BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2015, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 0 - , 22.06.2015
https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.43453

Abstract

The objective of the study is to determine the opinions and experiences of teacher candidates related with academic dishonesty. Descriptive survey model has been used in present study. The sample of this study consists of 1119 teacher candidates enrolled at Dumlupınar University. The data were collected through the survey developed by researchers and analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques. According to the study results, it was found that more than half of the teacher candidates considered academic dishonesty behaviors as unethical (%59.2) and felt guilty when they behaved in such way (53.5%). Also, teacher candidates indicated that preventive measures should be taken (60.2%). However, the study showed that 95% of the teacher candidates engaged in academic dishonesty behavior for at least one time during their higher education lives, and only 7.1% of the teacher candidates were warned or punished by their instructors. On the other hand, more than half of the teacher candidates stated that the attitudes of instructors and proctors had an impact on academic dishonesty behaviors (55.6%) and academic honesty may be learned (55.6%). The academic dishonesty behaviors of the teacher candidates mostly focused on cheating in exams, and the most frequent ones were informing the students of other classes about the content of an exam after it and letting another student look at one's exam paper. The major reasons for academic dishonesty were indicated as the desire to get high marks, intense exam content, not being able to understand the lesson/subject, need for help, fear of failure and the desire to satisfy family expectations, and knowing that everybody does it

