BibTex RIS Cite

EFFECTS OF CARTOONS ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT AND ATTITUDES IN BIOLOGY TEACHING (ENDOCRINE SYSTEM)

Year 2013, Volume: 21 Issue: 3, 931 - 944, 15.07.2016

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine effect of cartoons as a teaching tool towards student’s achievement and attitudes about endocrine system and biology. This study was applied to students that include 28 students in control group and 28 students in experimental group in secondary school in Erzurum. In the research, mixed research design which consists of interview form with open ended questions and quasi-experimental non-equivalent pretest- posttest control group was used. An achievement test, attitude test and interviews were used to investigate the impact of using cartoons as a teaching tool on student learning in teaching of endocrine system. The findings of this study show that students’ knowledge and understanding and attitude of biology was positively changed on the unit of endocrine system with the use of cartoons.

References

  • Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press
  • Balim, A., D. Inel and E. Evrekli, (2008). Fen Öğretiminde Kavram Karikatürü Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarılarına ve Sorgulayıcı Öğrenme Becerileri Algılarına Etkisi, Ilköğretim Online, 7(1): 188-202.
  • Ball, H. G. (1982). Who is Snoopy. In J. L. Thomas (Ed.), Cartoon and comic in the classroom: A reference for teachers and librarians (pp. 14–20). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Barlex, D., & Carré, C. (1985). Visual communication in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Biggs J 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and OU Press.
  • Brocka, B. (1982). Comic nooks: In case you haven’t noticed they’ve changed. In J. L. Tho- mas (Ed.), Cartoon and comic in the classroom: A reference for teachers and librarians. (pp. 26–28). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Çepni, S. Taş, E. & Köse, S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students’ cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Computers & Education, 46 (2), 192–205
  • Çimer A. (2011). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Edu- cational Research and Reviews Vol. 7(3), pp. 61-71.
  • Dalacosta K, Kamariotaki-Paparrigopoulou M., Palyvos J.A., Spyrellis N. (2009). Multi- media application with animated cartoons for teaching science in elementary education. Computers & Education, 52:741–748.
  • De Fren, M. (1988). Using cartoons to develop writing and thinking skills. Social Studies Journal, 79, 221–224.
  • Dikmenli, M. & Çardak O. (2004). A study on misconceptions in the 9tkgrade high school biology textbooks, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Issue 17.
  • Doring A. (1998). Helping the move to university. Learning Journals Interlogue, 9(1): 63-70.
  • Ekici, F., E. Ekici and F. Aydin, 2007. Utility of Concept Cartoons in Diagnosing and Overco- ming Misconceptions Related to Photosynthesis, Intl. J. Envir. and Sci. Edu., 2(4): 111-124.
  • Eulie, J. (1969). Creating interest and developing understanding studies through cartoon. Pe- abody Journal of Education, 46, 288–290.
  • Ferguson, S., & Campinha-Bacote, J. (1989). Humor in nursing. Journal of Psychosocial Nur- sing, 27 (4), 29-34.
  • Fisher, R. (1990). Teaching children to think. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • Fleischer J.A. (2010).Using Cartoons for type education. http://www.docstoc.com/ docs/31863960/Using-Cartoons-for-Type-Education
  • Hill, D. J. (1988). Humor in the classroom: A handbook for teachers and other entertainers. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Horn, M. (1980). The world encyclopedia of cartoons (Vol. 1). New York: Chelsea House.
  • http://oir.fod.msu.edu/oir/TeachingMethods/humor.asp
  • Kabapinar, F., 2005. Effectiveness of Teaching Via Concept Cartoons From the Point of View of Constructivist Approach. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi., 5(1): 135-146.
