Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Scenarios for Increasing the Visual Quality of Erzurum City İpekyolu Bridge Intersection with Different Landscape Designs

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 719 - 736, 26.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1450020

Abstract

Landscaping works are needed to eliminate the monotony of concretion caused by bridge intersections, which increases with traffic density in cities. In this study, where the Erzurum city İpekyolu Intersection is the main material, 3 different scenarios have been created to increase the visual quality of the intersection landscape. A total of 4 visual groups consisting of the current situation of the intersection and the scenarios created in the Lumion Program were evaluated. The survey prepared for the analysis was applied to 80 undergraduate and graduate students at Atatürk University Faculty of Architecture. In the analysis, design elements were considered as evaluation criteria. In Scenario 3, which received the highest score, color and color harmony were effective in the side wall visuality. As a result of the research, it was seen that the design scenarios had higher visual quality than the current situations without design.

Thanks

This article was prepared by Kübra Gürbüz under the supervision of Prof.Dr. Işık Sezen with the title of "Scenarios for Increasing the Visual Quality of Erzurum City Bridge Intersections with Different Landscape Designs" and accepted as a Master's Thesis On 28/01/2021 By Atatürk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture. There is an ethics committee document dated 19.03.2024 and numbered E-60665420-000-2400101769.

References

  • Acar, C. & Güneroğlu Ayhan, N. (2009). A study on linear plant compositions' functionality, visuality and species diversity assessment in Trabzon City. Ecology, 72, 65-73. Online ISSN: 1300-1361. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20093225441
  • Ak, M. M. (2010). A research on the determination and evaluation of visual quality in the Akçakoca coastline example. (PhD thesis). Ankara University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture.
  • Akoğlu, M. & Akten, M. (2022). Examination of the change in the perception of space due to the use of light and color in the example of Antalya Cumhuriyet Square. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(1), 405-420. Online ISSN: 2548-0170. Access Address (02.04.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2404753
  • Altınçekiç, H. & Altınçekiç, S. Ç. (1996). Planting principles in highway landscaping works. Highway Landscape Panel in Urban and Rural Regions, Istanbul, 12-13 March 1996.
  • Arriaza, M., Cañas-Ortega, J. F., Cañas-Madueño, J. A. & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 115-125. Online ISSN: 1872-6062. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920460300246 9
  • Aslan, M. & Akan, H. (2019). A study of natural woody plants of forest in Şanlıurfa–determination of detection and landscape values of parks and garden plant. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12(1), 50-65. Online ISSN: 1308-8084. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/biodicon/issue/59395/854995
  • Austin, R. L. (1982) Designing with Plants, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA, p. 188
  • Benliay, A., & Soydan, O. (2015). Evaluation of landscape visual quality and landscape features in the example of the Aspendos-Sillyon-Perge bicycle route. Artium, 3(1), 48-64. Online ISSN: 2147-6683. Access Address (10.07.2024): http://artium.hku.edu.tr/en/download/article- file/25545.
  • Booth, N.K. (1990) Basic Elements of Landscape Architectural Design, Department of Landscape Architectural, Ohio State University, USA, Waveland Pres, Inc. Illinois, s. 315.
  • Bulut, Y. & Atabeyoğlu, Ö. (2010). The Place and Importance of Landscape Architects in Urban Planning. III. National Black Sea Forestry Congress Vol 4. (s. 1494-1503). Artvin, Türkiye: Zafer Offset. Access Address (07.03.2024): https://ticaret.edu.tr/cevre-ve-doga-bilimleri- uygulama-ve-arastirma-merkezi/wp- content/uploads/sites/46/2021/11/artvin-kongre-onsayfa- icindekiler.pdf
  • Bulut, Z., Sezen, I., & Karahan, F. (2010). Determination of spring visual ceremonies of urban fruit trees and shrubs: A case study from Erzurum, Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8(1), 289-296. Online ISSN:1459-0263. Access Address (21.07.2024): https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zoehre-Polat- 2/publication/267860475_Determination_of_spring_visual_ceremoni es_of_urban_fruit_trees_and_shrubs_A_case_study_from_Erzurum _Turkey/links/59314a1c45851553b68e26e1/Determination-of-spring- visual-ceremonies-of-urban-fruit-trees-and-shrubs-A-case-study- from-Erzurum-Turkey.pdf
  • Bulut, Z. & Yılmaz, H. (2008). Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: a case study for Kemaliye (Erzincan/Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 141(1-3), 121-129. Online ISSN: 1573-2959. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-007-9882-0.pdf
