Mimari Yapılarda Kullanılabilecek Doğa Temelli Tasarım Yaklaşımlarının İrdelenmesi

Year 2025, Volume: 18 Issue: 6, 3208 - 3232, 20.11.2025

Maryam Momaiyezi Gökçen Firdevs Yücel Caymaz

https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1723297

Abstract

Bu makalenin temel amacı; doğa ile uyumlu bir yapının tasarlanmasına dair mevcut modelleri dikkate alarak yeni bir model geliştirmektir. Bu amaçla çalışma kapsamında birleşik-doğa temelli stratejiler; organik mimarlık, biyonik mimarlık, biyomimikri ve biyofilik mimari yaklaşımları irdelenmiştir. Mimari tasarıma doğal çevrenin dahil edilebilmesinde etkili olabileceği düşünülen tasarım ilkeleri; literatür taraması sonucunda bina formu, yapının çevresi ile ilişkisi, mekânda doğa ile tasarım, malzeme kullanımı, enerji, mekânın konforu ve algısı olarak belirlemiştir. Ardından Pritzker ödüllü beş mimar ve üçer yapısı seçilmiş belirlenen ilkelerin bu yapılardaki gerçekleşme oranları değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda; doğal malzeme kullanımı, pasif enerji ve mekân konforu ve algısı (korku kriteri hariç), bina formunda form ve fonksiyon birliği kriterlerininin çoğunlukla karşılandığı; yapının çevresi ile ilişkisi parametresinde, doğal ortama uyum, toprak kullanımı, ışık havuzları kullanım kriterlerinin karşılanmadığı gözlenmiştir.

Keywords

Tasarımda Doğa , Sürdürülebilirlik , Mekân Konforu , Mimari Tasarım

Thanks

Eko-Mimar Ken Yeang’ a değerli görüşleri için teşekkür ederiz.

A Review Of Nature-Inspired Design Methods Applicable To Architectural Structures

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to develop a new model by considering existing models for designing structures that are in harmony with nature. To this end, the study examines integrated nature-based strategies, including organic architecture, bionic architecture, biomimicry, and biophilic architecture approaches. Design principles that are thought to be effective in incorporating the natural environment into architectural design were identified through a literature review as building form, the relationship between the structure and its surroundings, design with nature in space, material use, energy, and the comfort and perception of space. Five Pritzker Prize-winning architects and three of their structures were then selected, and the extent to which the identified principles were realized in these structures was evaluated. The study found that the criteria of natural material use, passive energy, and spatial comfort and perception (excluding the fear criterion) were mostly met in terms of building form and the unity of form and function. However, it was observed that the criteria of harmony with the natural environment, land use, and use of light wells were not met in terms of the building's relationship with its surroundings.

