Gürültünün Tanımı ve Müzikle İlişkisi: Bir Literatür Derlemesi

Abstract

Gürültüye getirilmiş olan çeşitli tanımların kronolojik şekilde derlendiği ve değerlendirildiği bu araştırmada, özellikle müzik bilimleri çerçevesinde çalışmalarda bulunmuş yazarların gürültüyü nasıl düşündüğü irdelenmiştir. Her bir yazarın kendi disipliner paradigması içerisinde tutarlılık ve özgünlük taşıdığı görülen yaklaşımlarıyla oluşan düşünce dizisi göstermiştir ki, gürültünün tanımlanması çetrefilli bir meseledir. Farklı yazarlar, gürültüyü tanımlamakta güçlüğe sebep olan etmenler arasında gürültünün algılanması sürecinin öznelliğini, gelişen teknolojinin etkisini, modern gündelik yaşam pratiklerini, kültür unsurunu ve disiplinlerarası bakış eksikliğini işaret etmişlerdir. Öte yandan bu araştırma, literatürde zaman içerisinde gürültü ve müzik arasındaki sınırların nasıl eridiğine, gürültünün müziğin alanına nasıl girdiğine ve hatta gürültünün doğrudan müzikleşmesi üzerinden ‘gürültü müziği’ kavramına da ışık tutmaktadır. Araştırmada derlenen tanımlar, gürültünün kısıtlı bir alanda dahi ne denli çok yönlü ve esnek bir kavram olduğunu gözler önüne sermiştir. Böylelikle alandaki gürültü düşüncesinin çok yönlülüğü keşfedilmiş, gürültü ve müzik ilişkisinin literatürdeki yansıması değerlendirilmiştir.

Keywords

• Gürültü
• müzik
• kültür
• estetik
• literatür

The Definition of Noise and How it Relates to Music: A Literature Review

Abstract

In this research, various definitions of noise are chronologically compiled and evaluated, particularly within the framework of music sciences. The study explores how different authors conceive of noise, emphasizing the consistency and uniqueness of each author’s approach within their disciplinary paradigm. The thought sequence formed by these approaches demonstrates that defining noise is a complex issue. The authors highlight factors complicating noise definition, such as the subjectivity of the perception of noise, the impact of evolving technology, practices of modern daily life, cultural elements, and the lack of interdisciplinary perspectives. Furthermore, this research sheds light on how the boundaries between noise and music have blurred over time, how noise has entered the domain of music, and even the concept of ’noise music’ emerging through the direct musicalization of noise. The compiled definitions in the study reveal the versatility and flexibility of the concept of noise, even within a limited scope. Thus, the multifaceted nature of noise thinking in the field is uncovered, and the reflection of the relationship between noise and music in the literature is evaluated.

Keywords

• Noise
• music
• culture
• aesthetics
• literature

References

1. Arya, R. (2014). The many faces of abjection: a review of recent literatüre. Journal for Cultural Research, 18(4), 406-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2014.941162 google scholar
2. Attali, J. (1985). Noise: The Political Economy of Music. (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
3. Bartholomew, W. T. (1942). Acoustics of Music. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. google scholar
4. Dubois, P. (2016). L’impossible tentationdubruitdans lamusique anglaise alafinduXVIHe siecle. InEtudes Episteme (Issue 29). OpenEdition. https://doi.org/10.4000/episteme.1122 google scholar
5. Duschinsky, R. (2013). Abjection and self-identity: towards a revised account of purity and impurity. SAGE The Sociological Review, 61(4), 709-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.12081 google scholar
6. Fagan, A. (2010). Theodor Adorno (1903-1969). Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://iep.utm.edu/adorno/ google scholar
7. Foreman, J. E. K. (1990). Basics of Sound. In: Sound Analysis and Noise Control. (pp. 1-15) Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6677-5_1 google scholar
8. Fulka, J. (2006). Le langage de l’abjection: kristeva et celine. Verbum, 8(1), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1556/verb.8.2006.1.8 google scholar

9. Hainge, G. (2013). Noise Matters: Towards An Ontology of Noise. Oxford, UK: Bloomsbury Academic. google scholar
10. Hegarty, P. (2005). Noise and Music: A History. Oxford, UK: Bloomsbury google scholar
11. Hegarty, P. (2001). Noise threshold: merzbow and the end of natural sound. Organized Sound, 6, 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771801003053 google scholar
12. Jensen, K. (2004). Irregularities, noise and random fluctuations in musical sounds. JMM: The Journal of Music and Meaning, 2. Retrieved from http://www.musicandmeaning.net/issues/showArticle.php?artID=2.3 google scholar
13. Kaplan, D. (1976). The joys of noise part 1. Music Educators Journal, 62(6), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3394951. google scholar
14. Kelly, C. (2009). Cracked Media: The Sound of Malfunction. Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press. google scholar
15. Liu, F., Jiang, S., Kang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, D., Meng, Q., & Wang, C. (2022). On the definition of noise. Springer Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01431-x google scholar
16. Luna, I. B. (2021). Noise is not volume alone - ambiences and drony experiments in music and sound art. Revista V6rtex, 9(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.33871/23179937.2021.9.2.2 google scholar
17. Mazurek, M. G. (2022). Aesthetic noise: listening philosophically. (Doctoral dissertation, Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts, Portland, Maine). Retrieved from https://digitalmaine.com/academic/42 google scholar
18. Meriam, A. P. (1964). The Anthropology of Music. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. google scholar
19. Montuschi, E. (2017). There is ’noise,’ and noise. Perspectives on Science, 25, 204-225. https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00241 google scholar
20. Riley, T.R. (2014). Noise: towards a definition (Master’s thesis, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate). Retrieved from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/23709/. google scholar
21. Russolo, L. (1967). The Art of Noise (Futurist Manifesto, 1913). Manhattan, NY: Something Else Press. google scholar
22. Scobie, N. (2015). ’We wanted our coffee black’: public enemy, improvisation, and noise. Critical Studies in Improvisation, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.21083/csieci.v10i1.3028 google scholar
23. Smith, N. (2005). The splinter in your ear: noise as the semblance of critique, Culture, Theory and Critique, 46(1), 43-59, https://doi.org/10.1080/14735780500102421 google scholar
24. Van Nort, D. (2006). Noise/music and representation systems. Organized Sound, 11(2), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355771806001452 google scholar
25. Verhagen, D.S. (2015). Noise, music & perception: towards a functional understanding of noise composition (Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University, Melbourne). Retrieved from: https://researchrepository.rmit.edu.au/esploro/fulltext/doctoral/Noise-music-perception-towards-a/9921863770301341?repId=12248219000001341&mId=13248419750001341&institution=61RMIT_INST google scholar
26. Wittje, R. (2020). Noise: from nuisance to research subject. Physics Today, 73, 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.4409 google scholar
27. Wolf, M. (2009). Thinking about noise. Paper presented at Sound, Sight, Space and Play conference, De Montfort University, Leicester. Retrieved from http://www.mti.dmu.ac.uk/events-conferences/sssp2009/ google scholar