References

  • Ahmadi, A. (2012). Cheating on exams in the Iranian EFL context. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 151-170. doi: 10.1007/s10805-012-9156-5
  • Alleyne, P., & Philips, K. (2011). Exploring academic dishonesty among university students in Barbados: An extension to the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9, 323-338. doi: 10.1007/s10805-011-9144-1.
  • Akbulut, Y., Uysal, Ö., Odabaşı, H. F. ve Kuzu, A. (2008). Influence of gender, program of study and pc experience on unethical computer using behaviors of Turkish undergraduate students. Computers & Education, 51, 485-492.
  • Arslantaş, C. C. ve Acar, G. (2008). Perceptions of academic and business dishonesty among senior level students. Yönetim, 19(60), 34-49.
  • Bernardi, R. A., Baca, A. V., Landers, K. S., & Witek, M. B. (2008). Methods of cheating and deterrents to classroom cheating: An international study. Ethics & Behavior, 18(4), 373- 391. doi:10.1080/10508420701713030.
  • Bisping, T. O., Patron, H., & Roskelley, K. (2008). Modeling academic dishonesty: The role of student perceptions and misconduct. Journal of Economic Education, 38, 4-21. doi:10.3200/JECE.39.1.4-21.
  • Bozdoğan, A. E. ve Öztürk, Ç. (2008). Öğretmen adayları neden kopya çeker? İlköğretim Online, 7(1), 141-149. [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr.
  • Brown, B. S. & Weible, R. (2006). Changes in academic dishonesty among mis majors between 1999 and 2004. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 18(1), 116-134. doi: 10.1007/BF03032727.
  • Burrus, R. T., McGoldrick, K., & Schuhmann, P.W. (2007). Self-reports of student cheating: does a definition of cheating matter? Journal of Economic Education, 38(1), 3-16. doi:10.3200/JECE.38. 1.3-17.
  • Christensen Hughes, J., M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006a). Understanding academic misconduct. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(1), 49-63.
  • Christensen Hughes, J., M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006b). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 1-21.
  • Çetin, Ş. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kopya çekme davranışlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim, 175, 129-142.
  • Davis, S. F., & Ludvigson, H. W. (1995). Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 119-121. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top2202_6.
  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology. 19(1), 16- 20. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top1901_3.
  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1999). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 343-353. doi: 10.1023/A:1018703217828.
  • Dodeen, H. M. (2012). Undergraduate student cheating in exams. Damascus University Journal, 28(1), 37-55.
  • Durmuşçelebi, M. (2011). Lise öğrencilerinin ve öğretmen adaylarının kopya çekme davranışlarına ilişkin görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17(1), 77-97.
  • Eraslan, A. (2011). Matematik öğretmeni adayları ve kopya: Hiç çekmedim desem yalan olur Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(160), 52-64.
  • Eret, E. ve Ok, A. (2014) Internet plagiarism in higher education: Tendencies, triggering factors and reasons among teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 1002-1016. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.880776.
  • Ersoy, A. (2014). İnternet kaynaklarından intihal yaptığımın farkında değildim: Bir olgubilim araştırması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 47-60.
  • Ersoy, A. ve Karaduman, H. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının hazırladıkları araştırma raporlarında dijital aşırma: Google arama motoru örneği. 9. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Eğitimi Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı içinde (s.529-534). Elazığ: Fırat Üniversitesi.
  • Ersoy, A. ve Özden, M. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının ödevlerinde internetten intihal yapmalarında öğretim elemanının rolüne ilişkin görüşleri. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), 608-619. [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr.
  • Evans, R. (2006). Evaluating an electronic plagiarism detection service: The importance of trust and the difficulty of proving students don’t cheat. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 87-99. doi: 10.1177/1469787406061150.
  • Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115- 122.
  • Fisher, T. D., & Brunell, A. B. (2014). A bogus pipeline approach to studying gender differences in cheating behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 61-62, 91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.019.
  • Geddes, K. A. (2011). Academic dishonesty among gifted and high-achieving students. Gifted Child Today, 34(2), 50-56.
  • Hutton, P. (2006). Understanding student cheating and what educators can do about it. College Teaching, 54(1), 171-176.
  • Iyer, R. & Eastman, J. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty: Are business students different from other college students? Journal of Education for Business, 82(2), 101-110.
  • Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s wrong, But everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 209-228.
  • Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141-150. doi: 10.1177/1080569911404059
  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233-247. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB11 03_3.
  • Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (Onsekizinci baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Keçeci, A., Bulduk, S., Oruç, D. ve Çelik, S. (2011). Academic dishonesty among nursing students: A descriptive study. Nursing Ethics, 18(5), 725-733. doi: 10.1177/0969733011408042.
  • Köse, Ö. ve Arıkan, A. (2011). Reducing plagiarism by using online software: An experimental study. Contemporary Online Language Education Journal, 1, 122-129. [Online]: http://www.colej.org
  • Küçüktepe, S. E. ve Küçüktepe, C. (2012) Tarih öğretmeni adaylarının kopya çekme eğilimlerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 115-125.
  • Ledesma, R. G. (2011). Academic dishonesty among undergraduate students in a Korean university, Research in World Economy, 2(2), 25-35.
  • Lin, C. S., & Wen, L. M. (2007). Academic dishonesty in higher education: A nationwide study in Taiwan. Higher Education, 54(1), 85-97.
  • Lupton, R. A., & Chapman, K. J. (2002). Russian and American college students’ attitudes, perceptions and tendencies towards cheating. Educational Research, 44(1), 17-27. doi: 10.1080/00131880110081080.
  • Lupton, R. A., Chapman, K. J., & Weiss, J. E. (2000). International perspective: A cross-national exploration of business students’ attitudes, perceptions, and tendencies toward academic dishonesty. 10.1080/08832320009599020.
