A Review On The Possibility Of Privacy In Digital Societies

Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 38 - 58, 14.10.2022

Hasan Tutar , Ceren Güler Çağıltay

Abstract

Developments in the field of digital technologies, on the one hand, transform individual and social life, and on the other hand, transform the privacy understanding of individuals and societies. The ability to record, store and transmit images and sounds through digital technologies raises the issue of violation of privacy and narrows one's private space. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between surveillance, smart technologies, and privacy phenomena through factual data. The research was conducted based on the descriptive statistical method. In line with the research problem and basic question, the descriptive statistical method was preferred because it can access the universe parameters directly. The research analysis was based on secondary data obtained through various databases and open sources. The data has been examined in terms of trends, and the development of smart technologies that make societies surveillance societies over the years is given graphically. In this way, the possibility of considering privacy and surveillance society together has been critically examined. Research findings show that developed countries are also developed in terms of surveillance, and it is almost impossible to protect privacy in these societies.

Keywords

Digital society, privacy, smart devices, descriptive statistics, digital technology.

References

• Aïmeur, E., Gambs, S. ve Ho, A. (2010). Towards a Privacy-Enhanced Social Networking Site. 2010 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security içinde (ss. 172-179).
• Allen, D. S. (2008). The Trouble with Transparency: The Challenge of Doing Journalism Ethics in a Surveillance Society. Journalism Studies, 9(3), 323-340.
• Amitay, G.,&Rahav, G. (2020). The Map and the Territory: a Subversive Synopticon in an Alternative Educational Space. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 1-20.
• Baudrillard, Jean (2014). Simülakrlar ve Simülasyon, (Çev: Oğuz Adanır),Ankara: Doğu-Batı Yayınları.
• Bauman, Z. ve Lyon, D. (2018) Akışkan Gözetim, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları
• Bazhair, A. (2014). Factor Performance for ERP Systems Acceptance a Descriptive Statistical Analysis from Saudi Arabia Companies 2(9): 14–22
• Bennett, C. J. (2018). The European General Data Protection Regulation: An instrument for the Globalization of Privacy Standards?. Information Polity, 23(2), 239-246.
• Bentham J. (2008). Panoptikon - Gözün İktidarı,(Z. Özarslan ve B. Çoban çev.). İstanbul: Su Yayınevi.
• Berman, J. & Bruening, P. (2007). Is Privacy Still Possible in the Twenty-First Century? Social Research, 68(1), 306-318.
• Berkup, S. B. (2015). Sosyal Ağlarda Bireysel Mahremiyet Paylaşımı: X ve Y Kuşakları Arasında Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. Doktora tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir, Türkiye
• Boyd, D. ve Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook Privacy Settings: Who cares?. First Monday, 15(8).
• Bozkurt, V. (2014). Endüstriyel, Post Endüstriyel Dönüşüm, Bilgi, Ekonomi, Kültür, Bursa: Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
• Buchenscheit, A., Könings, B., Neubert, A., Schaub, F., Schneider, M., ve Kargl, F. (2014). Privacy Implications of
• Presence Sharing in Mobile Messaging Applications. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia içinde (ss. 20–29). New York, USA: ACM.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz Ş., Demirel, F. (2016) Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 20. Baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
• Castells M,. (2005). Enformasyon Çağı: Ekonomi, Toplum ve Kültür, Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi, Cilt 1. (Çev. Ebru Kılıç). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Cormack, A. (2019). See No…,Hear No…, Track No: Ethics and the Intelligent Campus. J. Inf. Rights Policy Pract, 41, 1-23.
• Çakır, M. (2015). İnternette Gösteri ve Gözetim: Eleştirel Bir Okuma, Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi.
• Çalık, D. & Toker, G. (2016). “Ekran Çağı İnsanı ve Dijital Toplum”, XXI. Yüzyılda Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı, 03-05 Kasım 2016, Ankara: TED Üniversitesi.
• Çaycı, A. E. ve Çaycı, B. (2017) Dijital İletişim Çağında Teknolojinin Açığa Çıkarttıkları: Gözetim ve Mahremiyet. The Turkish Online Journal of Desing, Art and Communication, 7(1), 36-46.
• Çaycı, B. ve Karagülle, A. E. (2014). X Kuşağından Z Kuşağına Değişen Mahremiyet Algısı. A. Z. Özgür, M. Barkan, A. İşman, E. Yolcu (Ed.), International Trends And Issues İn Communication & Media Conference (ss. 190–196). Dubai, UAE.
• De Laat, P. B. (2008). Online Diaries: Reflections on Trust, Privacy, and Exhibitionism. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(1), 57.
• Dinev, T., ve Hart, P. (2005). Internet Privacy Concerns and Social Awareness as Determinants of Intention to Transact. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 7-29.
• Dolgun, U. (2005). İşte Büyük Birader, İstanbul: Hayykitap Yayınları.
• El Saddik, A. (2018). Digital twins: The Convergence of Multimedia Technologies. IEEE Multimedia, 25(2), 87-92.
• Erdem, B. K. ve Kaya, M. (2019). Instagram’da Görülme ve Beğenilme Arzusu: Kullanıcı Bakış Açısından Değerlendirme, Uluslarası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(62), 1457-1464.
