Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters

Semanur Kaplan; Ekrem Cem Alppay

doi:10.30785/mbud.1728870

TR EN

Kentsel Ulaşımda Paylaşımlı Mikromobilite: Potansiyel Kullanıcıların E-Scooter Kullanımına Yönelik Görüş ve Tutumlarının İncelenmesi

Abstract

Paylaşımlı mikro mobilite sistemleri, özellikle e-scooter'lar, kentsel alanlarda kısa mesafeli seyahatler için pratik ve çevre dostu çözümler sunmaktadır. İstanbul'da bu sistemler giderek daha popüler hale gelmiştir, ancak hala herkes tarafından benimsenmediği gözlemlenmilştir. Bu çalışma, bir çerçeve olarak UTAUT2 modelini kullanarak, potansiyel kullanıcıların İstanbul'da paylaşımlı e-scooter kullanma niyetini etkileyen faktörleri araştırmaktadır. Teknoloji kabulünü anlamak için çaba beklentisi, performans beklentisi ve kolaylaştırıcı koşullar gibi temel unsurlar incelenmektedir. Daha derin bir anlayış elde etmek için, daha önce e-scooter deneyimi olmayan 32 katılımcıyla bir test sürüşü yapılmıştır. Potansiyel katılımcıların paylaşımlı bir mikro mobilite aracı olan e-scooter'lara yönelik davranışsal niyetleri, test sürüşünden sonra katılımcılara uygulanan UTAUT2 anketinin analiz edilmesiyle belirlenmiştir. Katılımcıların e-scooter kullanımına yönelik gelecek niyetlerinin düşük olduğu, bu araçların şehir içi ulaşımda ana tercih olmayacağı, ancak performans beklentisi, eğlence motivasyonu ve fiyat değeri gibi etkenlerin davranış niyetini anlamada belirleyici olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

Mikromobilite, e-skuter, teknoloji kabulü, UTAUT2, kentsel hareketlilik

Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters

Abstract

Shared micro-mobility systems, especially e-scooters, offer a practical and environmentally friendly urban travel option in the context of today’s modern cities. Like in other continents and countries, these mobility services have become increasingly popular in Istanbul, however, it has not yet been observed that they have been adopted by everyone. This research attempts to explore the factors that affect potential users' intention to use shared e-scooters in Istanbul. The technology acceptance model is used as the theoretical framework of the study. Key elements such as effort expectancy, performance expectancy, and facilitating conditions are examined to understand technology acceptance. To obtain a deeper understanding, a test drive was conducted with 32 participants who had no previous e-scooter experience. The behavioral intentions of potential participants towards e-scooters were determined by analyzing the UTAUT2 questionnaire administered to the participants after the test drive. It was concluded that the participants' future intentions towards e-scooters were low, and that these vehicles would not be the primary choice for urban transportation. However, factors such as performance expectancy, entertainment motivation, and price value were decisive in understanding behavioral intention.

Keywords

Micro-mobility, e-scooters, technology acceptance, UTAUT2, urban mobility

Ethical Statement

The article adheres to national and international research and publication ethics. The Ethics Committee approval for the study was obtained from the Istanbul Technical University Ethics Committee on 29/08/2023 with decision number 399.

Thanks

This article is based on the research of a Master’s Thesis at the Istanbul Technical University Graduate School of Master's Degree, completed in 2024 in the Department of Industrial Design.

