Farklı Ülke Vatandaşı Öğrencilerin İletişim Kurma ve Çatışmaları Çözme Anlayışlarının İncelenmesi

Year 2019, , 2781 - 2794, 15.11.2019

Zekerya Batur Murat Başar Nurcan Şener , Kamil Uygun

https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3797

Abstract

İletişim, insanların sosyalleşmesini sağlayan en önemli
unsurların başında gelmektedir. Bu iletişim unsurları aracılığıyla insanlar
arasında bir etkileşim başlamaktadır. İnsanlar etkileşimi iletişime evirmek
için bazen kelimelere bazen de beden diline başvurmaktadırlar. Bu bağlamda
günlük yaşamda insanlar bu unsurları yerinde ve zamanında kullandığında daha
başarılı bir iletişim gerçekleştirebilmektedir. Dolayısıyla insanların iletişim
becerilerini arttırmak için hem sözel hem de beden dilini eşgüdümlü kullanmaları
gerekmektedir. Özellikle beden dilinin kullanımı etkili iletişim için ayrı bir
yere sahiptir. Çünkü beden dilinin kullanımında kültürel özellikler devreye
girmektedir. Kültürel özelliklerin devreye girmesiyle birlikte etkili
iletişimin boyutu da değişebilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı ülke
vatandaşı olan öğrencilerin iletişim kurma ve çatışmaları çözme anlayışlarını
incelemektir. Çalışma nitel araştırma yöntemine göre desenlenmiş olup çalışmada
toplanan verilerin incelenmesinde betimsel analiz kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubu
Türkiye'de lisans programlarında eğitimine devam eden Türkiye 5, Azerbaycan 4,
Türkmenistan 5, Mali 5,  Somali 5,  Fransa 4 ve Gine'den 5 olmak üzere toplam 33
öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmanın verileri yapılandırılmış görüşme tekniğiyle
toplanmıştır. Öğrencilerle bire bir farklı saatlerde görüşülmüş, sorulara
verdikleri cevaplar not edilmiştir. Daha sonra her soruya verilen cevaplar
tablolaştırılarak ülkelere göre öğrenciler kodlanmıştır. Toplanan veriler
içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Çalışmanın sonucunda öğrencilerin iletişim
kurma ve çatışma çözme anlayışlarının bazı noktalarda benzer, bazı noktalarda
ise farklılaştığı görülmüştür. Sonuçlara göre, etkili iletişimde ilk iletişime
geçilenler arasında aile ve arkadaş yer almaktadır. Etkili iletişimde çatışmayı
çözücü olarak ise sırasıyla aile, arkadaş ve uzmana başvurulduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

iletişim, etkili iletişim, çatışma çözme

The Examination on Communication and Dissenting Disputes in Different Nationalities' Students

Abstract

People sometimes use words and
sometimes body language to invert interaction to communication. Especially, the
use of body language has an important place for effective communication since
cultural features come in to play in the use of body language. With the
introduction of cultural features, the dimension of effective communication can
change. The aim of this study is to examine
the understanding of communicating and resolving conflicts among students of
different nationalities. The study was qualitative and content analysis was
used in studying collected data. The study group consist of 5 students from
Turkey, 4 students from Azerbaijan, 5students from Turkmenistan, 5 students
from Mali, 5 students from Somalia, 4 students from France, 5 students from
Guinea, total of 33 students who continue their education in undergraduate
programs in Turkey. The data of the study was collected by structured interview
technique. The students were interviewed at different times, and the answers
that they gave to the questions were noted. Then the answers given to each
question were tabulated and the students were coded according to the countries.
The collected data were subjected to content analysis. In the result of the
study, students' understanding of communication and conflict resolution seemed
to be similar at some points and at some points differentiated. According to
the results, the first communication in effective communication is family and
friends. It was seen that family, friends and experts are consulted
respectively in order to solve the conflict in effective communication.

