The Interplay Between Gender and Controlled Environments: A Study on Stimulus Perception

Year 2023, , 865 - 876, 16.12.2023

Navid Khaleghımoghaddam

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1315873

Abstract

Understanding the interplay of gender and environmental perception is important in recognizing how architectural environments can either reinforce or challenge gendered norms and experiences. Literature reviews at a glance show differences between the environmental perception of women and men, which have significant implications for projects aimed at improving the quality of the environment. Thus, 240 architecture students were invited to participate in a photo exhibition of forty images of various architectural buildings and answer a survey questions regarding the content of photos in the current study. The purpose was to determine how students perceive the environment and to examine perceptual differences among them. Data obtained were collected based on inferential and comparative approaches and were analyzed with SPSS software using Pearson correlation tests and one-sample t-tests. Specifically, the results suggest that females pay more detailed attention to the environment’s components than males, while males focus more holistically on the environment content. The results typically indicate that individuals are sensitive to all aspects when confronted with the environment, so all of their senses are active in such a process, accordingly, this should be considered when designing the environment so that all of the user’s senses are stimulated in a desired manner.

Keywords

Environment, gender, perception, senses, stimulus

Thanks

I offer my endless gratitude to all voluntary participants who supported me in conducting the current study. I believe that without their participation, this study would be impossible. It is noteworthy that an Ethics Committee Approval was prepared for this study by the Ethics Committee of the Selcuk University of Konya dated 04.04.2023 and decision No: 04/01.

Cinsiyet ve Kontrollü Çevreler Arasındaki Etkileşim: Uyaran Algısı Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Abstract

Bulgular, kadın ve erkeklerin çevre algısı arasında farklılıklar olduğunu göstermektedir ve bu farklılıklar, çevre kalitesini iyileştirmeyi amaçlayan projeler için önemli sonuçlar doğurmaktadır. Bu nedenle, 240 mimarlık öğrencisi, çeşitli mimari yapıların kırk fotoğrafından oluşan bir fotoğraf sergisine katılmaya ve mevcut çalışmadaki fotoğraflarla ilgili soruları yanıtlamaya davet edildi. Amaç, öğrencilerin çevreyi nasıl algıladıklarını belirlemek ve aralarındaki algısal farklılıkları incelemektir. Sonuçlar, özellikle, kadınların çevrenin bileşenlerine erkeklerden daha ayrıntılı bir şekilde dikkat ettiklerini, erkeklerin ise çevrenin içeriğine daha bütünsel bir şekilde odaklandıklarını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, sonuçlar tipik olarak bireylerin çevreyle etkileşim kurduklarında tüm yönlere duyarlı olduklarını, dolayısıyla böyle bir süreçte tüm duyularının aktif olduğunu ve buna göre, kullanıcının tüm duyularının istenen şekilde uyarılması için çevre tasarlanırken bu durumun dikkate alınması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Çevre, cinsiyet, algı, duyular, uyaran