References

Abduljabbar, R. L., Liyanage, S. & Dia, H. (2021). The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92. Online ISSN: 1361-9209. Access Address (07.01.2025): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102734
Abouelela, M., Al Haddad, C. & Antoniou, C. (2021). Are young users willing to shift from carsharing to scooter– sharing? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 95. Online ISSN: 1361-9209. Access Address Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102821
Aizpuru, M., Farley, K. X., Rojas, J. C., Crawford, R. S., Moore, T. J. & Wagner, E. R. (2019). Motorized scooter injuries in the era of scooter-shares: A review of the national electronic surveillance system. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 37(6). Online ISSN: 0735-6757. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.049
Arı, E. & Yılmaz, V. (2024). Investigating the factors affecting electric scooter usage behavior with a proposed structural model. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Volume 56,2024,101164. Online ISSN: 2210-5395. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101164.
Aydın, G. E. (2025). Micro-mobility and urban planning. In: S. Dündar (ed) Micromobility: Perspectives from Engineering, Urban Planning, Health Sciences and Social Sciences. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering. Springer, Cham. Online ISBN: 978-3-031-77098-2. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77098-2_5
Baabdullah, A. M., Alalwanb, A., A., Ranac, N., P., Kizginc, H. & Patilc, P. (2019). Consumer use of mobile banking (MBanking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an integrated model. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 38– 52. Online ISSN: 0268-4012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.002.
Badeau, A., Carman, C., Newman, M., Steenblik, J., Carlson, M. & Madsen, T. (2019). Emergency department visits for electric scooter-related injuries after introduction of an urban rental program. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 37(8). Online ISSN: 0735-6757. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.003
Blomberg, S. N. F., Rosenkrantz, O. C. M., Lippert, F. & Collatz Christensen, H. (2019). Injury from electric scooters in Copenhagen: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 9(12). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019- 033988
Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Skoufas, A., Akgün, N., Ticali, D. & Tesoriere, G. (2020). The impact of covid-19 pandemic on the resilience of sustainable mobility in Sicily. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21). Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218829
Canitez, F., Alpkokin, P. & Topuz Kiremitci, S. (2020). Sustainable urban mobility in Istanbul: Challenges and prospects. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Volume 8, Issue 4, 2020, Pages 1148-1157. Online ISSN 2213-624X. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.07.005

