Medyatizasyon Süreci Bağlamında Müziğin Teknolojisi, Teknolojinin Müziği

Abstract

Yeni medya ortamlarının yapısı, toplumsal, kültürel ve kişisel birçok uygulamaya, medyada temsil edilebilecek bir değer kazandırmıştır. Bu uygulamalardan biri olan müzik, geleneksel medyadan aldığı referansla yeni medya ortamlarında sıklıkla görünür hale gelmekte; bu görünürlük, müziğin kendisinden başlayarak müzisyene, türlere, alt türlere ve tarzlara kadar genişleyebilmektedir. Müzik, medya teknolojilerindeki gelişmelerin yanı sıra elektronik ve bilgisayar teknolojilerindeki ilerlemelere de duyarlıdır; temsili, biçimi, üretimi, dağıtımı ve tüketimi bu değişimler doğrultusunda dönüşmektedir. Müziğin karakteristiğine de etki etmekte olan teknolojik gelişmelerin sonuncusu yapay zekâ ile müzik üretiminin mümkün hale gelmesidir. Müziğin teknoloji ile etkileşiminin somut bir göstergesi olan bu gelişme, yapay zekâ ile müzik üretimini mümkün kılan uygulamaların medya araçlarıyla tanıtılmasıyla, medyatizasyon bağlamında da ele alınabilmektedir. Bu araştırma, müziğin teknoloji ve medya ile giderek sıkılaşan bağını kavramsal düzeyde tartışmayı ve yapay zekâ uygulamaları ile müzisyen iş birliklerini içeren haberlerde bu bağın nasıl sunulduğunu analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada tümevarımsal çerçeveleme analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda elde edilen bulgular, nitel ve nicel olarak ortaya konmuş, yapay zekâ ve müzisyen iş birliğini konu edinen haberlerde tanımlama, müzikal unsurlar ve insan etkisi çerçevelerinin yoğun bir biçimde işlendiği görülmüştür

Keywords

• Yapay zekâ
• medyatizasyon
• müzik

The Technology of Music, the Music of Technology From the Perspective of Mediatization

Abstract

The structure of new media environments has endowed numerous social, cultural, and personal practices with a representational value in the media. One such practice, music, frequently gains visibility in new media environments by drawing on references from traditional media. This visibility can extend from music itself to musicians, genres, subgenres, and styles. Music is not only responsive to advancements in media technologies but also to developments in electronic and computer technologies; its representation, form, production, distribution, and consumption are transformed in line with these changes. The latest technological advancement influencing the characteristics of music is the emergence of artificial intelligence, which has made music production possible through AI-driven processes. This development, which serves as a concrete indicator of music's interaction with technology, can also be examined within the context of mediatization, as artificial intelligence-driven music production applications are promoted through media channels. This study aims to discuss the increasingly intertwined relationship between music, technology, and media at a conceptual level and to analyze how this relationship is presented in news articles covering collaborations between artificial intelligence applications and musicians. The research employs an inductive framing analysis technique. The findings derived from the analysis are presented both qualitatively and quantitatively, revealing that news articles focusing on AI-musician collaborations heavily emphasize frames related to definition, musical elements, and human influence.

Keywords

• Artificial intelligence
• mediatization
• music

References

1. Aksoy, G. P. & Nisan, F. (2017). Türkiye’deki terör olayları çerçevesinde Ankara patlamaları üzerine bir içerik analizi çalışması. TRT Akademi, 2(3), 134-158. google scholar
2. Brene, S. & Carl, T. (2014). How musical instrumentation affects perceptual identification of musical genres. Thesis, KTH, Skolan for datavetenskap och kommunikation (CSC), http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-157339. google scholar
3. Bohlman PV. (1999). Ontologies of music. In N. Cook & M. Everist (Eds.), Rethinking Music, (pp. 17–34). Chicago Press google scholar
4. Bunz, M. & Braghieri, M. (2022). The AI doctor will see you now: assessing the framing of AI in news coverage. AI & Soc 37, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01145-9 google scholar
5. Collins, N., Schedel, M. & Wilson, S. (2013). Electronic music. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
6. Couldry, N. & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. google scholar
7. D’Angelo, P. & Kuypers, J. A. (2009). Introduction: doing news framing analysis. In P. D’Angelo & J.A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing News Framing Analysis Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, (pp. 1-13). Routledge. google scholar
8. Deuze, M. (2014). Media life and the mediatization of the lifeworld. In Hepp, A. & Krotz, F. (Eds.), Mediatized Worlds, (pp. 207-220). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137300355_12 google scholar

