The Effect of the Universal Design Model in Learning on the Academic Success of Eighth Grade Students: The Subject of Heredity

Year 2024, Volume: 2024 Issue: 2, 264 - 280, 30.06.2024

Alev Rencüzoğulları , Tolga Saka

https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1382209

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of teaching the heredity subject with the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) on students' academic achievement towards science lesson. In addition, during the implementation of this teaching model, it was aimed to determine the effects of computer/tablet, internet availability at home and presence of helpers at home variables on the results. The study was conducted with 73 8th grade students of a public school in Kars in the 2021- 2022 academic year. In the study, two of the four classes were determined as the experimental group and two as the control group. While the lessons in the experimental group were taught according to the plans prepared within the framework of UDL, the control group was taught within the framework of the activities recommended in the curriculum. The data were collected with the 8th Grade Heredity Subject Achievement Test and the Personal Information Form prepared to determine the demographic characteristics of the students. Multi-Factor Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was used in the analysis of the quantitative data obtained in the study. When the pre-test and post-test scores of the students in the experimental and control groups were compared, it was seen that there was a significant difference in favor of the experimental group. As a result, it was determined that the course taught according to UDL increased the academic achievement of the students the science course, regardless of all these variables. The implementation of the UDL model by teachers in the design of inclusive practices for effective and efficient science education in rural areas is among the recommendations of this research.

Keywords

Universal Design for Learning, Science Education, Heredity

Ethical Statement

In this study, we declare that the rules stated in the "Higher Education Institutions Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive" are complied with and that we do not take any of the actions based on "Actions Against Scientific Research and Publication Ethics". At the same time, we declare that there is no conflict of interest between the authors, that all authors contribute to the study and that all the responsibility belongs to the article authors in case of all ethical violations. Ethical permissions were taken from Kafkas University Institute of Science, Kars, Turkiye dated 30/12/2021.

References

• Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer reviewed journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16 (3), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
• Alfaro, E. C. & Taylor, A. J. U. (2015). The longitudinal relation between academic support and Latino adolescents’ academic motivation. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciens, 37(3), 319-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986315586565
• Alpar, R. (2003). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemlere Giriş. Nobel Yayıncılık. Anderson, J. & Barnett, M. (2011). Using video games to support pre-service elementary teachers learning of basic physics principles, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(4), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9257-0
• Anderson, S. E., & Putman, R. S. (2020). Special education teachers’ experience, confidence, beliefs, and knowledge about integrating technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419836409
• Aydın, G. (2011). Öğrencilerin "Hücre Bölünmesi Ve Kalıtım" konularındaki kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesinde ve zihinsel modelleri üzerinde yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın etkisi [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
• Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Sutcliffe, R. G. (1999). Investigation of students' cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655653
• Balcı, C. (2015). 8. sınıf öğrencilerine" Hücre Bölünmesi ve Kalıtım" ünitesinin öğretilmesinde bilimsel argümantasyon temelli öğrenme sürecinin etkisi [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Aydın.
• Bodner, G. M. (1990). Why good teaching fails and hard-working students do not always succeed? Spectrum, 28(1), 27-32.
• Bowling, B. V., Acra, E. E., Wang, L., Myers, M. F., Dean, G. E., Markle, G. C., Moskalik, C. L., & Huether, C. A. (2008). Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates. Genetics, 178(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.079533
• Burgstahler, S. (2020). Equal access: Universal design of instruction. DO-It, Universty of Washington. Retrieved from https://slds.osu.edu/posts/documents/udi-checklist-do-it.pdf.
• Çakıcı, Y. (2010). Fen eğitiminde yapılandırmacı yaklaşım ve öğrencilerin kavram yanılgıları. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12 (1), 89-115.
• Çakır, C., and Sezgin-Memnun, D. (2019). Academic Studies on Social and Education Sciences. Dalkılıç, M. (Ed.), İlköğretim yedinci sınıf öğrencilerine daire ve daire diliminin alanı konusunun evrensel öğretim tasarım modeliyle öğretimine yönelik bir öneri içinde (s.s. 95-113). Gece Akademi.
• Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074
• CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org, (28.01.2022).
• CAST (2022). About Universal Design for Learning, https://www.cast.org/impact/universal-design-for-learning-udl, ( 26.01.2022).
• Çetin, O., & Günay, Y. (2010). Fen eğitiminde web tabanlı eğitimin akademik başarılarına ve tutumlarına etkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(38), 19-34.
• Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Cole, C. M., Waldron, N., & Majd, M. (2004). Academic progress of students across inclusive and traditional settings. Mental retardation, 42(2), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<136:APOSAI>2.0.CO;2
• Dell, A. G., Newton, D. A., and Petroff, J. G. (2016). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities (3rd Edition). Pearson.
• Dickinson, K. J. & Bass, B. L. (2020). A systematic review of educational mobile-applications (APPS) for surgery residents: Simulation and beyond. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(5), 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.022
• Dymond, S. K., Renzaglia, A., Rosenstein, A., Chun, E. J., Banks, R. A., Niswander, V., & Gilson, C. L. (2006). Using a participatory action research approach to create a universally designed inclusive high school science course: A case study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(4), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100403
• Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Ed.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 665-691). New York: Guilford Press. Eliason, C. & Jenkins, L. (2008). A practical guide to early childhood curriculum. Upper saddle river (8. Baskı). N. J.: Pearson Merrill / Prentice Hall.