  • Büyüköztürk, S. (2008). Scientific Research Methods. Pegem Yayınları, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Çakıcı, I. (2007). A method research for visual landscape evaluation in landscape planning studies. (PhD thesis). Ankara University Institute of Science and Technology. Access Address (08.03.2024). https://dspace.ankara.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12575/34272
  • Daniel, T.C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1- 4), 267-281. Online ISSN: 1872-6062. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204601001414
  • Dere, E. E. (2017). Landscape visual analysis and evaluation: TEM highway example (Master's thesis, Namık Kemal University Institute of Science and Technology. Access Address (10.07.2024). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Elinç, H. (2011). Examination of City Parks of Abdurrahman Alaettinoğlu and Alanya Mayors in Alanya District of Antalya Province with Visual Quality Assessment Method. (Master's Thesis) Selçuk University Institute of Science and Technology. Access Address (06.03.2024). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Güleç, T.F. (2019). City and Landscape https://www.plantdergisi.com/turkan-fusun-gulec/kent-ve- peyzaj.html.(24.12.2020).
  • Gülgün, B. & Türkyilmaz, B. (2001). The place and importance of ergonomics in landscape architecture and human life and a research on the Bornova example. Ege Univ. Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 38(2- 3), 127-134, 2001. Online ISSN: 1018-8851. Access Address (05.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/58955
  • Güngör, H. (2005). Basic Design, Esen Publishing House, Istanbul.
  • Güngör, S. & Arslan, M. (2004). Swot analysis, visual quality assessment, preferences of tourism facilities and tourism facilities' conditional analysis for tourism and recreational strategies: case study for Beysehir province. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 18(33), 68-72. Online ISSN: 2458-8377. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/selcukjafsci/issue/76653/1276935
  • Güneroğlu, N. (2017). The effect of restoration process on riparian landscape. Artvin Coruh University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 18(1), 10- 20. Online ISSN: 2146-698X. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/tr/download/article-file/280795
  • Gürbüz, K. (2021). Scenarios for Increasing the Visual Quality of Erzurum City Interchanges with Different Landscape Designs. Master's Thesis. Atatürk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture, Erzurum. Access Address (02.04.2024): https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Gürbüz, K. & Sezen, I. (2023). Scenarios of Improving the Visual Quality of Erzurum City Mecidiye Bridge Interchange with Different Landscape Design. III. International Architecture Symposium, December 11-12, 2023 / Diyarbakır, Türkiye
  • Irmak, M. A. & Yılmaz, H. (2010). Visual Analysis of Natural and Cultural Source Values Considering Different Landscape Character Sites; The Sample of Erzurum. Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 27(2), 45-55. Online ISSN: 2147-8848. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gopzfd/issue/7332/9594
  • İslamoğlu, H. (2003). Scientific research methods. Istanbul: Beta Press.
  • Kalın, A. (2004). Determination and improvement of visual quality in environmental preference and evaluation: Trabzon coastline example. PhD thesis. K.T.U. Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Landscape Architecture, Trabzon. Access Address (07.03.2024). file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/156101.pdf
  • Kaptanoğlu, C. A. Y. (2006). The effects of visual animation techniques on user preference in landscape evaluation. PhD thesis. Istanbul University. Faculty of Forestry, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture, Istanbul. Access Address (07.03.2024).
  • Karahan, F. & Yilmaz, H. (2004). Visual Quality Assessment of Erzurum- Rize State Highway Corridor. TMMOB Chamber of Landscape Architects 2nd Congress of Landscape Architecture. Ankara: Chamber of Landscape Architects.
  • Karasar, N. (1982). Scientific Research Method. Ankara: Nadir Bookstore.
  • Karaşah, B. (2006). Determination of mistakes made in planting design in urban texture "Trabzon Example" (Master's Thesis). Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, Trabzon.
  • Müderrisoğlu, H. & Eroğlu, E. (2006). Differences in visual perception of some coniferous trees under snow load. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Forestry Journal, A(1), 136-146. Online ISSN: 1302-7085. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article- file/195574
  • Namlı, R. (2015). The interchanges and traffic safety. Journal of Erciyes University Institute of Science and Technology, 31(2), 129-134. Online ISSN: 1012-2354. Access Address (05.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erciyesfen/issue/25553/269548