9. Ekström, M., Fornäs, J., Jansson, A., & Jerslev, A. (2016). Three tasks for mediatization research: contributions to an open agenda. Media, Culture & Society, 38(7), 1090-1108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716664857 google scholar
10. Emmerson, S. (2018). Introduction. In S. Emmerson (Eds.), The Routledge research companion to electronic music, (pp.1-17). Routledge. google scholar
11. Emmerson, S., & Smalley, D. (2001). Electro-acoustic music. Grove Music Online. google scholar
12. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. google scholar
13. Fry, H. (2018). Hello world being human in the age of algorithms. W. W. Norton & Company. google scholar
14. Fornäs, J. (2014). Culturalizing mediatization. In Hepp, A. & Krotz, F. (Eds.), Mediatized Worlds. Palgrave Macmillan, (pp.38-53). London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137300355_3 google scholar
15. Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillesipe, P. Boczkowski, K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, (pp. 167-193). The MIT Press. google scholar
16. Grammy. (2024, Kasım 27). Jona Bechtolt, https://www.grammy.com/artists/jona-bechtolt/251649 google scholar
17. Govindarajan, M. (2021). Challenges in big data analysis. In M. Khosrow-Pour D.B.A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fifth Edition (pp. 577-585). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3479-3.ch041 google scholar
18. Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080 google scholar
19. Hjarvard, S. (2017). Mediatization: critical theory approaches to media effects. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. V. Zoonen (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (Vol. 3, pp. 1221-1241). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0107 google scholar
20. Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of mediatization. Wiley. google scholar
21. Holmes, T. (2002). Electronic and experimental music. Routledge. google scholar
22. Hosken, D. (2015). An introduction to music technology. Routledge. google scholar
23. IFPI. (2024, Kasım 21). Engaging with Music 2023. https://www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/IFPI-Engaging-With-Music-2023_full-report.pdf google scholar
24. IFPI (2024, Kasım 21). Global Music Report 2024. https://globalmusicreport.ifpi.org/ google scholar
25. Jenkins, H. (2017). Medya yöndeşmesinin kültürel mantığı, (E. Çizmeci, Çev.), Aydoğan F. (Ed.), Yeni Medya Kuramları içinde (s.33-45). Der Yayınları. google scholar
26. Kaniža, R. (2023). Reshaping the musical experience: a critical examination of musique concrète and the notion of ‘music of technology, INSAM Journal of Contemporary Music, Art and Technology, 10, 136–156. https://doi.org/10.51191/issn.2637-1898.2023.6.10.136 google scholar
27. Knoblauch, H. (2013) Communicative constructivism and mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 297-315. google scholar
28. Kristensen, N. N., & Christensen, C. L. (2017). The mediatization of fashion: The case of fashion blogs. In O. Driessens, G. Bolin, & S. Hjarvard (Eds.), Dynamics of mediatization. Institutional change and everyday transformations in a digital age (pp. 225–246). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
29. Krotz, F., & Hepp, A. (2011). A concretization of mediatization: How “mediatization works” and why mediatized worlds are a helpful concept for empirical mediatization research. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3(2), 137–152. doi:10.1386/ejpc.3.2.137_1 google scholar
30. Kvifte, T. (2008). What is a musical instrument?. Svensk Tidskrift för Musikforskning Swedish Journal of Music Research, 90, 45–56. Hämtad från https://publicera.kb.se/stm-sjm/article/view/34186 google scholar
31. Michelsen, M. & Krogh, M. (2017). Music, radio, and mediatization. Media, Culture & Society, 39(4), 520-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716648494 google scholar
32. Miller, J. (2017). Mediatization of the automobile. In O. Driessens, G. Bolin, & S. Hjarvard (Eds.), Dynamics of mediatization. Institutional change and everyday transformations in a digital age (pp. 203–223). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
33. Musique concrète. (2018, Nisan 27). Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia içinde. https://www.britannica.com/art/musique-concrete google scholar
34. NASA, (2024, Aralık 05). What is artificial intelligence? https://www.nasa.gov/what-is-artificial-intelligence/ google scholar
35. Nieborg, D. B. & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275-4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694 google scholar
36. Nisan, F. & Şeker, N. T. (2017). Demokrasiyi sekteye uğratan darbe haberlerinin çerçevelenmesi: 15 Temmuz 2016 darbe girişimi örneği. TRT Akademi, 2(3), 68-96. google scholar
37. Nisan, F. (2022). Haberdeki çerçeve. Çizgi Kitabevi Yayınları. google scholar
38. Olson, M. (2014). Postinernet: art after the internet. Art and the Internet. Black Dog Publishing. P:60 google scholar
39. Papatzikis, E. & Rishony, H. (2022). What is music for neuroplasticity? Combined value on ınfant development and inclusion. In M. google scholar
