Investigation of Urban Squares through the Biophilic Design Approach: A Comparative Analysis of Adapazarı City Square and Train Station Square
Abstract
Keywords
Biophilic design, nature-based design, public spaces, urban landscape design, Adapazarı
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- Akyıldız, N. A. (2023). Biyofilik tasarım konulu lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Kent Akademisi, 16(2), 879-904.
- Aslan, D. (2014). Kent ve meydanlar. İTÜ Vakıf Dergisi, 63, 20-24.
- Atalay, H. (2008). Deprem durumunda kentsel açık ve yeşil alanların kullanımı: Küçükçekmece Cennet Mahallesi örneği (Master's thesis). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Atalay, N. (2010). Urban square: a critical approach within the concepts of "public" and "aesthetics” (PhD thesis). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Bağbaşı, G. (2010). İstanbul kent meydanlarının peyzaj mimarlığı ilkeleri açısından irdelenmesi: Sultanahmet, Beyazıt, Taksim, Beşiktaş, Ortaköy Meydanı örneği (Master's thesis). Bartın Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bartın.
- Beatley, T. (2016). Handbook of biophilic city planning & design. Island Press.
- Browning, W.D., Ryan, C.O. & Clancy, J.O. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green, LLC. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/report/14-patterns/
- Cabanek, A., Zingoni de Baro, M. E. & Newman, P. (2020). Biophilic streets: a design framework for creating multiple urban benefits. Sustainable Earth, 3(1), 1-17.
- Clason, D. L. & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(4), ss. 31- 35.
- Cogley, B. (2018). Plant-filled spheres open at Amazon headquarters in Seattle. Access Address (30.01.2018): https://www.dezeen.com/2018/01/30/plant-filled-seattle-spheres-open-amazon-headquarters/