  • Önder S. & Polat A.T. (2004). Visual quality assessment and swot analysis ecotourism aspect for Karapınar country of Konya. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 18(33), 80-86. Online ISSN: 2458-8377. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/selcukjafsci/issue/76653/1276960
  • Özcan, Y. (2022). Examination of woody plant taxa used in urban areas in the context of ecosystem services; Rize city example (Master's thesis). Artvin Çoruh University/Graduate Education Institute
  • Özdamar, K. (2003). Modern Scientific Research Methods. Eskişehir: Kaan Bookstore.
  • Özhancı, E. & Yılmaz, H. (2013). Photo safari oriented visual landscape analysis of the mountains reserving different landscape characters. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 44(1), 83-89. Online ISSN: 2979-9686. Access Address (09.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunizfd/issue/3026/42031
  • Özgeriş, M. & Karahan, F. (2015). A study on visual quality assessment in recreational facilities: sample of Tortum and Uzundere (Erzurum). Artvin Coruh University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 16(1), 40-49. Online ISSN: 2146-698X. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/25887
  • Robinson, N., (2004). The Planting Design Handbook, Second Edition, Ashgate Publishing, England, s. 287.
  • Sağlık, A., Kelkit, A., Sağlık, E. & Kahvecioğlu, C. (2020). ÇOMÜ Terzioğlu Campus Landscape Plants. Ankara: Pozitif Printing House.
  • Sarı, D. & Karaşah, B. (2018). A research on preferences of planting design elements, principles and approaches in landscape design applications. Megaron, 13(3). Online ISSN: 1309-6915. Access Address (21.07.2024): https://jag.journalagent.com/megaron/pdfs/MEGARON- 29981-ARTICLE-SARI.pdf
  • Seçkin, Ö.B. (1997). Landscape structures II. Istanbul: Faculty of Forestry Publications.
  • Sezen, I. & Yılmaz, S. (2010). Visual assessment for the evaluation of Erzurum-Bayburt-Of Highways as scenic road. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(4), 366-377. Online ISSN: 1992-2248. Access Address (06.03.2024): http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE
  • Sezen, I. (2015). Visual Quality Analysis for Roadside Landscape Scenes of Erzurum-Erzincan (Turkey) Highway Route. R. Efe ve diğerleri (Ed.). Environment and Ecology at the Beginning of 21st Century. Chapter 9. (p: 138-152). ISBN 978-954-07-3999-1. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
  • Sezen, I., Demircan, N., Karahan, F. & Polat, Z. (2015). Assessment of Visual Quality in Geomorphologic Landscape: Case Study of Tortum Creek Valley, Uzundere District (Erzurum/Turkey). R. Efe ve diğerleri (Ed.). Environment and Ecology at the Beginning of 21st Century. Chapter 40. (p: 556-569). ISBN 978-954-07-3999-1. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
  • Sezen, I., Külekçi, E. A. & Keleş, B. (2019). Visual Quality Analysis of Urban Roadside Trees for Autumn Color Effects: The Case of Erzurum City. Urban Academy, 12 (40-4), 739-751. Online ISSN: 2146-9229.
  • Smith, C. J. (2011). Designing Gardens with Plants Shapes, The Crowood Press, p. 128.
  • Söğüt, Z. (2005). Urban green links and Adana city. Akdeniz University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 18(1), 113-124. Online ISSN: 2528-9675. Access Address (05.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/akdenizfderg/issue/1581/19639
  • Şekerci, C., Özgen, E. & Dündar, Z. (2016). The Importance of Color in Space Design. B.C. Arabacıoğlu (Ed.). National Space Design Symposium Themed Boundary Between Inside and Outside (pp: 13-23).
  • Turgut, H., Atabeyoğlu, Ö., Yılmaz, H. & Irmak, M. A. (2012). Evaluating different planting design compositions for visual landscape quality in street planting. Artvin Çoruh University Faculty of Forestry Journal, 13(1), 49-66. Online ISSN: 2146-1880. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/25772
  • Uzun, G. (1999). Basic Design, Çukurova University Faculty of Agriculture General Publication No: 196 Textbooks Publication No: A-62, Adana, p. 214.
  • Yayla, N. (2011). Highway Engineering. İstanbul: Birsen Publishing House.
  • Yazıcı, K. (2017). Functional-aesthetic evaluation of urban road plantings and examination of existing planting designs: Tokat example. Agricultural Engineering, 364, 30-39. Online ISSN: 2651-4494. Access Address (05.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article- file/494663
  • Yazıcıoğlu, Y. (2004). SPSS Applied Scientific Research Methods. Ankara: Detay Publishing.
  • Yuca, N., & Aşur, F. (2022). Visual landscape quality assessment in the example of Van Yüzüncü Yıl University-Ferit Melen Airport highway route. Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 59(1), 135-145. Online ISSN: 2548-1207. Access Address (10.07.2024): https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.850123
  • Yücel, E. (2012). Trees and Shrubs. İstanbul: Türmatsan Organized Printing.
  • Zhang, X., Xiong, X., Chi, M., Yang, S., & Liu, L. (2024). Research on visual quality assessment and landscape elements influence mechanism of rural greenways. Ecological Indicators, 160, 111844.