40. Efstratopoulou (Eds.), Rethinking Inclusion and Transformation in Special Education (pp. 160-177). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4680-5.ch010 google scholar
41. Parker III, F. R. (2023). The aesthetic domain as a means for developing sel in the college classroom. In R. Rahimi & D. Liston (Eds.), Exploring Social Emotional Learning in Diverse Academic Settings (pp. 191-204). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7227-9.ch010 google scholar
42. Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B. & Duffy, B. E. (2021). Platforms and cultural production. Cambridge: Polity. google scholar
43. Pontara, T. &Volgsten, U. (2017). Musicalization and mediatization. In Driessens, O., Bolin, G., Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S. (eds) Dynamics Of Mediatization. Transforming Communications – Studies in Cross-Media Research. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62983-4_12 google scholar
44. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press. google scholar
45. Roy, W. G. & Dowd, T. J. (2010). What is sociological about music? Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 183–203. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102618 google scholar
46. Sa Martino, L. M. (2013). The mediatization of religion. Routledge. google scholar
47. Schaffer, P. (2017). In treatise on musical objects. Unıversity of California Press. google scholar
48. Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87–101 SAGE Publications. google scholar
49. Semetko, H. & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing european politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication. 50, 93-109. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x. google scholar
50. Sharon, D. & Bell, D. (2012). A cappella arranging. Rowman & Littlefield. google scholar
51. Storey, J. & McDonald, K. (2014). Media love: intimacy in mediatized worlds. In Hepp, A., Krotz, F. (Eds.), Mediatized worlds. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137300355_13 google scholar
52. Şimşek İ. F. (2014). Fotoğraf ve ideolojik çerçeveleme: ‘1 Mayıs’ haberlerinin fotoğraflarına yönelik bir odak grup çalışması, ASOS Journal The Journal of Academic Social Science, (2)5, 592-608. google scholar
53. Teruggi, D. (2017). The treatise on musical objects and the GRM. In Treatise on Musical Objects (pp. xv-xix). Unıversity of California Press. google scholar
54. Tullberg, M. (2020). An exploration of musician/musical instrument relationships. Curated/produced exhibition/event, https://www.mhm.lu.se/en/markus-tullberg/publication/74a4232e-79bb-48d6-a47a-dcd8f8a9b0a5 google scholar
55. Turk, M., Turk, I., & Otte, M. (2020). The neanderthal musical instrument from Divje Babe I Cave (Slovenia): A critical review of the discussion. Applied Sciences, 10(4), 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041226 google scholar
56. Uzun, Y. & Nisan, F. (2018). 16 Nisan 2017 anayasa değişikliği referandum sürecinin ulusal basındaki haber çerçevelenmesi üzerine bir çalışma. İnönü Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi (İNİF E-Dergi), 3(1), 159-176. google scholar
57. Van Dooremalen, T. & Uitermark, J. (2020). The framing of 9/11 in American, French, and Dutch national newspapers (2001–2015): An inductive approach to studying events. International Sociology, 36(3), 464-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920966829 google scholar
58. Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? victims and İntruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 484-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253 google scholar
59. Van Gorp, B. (2007), The constructionist approach to framing: bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57, 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x google scholar
60. Van Gorp B & Vercruysse T. (2012). Frames and counter-frames giving meaning to dementia: a framing analysis of media content. Soc Sci Med. 74(8):1274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.045. google scholar
61. Varış, Y. A. (2021). Reflections of violence in Music. In M. Erdem, N. Kocabay-Sener, & T. Demir (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Aestheticization of Violence, Horror, and Power (pp. 98-118). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4655-0.ch006 google scholar
62. Waugh, M. (2017). My laptop is an extension of my memory and self: Post-Internet identity, virtual intimacy and digital queering in online popular music. Popular Music, 36(02), 233–251. doi:10.1017/s0261143017000083 google scholar
63. Weisberg, D. J. (2019). The utility of interdisciplinary case study: research and education in the arts and sciences. In A. Baron & K. McNeal (Eds.), Case Study Methodology in Higher Education (pp. 261-279). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9429-1.ch012 google scholar
64. Windsor, L. (2000). Through and around the acousmatic: the interpretation of electroacoustic sounds. In S. Emmerson (Ed.), Music, Electronic Media and Culture (pp.7-35). Ashgate. google scholar
65. Yıldız, M. & Saylam, A. (2013). E-government discourses: An inductive analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 141–153. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.10.007 google scholar