Research Article

The Evaluation of Local Commercial Typologies Based On Adaptive Reuse Models: (Tabriz Bazaar)

Volume: 9 Number: 1 July 30, 2024
EN TR

The Evaluation of Local Commercial Typologies Based On Adaptive Reuse Models: (Tabriz Bazaar)

Abstract

The modernization of Islamic countries has brought significant changes to heritage buildings, particularly in construction and architecture. The Bazaar, as one of the most important heritage buildings, has played a crucial role in shaping people's identity, culture, and political, economic, and social characteristics. However, the development of new trade centers and the city's expansion after the Industrial Revolution caused a shift in the Bazaar's functions, resulting in its loss of values and social roles in the lives of new generations. To preserve heritage buildings for future generations, cultural sustainability approaches have been considered, and adaptive reuse models are being used worldwide. This study focuses on historical typology in Tabriz, Iran, and uses adaptive reuse models (ARMs) to evaluate the Tabriz Ground Bazaar based on cultural sustainability. The study aims to achieve the potential of rehabilitation by utilizing the SWOT analysis. The selection of Tabriz Ground Bazaar as the case study was based on the quantitative research methodology.

Keywords

Rehabilitation , Tabriz Bazaar , adaptive reuse model (ARM) , commercial typology , sustainability.

References

  1. Ashworth, G. J. (1997). Conservation as preservation or as heritage: two paradigms and two answers. Built Environment (1978-), 92-102. Access Address: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23288309
  2. Ashworth, G.J. & Tunbridge, J.E. (1990). The Tourist-Historic City. London: Belhaven Press.
  3. Blagojević, M. R. & Tufegdžić, A. (2016). The new technology era requirements and sustainable approach to industrial heritage renewal. Energy and Buildings, 115, 148-153. DOI: http://10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.062
  4. Bullen, P. A. & Love, P. E. (2010). The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field. Cities, 27(4), 215-224. DOI: http://10.1016/j.cities.2009.12.005
  5. Bullen, P. A. & Love, P. E. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411-421
  6. Conejos, S., Langston, C. & Smith, J. (2014). Designing for better building adaptability: A comparison of adaptSTAR and ARP models. Habitat International, 41, 85-91. DOI: http://10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.002
  7. DETR, B. (2000). Our Towns and Cities: the future, London: HMSO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.2001.145.1.69
  8. Deriu, D., Turan Özkaya, B., & Piccoli, E. (2016). Travels in Architectural History. Architectural Histories, 4(1), 19, pp.  1–7, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ah.234
  9. Douglas, J. (2006). Building adaptation. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080458519
  10. European Union. (2020). A Policy Brief from the Policy Learning Platform on Environment and resource efficiency Built Cultural Heritage. Access Address (20.06.2022) https://www.interregeurope.eu/sites/default/files/inline/Policy_brief_on_built_cultural_heritage.pdfEuropean
APA
Farjamı, E., & Golkarıan, S. (2024). The Evaluation of Local Commercial Typologies Based On Adaptive Reuse Models: (Tabriz Bazaar). Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 9(1), 652-677. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1427134