Akıllı Kent Uygulamalarının Sosyal Eşitsizlikler Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Kentsel alanların yoğunlaşması ve karmaşıklığı, kent yönetiminde yeni yaklaşımların geliştirilmesini zorunlu kılmıştır. Bu çerçevede, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin kentsel yönetişim süreçlerine entegre edilmesi, literatürde “akıllı kent” kavramının ortaya çıkmasına ve gelişimine zemin hazırlamıştır. Akıllı kentler, teknolojinin sunduğu olanaklar sayesinde sürdürülebilirlik, etkinlik ve yaşam kalitesini artırmayı hedeflemektedir. Ancak, bu teknolojik dönüşüm süreci, kentte yaşayan farklı sosyoekonomik gruplar arasındaki güç ilişkilerini ve eşitsizlik dinamiklerini yeniden şekillendirmektedir. Bu çalışma, akıllı kent uygulamalarının sosyal eşitsizlikler üzerindeki etkilerini teorik bir perspektifle irdelemekte, dijital bölünme, mekânsal adalet ve toplumsal kapsayıcılık kavramları üzerinden değerlendirmektedir. Dijital dönüşüm sürecinde akıllı kentlerin, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri kullanarak kent yaşamını daha verimli ve sürdürülebilir hâle getirme potansiyeli; dijital eşitsizlik, mekânsal adalet ve toplumsal bütünleşme gibi kritik kavramlarla ilişkilendirilerek tartışılmıştır. Teknolojinin kent yönetimindeki artan rolü, toplumsal yapı üzerindeki etkileri bağlamında incelenmiş ve bu bağlamda, sosyal eşitlik perspektifinin kent politikalarına entegrasyonunun gerekliliği vurgulanmıştır.

Keywords

• Akıllı kent
• sosyal eşitsizlik
• dijital bölünme
• mekânsal adalet
• kapsayıcılık
• toplumsal dışlanma.

Evaluation of Smart City Applications in the Context of Social Inequality

Abstract

The concentration and complexity of urban areas have necessitated the development of new approaches to urban governance. In this context, the integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) into urban governance processes has laid the groundwork for the emergence and evolution of the concept of the "smart city" in the academic literature. Smart cities aim to enhance sustainability, efficiency, and quality of life by leveraging technological innovations. However, this process of technological transformation also reshapes power relations and inequality dynamics among different socio-economic groups residing in cities. This study examines the impact of smart city practices on social inequalities from a theoretical perspective, focusing on the concepts of digital divide, spatial justice, and social inclusion. It discusses how the potential of smart cities to improve urban life through the use of ICT is closely linked with critical issues such as digital inequality, equitable spatial distribution, and social integration. The increasing role of technology in urban governance is analyzed in relation to its effects on the social structure. In this regard, the necessity of incorporating a social equity perspective into urban policies is emphasized.

Keywords

• Smart city
• social inequality
• digital divide
• spatial justice
• inclusivity
• social exclusion.

References

1. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., vd. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518.
2. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
3. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.
4. Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review. In R. P. Dameri & C. Rosenthal-Sabroux (Eds.), Smart City: How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space (pp. 13-43).
5. Cowley, R., Joss, S., & Dayot, Y. (2018). The smart city and its publics: Insights from across six UK cities. Urban Research & Practice, 11(1), 53–77.
6. Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2019). AI systems as infrastructure: The case of facial recognition. Social Studies of Science, 49(2), 189–212.
7. Çetin, E. (2021). Akıllı kentlerde gözetim ve mahremiyet: İstanbul örneği. İstanbul Üniversitesi Şehir Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 45–63.
8. Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just city. Cornell University Press.

9. Goodman, E. P., & Powles, J. (2019). Urban innovation and the right to the city: The case of Sidewalk Toronto. Fordham Law Review, 88(2), 457–498.
10. Graham, S. (2002). Bridging urban digital divides? Urban polarisation and information and communications technologies (ICTs) in the UK. Urban Studies, 39(1), 33–56.
11. Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.
12. Graham, S., & Wood, D. (2003). Digitizing surveillance: Categorization, space, inequality. Critical Social Policy, 23(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006
13. Greenfield, A. (2013). Against the smart city. Do projects.
14. Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation.” Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
15. Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
16. Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso Books.
17. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan.
18. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
19. Hollands, R. G. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61–77.
20. Kaya, B. (2020). İstanbul’da akıllı kent politikaları ve mekânsal eşitsizlik. Planlama Dergisi, 30(3), 210–225.
21. Kim, H. (2021). Digital inclusion in Smart Seoul: Challenges of aging and inequality. Journal of Urban Technology, 28(4), 57–75.
22. Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
23. Kitchin, R. (2021). Data Lives: How Data Are Made and Shape Our World. Bristol University Press.
24. Komninos, N. (2011). Intelligent cities: Innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. Routledge.
25. Komninos, N. (2013). Intelligent cities: Innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. Routledge.
26. Kong, X., Li, M., Li, J., Tian, K., Hu, X., & Xia, F. (2019). CoPFun: An urban co-occurrence pattern mining scheme based on regional function discovery. WorldWideWeb, 22(3), 1029-1054. doi:10.1007/s11280-18-0578.
27. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage.
28. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Eds. & Trans.). Blackwell.
29. Leszczynski, A. (2016). Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and Planning A, 48(9), 1691–1708.
30. March, H., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2018). Smart contradictions: The politics of making Barcelona a self-sufficient city. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(4), 816–830.
31. Morozov, E., & Bria, F. (2018). Rethinking the Smart City: Democratizing Urban Technology. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.
32. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011, June). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (pp. 282–291). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
33. Pacione, M. (2009). Urban geography: A global perspective (3rd ed.). Routledge.
34. Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford University Press.
35. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation. In Domingue, J., et al. (Eds.), The Future Internet. FIA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 6656, pp. 431-446).
36. Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519
37. Shelton, T., & Lodato, T. (2019). Actually existing smart citizens: Expertise and (non)participation in the making of the smart city. City, 23(1), 35–52.
38. Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The “actually existing smart city”. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13–25.
39. Shwayri, S. T. (2013). A model Korean ubiquitous eco-city? The politics of making Songdo. Journal of Urban Technology, 20(1), 39–55.
40. Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Blackwell.
41. Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
42. Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869
43. Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W.W. Norton & Company.
44. UN-Habitat. (2016). Urbanization and development: Emerging futures – World cities report 2016. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report
45. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
46. Vanolo, A. (2016). Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow’s smart cities. Futures, 82, 26–36.
47. Wilson, C. (2016). Digital inequality: Technology and social inclusion (2nd ed.). Routledge.
48. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
49. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.