Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park

Alper Sağlık; Merve Temiz; Fatoş Kartal; Dilan Şenkuş

doi:10.30785/mbud.1169558

TR EN

Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park

Abstract

Public open spaces provide many services that will improve the physical and mental health of the society and increase the quality of life. These services are an important indicator for measuring spatial quality. In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the reinforcement elements used in the Özgürlük Park in the city of Çanakkale according to the spatial quality criteria in the Space Quality Diagram. Situation analysis, which is a component of the qualitative research design, was used in line with the target and the reinforcement elements were evaluated as successful or unsuccessful. As a result, it was determined that the park is an area with high quality value, but the "maintenance" criterion was found to be insufficient in the area. It is suggested that the maintenance and repair works of the reinforcement elements and plant elements in the area should be carried out regularly.

Keywords

Quality of life, urban identity, Çanakkale

Thanks

The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics Committee approval was not required for the study.

References

Alpagut, Y. (2003). Toplu konut dış mekânlarında tüm kullanıcılar için erişebilirlik ölçütlerinin saptanması (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Access Address (09.07.2022): Access Address (09.07.2022): https://polen.itu.edu.tr:8443/server/api/core/bitstreams/ba36853c-0e41-4790-a40b 8ad18a5971a6/content
Burns, L. D. (1979). Transportation, temporal and spatial components of accessibility. Toronto: Lexington Books. ISBN-10: ‎ 0669029165.
Burt, M. E. (1978). A survey of quality and value in building. Watford, UK: Building Research Establishment. ISBN-10: ‎ 0851250483.
Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: a case study of Guwahati. Social Indicator Research Journal, (88), 297-310. Doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9191-6.
Dissart, J. & Deller, S. (2000). Quality of life in the planning literature. Journal Planning of Literature, 15(1). Doi: 10.1177/08854120022092962.
Erdönmez, M. E. & Akı, A. (2005). The effects of open public urban spaces on social relations. MEGARON, 1(1), 67-87. Access Address (09.07.2022): https://jag.journalagent.com/megaron/pdfs/MEGARON-21939-ARTICLE-ERDONMEZ.pdf
Erdönmez, M. E. & Çelik, F. (2016). Public space relations in the urban area. Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Cultural Inventory, (14), 145-163. Access Address (09.07.2022): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tubaked/issue/57267/810019
Google Earth (2022). Google Earth Image. Access Address (09.07.2022): https://earth.google.com/web/search/%c3%a7anakkale+%c3%b6zg%c3%bcrl%c3%bck+park%c4%b1/@40.1633576,26.4079543,56.27182868a,784.59513386d,35y,0h,0t,0r/data=CigiJgokC YZVCpW-hDRAEYZVCpW-hDTAGSvtfz-o5iVAIRQQc8ifzlbA
Hacıhasanoğlu, I. & Hacıhasanoğlu, O. (1997). İ.T.Ü. Ayazağa Kampüsü Binalarının ve Yakın Çevrelerinin Özürlülerin Kullanımına Uygun Olarak Düzenlenmesi. İstanbul: İTÜ. Araştırma Fonu Araştırma Projesi.
Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73-76. Doi: 10.1080/01944365908978307.

