A New Risk Analysis Method in The Construction Sector: HES
Abstract
Hazardous environments are frequently present in the construction industry during both the project planning and implementation phases, with different risks emerging at each stage. Although various risk assessment methods are available to reduce workplace accidents, the industry prefers techniques that are adaptable to changing site conditions and easy to apply. This study examines the effectiveness of the Hazard Evaluation System (HES) matrix method compared to the traditional X-type and L-type matrix methods. The HES method provides a more detailed and comprehensive assessment by incorporating human factors such as employee training, age, severity, and probability. Since 88% of workplace accidents in the country are human-related, focusing on these elements allows for better risk mitigation. The study was carried out on a construction project in the Demre District of Antalya Province. Findings reveal that the HES method is more practical and reliable than traditional methods, while also improving project safety, enhancing efficiency, and generating economic advantages in construction operations.
Keywords
Construction sector, occupational safety, HES matrix method, risk analysis
References
- Ak, M. A. (2020). Comparison of risk assessment methods in the context of occupational safety in the construction sector, European Journal of Science and Technology, Volume: 18, Pages: 272-282.
- Aytekin, O. & Kaya, M.Ü. & Kuşan, H. (2015). Suggestions for Selecting an OHS Risk Assessment Method Suitable for Project Type and Work Data in Construction Works, 5th Worker Health and Occupational Safety Symposium, Izmir, Turkey, pp.127-136.
- Bilir, S. & Gürcanlı, G. E. (2014). Activity-Based Occupational Health and Safety Risk Assessment on Construction Projects, 11P thP International Congress on Advance in Civil Engineering, İstanbul. (Oral Presentation).
- Bilir, S. & Gürcanlı, G. E. (2015). Applicability of The Hazard Rating Number System in The Construction Industry. The XXVIIth Annual Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference”, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. (Oral Presentation).
- Dizdar, E.N. (2000). Occupational Safety, Alver Publishing. October, Ankara.
- Fine W.T. (1974). Mathematical evaluations for controlling hazards. Journal of Safety Research. 3, 157- 166.
- Gürcanli, G. E. (2008). Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment, ITUSEM Occupational Safety Certification Program in the Construction Sector, Construction Site Occupational Safety Course Notes 3, Istanbul.
- Gül, M. & M, Ak. (2018). Comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment, Elsevier, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 196: 653-664.
- ILO. (2020). Safety and Health at Work.
- Kinney, G. F. & Wiruth, A. D. (1976). Practical Risk Analysis For Safety Management. NWC Technical Publication 5865, Naval Weapons Center, China Lake CA, USA.