Farklı Peyzaj Tasarımları ile Erzurum Kenti İpekyolu Köprülü Kavşağının Görsel Kalitesinin Artırılması Senaryoları

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 719 - 736, 26.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1450020

Abstract

Kentlerde trafik yoğunluğuyla artan köprülü kavşaklarla oluşan betonlaşmanın monotonluğu gidermek için peyzaj çalışmalarına ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Erzurum kenti İpekyolu Köprülü Kavşağı’nın ana materyali oluşturduğu bu çalışmada köprülü kavşağın yan duvar, üst geçit, kavşak peyzaj görselliğini artırmaya yönelik 3 farklı senaryo oluşturulmuştur. Köprülü kavşağın mevcut durumu ve Lumion Programı’nda oluşturulan senaryolardan oluşan toplam 4 görsel grup değerlendirilmiştir. Analiz için hazırlanan anket Atatürk Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi’nde lisans ve lisansüstü eğitim gören 80 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Analizde tasarım unsurları değerlendirme kriterleri olarak ele alınmıştır. En yüksek puanı alan Senaryo 3’de yan duvar görselliğinde renk ve renk harmonisi etkili olmuştur. Araştırmanın sonucunda tasarım senaryolarının, tasarım yapılmayan mevcut durumlardan daha yüksek görsel kaliteye sahip olduğu görülmüştür.