İnceoğlu, M. & Aytuğ, A. (2009). The concept of quality in urban space. MEGARON, 4(3), 131-146. Access Address (09.07.2022): https://megaronjournal.com/tr/jvi.aspx? pdir=megaron&plng=tur&un=MEGARON-24772
Jacobs, J. (1969). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Karayılmazlar, A. S. & Çelikyay, H. S. (2018). Design and importance of public spaces in cities. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 9(17), 83-90. Access Address (09.07.2022): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/522467
Külekçi, E. A. (2018). Examination of original designs in urban equipment with landscape ergonomics approach. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications (JASA), 3(2), 89-109. e-ISSN: 2548-0170.
Önder, S. & Polat, A.T. (2012, May). The place and importance of urban open-green spaces in urban life. Formation and Maintenance Principles of Urban Landscape Areas Seminar, Konya.
Öztürk, S. & Özdemir, Z. (2013). The effect of urban open and green spaces on the quality of life "The example of Kastamonu". Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 13(1), 109- 116. Access Address (09.07.2022): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/159529
Project of Public Spaces. (2022). What Makes a Successful Place. Access Address (10.07.2022): https://www.pps.org/article/grplacefeat
Sağlık, A., Sağlık, E. & Kelkit, A. (2014, May). Examination of urban reinforcement elements in terms of landscape architecture: Çanakkale city center example. 1st International Urban Planning-Architecture-Design Congress, Kocaeli.
Sağlık, A., Baytan, N., Bayrak, M.İ., Temiz, M. & Kelkit, A. (2020). Optimization of lighting equipment in Çanakkale Public Garden in terms of energy efficiency. Urban Academy | Journal of Urban Culture and Management, 13(43), 4, 599-608. Doi: 10.35674/kent.754469.
Sağlık, E., Sağlık, A. & Temiz, M. (2020). Landscape design-campus walkways-quality of life. GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism Recreation and Sports Sciences (ATRSS), 3(1), 35-46. Doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4003811.
Sağlık, A., Sağlık, E., Kelkit, A., Öncül, N. E. & Temiz, M. (2020). The relationship between livability and landscape design in ÇOMÜ Terzioğlu Campus. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 8(2), 427–441.
Sağlık, A., Demir, S., Çelik, R., Durdymyradov, O. & Bayrak, M. İ. (2021). Investigation of Çanakkale Public Garden in terms of design principles for everyone. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry 23(3), 720-732. Doi: 10.24011/barofd.935509.
Temiz, M. & Sağlık, A. (2021). Sustainable cities: green business parks. Turkish Journal of Landscape Research, 4(1), 1-12. Doi: 10.51552/peyad.786432.
True, E. M. & Türel, H. S. (2017). Analysis of a public space based on the space diagram of Pps (Project For Public Spaces). Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 54(3), 319-326. doi: 10.20289/zfdergi.387931.
Uzgören, G. & Erdönmez, M. E. (2017). A comparative study on the relationship between space quality and urban space activities in public open spaces. MEGARON, 2(1), 41-56. doi: 10.5505/megaron.2016.42650
Yazıcıoğlu, Y. & Erdoğan, S. (2011). SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 3. Baskı Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Landscape Architecture

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Alper Sağlık ^*
0000-0003-1156-1201
Türkiye

Merve Temiz
0000-0002-6662-4399
Türkiye

Fatoş Kartal
0000-0003-3897-7493
Türkiye

Dilan Şenkuş
0000-0002-4577-7580
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 30, 2022

Submission Date

September 1, 2022

Acceptance Date

November 25, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 7 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1169558

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA89TX24TZ

APA

Sağlık, A., Temiz, M., Kartal, F., & Şenkuş, D. (2022). Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(2), 795-812. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1169558

AMA

1.Sağlık A, Temiz M, Kartal F, Şenkuş D. Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park. JASA. 2022;7(2):795-812. doi:10.30785/mbud.1169558

Chicago

Sağlık, Alper, Merve Temiz, Fatoş Kartal, and Dilan Şenkuş. 2022. “Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 7 (2): 795-812. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1169558.

EndNote

Sağlık A, Temiz M, Kartal F, Şenkuş D (December 1, 2022) Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 7 2 795–812.

IEEE

[1]A. Sağlık, M. Temiz, F. Kartal, and D. Şenkuş, “Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park”, JASA, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 795–812, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.30785/mbud.1169558.

ISNAD

Sağlık, Alper - Temiz, Merve - Kartal, Fatoş - Şenkuş, Dilan. “Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 7/2 (December 1, 2022): 795-812. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1169558.

JAMA

1.Sağlık A, Temiz M, Kartal F, Şenkuş D. Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park. JASA. 2022;7:795–812.

MLA

Sağlık, Alper, et al. “Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, vol. 7, no. 2, Dec. 2022, pp. 795-12, doi:10.30785/mbud.1169558.

Vancouver

1.Alper Sağlık, Merve Temiz, Fatoş Kartal, Dilan Şenkuş. Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park. JASA. 2022 Dec. 1;7(2):795-812. doi:10.30785/mbud.1169558

Cited By

Spor Komplekslerinin Deprem Sonrası Kullanımı ve Potansiyelleri: Kahramanmaraş ve Gaziantep Örnekleri

Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD)

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1334040

Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park

Kamusal Açık Alanlarda Mekân Kalite Kavramının İrdelenmesi: Çanakkale Özgürlük Parkı Örneği

Abstract

Keywords

Examining the Concept of Quality of Space in Public Open Spaces: The Example of Çanakkale Özgürlük Park

Abstract

Keywords

Thanks

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Spor Komplekslerinin Deprem Sonrası Kullanımı ve Potansiyelleri: Kahramanmaraş ve Gaziantep Örnekleri

JASA JOURNAL TAG / MBUD DERGİ KÜNYESİ