BibTex RIS Cite

ÖĞRENME NESNELERİ KAVRAMINA İLİŞKİN GELİŞTİRİLEN ÖRNEK ANALOJİLER

Year 2013, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 371 - 384, 01.05.2013

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğrenme nesnelerini tanımlamak için kullanılabilecek örnek analojiler geliştirmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda 2010-2011 ve 2011-2012 öğretim yıllarında Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümünde öğrenim gören 32 öğretmen adayının geliştirmiş oldukları analojiler içerik analizi yöntemi doğrultusunda incelenmiştir. Araştırma betimsel yapıda nitel bir çalışmadır. Öğretmen adayları 15 farklı kavram ile ifade edilen 26 geçerli analoji geliştirmişlerdir. Analojilerin tamamında öğrenme nesnelerin tekrar kullanılabilirlik özelliğine vurgu yapılmıştır.

References

  • Boyle, T. (2003). Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 46–58.
  • Cebeci, Z. (2003). Öğrenim Nesnelerine Giriş. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6,1-6.
  • Ceylan, B.(2008), Öğrenme Nesnelerinin Tasarımı ve Öğrenme Süreçlerinde Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Basarı Düzeylerine Etkisi İle Öğrenme Süreçlerine Katkıları, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Cisco (2001). Elearning Glossary. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/ elearning/pdf/elearn_glossary. Pdf
  • Francis, David E. & Murphy, E. (2008). Instructional designers’ conceptualisations of learning objects. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 475- 486.
  • Glynn, S. M. (1995). Conceptual bridges: Using analogies to explain scientific concepts. The Science Teacher, 62(9), 25-27.
  • Glynn, Shawn M.; Taasoobshırazı, G.; Fowler, S. (2007). Analogies: Explanatory tools in web-based science instruction. Educational Technology, 47 (5), 45-50
  • Harman, K. & Koohang, A. (2005). Discussion board: A learning object. Interdisciplinary Journal http://ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p067-077Harman.pdf and Learning Objects, 1, 67-77.
  • Hodgins, W. (2000). The Future of Learning Objects, Wiley, D. A. (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/ hodgins.doc
  • IEEE (2002). Draft Standardfor Learning Object Metadata, http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files /LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf
  • McGreal, R., & Roberts, T. (2001, October). A primer on metadata for learning objects: Fostering http://elearningmag.com/elearning/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=2031 environment. E-Learning, 2(10), 26-29.
  • Moisey, S. D., Ally, M., & Spencer, B. (2006). Factors affecting the development and use of learning objects. The American Jounnral of Distance Education, 20(3), 143- 161
  • Muzio, J. A., Heins, T. ve Mundell, R. (2002) Experiences with reusable e-learning objects from theory to practice,Internet and Higher Education,2002(1), 21–34
  • Namuth, D., Fritz, S., King, J. Ve Boren, A. (2005). Principles of sustainable learning object libraries. Interdis-ciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 181-196, http://ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p181-196Namuth.pdf
  • Palmquist, R. (1996). The Search for an Internet Metaphor: A Comparison of Literatures. American Society of Information Science Conference, http://www.asis.org/annual- 96/ElectronicProceedings/ palmquist.html.
  • Parrish, P. (2004). The trouble with learning objects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (1), 49-67.
  • Polsani, P. R. (2003). Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects. Journal of Digital information, 3(4). http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v03/i04/Polsani/
  • Robin H. Kay & Liesel Knaack (2007): Evaluating the learning in learning objects, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 22:1, 5-28
  • Sicilia, M. A., & Garcia, E. (2003). On the concepts of usability and reusability of learning objects. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), http://www.irrodl.org/content/v4.2/sicilia-garcia.html
  • Tekdal, M. (2004). E-Öğrenimde Yeni bir Boyut: Öğrenme Nesneleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2)
  • Türel, Y. K. (2008). Öğrenme nesneleri ile zenginleştirilmiş öğretim ortamlarının öğrenci başarıları tutumları ve motivasyonları üzerindeki etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
  • Wiley, D.A. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. Wiley, D.A. (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects, http://reusability.org/read/williams.doc
  • Williams, D. D. (2000). Evaluation of learning objects and instruction using learning objects. Wiley, D. (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