  • Keogh, B. and S. Naylor, 1999. Concept Cartoons, Teaching and Learning In Science: An Evaluation. International J. Sci. Edu., 21(4): 431-446.
  • Köse, S. (2007). The effects of concept mapping instruction on overcoming 9th grade stu- dents’ misconception about diffusion and osmosis. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6 (2), 16-25.
  • Matthew J. A. D. (1991). Cartoons in science Physics Education (26) 110-114
  • McCloud, S. “Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art,” HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. New York, 1993.
  • McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction, (p.245), 5th Ed., New York, NY: Longman
  • Mollica A 1976. Cartoons in the language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 32(4): 424-444.
  • Öztaş H. ve Özay E. (2004). Biyoloji öğretmenleririn biyoloji öğretiminde karşılaştıkları sorunlar (Erzurum örneği). Gazi Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Mart 2004 Cilt: 12, No:1 Sayfa:69-77.
  • Parrott T 1994. Humour as a teaching strategy. Nurse Educator, 19(3): 36-38.
  • Peacock, A. (1995). An agenda for research on text material in primary science for second language learners of English in developing countries. Journal of Multilingual and Multi- cultural Development, 16, 389–401.
  • Pease RA 1991. Cartoon humour in nursing education. Nursing Outlook, 39(6): 262-267.
  • Pekel, O., F., (2005). DNA, Gen, Kromozom kavramlarının anlaşılmasında kavramsal deği- şim yaklaşımının etkinliğinin İncelenmesi, Doktora tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
  • Perales, F. J., & Vilchez, J. M. (2005). The Teaching of Physics and Cartoons: Can they be interrelated in secondary education? International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1647–1670.
  • Perales, F. J., & Vilchez, J. M. (2006). Image of science in cartoons and its relationship with the image in comics. Physics Education, 41(3), 240–249.
  • Philippe, R. (1980). Political graphics: Art as a weapon. New York: Abbeville.
  • Poveell J. P. & Andresea L. W.(1985). Humour and Teaching in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education 10(1):79-90.
  • Ramsden P 1992. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. New York: Routledge
  • Ross P.M. (2012). The use of cartoons in teaching and learning invertebrate biology. www. bioassess.edu.au. 2012.
  • Schwarz, G. (1989). The importance of being silly. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 82-83.
  • Srikwan S. and Jakobsson M. (2007). Using Cartoons to Teach Internet Security. DIMACS Technical Report 2007 by School of Informatics Indiana University Bloomington.
  • Stephenson P. and Warwick P.(2002). Using concept cartoons to support progression in stu- dents’ understanding of light. Physics Education, 37(2):135-141.
  • Stetson, 2011. How to Find Cartoons to Teach Science The Purpose of Using Comics in the Classroom. http://www.ehow.com/info_8523404_purpose-using-comics-classroom. html#ixzz1rty3lQFX
  • Tekkaya C, Özkan Ö, Sungur S (2001). Biology concepts perceived as difficult by Turkish high school students. Hacettepe Univ. J. Educ., 21: 145-150.
  • Ugurel, I. and S. Morali, 2006. Karikatürler ve Matematik Öğretiminde Kullanımı, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, S: 170.
  • Walter, G. (1990). Laugh, teacher, laugh The Educational Digest, 55(9), 43-44.
  • Warnock, P. (1989). Humor as a didactic tool in adult education. Lifelong Learning, 12(8), 22-24.
  • Wright, G. (1979). The comic book: A forgotten medium in the classroom. In J. L. Thomas (Ed.). Cartoons and comics in the classroom: A reference for teachers and librarians. Litt- leton: CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Zöhre B., Şahin N.,Şahin B. and Sevim S. (2002). Biyoloji 2 dersi endokrin sis- tem kavramlarının öğrenilme düzeylerinin tespiti. V. Ulusal fen bilimleri ve matematik eğitimi kongresi. ODTU. Ankara.
  • Zöhre, B. (1999). Lise 2 biyoloji dersi öğrencilerinin endokrin sistem kavramlarını öğrenme düzeylerinin tespiti, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.