  • Mastin, D. F., Peszka J., & Lilly, D. R. (2009). Online academic integrity. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 174-178.
  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522-538.
  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education 38(3), 379-396.
  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.
  • McCabe, D. L., Feghali, T. & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the middle east: İndividual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49, 451-467.
  • Molnar, K. K. (2015). Students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty: A nine-year study from 2005 to 2013. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13, 135-150. doi: 10.1007/s10805-015-9231-9.
  • Molnar, K. K., & Kletke, M. G. (2012). Does the Type of Cheating Influence Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Cheating? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 201-212. doi: 10.1007/s10805-012-9164-5.
  • Murdock, T. B. & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129-145.
  • Murdock, T. B., Beauchamp, A. S., & Hinton, A. M. (2008). Predictors of cheating and cheating attributions: Does classroom context influence cheating and blame for cheating? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(4), 477-492.
  • Nazir, M S., & Aslam, M. S. (2010). Academic dishonesty and perceptions of Pakistani students. International Journal of Educational Management, 24 (7), 655-668.
  • Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69-77.
  • Olafson, L., Schraw, G., Nadelson L., Nadelson, S., & Kehrwald, N. (2013). Exploring the judgment-action gap: College students and academic dishonesty. Ethics & Behavior, 23(2), 148-162.
  • Orhan, F. ve Günay, A. (2014). Üniversite öğrencilerinin internet tabanlı akademik usulsüzlük nedenlerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, (15)1, 176-190.
  • Özden, M. ve Özdemir Özden, D. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerine dayalı olarak akademik usulsüzlük davranışlarının belirlenmesi, Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 5(1), 88-98. doi: 10.5961/jhes.2014.00x.
  • Özgüngör, S. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinde öğretmene ilişkin algıların ve öğrenci özelliklerinin kopya çekme davranışlarıyla ilişkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(149), 68-79.
  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students - literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488. doi: 10.1080/02602930301677.
  • Park, E.-J., Park, S., & Jang, I.-S. (2013). Academic cheating among nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33, 346–352. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.12.015.
  • Perry, B. (2010). Exploring academic misconduct: Some insights into student behaviour. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 97-108. doi: 10.1177/1469787410365657.
  • Preiss, M., Klein, H. A., Levenburg, N. M., & Nohavova, A. (2013). A cross-country evaluation of cheating in academia - A comparison of data from the US and the Czech Republic. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11, 157-167. doi 10.1007/s10805-013-9179-6.
  • Rawwas, M. Y. A, Al-Khatib, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (2004). Academic dishonesty: A cross-cultural comparison of U.S. and Chinese marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 89-100. doi: 10.1177/0273475303262354.
  • Schmelkin, L. P., Gilbert, K., Spencer, K. J., Pincus, H. S., & Silva, R. (2008). A multidimensional scaling of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 587-607.
  • Selçuk, Z. (1995). Bir eğitim ve rehberlik sorunu: Okullarda kopya çekme. Eğitim Yönetimi, 1(3), 397-418.
  • Seven, M. A. ve Engin, A. O. (2008). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin kopya çekmeye duydukları ihtiyaç ve kopya çekme sebepleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(1), 111-136.
  • Smyth M. L., & Davis, J. R. (2003). An examination of student cheating in the two-year college. Community College Review, 31, 17-32. doi: 10.1177/009155210303100102.
  • Swift, C. O., & Nonis, S. (1998). When no one is watching: Cheating behavior on projects and assignments. Marketing Education Review, 8(1), 27–36.
  • Szabo, A. & Underwood, J. (2004). Cybercheats: Is information and communication technology fuelling academic dishonesty? Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 180-199. doi: 10.1177/1469787404043815.
  • Tayfun, A. ve Yazıcıoğlu, İ. (2008). Öğrencilerin kopya hakkındaki görüşleri üzerine bir araştırma. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6, 375-393.
  • Tekin, H. (2000). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. (On dördüncü baskı) Ankara: Yargı Yayınları.
  • Topçu, Y. ve Uzundumlu, A. S. (2011). Yüksek öğretimde öğrencilerin kopya çekme motivasyonu ile ilgili tutum ve davranışları. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 303-313. [Online]: http://www.insanbilimleri.com
  • Trost, K. (2009). Psst, have you ever cheated? A study of academic dishonesty in Sweden. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (34)4, 367-376. doi: 10.1080/02602930801956067.
  • Underwood, J., & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic offences and e-learning: individual propensities in cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4), 467-477. doi: 10.1111/1467- 8535.00343.
  • Ünlü, H. ve Eroğlu, C. (2012). Beden eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının kopya çekmeye yönelik tutumları. Spormetre: Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, (3), 101-106.
  • Wei, T., Chesnut, S. R., Barnard-Brak, L., & Schmidt, M. (2014). University students’ perceptions of academic cheating: Triangulating quantitative and qualitative findings. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12, 287-298. doi:10.1007/s10805-014-9219-x.
  • Whitley, B. E., Nelson, A. B., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 41(9-10), 657-680.
  • Yang, S. C., Huang, C.-L., & Chen, A-S. (2013). An investigation of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty, reasons for dishonesty, achievement goals, and willingness to report dishonest behavior, Ethics & Behavior, 23(6), 501-522, doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.802651.
  • Yangın, S. ve Kahyaoğlu, M. (2009). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının kopya çekmeye yönelik tutum ve görüşleri. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(21), 46-55.
  • Yeşilyurt, E. (2014). Academic locus of control, tendencies towards academic dishonesty and test anxiety levels as the predictors of academic self-efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(5), 1945-1956. doi: 10.12738/estp.2014.5.1841.

