ALKAN, Y., UZUN, G., 2016. Erdemli Kenti Mücavir Alanı İçinde Ekolojik Kapsamlı Alan Kullanımı Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 5(1):35-50 (2016) Araştırma Issn: 2147-6403, 2016.
3. CHENG, E.H.P., PATTERSON, I., PACKER, J. AND PEGG, S., 2010. Identifying The Satisfactions Derived from Leisure Gardening By Older Adults, Annals of Leisure Research, 2010, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 395-419.
4. ÇUKURÇAYIR, M. A., 2002. Siyasal Katılma ve Yerel Demokrasi, Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi, 99.
5. DOĞAN, M., CEYLAN, Y., TEKIN, C., 2015. Turistik Bir Destinasyon Olarak Hasankeyf’in Ziyaretçi Tatmini Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi Cilt 7, Sayı 1, 2015 ISSN: 1309 -8039 (Online).
6. ERTEN, S., GÜNDÜZ, S., 2011. Peyzaj Planlama ve Kentsel Tasarımda Koruma-Kullanma İçin Yeni Bir Sistem Yaklaşımı Önerisi: Uludağ Milli Parkı ve “Rejenerasyon”, MEGARON Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi E-Dergi 2011;6(2):109-122.
7. GÖÇER, Ö., TORUN, A.Ö., BAKOVIÇ, M., 2018. Thermal Comfort, Behavioral Mapping and Space Syntax Analysis Of Outdoor Spaces in a Suburban Campus, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 33:3 (2018) 853-873, 2018.
8. JIM, C.Y., 2004. Green-space Preservation and Allocation for Sustainable Greening of Compact Cities. Cities, 21(4): 311-320, 2004.

9. KELKIT, A., 2003. Environmental Problems of Canakkale City and Solutions, Vol.19, Issue 1 > DOI: 10.1504/IJEP.2003.003305.
10. KÜLEKÇI, E.A., IRMAK, M.A., 2019. Kent Parklarında Kullanılan Donatı Elemanlarının Estetik ve Fonksiyonel Açıdan Yeterlilikleri; Erzurum Kenti Örneği. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 9(2): 1144-1155, 2019.
11. ÖZDEMIR, A., 2019. Katılımcı Planlama İçin Yöntem Yaklaşımı: Sakarya Mahallesi Parkı Örneği, Denizli-Türkiye, Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, ISSN: 2146-0574, eISSN: 2536-4618, 9(1): 233-243, 2019.
12. ÖZDEMIR, A., VURAL, B.K., 2015. Yaşlıların Doğa/Bahçe Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Denizli Örneği, İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi İnönü University Journal of Art And Design, Issn: 1309-9876, E-Issn: 1309-9884 Cilt/Vol. 5 Sayı/No.11 (2015): 65-77.
13. SAĞLIK, A., ALKAN, Y., KELKIT, A., 2016. Devecioğlu, N.E., Sağlık, E., 2016. Meydanların Kent Kimliği Üzerine Etkileri: Çanakkale İskele Meydanı”, Uluslararası Hakemli Tasarım ve Mimarlık Dergisi, (7): 1-12, 2016.
14. SHERMAN, S.A., CUSKEY, M.C., SHEPLEY, M. and VAMI, J.W., 2005. Children’s Environments and Health- Related Quality of Life: Evidence informing Pediatric Healthcare Environmental Design. Children. Youth and Environments, 2005, 15(1): 186-223.
15. WILLIS, K.G., TURNER, R.K., BATEMAN, I.J., 2001. Urban Planning and Management. Edward Elgar Publishing, New York, 2001.
16. YILMAZ, T., OLGUN, R., ŞAVKLI, F. 2016. Yaşlı Bireylerin Park Kullanım Tercihleri Üzerine Bir Çalışma İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, ISSN: 1309-9876, Cilt/Vol.6 Sayı/No.14 (2016): 1-10.