KARİKATÜRLERİN BİYOLOJİ ÖĞRETİMİNDE ÖĞRENCİ BAŞARILARINA VE TUTUMLARINA ETKİLERİ(ENDOKRİN SİSTEM)

Year 2013, Volume: 21 Issue: 3, 931 - 944, 15.07.2016

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, endokrin sistem hakkında öğrencilerin başarıları ve biyolojiye karşı tutumlarına bir öğretim aracı olarak karikatürlerin etkisini araştırmaktır. Araştırma Erzurum il merkezinde bulunan bir lisede 28 deney 28 kontrol gurubunu oluşturan öğrencilere uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada, öntest-sontest kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel ve açık uçlu sorulu içeren görüşme formunu içeren birleştirilmiş araştırma modeli kullanılmıştır. Karikatürün etkisini ölçmek için endokrin sistem ile ilgili bir başarı testi, biyolojiye karşı tutum ölçeği ve nitel görüşmeler kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları göstermiştir ki; karikatürlerin kullanılmasının endokrin sistemle ilgili öğretim başarısının ve biyolojiye karşı tutumun artırılmasında etkili olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

References

  • Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press
  • Balim, A., D. Inel and E. Evrekli, (2008). Fen Öğretiminde Kavram Karikatürü Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarılarına ve Sorgulayıcı Öğrenme Becerileri Algılarına Etkisi, Ilköğretim Online, 7(1): 188-202.
  • Ball, H. G. (1982). Who is Snoopy. In J. L. Thomas (Ed.), Cartoon and comic in the classroom: A reference for teachers and librarians (pp. 14–20). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Barlex, D., & Carré, C. (1985). Visual communication in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Biggs J 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and OU Press.
  • Brocka, B. (1982). Comic nooks: In case you haven’t noticed they’ve changed. In J. L. Tho- mas (Ed.), Cartoon and comic in the classroom: A reference for teachers and librarians. (pp. 26–28). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Çepni, S. Taş, E. & Köse, S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students’ cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Computers & Education, 46 (2), 192–205
  • Çimer A. (2011). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Edu- cational Research and Reviews Vol. 7(3), pp. 61-71.
  • Dalacosta K, Kamariotaki-Paparrigopoulou M., Palyvos J.A., Spyrellis N. (2009). Multi- media application with animated cartoons for teaching science in elementary education. Computers & Education, 52:741–748.
  • De Fren, M. (1988). Using cartoons to develop writing and thinking skills. Social Studies Journal, 79, 221–224.
  • Dikmenli, M. & Çardak O. (2004). A study on misconceptions in the 9tkgrade high school biology textbooks, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Issue 17.
  • Doring A. (1998). Helping the move to university. Learning Journals Interlogue, 9(1): 63-70.
  • Ekici, F., E. Ekici and F. Aydin, 2007. Utility of Concept Cartoons in Diagnosing and Overco- ming Misconceptions Related to Photosynthesis, Intl. J. Envir. and Sci. Edu., 2(4): 111-124.
  • Eulie, J. (1969). Creating interest and developing understanding studies through cartoon. Pe- abody Journal of Education, 46, 288–290.
  • Ferguson, S., & Campinha-Bacote, J. (1989). Humor in nursing. Journal of Psychosocial Nur- sing, 27 (4), 29-34.
  • Fisher, R. (1990). Teaching children to think. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  • Fleischer J.A. (2010).Using Cartoons for type education. http://www.docstoc.com/ docs/31863960/Using-Cartoons-for-Type-Education
  • Hill, D. J. (1988). Humor in the classroom: A handbook for teachers and other entertainers. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Horn, M. (1980). The world encyclopedia of cartoons (Vol. 1). New York: Chelsea House.
  • http://oir.fod.msu.edu/oir/TeachingMethods/humor.asp
  • Kabapinar, F., 2005. Effectiveness of Teaching Via Concept Cartoons From the Point of View of Constructivist Approach. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi., 5(1): 135-146.
  • Keogh, B. and S. Naylor, 1999. Concept Cartoons, Teaching and Learning In Science: An Evaluation. International J. Sci. Edu., 21(4): 431-446.
  • Köse, S. (2007). The effects of concept mapping instruction on overcoming 9th grade stu- dents’ misconception about diffusion and osmosis. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6 (2), 16-25.