Keywords

communication, effective communication, conflict to solve

References

• Ainsworth, M. (1979). Infant-mother attachment. American Psychologist, 34(10), 932-937.
• Aksüt, M., Batur, Z. & Avşar, T. (2006). Sanalca, sanal odalarda (internet) iletişim ve Türkçe, Akademik Bilişim'06 - VIII. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri.
• Aksüt, M.& Batur, Z. (2007). İnternet perspektifinde ergenlerin sosyalleşme ve iletişim kurma süreci, Akademik Bilişim'07 - IX. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri. 31 Ocak 2 Şubat 2007 Dumlupunar Üniversitesi Kütahya
• Ames, D., Maissen, L. B. & Brockner, J. (2012). The role of listening in interpersonal influence. Journal of Research in Personality 46(3), 345-349.
• Barkai, J. L. (1990). Nonverbal communication from th eother side: Speaking body language. San Diego Law Review, 27(101), 102-125.
• Başar, M, Doğan, C., Şener, N., Uzun, Ö.,&Topal H. (2018) İlkokulda öğretmen öğrenci iletişimi Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 4(1) 1-17
• Batur, Z. (2010). Kitle iletişim araçlarının oluşturduğu yeni bir dil katmanı: öğretmen adaylarının kullandığı kitle iletişim jargonu, Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 63-73.
• Batur, Z. & Uygun, K. (2012). İki neslin bir kavram algısı:Teknoloji. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 74-88.
• Bozorgian, H. (2012). Metacognitive instruction does improve listening comprehension. International Scholarly Research Network, 1-6.
• Brownell, J. (1994). Creating strong listening environments: A key hospitality management task. International Journal of Contemporary Hospital Management, 6(3) 3-10.
• Burener, J. (1984) Interaction, communication, and self. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 23(1), 1-7.
• Castleberry, S. & Shepherd, D. (1993). Effective interpersonal listening and personal selling. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 13(1), 35-49.
• Cochran, M. & Brassard, J. (1979). Child development and personal social networks. Child Development, 50(3), 601-616.
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
• Davidsson, P. & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing 18(3), 301-331.
• Deniz, K. (2013). Eğitimde etkili iletişim, Ed. H. Karatay, Türkçe öğretimi el kitabı. Ankara:Pegem Akademi.
• Dumbrav, G. & Koronka, A. (2009). Actions speak louder than words" - body language in business communication. Annals of the University of Petroşani, Economics, 9(3), 249-254.
• Dunbar, N. E., Bippus, A. M. & Young, S. L. (2008). Interpersonal dominance in relational conflict: a view from dyadic power theory. Interpersona, 2(1), 1-33.
• Elgünler, T. Ç. & Fener, T. (2011). İletişimin kalitesini etkileyen engeller ve bu engellerin giderilmesi. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication - TOJDAC, 1(1), 35-39.
• Elving, W. J. L. (2005). The role of communication in organisational change. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(2), 129-138.
• Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75.
• Gelder, B. (2007). Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 242-249.
• Giles, H. & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication Accommodation Theory, In B. B. Whaley and W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (293-310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum.
• Gluzek, A. & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). Speaking with a nonnative accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 224-234.
• Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners' perspective. System, 34, 165-182.
• Halawah, I. (2005). The relationship between effective communication of high school principal and school climate. Education, 126(2), 334-345.
• Hamouda, A. (2013). An investigation of listening comprehension problems encountered by Saudi students in the EL listening classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(2), 113-155.
• Harvey, M. & Griffith, D. (2002). Developing effective intercultural relationships: the importance of communication strategies. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(4) 455-476.
• Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental ınfluence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74(5), 1368-1378.
• Fallowfield, L. & Jenkins, V. (1999). Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care, European Journal of Canser, 35(11), 1592-1597.
• Janusik, L. A. & Wolvin, A. D. (2002). Listening treatment in the basic communication course text. Basic Communication Course Annual, 14(11), 164-210
• Kraut, R., Fish, R. S., Root, R. W. & Chalfonte, B. L. (1990). Informal communication in organizations: form, function, and technology, I S. Oskamp& S. Spacapan (Eds.). Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applies Social Psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
• Kim, Y. & Kang, J. (2010). Communication, neighbourhood belonging and household hurricane preparedness. Disasters, 34(2), 470-488.
• Kayes, P. E. (2006). New paradigms for diversifying faculty and staff in higher education: uncovering cultural biases in the search and hiring process. Multicultural Education, 65-69.