Chang, A. Y., Miranda-Moreno, L., Clewlow, R. & Sun, L. (2019). “Trend or Fad? Deciphering the Enablers of Micromobility in the U.S.” A Report of SAE International. Access Address (07.01.2025): https://legacy.sae.org/binaries//content/assets/cm/content/topics/micromobility/sae-micromobility- trend-or-fad-report.pdf
Chien, Y.-S., Liang, J.-K. & Lu, C.-C. (2023). Investigating factors that influence the intention to use electric scooter sharing in a market with multiple service providers: Combined UTAUT2 and brand attitude. Transportation Research Record, 2678(4), 543-561. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231185142
Choi, M. & Jung, H. (2022). Influencing factors of intention to use e-scooter based on UTAUT2. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 57(2), 80-91. Online ISSN: 2383-9171. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2022.04.57.2.80
Christoforou, Z., Gioldasis, C., de Bortoli, A. & Seidowsky, R. (2021). Who is using e-scooters and how? Evidence from Paris. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92. Online ISSN: 1361-9209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102708
Çelebi, N. G. & Arpacıoğlu, Ü. (2022). City and energy. In M. Çakır, M. Tuğluer, & P. Fırat Örs. (Eds.) Architectural Sciences and Ecology (27-53). ISBN: 978-625-8213-87-4. Ankara: Iksad Publications.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. Online ISSN:2162-9730. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Dündar, S., Günay, G., Karlikanovaite-Balıkçı, A., Berktaş, E. Ş. & Ulu, İ. M. (2022). Mikromobilite–ulaşıma mucizevi bir çözüm mü, yoksa bir hayal kırıklığı mı?. İdealkent, 13(36), 576-598. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1066650
Ernst & Young (2020). Micromobility: Moving Cities into a Sustainable Future. Access Address (07.01.2025): https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/insights/automotive/documents/ey-gl- micromobility-moving-cities-into-a-sustainable-future-01-2025.pdf
Fan, Z. & Harper, C. D. (2022). Congestion and environmental impacts of short car trip replacement with micro-mobility modes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 103. Online ISSN: 1361- 9209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103173
Figueroa Jacinto, R. & Webb, J. (2024). The Role of Human Factors, Ergonomics, and 3D Modeling When Evaluating Incidents Involving Micromobility Devices: An E-Scooter Fall Case Study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 281-284). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241275088
Fishman, E., Washington, S. & Haworth, N. (2015). Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D, 31, 13–20. Online ISSN 1361-9209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013.
Garman, C., Como, S. G., Campbell, I. C., Wishart, J., O’Brien, K. & McLean, S. (2020). Micro-Mobility Vehicle Dynamics and Rider Kinematics during Electric Scooter Riding. SAE Technical Papers, 2020-(April). Access Address (07.01.2025): https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0935
Google Earth. (2025). Akülü Araç Parkuru (Satellite Map). Access Address (08.01.2025): https://www.kisa.link/QuxfJ
Gulino, M. S., Zonfrillo, G., Damaziak, K. & Vangi, D. (2021). Exploring performances of electric micro-mobility vehicles and behavioural patterns of riders for in-depth accident analysis. Designs, 5(4), 66. Online ISSN: 2411-9660. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/designs5040066
Gupta, A. & Dogra, N. (2017). Tourist adoption of mapping apps: A UTAUT2 perspective of smart travellers. Tourism and hospitality management, 23(2), 145-161. Online ISSN: 1847-3377. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.23.2.6
Güldür,H., Karaçor, F. Hatipoğlu, S. & Çubuk, M.K. (2022). A new mode of urban transportation: E-scooter and suggestions for application Türkiye. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol.8, no.1, pp. 60-73, 2022.Online ISSN: 2149-9373. Doi:10.30855/gmbd.2022.01.04
Hardt, C. & Bogenberger, K. (2019). Usage of e-Scooters in Urban Environments. In B., Friedrich, D. Mattfeld, A. Mayerhofer, B. A>. N. Saavedra (Eds.) Transportation Research Procedia, 37. Online ISSN: 2352-1465. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.178
Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B. & Johnson, J. X. (2019). Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters, 14(8). Online ISSN: 1748-9326. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8
Huertas-Leyva, P., Dozza, M. & Baldanzini, N. (2019). E-bikers’ braking behavior: Results from a naturalistic cycling study. Traffic Injury Prevention, 20(sup3). Online ISSN: 1538-957X. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1643015
Hürriyet Daily News. (2024). Access Address (07.01.2025): https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/marti- acquires-zobas-optimization-platform-190500
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). The Role of Micro-mobility in Urban Transport Transition. Access Address (20.04.2025): https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/availability-of-dockless-shared- micromobility-services-in-europe-and-central-asia-2019-2021
International Transport Forum (ITF). (2020). Safe Micro-mobility. OECD Publishing. Access Address (20.04.2025): https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/02/safe- micromobility_a7f10061/0b98fac1-en.pdf
Kabakuş, N. & Eyüboğlu, M. (2025). Factors affecting the integration of micro-mobility into smart cities and effects on urban transport. Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri Ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 8(1), 170-183. Online ISSN: 2636- 820X. Doi: https://doi.org/10.51513/jitsa.1603010
Kang, S. (2014). Factors influencing intention of mobile application use. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 12(4), s. 360-379. Online ISSN: 1741-5217. Access Address (07.01.2025): https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJMC.2014.063653
Khalil, J., Yan, D., Guo, G., Sami, M. T., Roy, J. B. & Sisiopiku, V. P. (2021). Traffic study of shared micromobility services by transportation simulation. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 3691- 3699). IEEE. Online ISBN:978-1-6654-3902-2. Access Address (07.01.2025): https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9671455
Kim, Y. W., Lee, S. C. & Yoon, S. H. (2025). Exploring e-scooter riders’ risky behaviour: survey, observation, and interview study. Ergonomics, 68(9), 1371–1387. Online ISSN: 1366-5847. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2409302
Kopplin, C.S., Brand, B.M. & Reichenberger, Y. (2021). Consumer acceptance of shared e-scooters for urban and short-distance mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 91, 2021, 102680, ISSN 1361-9209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102680
Korkmaz, E. (2022). COVID-19 salgın sürecinin toplu taşıma sistemlerine etkisinin anket yöntemiyle İstanbul- Ankara için incelenmesi. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 5(1), 247-260. Online ISSN: e-ISSN: 2636-8390. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1060291
Kültür, Y., Tütüncü, M. N. & Ulutaş, S. (2023). Using e-scooters: An easy way to get home or a nightmare? An orthopedic perspective on e-scooter accidents. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery, 29(10), 1158. Online ISSN: 1307-7945. Access Address (07.01.2025): https://pdf.journalagent.com/travma/pdfs/UTD_29_10_1158_1166.pdf
Laa, B. & Leth, U. (2020). Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna: Who they are and how they ride. Journal of Transport Geography, 89. Online ISSN: 0966-6923. Access Address Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102874