References

• Abramov, I., Gordon, J., Feldman, O., & Chavarga, A. (2012). Sex and vision II: Color appearance of monochromatic lights. Biology of Sex Differences, 3(21), 1-15. Online ISSN: 2042-6410. Doi: 10.1186/2042-6410-3-21. Access Address (10.07.2023): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22943488/
• Akoğlu, M. & Akten, M. (2022). Examination of the change in the perception of space due to the use of light and color in the example of Antalya Cumhuriyet Square. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(1), 405-420. Online ISSN: 2548-0170. Doi: 10.30785/mbud.1110835. Access Address (10.07.2023): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2404753
• Allison, C., Redhead, E. S., & Chan, W. (2017). Interaction of task difficulty and gender stereotype threat with a spatial orientation task in a virtual nested environment. Learning and Motivation, 57, 22–35. Online ISSN: 1095- 9122. Doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2017.01.005. Access Address (10.07.2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0023969017300061
• Barati, N. & Soleimannejad, M. (2011). Perception of stimuli in controlled environment and gender impact on its case study: Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism Students at the International University of Imam Khomeini, Qazvin, Iran. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 8(17), 19-30. Online ISSN: 2251-7197. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_110_en.html
• Basu, N., Haque., Md. M., King, M., Kamruzzaman, Md. & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2021). The unequal gender effects of the suburban built environment on perceptions of security. Journal of Transport & Health, 23, 1-16. Online ISSN: 2214-1405. Doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101243. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214140521002735
• Cocquyt, C. M., Youngson, N. & Sutton, J. E. (2022). Sex differences and cognitive maps: Studies in the lab don’t always reflect cognitive map accuracy in everyday life. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, 1-12. Online ISSN: 2673-4192. Doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.896081. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frvir.2022.896081/full
• Ceylan, S. (2020). Gender issues in the built environment: A study on the role of architecture for a sustainable society. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9, 748-762. Online ISSN: 1929-4409. Doi 10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.70. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.academia.edu/72053770/Gender_Issues_in_the_Built_Environment_A_Study_on_the_Role_of_ Architecture_for_a_Sustainable_Society
• Dixit, A. & Bhattacharya, B. (2021). Sensory perception of environmental cues as a modulator of aging and neurodegeneration: Insights from Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99, 2416-2426. Online ISSN: 1097-4547. Doi: 10.1002/jnr.24910. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jnr.24910
• Fider, N. A. & Komarova, N. L. (2019). Differences in color categorization manifested by males and females: a quantitative World Color Survey study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 5(142), 1-10. Online ISSN: 2662-9992. Doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0341-7. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-019-0341-7
• Goldstein, E. & Brockmole, J. (2016). Sensation and Perception (10th Ed.). London: Cengage Learning.
• Gou, A., Shi, B., Wang, J. & Wang, H. (2021). Color preference and contributing factors of urban architecture based on the selection of color samples-Case study: Shanghai. COLOR Research and Application, 47(2), 454- 474. Online ISSN: 1520-6378. Doi: 10.1002/col.22731. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/col.22731
• Green, E. J. (2020). The perception-cognition border: A case for architectural division. Philosophical Review, 129(3), 323-393. Online ISSN: 0031-8108. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130159
• Hawes, D. (2016). Fair Shared Cities: Fair share cities: the impact of gender planning in Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 24(4), 553–554. Online ISSN: 1478-2790. Doi: 10.1080/14782804.2016.1249658. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2016.1249658
• Hidayati, I., Tan, W. & Yamu, S. (2020). How gender differences and perceptions of safety shape urban mobility in Southeast Asia. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73: 155-173. Online ISSN: 1873-5517. Doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.014. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847820304514?via%3Dihub
• Iriguchi, M., Koda, H. & Masataka, N. (2018). Colour Perception Characteristics of Women in Menopause. International Joint Workshop on Multimedia Artworks Analysis and Attractiveness Computing in Multimedia, 20–25. Doi: 10.1145/3209693.3209694. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3209693.3209694
• Jeffery, K. J. (2021). How environmental movement constraints shape the neural code for space. Cognitive Processing, 22(1), 97-104. Online ISSN: 1612-4790. Doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01045-2. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34351539/
• Khaleghimoghaddam, N. (2023). Figures were prepared by the author of the article and are original.
• Kobayasi, R., Tempski, P. Z., Arantes-Costa, F. M. & Martins, M. A. (2018). Gender differences in the perception of quality of life during internal medicine training: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(281), 1-14. Online ISSN: 1472-6920. Doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1378-9. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30477504/
• Krizman, J., Bonacina, S. & Kraus, N. (2020). Sex differences in subcortical auditory processing only partially explain higher prevalence of language disorders in males. Hearing Research. 1-14. Online ISSN: 1878-5891. Doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108075. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378595520303464
• Krizman, J., Bonacina, S., Nicol, T. & Kraus, N. (2021). Sex differences in auditory processing vary across estrous cycle. Scientific Reports, 11, 1-7. Online ISSN: 2045-2322. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04143-5. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34961783/