  • Matthew J. A. D. (1991). Cartoons in science Physics Education (26) 110-114
  • McCloud, S. “Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art,” HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. New York, 1993.
  • McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction, (p.245), 5th Ed., New York, NY: Longman
  • Mollica A 1976. Cartoons in the language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 32(4): 424-444.
  • Öztaş H. ve Özay E. (2004). Biyoloji öğretmenleririn biyoloji öğretiminde karşılaştıkları sorunlar (Erzurum örneği). Gazi Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Mart 2004 Cilt: 12, No:1 Sayfa:69-77.
  • Parrott T 1994. Humour as a teaching strategy. Nurse Educator, 19(3): 36-38.
  • Peacock, A. (1995). An agenda for research on text material in primary science for second language learners of English in developing countries. Journal of Multilingual and Multi- cultural Development, 16, 389–401.
  • Pease RA 1991. Cartoon humour in nursing education. Nursing Outlook, 39(6): 262-267.
  • Pekel, O., F., (2005). DNA, Gen, Kromozom kavramlarının anlaşılmasında kavramsal deği- şim yaklaşımının etkinliğinin İncelenmesi, Doktora tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
  • Perales, F. J., & Vilchez, J. M. (2005). The Teaching of Physics and Cartoons: Can they be interrelated in secondary education? International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1647–1670.
  • Perales, F. J., & Vilchez, J. M. (2006). Image of science in cartoons and its relationship with the image in comics. Physics Education, 41(3), 240–249.
  • Philippe, R. (1980). Political graphics: Art as a weapon. New York: Abbeville.
  • Poveell J. P. & Andresea L. W.(1985). Humour and Teaching in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education 10(1):79-90.
  • Ramsden P 1992. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. New York: Routledge
  • Ross P.M. (2012). The use of cartoons in teaching and learning invertebrate biology. www. bioassess.edu.au. 2012.
  • Schwarz, G. (1989). The importance of being silly. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 82-83.
  • Srikwan S. and Jakobsson M. (2007). Using Cartoons to Teach Internet Security. DIMACS Technical Report 2007 by School of Informatics Indiana University Bloomington.
  • Stephenson P. and Warwick P.(2002). Using concept cartoons to support progression in stu- dents’ understanding of light. Physics Education, 37(2):135-141.
  • Stetson, 2011. How to Find Cartoons to Teach Science The Purpose of Using Comics in the Classroom. http://www.ehow.com/info_8523404_purpose-using-comics-classroom. html#ixzz1rty3lQFX
  • Tekkaya C, Özkan Ö, Sungur S (2001). Biology concepts perceived as difficult by Turkish high school students. Hacettepe Univ. J. Educ., 21: 145-150.
  • Ugurel, I. and S. Morali, 2006. Karikatürler ve Matematik Öğretiminde Kullanımı, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, S: 170.
  • Walter, G. (1990). Laugh, teacher, laugh The Educational Digest, 55(9), 43-44.
  • Warnock, P. (1989). Humor as a didactic tool in adult education. Lifelong Learning, 12(8), 22-24.
  • Wright, G. (1979). The comic book: A forgotten medium in the classroom. In J. L. Thomas (Ed.). Cartoons and comics in the classroom: A reference for teachers and librarians. Litt- leton: CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Zöhre B., Şahin N.,Şahin B. and Sevim S. (2002). Biyoloji 2 dersi endokrin sis- tem kavramlarının öğrenilme düzeylerinin tespiti. V. Ulusal fen bilimleri ve matematik eğitimi kongresi. ODTU. Ankara.
  • Zöhre, B. (1999). Lise 2 biyoloji dersi öğrencilerinin endokrin sistem kavramlarını öğrenme düzeylerinin tespiti, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
There are 49 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA43RH96TS
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Esra ÖZAY Köse This is me

Publication Date July 15, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 21 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Köse, E. Ö. (2016). EFFECTS OF CARTOONS ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT AND ATTITUDES IN BIOLOGY TEACHING (ENDOCRINE SYSTEM). Kastamonu Education Journal, 21(3), 931-944.

10037