JSTER PUBLICATION POLICY
Journal of Science, Technology and Engineering Research (JSTER); It is an open access, online, peer-reviewed academic journal .
Article Evaluation
All works sent to be published are sent to two or three referees who are experts in their fields for evaluation. After the review process that resulted with at least 2 referees sending a positive response, the editor decides whether the work will be published, taking into account the accuracy and importance of the work in question, the referee reports, legal regulations such as copyright infringement and plagiarism. In the event that one of the referees reports negatively, the article is sent to a third referee and a publication decision is made in line with the third referee's response. The editor may need the advice of other editors or referees when deciding on the work. The normal article process is aimed to be completed in 60 days.
Articles with the name of the editor and the field editor are assigned to an editor/field editor other than these names. The blind peer-review process for these articles is continued in the same way. The editor/field editor, whose name is included as the author, does not participate in the evaluation process of these articles, the evaluation process is carried out independently.
Correction
In addition to the normal article evaluation process, 30 days for minor revisions; In the case of extensive revisions, a maximum of 60 days is added, and in articles that require a wide revision by more than one referee, a maximum of 90 days is added.
Article Withdrawal (Author):
Pursuant to the JSTER publishing policy, author cooperation with the editor of the journal should be ensured in withdrawals.
The author (s) who wish to withdraw their work during the evaluation phase, must submit the petition containing the reason for the withdrawal to the editorial board in a wet signature, stating that they have the consent of all authors. The editorial board must return to the author within ten days at the latest by reviewing this request. Since the publishing rights have been transferred to the JSTER by the author (s) at the time of article submission, the article cannot be submitted for evaluation to another journal, unless the study's withdrawal request is approved.
Withdrawal of Published Article (Editors):
If the JSTER Editorial Board detects copyright infringement and plagiarism in a published or early-view work, it will take the following withdrawal and notification procedures within 15 days at the latest. The work in which ethical violations are detected;
1. The phrase “Withdrawn:” is added at the beginning of the title in the electronic display.
2. Instead of the Abstract and Full Text contents in the electronic display, the reasons for the withdrawal of the study and, if there are detailed sources of evidence, are published together with the notifications of the institutions and organizations to which the author(s) are affiliated.
3. Notice of withdrawal is announced on the home page of the journal website.
4. The electronic and hard copy of the first issue to be published as of the date of withdrawal is added to the list of contents as “Withdrawn: Working Title”, the reasons for the withdrawal and the original citations cited as the source are shared with the public and researchers, starting from the first page.
JSTER ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
JSTER Journal; Being aware of the fact that information should be easily accessible in order to advance scientific studies, the refereed journal literature in the Budapest Open Access Declaration supports the initiative of open access and presents all published articles free of charge in an environment that everyone can read and download. These open access policies adopted by our editorial board, adopted on September 12, 2012, can be accessed at http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-translations/turkish-translation.
Refereed articles are studies that ensure the application of the scientific method and impartiality. Publishing an article in a refereed journal is an important building block in developing a consistent and respected information network. It is a direct reflection of the quality of work of the author and the institutions that support them. Refereed articles support and embody the scientific method.
All parts of the publishing process in the realization of scientific production; publishers, editors, authors, reviewers and readers must comply with ethical principles. In this context, the publication ethics of Ankara University Faculty of Education Journal and the open access policy are also in line with the guidelines and policies published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in open access (For example, the Code of Ethics (COPE) Code of Conduct and The Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors; “Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors” and “COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors” require that all components of the publishing process comply with ethical principles.
Therefore, it is expected from all stakeholders to provide expected ethical standards of ethics. Ethical issues to be considered in publishing:
Article Authors' Ethical Responsibilities:
• The author of the article: Authorship should be limited to those who make significant contributions to the design, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported work. Transparency about the contributions of the authors is documented by the Copyright and Author Agreement..
• Originality and plagiarism: Authors should ensure that they write entirely original works, and when the authors use others' works and / or words, this is properly quoted or quoted.
• Data access and retention: Authors may be asked to provide raw data associated with an article for editorial review and must be ready to provide access to such data.
• Multiple, unnecessary or simultaneous broadcasts: An author should generally not publish articles describing the same research in more than one journal or primary publication.
• Sources approval: Appropriate approval of the work of others should always be given.
• Disclosure and conflicts of interest: All applications should include disclosure of all relationships that could be viewed as a potential conflict of interest.
• Basic mistakes in published works: When an author finds a significant error or mistake in his own work, he is obliged to notify the journal editor or publisher immediately and contact the editor to withdraw or correct the article.
• Human or animal rights: To ensure compliance with national and international laws and guidelines for all studies involving human or animal subjects (for example, WMA Helsinki Declaration, NIH Laboratory Animal Policy, EU Directive on Animal Use), to confirm that the necessary approvals have been obtained. respect. To specify the relevant ethics committee approvals and research details regarding his work in the “Materials and Methods” section of the study.
Ethical Responsibilities of Referees
• To contribute to the editor's decision making process, review the article objectively in time and agree to evaluate only the studies related to his area of expertise.
• To make the assessment objectively only in relation to the content of the study. To evaluate the work without considering religious, political and economic interests.
• Providing guidance to help improve the quality of the article to be published and scrutinizing the study. Communicating your comments to the author in a constructive and kind language.
• To protect the confidentiality of the information provided by the editor and the author, to destroy the study he / she examined in accordance with the principle of confidentiality after the evaluation process, to inform the editor if there is a situation against the blind peer review and not to evaluate the study.
• Be aware of potential conflicts of interest (financial, institutional, collaborative, or other relationship between the author and the author), and warn the editor to retract their help for this article if necessary.
Editors' Ethical Duties and Responsibilities
• Acting in a balanced, objective and fair manner while performing their duties without discriminating on gender, religious or political beliefs, ethnic or geographical origins of the authors.
• To evaluate the works sent to the journal according to its content, not to privilege any author.
• To take necessary measures to prevent possible conflicts of interest and to evaluate existing statements, if any.
• To handle sponsored works or works on special topics in the same way as other works,
• In the event of an ethical complaint, to follow the journal's policies and procedures and to apply the necessary procedures. To give the authors an opportunity to respond to the complaint, not to refuse to apply the necessary sanctions regardless of who the study belongs to.
• If the journal does not comply with its purpose and scope, to refuse the work.