Lang, N., Schellong, D., Hagenmaier, M., Herrmann, A. & Hohenreuther, M. (2022). Putting Micro-mobility at the Center of Urban Mobility I BCG. Access Address (07.01.2025): https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/the- future-of-urban-mobility
Li, A., Gao, K., Zhao, P., Qu, X. & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). High-resolution assessment of environmental benefits of dockless bike-sharing systems based on transaction data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 296. Online ISSN: 0959-6526. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126423
Li, A., Zhao, P., He, H. & Axhausen, K. W. (2020). Understanding the variations of micro-mobility behavior before and during COVID-19 pandemic period. Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs-und Raumplanung, 1547. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000460847
Marroquín-Ciendúa, F., Medina-Labrador, M., Hurtado Méndez, L. C., Mora Hernández, L. P. & Puentes Guzmán, C. N. (2025). Use of UTAUT for analyzing the acceptance and use of electric scooters in the public transport system. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 13(1). Online ISSN: 2165-0020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2025.2458548
McDonald, Z., Fulton, L. & Mason, J. (2015). A Global High Shift Scenario. International Journal for Sustainable Transportation, November., Access Address (10.04.2025): https://bisikletizm.com/wp- content/uploads/2016/03/A-Global-High-Shift-Cycling-Scenario_Bisikletli-Ulasim-Senaryosu.pdf
McQueen, M., MacArthur, J. & Cherry, C. (2020). The e-bike potential: Estimating regional e-bike impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87. Online ISSN: 1361- 9209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102482
Moradi, A. & Vagnoni, E. (2018). A multi-level perspective analysis of urban mobility system dynamics: what are the future transition pathways?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 231-243. Online ISSN: 0040-1625. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.002
Moreau, H., de Meux, L. de J., Zeller, V., D’Ans, P., Ruwet, C. & Achten, W. M. J. (2020). Dockless e-scooter: A green solution for mobility? Comparative case study between dockless e-scooters, displaced transport, and personal e-scooters. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(5). Online ISSN: 2071-1050. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051803
Nikiforiadis, A., Paschalidis, E., Stamatiadis, N., Raptopoulou, A., Kostareli, A. & Basbas, S. (2021). Analysis of attitudes and engagement of shared e-scooter users. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94. Online ISSN: 1361-9209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102790
Norman, D. (2018). Gündelik Şeylerin Tasarımı. İstanbul: Tübitak Yayınları.
Oeschger, G., Carroll, P. & Caulfield, B. (2020). Micro-mobility and public transport integration: The current state of knowledge. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 89. Online ISSN: 1361-9209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102628
O’hern, S. & Estgfaeller, N. (2020). A scientometric review of powered micro-mobility. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22). Online ISSN: 2071-1050. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229505
Önder, M. (2025). Evaluation of micro-mobility vehicles in terms of ergonomics of use. In: Dündar, S. (eds) Micromobility: Perspectives from Engineering, Urban Planning, Health Sciences and Social Sciences (pp. 183– 194). Springer, Cham. Online ISBN: 978-3-031-77098-2. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77098-2_13
Puzio, T. J., Murphy, P. B., Gazzetta, J., Dineen, H. A., Savage, S. A., Streib, E. W. & Zarzaur, B. L. (2020). The electric scooter: A surging new mode of transportation that comes with risk to riders. Traffic Injury Prevention, 21(2). Online ISSN: 1538-957X. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1709176
Reck, D. J., Martin, H. & Axhausen, K. W. (2022). Mode choice, substitution patterns and environmental impacts of shared and personal micro-mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102. ISSN 1361-9209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103134
Rojas-Rueda, D., de Nazelle, A., Teixidó, O. & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2012). Replacing car trips by increasing bike and public transport in the greater Barcelona metropolitan area: A health impact assessment study. Environment International, 49. Online ISSN: 0160-4120. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.009
SAE. (2019). Taxonomy and Classification of Powered Micro-mobility Vehicles. SAE International. Access Address (07.01.2025): https://www.sae.org/standards/j3194_201911-taxonomy-classification-powered- micromobility-vehicles
Sarıışık, B. E. & Yalçıner Ercoşkun, Ö. (2021). E-scooters in the World and Turkey as Micro Mobility Devices, Eksen Journal of Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Architecture, 2(1), 72-94. Volume 2, Issue 1, Year 2021, 72-94. Online ISSN: 2757-5640. Access Address (07.01.2025): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eksen/article/947609
Scorrano, M. & Danielis, R. (2021). The characteristics of the demand for electric scooters in Italy: An exploratory study. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 39. Online ISSN: 2210-5395. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100589
Shaheen, S. & Cohen A. (2019). Shared Micromoblity Policy Toolkit: Docked and Dockless Bike and Scooter Sharing. UC Berkeley: Transportation Sustainability Research Center. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7922/G2TH8JW7
Soni, M., Jain, K. & Kumar, B. (2019). Factors affecting the adoption of fashion mobile shopping applications. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 10(4), 358–376. Online ISSN: 2325-4483. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2019.1649165
Sperling, D. (2018). Three revolutions: Steering automated, shared, and electric vehicles to a better future. In Three Revolutions: Steering Automated, Shared, and Electric Vehicles to a Better Future. Washington: Island Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-906-7
Topçuoğlu, Y. H., Yılmaz, V. & Arı, E. (2022). Ortak paylaşımlı e-scooter kullanımının kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesiyle araştırılması, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 63, 83-90. Online ISSN: 2630-6409. Access Address: Doi: 10.18070/erciyesiibd.1112977
Tuncer, S. & Brown, B. (2020, April). E-scooters on the ground: Lessons for redesigning urban micro-mobility. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-14). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376499
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). New York: United Nations. eISBN: 978-92-1-004314-4. Access Address (10.04.2025): https://population.un.org/wup/assets/WUP2018-Report.pdf
Useche, S. A., Gonzalez-Marin, A., Faus, M. & Alonso, F. (2022). Environmentally friendly, but behaviorally complex? A systematic review of e-scooter riders’ psychosocial risk features. In PLoS ONE (Vol. 17, Issue 5 May). Online ISSN: 1932-6203. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268960
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. Online ISSN: 2162-9730. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L. & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. Online ISSN: 2162-9730. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Yaşa Özeltürkay, E., Yalçıntaş, D. & Oğuz, S. (2023). Benefits and barriers of e-scooter users and non-users: A pilot study. Studies on Marketing Insights, Volume 7, Issue 1. Online ISSN: 2667-6591. Access Address (10.04.2025): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/somi/article/1276299