References

  • Acar, C. & Güneroğlu Ayhan, N. (2009). A study on linear plant compositions' functionality, visuality and species diversity assessment in Trabzon City. Ecology, 72, 65-73. Online ISSN: 1300-1361. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20093225441
  • Ak, M. M. (2010). A research on the determination and evaluation of visual quality in the Akçakoca coastline example. (PhD thesis). Ankara University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture.
  • Akoğlu, M. & Akten, M. (2022). Examination of the change in the perception of space due to the use of light and color in the example of Antalya Cumhuriyet Square. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(1), 405-420. Online ISSN: 2548-0170. Access Address (02.04.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2404753
  • Altınçekiç, H. & Altınçekiç, S. Ç. (1996). Planting principles in highway landscaping works. Highway Landscape Panel in Urban and Rural Regions, Istanbul, 12-13 March 1996.
  • Arriaza, M., Cañas-Ortega, J. F., Cañas-Madueño, J. A. & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 115-125. Online ISSN: 1872-6062. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920460300246 9
  • Aslan, M. & Akan, H. (2019). A study of natural woody plants of forest in Şanlıurfa–determination of detection and landscape values of parks and garden plant. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12(1), 50-65. Online ISSN: 1308-8084. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/biodicon/issue/59395/854995
  • Austin, R. L. (1982) Designing with Plants, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA, p. 188
  • Benliay, A., & Soydan, O. (2015). Evaluation of landscape visual quality and landscape features in the example of the Aspendos-Sillyon-Perge bicycle route. Artium, 3(1), 48-64. Online ISSN: 2147-6683. Access Address (10.07.2024): http://artium.hku.edu.tr/en/download/article- file/25545.
  • Booth, N.K. (1990) Basic Elements of Landscape Architectural Design, Department of Landscape Architectural, Ohio State University, USA, Waveland Pres, Inc. Illinois, s. 315.
  • Bulut, Y. & Atabeyoğlu, Ö. (2010). The Place and Importance of Landscape Architects in Urban Planning. III. National Black Sea Forestry Congress Vol 4. (s. 1494-1503). Artvin, Türkiye: Zafer Offset. Access Address (07.03.2024): https://ticaret.edu.tr/cevre-ve-doga-bilimleri- uygulama-ve-arastirma-merkezi/wp- content/uploads/sites/46/2021/11/artvin-kongre-onsayfa- icindekiler.pdf
  • Bulut, Z., Sezen, I., & Karahan, F. (2010). Determination of spring visual ceremonies of urban fruit trees and shrubs: A case study from Erzurum, Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8(1), 289-296. Online ISSN:1459-0263. Access Address (21.07.2024): https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zoehre-Polat- 2/publication/267860475_Determination_of_spring_visual_ceremoni es_of_urban_fruit_trees_and_shrubs_A_case_study_from_Erzurum _Turkey/links/59314a1c45851553b68e26e1/Determination-of-spring- visual-ceremonies-of-urban-fruit-trees-and-shrubs-A-case-study- from-Erzurum-Turkey.pdf
  • Bulut, Z. & Yılmaz, H. (2008). Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: a case study for Kemaliye (Erzincan/Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 141(1-3), 121-129. Online ISSN: 1573-2959. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-007-9882-0.pdf
  • Büyüköztürk, S. (2008). Scientific Research Methods. Pegem Yayınları, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Çakıcı, I. (2007). A method research for visual landscape evaluation in landscape planning studies. (PhD thesis). Ankara University Institute of Science and Technology. Access Address (08.03.2024). https://dspace.ankara.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12575/34272
  • Daniel, T.C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1- 4), 267-281. Online ISSN: 1872-6062. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204601001414
  • Dere, E. E. (2017). Landscape visual analysis and evaluation: TEM highway example (Master's thesis, Namık Kemal University Institute of Science and Technology. Access Address (10.07.2024). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Elinç, H. (2011). Examination of City Parks of Abdurrahman Alaettinoğlu and Alanya Mayors in Alanya District of Antalya Province with Visual Quality Assessment Method. (Master's Thesis) Selçuk University Institute of Science and Technology. Access Address (06.03.2024). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Güleç, T.F. (2019). City and Landscape https://www.plantdergisi.com/turkan-fusun-gulec/kent-ve- peyzaj.html.(24.12.2020).