Akademik Usulsüzlük: Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşleri ve Deneyimleri

Year 2015, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 0 - , 22.06.2015
https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.43453

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının akademik usulsüzlük konusundaki görüş ve deneyimlerini belirlemektir. Araştırmada betimsel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi’nde öğrenim gören 1119 öğretmen adayı üzerinde gerçekleştirilen araştırmanın verileri araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Veriler frekans, yüzde ve aritmetik ortalama kullanılarak çözümlenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğretmen adaylarının yarıdan fazlası akademik usulsüzlüğün etik olmadığını (%59.2), engellenmesine yönelik önlemler alınması gerektiğini (%60.2) ve bu yönde bir davranış sergilediklerinde suçluluk duyduklarını (%53.5) belirtmiştir. Buna rağmen %95 oranında öğretmen adayının yükseköğretim hayatı boyunca akademik usulsüzlük içeren bir davranış sergilediği, sadece %7.1’inin öğretim elemanları tarafından uyarıldığı ve cezalandırıldığı görülmüştür. Öte yandan öğretmen adaylarının çoğunluğu akademik dürüstlüğün öğretilebileceğine (%55.9) ve öğretim elemanlarının ve gözetmenlerin tutumunun akademik usulsüzlük davranışlarında etkili olduğuna (%55.6) inanmaktadır. Öğretmen adaylarının sıklıkla gerçekleştirdikleri akademik usulsüzlük davranışları sınavlarda kopya çekme üzerine yoğunlaşmıştır. En sık gerçekleştirilen akademik usulsüzlük davranışları sınav sonrasında diğer sınıftaki öğrencilere sınavın içeriği hakkında bilgi vermek, bir başka öğrencinin sınav kâğıdına bakmasına izin vermek biçimindedir. Yüksek not alma isteği, içeriğin çok yoğun olması, dersi/konuyu anlayamama, yardıma gereksinim duyma, başarısız olma korkusu ve ailenin beklentilerine yanıt verme isteği, herkesin yaptığını bilmek ise öğretmen adaylarının akademik usulsüzlük yapmalarında en fazla etkili olan nedenler olarak belirlenmiştir.