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Industrial Product Design

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Semanur Kaplan ^*
0000-0002-3519-594X
Türkiye

Ekrem Cem Alppay
0000-0001-5027-223X
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 28, 2026

Submission Date

August 19, 2025

Acceptance Date

April 10, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 11 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1728870

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA42XW94JS

APA

Kaplan, S., & Alppay, E. C. (2026). Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 11(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1728870

AMA

1.Kaplan S, Alppay EC. Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters. JASA. 2026;11(1):85-103. doi:10.30785/mbud.1728870

Chicago

Kaplan, Semanur, and Ekrem Cem Alppay. 2026. “Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 11 (1): 85-103. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1728870.

EndNote

Kaplan S, Alppay EC (July 1, 2026) Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 11 1 85–103.

IEEE

[1]S. Kaplan and E. C. Alppay, “Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters”, JASA, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 85–103, July 2026, doi: 10.30785/mbud.1728870.

ISNAD

Kaplan, Semanur - Alppay, Ekrem Cem. “Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications 11/1 (July 1, 2026): 85-103. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1728870.

JAMA

1.Kaplan S, Alppay EC. Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters. JASA. 2026;11:85–103.

MLA

Kaplan, Semanur, and Ekrem Cem Alppay. “Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters”. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, vol. 11, no. 1, July 2026, pp. 85-103, doi:10.30785/mbud.1728870.

Vancouver

1.Semanur Kaplan, Ekrem Cem Alppay. Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters. JASA. 2026 Jul. 1;11(1):85-103. doi:10.30785/mbud.1728870

Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters

Kentsel Ulaşımda Paylaşımlı Mikromobilite: Potansiyel Kullanıcıların E-Scooter Kullanımına Yönelik Görüş ve Tutumlarının İncelenmesi

Abstract

Keywords

Shared Micro-Mobility in Urban Transportation: Exploring Potential Users’ Views and Attitudes Towards Using E-Scooters

Abstract

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Thanks

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

JASA JOURNAL TAG / MBUD DERGİ KÜNYESİ