  • Gülgün, B. & Türkyilmaz, B. (2001). The place and importance of ergonomics in landscape architecture and human life and a research on the Bornova example. Ege Univ. Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 38(2- 3), 127-134, 2001. Online ISSN: 1018-8851. Access Address (05.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/58955
  • Güngör, H. (2005). Basic Design, Esen Publishing House, Istanbul.
  • Güngör, S. & Arslan, M. (2004). Swot analysis, visual quality assessment, preferences of tourism facilities and tourism facilities' conditional analysis for tourism and recreational strategies: case study for Beysehir province. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 18(33), 68-72. Online ISSN: 2458-8377. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/selcukjafsci/issue/76653/1276935
  • Güneroğlu, N. (2017). The effect of restoration process on riparian landscape. Artvin Coruh University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 18(1), 10- 20. Online ISSN: 2146-698X. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/tr/download/article-file/280795
  • Gürbüz, K. (2021). Scenarios for Increasing the Visual Quality of Erzurum City Interchanges with Different Landscape Designs. Master's Thesis. Atatürk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture, Erzurum. Access Address (02.04.2024): https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Gürbüz, K. & Sezen, I. (2023). Scenarios of Improving the Visual Quality of Erzurum City Mecidiye Bridge Interchange with Different Landscape Design. III. International Architecture Symposium, December 11-12, 2023 / Diyarbakır, Türkiye
  • Irmak, M. A. & Yılmaz, H. (2010). Visual Analysis of Natural and Cultural Source Values Considering Different Landscape Character Sites; The Sample of Erzurum. Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 27(2), 45-55. Online ISSN: 2147-8848. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gopzfd/issue/7332/9594
  • İslamoğlu, H. (2003). Scientific research methods. Istanbul: Beta Press.
  • Kalın, A. (2004). Determination and improvement of visual quality in environmental preference and evaluation: Trabzon coastline example. PhD thesis. K.T.U. Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Landscape Architecture, Trabzon. Access Address (07.03.2024). file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/156101.pdf
  • Kaptanoğlu, C. A. Y. (2006). The effects of visual animation techniques on user preference in landscape evaluation. PhD thesis. Istanbul University. Faculty of Forestry, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Landscape Architecture, Istanbul. Access Address (07.03.2024).
  • Karahan, F. & Yilmaz, H. (2004). Visual Quality Assessment of Erzurum- Rize State Highway Corridor. TMMOB Chamber of Landscape Architects 2nd Congress of Landscape Architecture. Ankara: Chamber of Landscape Architects.
  • Karasar, N. (1982). Scientific Research Method. Ankara: Nadir Bookstore.
  • Karaşah, B. (2006). Determination of mistakes made in planting design in urban texture "Trabzon Example" (Master's Thesis). Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, Trabzon.
  • Müderrisoğlu, H. & Eroğlu, E. (2006). Differences in visual perception of some coniferous trees under snow load. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Forestry Journal, A(1), 136-146. Online ISSN: 1302-7085. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article- file/195574
  • Namlı, R. (2015). The interchanges and traffic safety. Journal of Erciyes University Institute of Science and Technology, 31(2), 129-134. Online ISSN: 1012-2354. Access Address (05.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erciyesfen/issue/25553/269548
  • Önder S. & Polat A.T. (2004). Visual quality assessment and swot analysis ecotourism aspect for Karapınar country of Konya. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 18(33), 80-86. Online ISSN: 2458-8377. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/selcukjafsci/issue/76653/1276960
  • Özcan, Y. (2022). Examination of woody plant taxa used in urban areas in the context of ecosystem services; Rize city example (Master's thesis). Artvin Çoruh University/Graduate Education Institute
  • Özdamar, K. (2003). Modern Scientific Research Methods. Eskişehir: Kaan Bookstore.
  • Özhancı, E. & Yılmaz, H. (2013). Photo safari oriented visual landscape analysis of the mountains reserving different landscape characters. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 44(1), 83-89. Online ISSN: 2979-9686. Access Address (09.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunizfd/issue/3026/42031
  • Özgeriş, M. & Karahan, F. (2015). A study on visual quality assessment in recreational facilities: sample of Tortum and Uzundere (Erzurum). Artvin Coruh University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 16(1), 40-49. Online ISSN: 2146-698X. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/25887
