Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

AB Küresel Stratejisinin Başarısı Hakkında Bir Değerlendirme

Year 2022, Volume: 14 Issue: 27, 362 - 379, 31.12.2022

Gökhan Akşemsettinoğlu

https://doi.org/10.38155/ksbd.1139224

Abstract

Son on yıl içinde Avrupa Birliği (AB)’nin yakın çevresinde ortaya çıkan siyasi-askeri tehditler, krizler ve çatışmalar, Avrupa Birliği üyesi devletlerin güvenlik ile ilgili tehdit algılamalarını değiştirmiştir. Dolayısıyla AB, farklılaşan tehditlere ve artan çatışmalara cevap verebilmek için 2016 yılında AB Küresel Stratejisini duyurmuştur. Küresel Strateji, AB’nin ilk stratejisi olarak benimsenen ve 2003 yılında açıklanan Avrupa Güvenlik Stratejisi’nin yerine geçmiştir. Bu çalışma, AB Küresel Stratejisi’nin son beş yıllık dönem içinde ne kadar başarılı olduğunu araştırmaktadır. Nitel araştırma metotlarından veri/belge analizi yöntemini kullanan bu çalışma, Küresel Strateji tarafından ortaya koyulan bakış açısını, AB’nin dış ve güvenlik politikasına ait çıkarları, ilkeleri ve öncelikleri çerçevesinde açıklamaktadır. Çalışma, son beş yılda elde edilen bulgular çerçevesinde AB’nin özellikle güvenlik ve savunma konularında askeri tedbirleri ve araçları öne çıkaran bir yaklaşımla, önceliklerini hayata geçirme konusunda oldukça başarılı olduğu ve yeni duyurulan Stratejik Pusula gibi girişimlere askeri bir temel hazırladığı sonuca varmaktadır.

Keywords

Avrupa Birliği Küresel Strateji ODGP OGSP

References

  • Barbé, E. ve Morillas, P. (2019). The EU global strategy: the dynamics of a more politicized and politically integrated foreign policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (6), 753-770. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1588227.
  • Bargués, P. ve Morillas, P. (2021). From democratization to fostering resilience: EU intervention and the challenges of building institutions, social trust, and legitimacy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Democratization, 28 (7), 1319-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1900120.
  • Besch, S. (2019). The European commission in EU defence industrial policy. Carnegie Europe, October, 1-7.
  • Biscop, S. (2021). Analysing the EU global strategy on foreign and security policy. Rehrl, J. (Ed.), Handbook on CSDP, the common security and defence policy of the European Union kitabı içinde (s. 29-36). Vienna: Publication of the Federal Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Austria.
  • Biscop, S. (2016a). The EU global strategy: realpolitik with European characteristics. Woischnik, J. (Ed.), Might and right in world politics kitabı içinde (s. 91-97). Rio de Janeiro: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
  • Biscop, S. (2016b). All or nothing? The EU global strategy and defence policy after the Brexit. Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1238120.
  • Biscop, S. (2017). How the EU can save NATO? Security Policy Brief, (83), 1-5. Bunde, T. (2021). Defending European integration by (symbolically) integrating European defence? Germany and its ambivalent role in European security and defence policy. Journal of European Integration, 43 (2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877693.
  • Council of the European Union. (2021, 22 Nisan). Implementation plan on security and defence. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_implementation_plan_st14392.en16_0.pdf.
  • Cross, M. K. D. (2016). The EU global strategy and diplomacy. Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1237820.
  • Csornai, Z. (2017). Evaluating the effects of Brexit on the EU’s common security and defence policy. KKI Policy Brief, (14), 1-12.
  • Duke, W. S. (2019). The competing logics of EU security and defence. Survival, Global Politics and Strategy, 61 (2), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1589092.
  • European External Action Service (2021a, 22 Nisan). Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe, a global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf.
  • European External Action Service (2021b, 22 Nisan). From shared vision to common action: implementing the EU global strategy, year 1. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs-report-full_brochure_year_1.pdf.
  • European External Action Service (2021c, 22 Nisan). Implementing the EU global strategy, year 2. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_annual_report_year_2.pdf.
  • European External Action Service (2021d, 22 Nisan). The European Union’s global strategy, three years on, looking forward. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eu_global_strategy_2019.pdf.
  • Fiott, D. (2017). The CARD on the EU defence table. European Union Institute for Security Studies, (April), 1-2.
  • Giusti, S. (2020). The European Union global strategy and the EU’s maieutic role. JCMS, 58 (6), 1452-1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13047.
  • Haastrup, T., Wright, K. A. M. ve Guerrina, R. (2019). Bringing gender in? EU foreign and security policy after Brexit. Politics and Governance, 7 (3), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2153.
  • Hage, M. F. (2020). Allocating political attention in the EU’s foreign and security policy: the effect of supranational agenda-setters. European Union Politics, 21 (4), 634-656. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1465116520942317.
  • Helwig, N. (2018). New tasks for EU-NATO cooperation: an inclusive EU defence policy requires close collaboration with NATO. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, (4, January), 1-4.
  • Howorth, J. (2019). Differentiation in security and defence policy. Comparative European Politics, 17 (2), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00161-w.
  • Joseph, J ve Juncos, A. E. (2020). A promise not fulfilled: the (non) implementation of the resilience turn in EU peacebuilding. Contemporary Security Policy, 41 (2), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1703082.
  • Juncos, A. E. (2017). Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm: a pragmatist turn? European Security, 26 (1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2016.1247809.
  • Koppa, M. (2019). The relationship between CSDP and NATO after Brexit and the EU global strategy. FEPS Studies, (April), 1-29.
  • Korosteleva, A. E. ve Flockhart, T. (2020). Resilience in EU and international institutions: redefining local ownership in a new global governance agenda. Contemporary Security Policy, 41 (2), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1723973.
  • Korosteleva, A. E. (2020). Reclaiming resilience back: a local turn in EU external governance. Contemporary Security Policy, 41 (2), 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1685316.
  • Leuprecht, C. (2019). New opportunities in common security and defence policy: joining PESCO. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 11 (3), 76-96. https://doi.org/10.30722/anzjes.vol11.iss3.15109.
  • Lucia, L. E. (2017). Performing EU agency by experimenting the ‘comprehensive approach’: the European Union Sahel strategy. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 35 (4), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2017.1338831.
  • Mälksoo, M. (2018). Countering hybrid warfare as ontological security management: the emerging practices of the EU and NATO. European Security, 27 (3), 374-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497984.
  • Mälksoo, M. (2016). From the ESS to the EU global strategy: external policy, internal purpose. Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 374-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1238245.
  • Renard, T. (2018). EU cyber partnerships: assessing the EU strategic partnerships with third countries in the cyber domain. European Politics and Society, 19 (3), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2018.1430720.
  • Tardy, T. (2018). Does European defence really matter? Fortunes and misfortunes of the common security and defence policy. European Security, 27 (2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1454434.
  • Tocci, N. (2017). From the European security strategy to the EU global strategy: explaining the journey. International Politics, 54 (2), 487-502. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0045-9.
  • Tocci, N. (2016). The making of the EU global strategy. Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1232559.
  • Tocci, N. (2018). Towards a European security and defence union: was 2017 a watershed? JCMS, 56 (Annual Review), 131-141.
  • Wagner, W. ve Anholt, R. (2016). Resilience as the EU global strategy’s new leitmotif: pragmatic, problematic or promising? Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 414-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1228034.

Year 2022, Volume: 14 Issue: 27, 362 - 379, 31.12.2022

Gökhan Akşemsettinoğlu

https://doi.org/10.38155/ksbd.1139224

Abstract

References

  • Barbé, E. ve Morillas, P. (2019). The EU global strategy: the dynamics of a more politicized and politically integrated foreign policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (6), 753-770. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1588227.
  • Bargués, P. ve Morillas, P. (2021). From democratization to fostering resilience: EU intervention and the challenges of building institutions, social trust, and legitimacy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Democratization, 28 (7), 1319-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1900120.
  • Besch, S. (2019). The European commission in EU defence industrial policy. Carnegie Europe, October, 1-7.
  • Biscop, S. (2021). Analysing the EU global strategy on foreign and security policy. Rehrl, J. (Ed.), Handbook on CSDP, the common security and defence policy of the European Union kitabı içinde (s. 29-36). Vienna: Publication of the Federal Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Austria.
  • Biscop, S. (2016a). The EU global strategy: realpolitik with European characteristics. Woischnik, J. (Ed.), Might and right in world politics kitabı içinde (s. 91-97). Rio de Janeiro: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
  • Biscop, S. (2016b). All or nothing? The EU global strategy and defence policy after the Brexit. Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1238120.
  • Biscop, S. (2017). How the EU can save NATO? Security Policy Brief, (83), 1-5. Bunde, T. (2021). Defending European integration by (symbolically) integrating European defence? Germany and its ambivalent role in European security and defence policy. Journal of European Integration, 43 (2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877693.
  • Council of the European Union. (2021, 22 Nisan). Implementation plan on security and defence. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_implementation_plan_st14392.en16_0.pdf.
  • Cross, M. K. D. (2016). The EU global strategy and diplomacy. Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1237820.
  • Csornai, Z. (2017). Evaluating the effects of Brexit on the EU’s common security and defence policy. KKI Policy Brief, (14), 1-12.
  • Duke, W. S. (2019). The competing logics of EU security and defence. Survival, Global Politics and Strategy, 61 (2), 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1589092.
  • European External Action Service (2021a, 22 Nisan). Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe, a global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf.
  • European External Action Service (2021b, 22 Nisan). From shared vision to common action: implementing the EU global strategy, year 1. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs-report-full_brochure_year_1.pdf.
  • European External Action Service (2021c, 22 Nisan). Implementing the EU global strategy, year 2. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_annual_report_year_2.pdf.
  • European External Action Service (2021d, 22 Nisan). The European Union’s global strategy, three years on, looking forward. Erişim adresi: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eu_global_strategy_2019.pdf.
  • Fiott, D. (2017). The CARD on the EU defence table. European Union Institute for Security Studies, (April), 1-2.
  • Giusti, S. (2020). The European Union global strategy and the EU’s maieutic role. JCMS, 58 (6), 1452-1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13047.
  • Haastrup, T., Wright, K. A. M. ve Guerrina, R. (2019). Bringing gender in? EU foreign and security policy after Brexit. Politics and Governance, 7 (3), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2153.
  • Hage, M. F. (2020). Allocating political attention in the EU’s foreign and security policy: the effect of supranational agenda-setters. European Union Politics, 21 (4), 634-656. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1465116520942317.
  • Helwig, N. (2018). New tasks for EU-NATO cooperation: an inclusive EU defence policy requires close collaboration with NATO. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, (4, January), 1-4.
  • Howorth, J. (2019). Differentiation in security and defence policy. Comparative European Politics, 17 (2), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00161-w.
  • Joseph, J ve Juncos, A. E. (2020). A promise not fulfilled: the (non) implementation of the resilience turn in EU peacebuilding. Contemporary Security Policy, 41 (2), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1703082.
  • Juncos, A. E. (2017). Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm: a pragmatist turn? European Security, 26 (1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2016.1247809.
  • Koppa, M. (2019). The relationship between CSDP and NATO after Brexit and the EU global strategy. FEPS Studies, (April), 1-29.
  • Korosteleva, A. E. ve Flockhart, T. (2020). Resilience in EU and international institutions: redefining local ownership in a new global governance agenda. Contemporary Security Policy, 41 (2), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1723973.
  • Korosteleva, A. E. (2020). Reclaiming resilience back: a local turn in EU external governance. Contemporary Security Policy, 41 (2), 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1685316.
  • Leuprecht, C. (2019). New opportunities in common security and defence policy: joining PESCO. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 11 (3), 76-96. https://doi.org/10.30722/anzjes.vol11.iss3.15109.
  • Lucia, L. E. (2017). Performing EU agency by experimenting the ‘comprehensive approach’: the European Union Sahel strategy. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 35 (4), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2017.1338831.
  • Mälksoo, M. (2018). Countering hybrid warfare as ontological security management: the emerging practices of the EU and NATO. European Security, 27 (3), 374-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497984.
  • Mälksoo, M. (2016). From the ESS to the EU global strategy: external policy, internal purpose. Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 374-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1238245.
  • Renard, T. (2018). EU cyber partnerships: assessing the EU strategic partnerships with third countries in the cyber domain. European Politics and Society, 19 (3), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2018.1430720.
  • Tardy, T. (2018). Does European defence really matter? Fortunes and misfortunes of the common security and defence policy. European Security, 27 (2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1454434.
  • Tocci, N. (2017). From the European security strategy to the EU global strategy: explaining the journey. International Politics, 54 (2), 487-502. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0045-9.
  • Tocci, N. (2016). The making of the EU global strategy. Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1232559.
  • Tocci, N. (2018). Towards a European security and defence union: was 2017 a watershed? JCMS, 56 (Annual Review), 131-141.
  • Wagner, W. ve Anholt, R. (2016). Resilience as the EU global strategy’s new leitmotif: pragmatic, problematic or promising? Contemporary Security Policy, 37 (3), 414-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1228034.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gökhan Akşemsettinoğlu 0000-0002-6990-6834

Early Pub Date October 22, 2022
Publication Date December 31, 2022
Submission Date July 1, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 14 Issue: 27

Cite

APA Akşemsettinoğlu, G. (2022). AB Küresel Stratejisinin Başarısı Hakkında Bir Değerlendirme. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(27), 362-379. https://doi.org/10.38155/ksbd.1139224
 Download Cover Image