Sample Analogies Developed Regarding the Concept of Learning Objects

Year 2013, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 371 - 384, 01.05.2013

Abstract

The aim of this research is to develop sample analogies which may be used to define the learning objects. Towards this aim, analogies developed in 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 academic years by 32 teacher candidates in Ahi Evran University Faculty of Education, Computer and Learning Technologies Education Department were examined by the content analysis method. The research is a qualitative study with a descriptive structure. The teacher candidates developed 26 valid analogies defining 15 different concepts. In all analogies, the reusability of the learning objects was emphasized

References

  • Boyle, T. (2003). Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 46–58.
  • Cebeci, Z. (2003). Öğrenim Nesnelerine Giriş. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6,1-6.
  • Ceylan, B.(2008), Öğrenme Nesnelerinin Tasarımı ve Öğrenme Süreçlerinde Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Basarı Düzeylerine Etkisi İle Öğrenme Süreçlerine Katkıları, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Cisco (2001). Elearning Glossary. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/ elearning/pdf/elearn_glossary. Pdf
  • Francis, David E. & Murphy, E. (2008). Instructional designers’ conceptualisations of learning objects. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 475- 486.
  • Glynn, S. M. (1995). Conceptual bridges: Using analogies to explain scientific concepts. The Science Teacher, 62(9), 25-27.
  • Glynn, Shawn M.; Taasoobshırazı, G.; Fowler, S. (2007). Analogies: Explanatory tools in web-based science instruction. Educational Technology, 47 (5), 45-50
  • Harman, K. & Koohang, A. (2005). Discussion board: A learning object. Interdisciplinary Journal http://ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p067-077Harman.pdf and Learning Objects, 1, 67-77.
  • Hodgins, W. (2000). The Future of Learning Objects, Wiley, D. A. (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/ hodgins.doc
  • IEEE (2002). Draft Standardfor Learning Object Metadata, http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files /LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf
  • McGreal, R., & Roberts, T. (2001, October). A primer on metadata for learning objects: Fostering http://elearningmag.com/elearning/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=2031 environment. E-Learning, 2(10), 26-29.
  • Moisey, S. D., Ally, M., & Spencer, B. (2006). Factors affecting the development and use of learning objects. The American Jounnral of Distance Education, 20(3), 143- 161
  • Muzio, J. A., Heins, T. ve Mundell, R. (2002) Experiences with reusable e-learning objects from theory to practice,Internet and Higher Education,2002(1), 21–34
  • Namuth, D., Fritz, S., King, J. Ve Boren, A. (2005). Principles of sustainable learning object libraries. Interdis-ciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 181-196, http://ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p181-196Namuth.pdf
  • Palmquist, R. (1996). The Search for an Internet Metaphor: A Comparison of Literatures. American Society of Information Science Conference, http://www.asis.org/annual- 96/ElectronicProceedings/ palmquist.html.
  • Parrish, P. (2004). The trouble with learning objects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (1), 49-67.
  • Polsani, P. R. (2003). Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects. Journal of Digital information, 3(4). http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v03/i04/Polsani/
  • Robin H. Kay & Liesel Knaack (2007): Evaluating the learning in learning objects, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 22:1, 5-28
  • Sicilia, M. A., & Garcia, E. (2003). On the concepts of usability and reusability of learning objects. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), http://www.irrodl.org/content/v4.2/sicilia-garcia.html
  • Tekdal, M. (2004). E-Öğrenimde Yeni bir Boyut: Öğrenme Nesneleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2)
  • Türel, Y. K. (2008). Öğrenme nesneleri ile zenginleştirilmiş öğretim ortamlarının öğrenci başarıları tutumları ve motivasyonları üzerindeki etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
  • Wiley, D.A. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. Wiley, D.A. (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects, http://reusability.org/read/williams.doc
  • Williams, D. D. (2000). Evaluation of learning objects and instruction using learning objects. Wiley, D. (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Alpaslan Durmuş This is me

Publication Date May 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 14 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Durmuş, A. (2013). ÖĞRENME NESNELERİ KAVRAMINA İLİŞKİN GELİŞTİRİLEN ÖRNEK ANALOJİLER. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 371-384.

2562219122   19121   19116   19117     19118       19119       19120     19124