• Kruse, N. (2016). Feelings of belonging in a congregation: a social- psychological assessment. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 19(2), 164-177.
• Lau, K. L. (2017) Strategy use, listening problems, and motivation of high and low-proficiency Chinese listeners. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 503-514.
• Lotfi, L. (2012). A questionnaire of beliefs on english language listening comprehension problems: development and validation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16(4), 508-515.
• Leonard, M., Graham, S. & Bonacum, D. (2004). The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. QualSaf Health Care, 13(1), 85-90.
• Levine, S., Theobalt, C. & Koltun, V. (2009). Real-time prosody-driven synthesis of body language. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2-9.
• Liyanage, C., Ballal, T., Elhag, T. & Li, Q. (2009). Knowledge communication and translation A knowledge transfer model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 118-131.
• Meeren, H. K., Van Heijnsbergen, C. C., & De Gelder, B. (2005). Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(45), 16518–16523.
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitive data analysis. California: Sage Pub
• Mohr, J. J. & Sohi, R. S. (1995). Communication Flows in Distribution Channels: Impact on Assessments of Communication Quality and Satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 71(4), 393-416.
• Moore, D. R., Halliday, L. F., & Amitay, S. (2009). Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 364(1515), 409–420.
• Özgan, H. & Aslan, N. (2008). İlköğretim okul müdürlerinin sözlü iletişim biçiminin öğretmenlerin motivasyonuna etkisinin incelenmesi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 190-206.
• Pierce, T. (2009). Social anxiety and technology: Face-to-face communication versus technological communication among teens. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1367-1372.
• Rains, A. & Scott, R. (2007). To Identify or Not to Identify: A Theoretical Model of Receiver Responses to Anonymous Communication. Communication Theory, 17, 61-91.
• Renn O., Levine D. (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson R.E., Stallen P.J.M. (eds) Communicating Risks to the Public. Technology, Risk, and Society (An International Series in Risk Analysis), vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht
• Roberts, W. & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 67(2), 449-470.
• Ryan, E. B., Meredith, S. D., Maclean, M. J. & Orange, J. B. (1995). Changing the way we talk with elders: promoting health using the communication enhancement model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41(2), 69-107.
• Salmon, G. & Perkins, D. (2009). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review Of Research In Education, 23(1), 1-24.
• Selwyn, N. (2003). Apart from technology: understanding people's non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society 25, 99-116.
• Socha, T. & Pitts, M. (2009). The positive side of interpersonal communication. New York: Peter Lang.
• Suter, E., Arndt, J., Arthur, N., Parboosingh, J., Taylor, E. & Deutschlander, S. (2009). Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23(1), 41-51.
• Stewart, K. (1978). And daddy makes three: the father's ımpact on mother and young child. Child Development, 49(2), 466-478.
• Street, R., Brady, R. & Putman, W. (1983). The influence of speech rate stereotypes and rate similarity or listeners' evaluations of speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psycology, 2(1), 37-56.
• Sypher, B. D., Bostrom, R. & Seibert, J. (1989). Listening, communication abilities, and success at work. The Journal of Business Communication, 26(4), 293-303.
• Tavakolizadeha, J., Nejatianb, M. & Soori, A. (2015). The Effectiveness of communication skills training on marital conflicts and its different aspects in women. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 214 - 221.
• Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, Mass : A Bradford Book.
• Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Cinderella of communication strategies: reception strategies in ınteractive listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 494-505.
• Weigner, B. (1995). Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a theory of social conduct. The Guilford Press: New York London.
• Wolvin, A. (2010). Listening and human communication in the 21st century. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• Wood, J. T. (2010). Interpersonal communication: everyday encounters. Sixth Edition, Publisher: Lyn Uhl.
• Wrench, J. S., Corrigan M. W., McCroskey J. C. & Panyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2006). Religious fundamentalism and ıntercultural communication: the relationships among ethnocentrism, ıntercultural communication apprehension, religious fundamentalism, homonegativity, and tolerance for religious disagreements. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35(1), 23-44.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin