The Reading Strategy Use Profile of EFL Learners

Year 2021, , 1 - 12, 24.06.2021

Mustafa Caner , Ersen Vural , Işıl Yalçın

https://doi.org/10.35207/later.932002

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore foreign language reading strategy use profile of the prep-school students at a Turkish university with reference to the proficiency levels,
genders, and the majors of the participants. The participants were 186 Turkish students enrolled in various levels of intensive English courses at a prep-school in a Turkish
university. The present study adopted a cross sectional quantitative research design and its data was gathered by means of a foreign language reading strategy questionnaire. The
analysis of the findings indicated that focal participants of this study generally use global reading strategies (x̅ 4.52), problem-solving strategies (x̅ 3.67), and support strategies (x̅
3.16) respectively. In terms of gender, and the majors of the participants, it was found that the difference is not significant in both variables. As for the proficiency levels of the
participants, it was found that low proficient students use more reading strategies than the high proficient students do in general.

Keywords

Reading strategies, EFL, Reading

References

• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. (2008). Skills and strategies: Their differences, their relationships, and why it matters. In K. Mokhtari, and R. Sheorey (Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second- language learners: See how they read (pp. 11–24). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
• Anderson, N. J. (2009). ACTIVE reading: The research base for a pedagogical approach in the reading classroom. In Z. H. Han and N. J. Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading research and instruction: Crossing the boundaries (pp. 117-143). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
• Aydin, F., & Yıldırım, O. (2017). Foreign language reading strategy use of intermediate level adult Turkish EFL learners. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(2), 135-158.
• Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil and P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 353 - 394). New York: Longman.
• Brantmeier, C. (2002). The effects of passage content on second language reading comprehension by gender across instruction levels. In J. Hammadou Sullivan. (Ed.), Research in Second Language Learning: Literacy and the Second Language Learner. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
• Brown, A. (1981). Metacognition in reading and writing: The development and facilitation of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In Michael Kamil (Ed.). Directions in Reading: research and instruction, p.21-43. Washington, D.C.: National Reading Co.
• Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
• Chutichaiwirath, K., & Sitthitikul, P. (2017). The Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies in Thai EFL learners. Journal of Nusantara Studies-Jonus, 2(2), 1-14.
• Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
• Daguay-James, H., & Bulusan, F. (2020). Metacognitive strategies on reading English texts of ESL freshmen: A sequential explanatory mixed design. TESOL International Journal,15 (1), 20-30.
• Dreyer, C., & Nell, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategy and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31, 349-365
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
• Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2014). Teaching reading for academic purposes. In M. Celce- Murcia, D. M. Brinton, and M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 189-205). Boston, MA: NGL Heinle Cengage Learning.
• Gurses, M. O., & Bouvet, E. (2016). Investigating reading comprehension and learning styles in relation to reading strategies in L2. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(1), 20-42.
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127-160.
• Hsiao, T. Y., & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368-383.
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
• Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2-10.
• Mokhtari, K., Sheorey, R., & Reichard, C. A. (2008). Measuring the reading strategies of first- and second-language readers. In R. Sheorey and K. Mokhtari (Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second language learners: See how they read (pp. 43-65). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle.
• Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. London, UK: Pearson.
• Palinscar, A. & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1(2):117-1
• Poole, A. (2005). Gender differences in reading strategy use among ESL college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36(1), 7-20.
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum
• Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 273-295.
• Purpura, J. E. (2014). Language learner strategies and styles. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, and M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 532-549). Boston, MA: NGL Heinle Cengage Learning.
• Salatacı, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 1-17
• Sarıçoban, A., & Behjoo, B. M. (2017). Metacognitive awareness of Turkish EFL learners on reading strategies. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(1), 159-172.
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449.
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2008a). Introduction. In R. Sheorey and K. Mokhtari (Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second language learners: See how they read (pp.1-10). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2008b). Differing perceptions of reading strategy use between native and non-native college students. In R. Sheorey and K. Mokhtari (Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second language learners: See how they read (pp. 131-141). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
• Shiotsu, T. (2009). Reading ability and components of word recognition speed: The case of L1-Japanese EFL learners. In Z. Han and N. J. Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading research and instruction (pp. 15-39). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
• Singhal, M. (2001). Reading proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness and L2 readers. The Reading Matrix, 1.
• Song, M. J. (1998). Teaching reading strategies in an ongoing EFL university reading classroom. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 41-54.
• Taraban, R., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. S. (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students' metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25(2), 67-81.
• Wyatt, D., Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Stein, S., Evans, P., & Brown, R. (1993). Comprehension strategies, worth and credibility monitoring, and evaluations: Cold and hot cognition when experts read professional articles that are important to them. Learning and Individual Differences, 5(1), 49–72.