  • Robinson, N., (2004). The Planting Design Handbook, Second Edition, Ashgate Publishing, England, s. 287.
  • Sağlık, A., Kelkit, A., Sağlık, E. & Kahvecioğlu, C. (2020). ÇOMÜ Terzioğlu Campus Landscape Plants. Ankara: Pozitif Printing House.
  • Sarı, D. & Karaşah, B. (2018). A research on preferences of planting design elements, principles and approaches in landscape design applications. Megaron, 13(3). Online ISSN: 1309-6915. Access Address (21.07.2024): https://jag.journalagent.com/megaron/pdfs/MEGARON- 29981-ARTICLE-SARI.pdf
  • Seçkin, Ö.B. (1997). Landscape structures II. Istanbul: Faculty of Forestry Publications.
  • Sezen, I. & Yılmaz, S. (2010). Visual assessment for the evaluation of Erzurum-Bayburt-Of Highways as scenic road. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(4), 366-377. Online ISSN: 1992-2248. Access Address (06.03.2024): http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE
  • Sezen, I. (2015). Visual Quality Analysis for Roadside Landscape Scenes of Erzurum-Erzincan (Turkey) Highway Route. R. Efe ve diğerleri (Ed.). Environment and Ecology at the Beginning of 21st Century. Chapter 9. (p: 138-152). ISBN 978-954-07-3999-1. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
  • Sezen, I., Demircan, N., Karahan, F. & Polat, Z. (2015). Assessment of Visual Quality in Geomorphologic Landscape: Case Study of Tortum Creek Valley, Uzundere District (Erzurum/Turkey). R. Efe ve diğerleri (Ed.). Environment and Ecology at the Beginning of 21st Century. Chapter 40. (p: 556-569). ISBN 978-954-07-3999-1. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
  • Sezen, I., Külekçi, E. A. & Keleş, B. (2019). Visual Quality Analysis of Urban Roadside Trees for Autumn Color Effects: The Case of Erzurum City. Urban Academy, 12 (40-4), 739-751. Online ISSN: 2146-9229.
  • Smith, C. J. (2011). Designing Gardens with Plants Shapes, The Crowood Press, p. 128.
  • Söğüt, Z. (2005). Urban green links and Adana city. Akdeniz University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 18(1), 113-124. Online ISSN: 2528-9675. Access Address (05.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/akdenizfderg/issue/1581/19639
  • Şekerci, C., Özgen, E. & Dündar, Z. (2016). The Importance of Color in Space Design. B.C. Arabacıoğlu (Ed.). National Space Design Symposium Themed Boundary Between Inside and Outside (pp: 13-23).
  • Turgut, H., Atabeyoğlu, Ö., Yılmaz, H. & Irmak, M. A. (2012). Evaluating different planting design compositions for visual landscape quality in street planting. Artvin Çoruh University Faculty of Forestry Journal, 13(1), 49-66. Online ISSN: 2146-1880. Access Address (06.03.2024): https://ofd.artvin.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/25772
  • Uzun, G. (1999). Basic Design, Çukurova University Faculty of Agriculture General Publication No: 196 Textbooks Publication No: A-62, Adana, p. 214.
  • Yayla, N. (2011). Highway Engineering. İstanbul: Birsen Publishing House.
  • Yazıcı, K. (2017). Functional-aesthetic evaluation of urban road plantings and examination of existing planting designs: Tokat example. Agricultural Engineering, 364, 30-39. Online ISSN: 2651-4494. Access Address (05.03.2024): https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article- file/494663
  • Yazıcıoğlu, Y. (2004). SPSS Applied Scientific Research Methods. Ankara: Detay Publishing.
  • Yuca, N., & Aşur, F. (2022). Visual landscape quality assessment in the example of Van Yüzüncü Yıl University-Ferit Melen Airport highway route. Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 59(1), 135-145. Online ISSN: 2548-1207. Access Address (10.07.2024): https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.850123
  • Yücel, E. (2012). Trees and Shrubs. İstanbul: Türmatsan Organized Printing.
  • Zhang, X., Xiong, X., Chi, M., Yang, S., & Liu, L. (2024). Research on visual quality assessment and landscape elements influence mechanism of rural greenways. Ecological Indicators, 160, 111844.
There are 57 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Landscape Design
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Kübra Gürbüz 0000-0002-0773-2998

İşik Sezen 0000-0003-0304-9072

Publication Date December 26, 2024
Submission Date March 21, 2024
Acceptance Date October 11, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Gürbüz, K., & Sezen, İ. (2024). Scenarios for Increasing the Visual Quality of Erzurum City İpekyolu Bridge Intersection with Different Landscape Designs. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 9(2), 719-736. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1450020