• Liao, H. & Dong, W. (2017). An exploratory study investigating gender effects on using 3d maps for spatial orientation in wayfinding. ISPRS International Journal of Geo Information, 6(3), 1-19. Online ISSN: 2220-9964. Doi: 10.3390/ijgi6030060. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/6/3/60
• Li, G. (2019). The dynamics of architectural form: Space, emotion, and memory. Art and Design Review, 7(4), 187-205. Online ISSN: 2332-2004. Doi: 10.4236/adr.2019.74016. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=95912
• Marques, V., Ursi, S., Lima, E. & Katon, G. (2020). Environmental perception: Notes on transdisciplinary approach. Scientific Journal of Biology & Life Sciences - SJBLS, 1(2), 1-9. Online ISSN: 2694-166X. Doi: 10.33552/SJBLS.2020.01.000511. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://irispublishers.com/sjbls/fulltext/environmental-perception-notes-on-transdisciplinary- approach.ID.000511.php
• Munro, D. (2021). Visual and bodily sensational perception: an epistemic asymmetry. Synthese, 198, 3651-3674. Online ISSN: 1573-0964. Doi: 10.1007/s11229-019-02304-8. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-019-02304-8
• Palumbo, L., Rampone, G. & Bertamini, M. (2021). The role of gender and academic degree on preference for smooth curvature of abstract shapes. PeerJ, 9, 1-20. Online ISSN: 2167-8359. Doi: 10.7717/peerj.10877. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33732544/
• Paramei, G. V., Griber, Y. A. & Mylonas, D. (2018). An online color naming experiment in Russian using Munsell color samples. Color Research and Application, 43(3), 358–374. Online ISSN: 1520-6378. Doi: 10.1002/col.22190. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/col.22190
• Peat, D. (2022). Perception and process: Towards a behavioural theory of compliance. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 13(2), 179–209. Online ISSN: 2040-3585. Doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idab030. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://academic.oup.com/jids/article/13/2/179/6439208
• Pektas, S. T. (2021). A scientometric analysis and review of spatial cognition studies within the framework of neuroscience and architecture. Cognition and Neuroscience in Architecture, 64(4), 374-382. Online ISSN: 1758- 9622. Doi 10.1080/00038628.2021.1910480. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00038628.2021.1910480
• Pletzer, B., Steinbeisser, J., van Laak, L. & Harris, T. (2019). Beyond biological sex: Interactive effects of gender role and sex hormones on spatial abilities. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13(675), 1-13. Online ISSN: 1662-453X. Doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00675. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2019.00675/full
• Reinitz, L.Z., Szoke, B., Varkonyi, E.E., Sotonyi, P. & Jancsik, V. (2015). Three-dimensional visualization of the distribution of melanin-concentrating hormone producing neurons in the mouse hypothalamus. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 71, 20-25. Online ISSN: 1873-6300. Doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.11.009. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S089106181500099X
• Sneider, J. T., Hamilton, D. A., Cohen-Gilbert, J. E., Crowley, D. J., Rosso, I. M. & Silveri, M. M. (2015). Sex differences in spatial navigation and perception in human adolescents and emerging adults. Behavioral processes, 111, 42– 50. Online ISSN: 1872-8308. Doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.11.015. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376635714002988?via%3Dihub
• Spence, C. (2020). Sense of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive Research- Principles Implications, 5(46), 1-26. Online ISSN: 2365-7464. Doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7501350/
• Steg, L. & de Groot, J. I. M. (2018). Environmental psychology: An introduction. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
• Stone, K. D., Keizer, A. & Dijkerman, H. C. (2018). The influence of vision, touch, and proprioception on body representation of the lower limbs. Acta Psychologica, 185, 22–32. Online ISSN: 1873-6297. Doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.007. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001691816303791
• Toccaceli, V., Fagnani, C., Eisenberg, N., Alessandri, G., Vitale, A. & Stazi, M. (2018). Adult empathy: Possible gender differences in gene-environment architecture for cognitive and emotional components in a large Italian twin sample. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 21(3), 214-226. Online ISSN: 1839-2628. Doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.19. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29655398/
• Wallhagen, M., Eriksson, O. & Sörqvist, P. (2018). Gender differences in environmental perspectives among urban design professionals. Buildings, 8(59): 1-15. Online ISSN: 2075-5309. Doi: 10.3390/buildings8040059. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/8/4/59
• Xin, J., Zhang, Y., Tang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). Brain differences between men and women: Evidence from deep learning. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1-10. Online ISSN: 1662-453X. Doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00185. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2019.00185/full
• Xue, J., Li, C., Quan, C., Lu, Y., Yue, J., Zhang, C. (2017). Uncovering the cognitive processes underlying mental rotation: An eye-movement study. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-12. Online ISSN: 2045-2322. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-017- 10683-6. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28855724/
• Yuan, L., Kong, F., Luo, Y., Zeng, S., Lan, J., & You, X. (2019). Gender differences in large-scale and small-scale spatial ability: A systematic review based on behavioral and neuroimaging research. Frontiers Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(128), 1-23. Online ISSN: 1662-5153. Doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128. Access Address (12.07.2023): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31275121/