• Flanagan, V. (2014). Surveillance Societies: Privacy and Power in YA Fiction. In Technology and Identity in Young Adult Fiction, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Foucault, M. (1992). Hapishanenin Doğuşu,(Kılıçbay, M. çev.) Ankara: İmge Kitapevi.
• Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming For A New Human-Centered Society. Japan Spotlight, 27, 47-50
• Gandy Jr, O. H., (1989). The Surveillance Society: Information Technology and Bureaucratic Social Control. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 61-76
• Giddens,. A. (2010). Mahremiyetin Dönüşümü, (Çev.: G. Şahin) İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Giddens, A. (2005).Ulus Devlet ve Şiddet, (Atay, C. çev.), İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları
• Granrath, L. (2017). Japan's Society 5.0: Going Beyond Industry 4.0.
• https://www.japanindustrynews.com/2017/08/japans-society-5-0-going-beyondindustry-4-0/ 12.05.2022
• Grossberg, M. (1990). Some Queries About Privacy and Constitutional Rights. Case W. Res. L. Rev., 41, 857.
• Gücüyener, M. (2011). Panoptik Gözetimden Synoptisizme Gözetim Toplumu (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: Afyon.
• Güven, S. K. (2011). “Gözetimin Toplumsal Meşruiyeti”, Medya Mahrem.İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları
• Guetl, C., & Chang, V. (2008). Ecosystem-based Theoretical Models for Learning in Environments of the 21st Century. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 3(1), 50-60.
• Hall, J. A., Kearney, M. W., &Xing, C. (2019). Two Tests of Social Displacement Through Social Media use. Information, Communication&Society, 22(10), 1396-1413.
• Hughes-Roberts, T., ve Kani-Zabihi, E. (2014). Online Privacy Behavior: Using User Interfaces for Salient Factors. Journal of Computer and Communications, 02, 220.
• Kaya, C. (2011). Avrupa Birliği Veri Koruma Direktifi Ekseninde Hassas Veriler ve İşlenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası 69 (1), 317-334.
• Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy Attitudes and Privacy Behaviour: A Review of Current Research on the Privacy Paradox Phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122-134.
• Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance Technology and Surveillance Society. Modernity and Technology, 161-184.
• Martin, A. (2008). Digital Literacy And The "Digital Society." Digital literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices, 30, 151-176.
• Merriam-Webster. (2021). Technology. https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/technology
• Miltgen, C. L., ve Peyrat-Guillard, D. (2014). Cultural and Generational Influences on Privacy Concerns: A Qualitative Study in Seven European Countries. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 103-125.
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship. The Internet, society, and participation. The MIT Press.
• Orwell, G. (2004) Bin Dokuz Yüz Seksek Dört, (çev. Nuran Akgören) İstanbul: Can Yayınları.
• Ridley-Siegert, T. (2015). Data privacy: What the Consumer Really Thinks. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 17, 30-35.
• Rigel, N. (2005). Kadife Karanlık’ 21. Yüzyıl İletişim Çağını Aydınlatan Kuramcılar. İstanbul: Su Yayınevi, s.275 Pitkänen, O., ve Tuunainen, V. K. (2012). Disclosing Personal Data Socially An Empirical Study on Facebook Users’ Privacy Awareness. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 8(1), 3-29.
• Robins, K. (2013). İmaj: Görmenin Kültür ve Politikası, (Çev: Nurçay Türkoğlu), İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Robison, W. L. (2017). Digital Privacy: Leibniz 2.0. Orbıt Journal, 1(2), 1–9.
• Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication Technology: The New Media in Society, New York: The Free Press
• Saeri, A. K.,Ogilvie, C., La Macchia, S.T., Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Predicting Facebook Users' Online Privacy Protection: Risk, Trust, Norm Focus Theory, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154(4), 352–369.
• Salzmann-Erikson, M. and Erikson H.(2018). A Descriptive Statistical Analysis of Volume, Visibility, and Attitu Dersegarding Nursing and Care Robots in Social Media, Contemporary Nurse, Social Media, Technology and Communication54(1),
• Sartori, G. (2004). Görmenin İktidarı Homo Videns: Gören İnsan, (Çev: Gül Batuş ve Bahar Ulukan), İstanbul: Karakutu Yayınları
• Sennett, R. (2002). Kamusal İnsanın Çöküşü. (2 b.). (S. D. Yılmaz, Çev.) İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
• Shead, S. (2019) “Facebook, on yılın en çok indirilen dört uygulamasına sahip”, bbc.com,23.06.2021, https:// www.bbc.com/news/technology- 50838013
• Snowden, E. (2018) “Facebook Bir İstihbarat Şirketi”, Bianet, 23.06 2021. https://m.bianet.org/bianet/dun ya/195348-snowden-Facebook-bir-istihbarat-sirketi
• Spiegel, Murray R, ve Stephens, Larry J. (2013) İstatistik, (Tr.Çev.: Çelebioğlu, Salih) İstanbul: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık
• Swinton, J. J. (2020). Extension Needs Outreach Innovation Free from the Harms of Social Media. Journal of Extension, 58(2), 1.
• Tan, Q., ve Pivot, F. (2015). Big Data Privacy: Changing Perception of Privacy. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City içinde (ss. 860-865).
• Tutar, H. ve Erdem, A. T. (2020). Örnekleriyle Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yüksel, M. (2003). “Mahremiyet Hakkı ve Sosyo-Tarihsel Gelişimi”,Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 58 (1), s. 181-213 We Are Social &Hootsuite. (2015-2021). Digital 2015-2020: Global Digital Overview. Retrieved From: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2015-global-digital-overview. 10.05.2022