Keywords

Nature in Design , Sustainability , Space Comfort , Architectural Design

References

• Addington, D. M., & Schodek, D. L. (2005). Smart Materials and Technologies in Architecture. Architectural Press.
• Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press.
• Asia Business Council. (2024, November 6). Asia Business Council Annual Survey 2024. Asia Business Council.
• Baker, N., & Steemers, K. (2002). Daylight Design of Buildings: A Handbook for Architects and Engineers. James & James.
• Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning. Island Press.
• Benyus, J. M. (1997). “Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature.” Harper Collins, William Morrow Company Inc., NY, pp.7- 15
• Berge, B. (2009). The Ecology of Building Materials (2nd ed.). Architectural Press.
• Brand, S. (1994), How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built, Penguin, New York,. NY, ISBN 9780140139969
• Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health and Well-Being in the Built Environment. Terrapin Bright Green.
• Calkins, M. (2005). Strategy use and challenges of ecological design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban planning, 73(1), 29-48.
• Cervera, Pioz. (2015). Bionic Architecture: Learning from Nature (English and Spanish Edition).
• Day, C. (2002). Spirit and Place: Healing Our Environment. Architectural Press.
• Edwards, B., & Hyett, P. (2001). Guidelines for Environmentally Friendly Architecture. Architectural Press.
• Farr, D. (2011). Sustainable urbanism: Urban design with nature. John Wiley & Sons.
• Frampton, K. (1983). Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance. In,
• Foster, H. (ed). Postmodern Culture. London; Pluto Press. pp.16-30.
• Givoni, B. (1998). Climate Considerations in Building and Urban Design. John Wiley & Sons.
• Hegger, M., Fuchs, M., Stark, T., & Zeumer, M. (2008). Energy Manual: Sustainable Architecture. Birkhäuser.
• Hensel, M. (2013). Performance-Oriented Architecture: Rethinking Architectural Design and the Built Environment. Wiley.
• Heschong, L. (1999). Daylighting in Architecture: A European Reference Book. James & James.
• Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23.
• Geissler, S., Schmid, A., & Kranzl, L. (2020). Reuse and recycling potentials in buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 123321.
• Gosselin, C., Duballet, R., Roux, P., Gaudillière, N., Dirrenberger, J., & Morel, P. (2020). "Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-highperformance concrete – A new processing route for architects and builders". Materials & Design, 188, 108-124.
• Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods. Wiley.
• Hensel, M., & Menges, A. (2008). Versatility and Vicissitude: Performance in Morpho-Ecological Design. Architectural Design, 78(2), 6–11.
• Heschong, L. (1999). Daylighting in Schools: Reanalysis Report. Heschong Mahone Group.
• Hough, M. (1995). Cities and Natural Process: A Basis for Sustainability. Routledge.
• IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
• Jo, H., Song, C., & Miyazaki, Y. (2019). Physiological benefits of viewing nature: A systematic review of indoor experiments. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(23), 4739.
• Jonkers, H. M. (2007). "Self Healing Concrete: A Biological Approach". In Self Healing Materials (pp. 195-204). Springer.
• Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
• Kellert, S. R. (2015). Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. Wiley.
• Kellert, S. R. (2005). Building for Life: Designing and Understanding the Human-Nature Connection. Island Press.
• Kellert, S. R., & Calabrese, E. F. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. Terrapin Bright Green.
• Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley.
• Keniger, L. E., Gaston, K. J., Irvine, K. N., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). What are the benefits of interacting with nature?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 10(3), 913-935.
• Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery (4th ed.). Wiley.
• Knaack, U., Klein, T., Bilow, M., & Auer, T. (2014). Facades: Principles of Construction. Birkhäuser.
• Knippers, J., Nickel, K. G., & Speck, T. (2019). Biomimetic Research for Architecture and Building Construction. Springer.
• Kolarevic, B., & Malkawi, A. (2005). Performative architecture: beyond instrumentality. New York: Spon Press.
• Konis, K. (2013). Effective daylighting: Evaluating visual comfort in daylit spaces using luminance-based contrast measures. Building and Environment, 59, 672–682.
• Krause, L. R. (2011). Frank Lloyd Wright: Organic architecture for the 21st century.
• Kronenburg, R. (2007). Flexible: Architecture that Responds to Change. Laurence King Publishing.
• Le Corbusier. (1931). Towards a New Architecture. Dover Publications.
• Lechner, N. (2015). Heating, Cooling, Lighting: Sustainable Design Methods for Architects (4th ed.). Wiley.
• Lehmann, S. (2010). The Principles of Green Urbanism: Transforming the City for Sustainability. Earthscan.
• Leupen, B. (2006). Design and Analysis. 010 Publishers.
• Leupen, B., et al. (2007). Design and Analysis. 010 Publishers.
• Levine, N. (1996). The Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright. Princeton University Press.
• Loonen, R. C. G. M., Trčka, M., Cóstola, D., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2013). "Climate Adaptive Building Shells: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 483-493.
• Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. MIT Press.
• McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to Cradle. North Point Press.
• McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with Nature. Natural History Press.
• Mei, X., Liu, C., & Li, Z. (2024). Research progress on functional, structural and material design of plant-inspired green bionic buildings. Energy and Buildings, 114357.
• Menges, A. (2012). Material Computation: Higher Integration in Morphogenetic Design. Architectural Design, 82(2), 14–21.
• Monbiot, G. (2013). Feral: Rewilding the Land, the Sea, and Human Life. Penguin Books.
• Mostafavi, M., & Doherty, G. (2010). Ecological Urbanism. Lars Müller Publishers.
• Norberg-Schulz, C. (1971). Existence, Space and Architecture. Praeger.
• Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. Rizzoli.
• Oliver, P. (2006). Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Architecture. Routledge.
• Otto, F. (2005). Bionik–Natur–Idee. Birkhäuser.
• Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Wiley.
• Pawlyn, M. (2011). Biomimicry in Architecture. RIBA Publishing.
• Pearson, D. (2001). New organic architecture: the breaking wave. University of California Press.
• Perez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J., & Pout, C. (2008). A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy and Buildings, 40(3), 394–398.
• Pohl, G., & Nachtigall, W. (2015). Biomimetics for Architecture & Design: Nature-Analogies-Technology. Springer.
• Rasmussen, S. .E. (1964). Experiencing Architecture – 2nd Edition. London: The Mit Press.
• Rios, F. J., Grau, D., & Francisco, C. (2015). Environmental benefits of reuse of construction materials in temporary structures: A case study in Brazil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, 67–76.
• Roaf, S., Fuentes, M., & Thomas, S. (2007). Ecohouse: A Design Guide. Architectural Press.
• Ryan CO, Browning WO, Clancy JO, et al. (2014). Biophilic design patterns: Emerging nature-based parameters for health and well-being in the built environment. International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(2), 62-76.
• Salingaros, N. A. (2006). A Theory of Architecture. Umbau-Verlag.
• Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2007). Flexible Housing. Architectural Press.
• Sheweka, S., & Magdy, A. N. (2011). The living walls as an approach for a healthy urban environment. Energy Procedia, 6, 592-599.
• Smith, B. (2001). Organic Architecture and the Sustainability Paradigm. Journal of Architectural Theory, 8(2), 45–60.
• Steiner, F. (2000). The Living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning. McGraw-Hill.
• Steinitz, C. (1990). A framework for theory applicable to the education of landscape architects. Landscape Journal, 9(1), 136–143.
• Szokolay, S.V. (2008) Introduction to Architectural Science The Basis of Sustainable Design, Architectural Press, Oxford.
• Şentürer, A. (2005). Ekolojik mimarlıkta sürdürülebilir malzeme kullanımı. Yapı Dergisi, 284, 52–56.
• Tschumi, B. (1996). Architecture and Disjunction. MIT Press.
• Tregenza, P., & Wilson, M. (2011). Daylighting: Architecture and Lighting Design. Routledge.
• Tuan, Y.-F. (1979). Landscapes of Fear. University of Minnesota Press.
• Ulrich, R. (1984). View through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery. Science.
• White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Bell, S., Elliott, L. R., Gascon, M., & Fleming, L. E. (2013). Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits. Environmental Research, 142, 38–50.
• Wright, F. L. (1939). An Organic Architecture: The Architecture of Democracy. Lund Humphries.
• Vale, B., & Vale, R. (1991). Green Architecture: Design for a Sustainable Future. Thames and Hudson.
• Yeang, K. (1999). The Green Skyscraper: The Basis for Designing Sustainable Intensive Buildings. Prestel.
• Zari, M. P. (2007). Biomimetic approaches to architectural design for increased sustainability. Sustainable Building Conference, 1-10.