References

  • Ahmadi, A. (2012). Cheating on exams in the Iranian EFL context. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 151-170. doi: 10.1007/s10805-012-9156-5
  • Alleyne, P., & Philips, K. (2011). Exploring academic dishonesty among university students in Barbados: An extension to the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9, 323-338. doi: 10.1007/s10805-011-9144-1.
  • Akbulut, Y., Uysal, Ö., Odabaşı, H. F. ve Kuzu, A. (2008). Influence of gender, program of study and pc experience on unethical computer using behaviors of Turkish undergraduate students. Computers & Education, 51, 485-492.
  • Arslantaş, C. C. ve Acar, G. (2008). Perceptions of academic and business dishonesty among senior level students. Yönetim, 19(60), 34-49.
  • Bernardi, R. A., Baca, A. V., Landers, K. S., & Witek, M. B. (2008). Methods of cheating and deterrents to classroom cheating: An international study. Ethics & Behavior, 18(4), 373- 391. doi:10.1080/10508420701713030.
  • Bisping, T. O., Patron, H., & Roskelley, K. (2008). Modeling academic dishonesty: The role of student perceptions and misconduct. Journal of Economic Education, 38, 4-21. doi:10.3200/JECE.39.1.4-21.
  • Bozdoğan, A. E. ve Öztürk, Ç. (2008). Öğretmen adayları neden kopya çeker? İlköğretim Online, 7(1), 141-149. [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr.
  • Brown, B. S. & Weible, R. (2006). Changes in academic dishonesty among mis majors between 1999 and 2004. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 18(1), 116-134. doi: 10.1007/BF03032727.
  • Burrus, R. T., McGoldrick, K., & Schuhmann, P.W. (2007). Self-reports of student cheating: does a definition of cheating matter? Journal of Economic Education, 38(1), 3-16. doi:10.3200/JECE.38. 1.3-17.
  • Christensen Hughes, J., M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006a). Understanding academic misconduct. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(1), 49-63.
  • Christensen Hughes, J., M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006b). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 1-21.
  • Çetin, Ş. (2007). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kopya çekme davranışlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim, 175, 129-142.
  • Davis, S. F., & Ludvigson, H. W. (1995). Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 119-121. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top2202_6.
  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology. 19(1), 16- 20. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top1901_3.
  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1999). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 343-353. doi: 10.1023/A:1018703217828.
  • Dodeen, H. M. (2012). Undergraduate student cheating in exams. Damascus University Journal, 28(1), 37-55.
  • Durmuşçelebi, M. (2011). Lise öğrencilerinin ve öğretmen adaylarının kopya çekme davranışlarına ilişkin görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17(1), 77-97.
  • Eraslan, A. (2011). Matematik öğretmeni adayları ve kopya: Hiç çekmedim desem yalan olur Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(160), 52-64.
  • Eret, E. ve Ok, A. (2014) Internet plagiarism in higher education: Tendencies, triggering factors and reasons among teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 1002-1016. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.880776.
  • Ersoy, A. (2014). İnternet kaynaklarından intihal yaptığımın farkında değildim: Bir olgubilim araştırması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 47-60.
  • Ersoy, A. ve Karaduman, H. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının hazırladıkları araştırma raporlarında dijital aşırma: Google arama motoru örneği. 9. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Eğitimi Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı içinde (s.529-534). Elazığ: Fırat Üniversitesi.
  • Ersoy, A. ve Özden, M. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının ödevlerinde internetten intihal yapmalarında öğretim elemanının rolüne ilişkin görüşleri. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), 608-619. [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr.
  • Evans, R. (2006). Evaluating an electronic plagiarism detection service: The importance of trust and the difficulty of proving students don’t cheat. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 87-99. doi: 10.1177/1469787406061150.
  • Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115- 122.
  • Fisher, T. D., & Brunell, A. B. (2014). A bogus pipeline approach to studying gender differences in cheating behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 61-62, 91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.019.
  • Geddes, K. A. (2011). Academic dishonesty among gifted and high-achieving students. Gifted Child Today, 34(2), 50-56.
  • Hutton, P. (2006). Understanding student cheating and what educators can do about it. College Teaching, 54(1), 171-176.
  • Iyer, R. & Eastman, J. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty: Are business students different from other college students? Journal of Education for Business, 82(2), 101-110.
  • Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s wrong, But everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 209-228.
  • Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141-150. doi: 10.1177/1080569911404059
  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233-247. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB11 03_3.
  • Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (Onsekizinci baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Keçeci, A., Bulduk, S., Oruç, D. ve Çelik, S. (2011). Academic dishonesty among nursing students: A descriptive study. Nursing Ethics, 18(5), 725-733. doi: 10.1177/0969733011408042.
  • Köse, Ö. ve Arıkan, A. (2011). Reducing plagiarism by using online software: An experimental study. Contemporary Online Language Education Journal, 1, 122-129. [Online]: http://www.colej.org
  • Küçüktepe, S. E. ve Küçüktepe, C. (2012) Tarih öğretmeni adaylarının kopya çekme eğilimlerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 115-125.
  • Ledesma, R. G. (2011). Academic dishonesty among undergraduate students in a Korean university, Research in World Economy, 2(2), 25-35.
  • Lin, C. S., & Wen, L. M. (2007). Academic dishonesty in higher education: A nationwide study in Taiwan. Higher Education, 54(1), 85-97.
  • Lupton, R. A., & Chapman, K. J. (2002). Russian and American college students’ attitudes, perceptions and tendencies towards cheating. Educational Research, 44(1), 17-27. doi: 10.1080/00131880110081080.
  • Lupton, R. A., Chapman, K. J., & Weiss, J. E. (2000). International perspective: A cross-national exploration of business students’ attitudes, perceptions, and tendencies toward academic dishonesty. 10.1080/08832320009599020.
  • Mastin, D. F., Peszka J., & Lilly, D. R. (2009). Online academic integrity. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 174-178.
  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522-538.
  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education 38(3), 379-396.
  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.
  • McCabe, D. L., Feghali, T. & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the middle east: İndividual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49, 451-467.
  • Molnar, K. K. (2015). Students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty: A nine-year study from 2005 to 2013. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13, 135-150. doi: 10.1007/s10805-015-9231-9.
  • Molnar, K. K., & Kletke, M. G. (2012). Does the Type of Cheating Influence Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Cheating? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 201-212. doi: 10.1007/s10805-012-9164-5.
  • Murdock, T. B. & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129-145.
  • Murdock, T. B., Beauchamp, A. S., & Hinton, A. M. (2008). Predictors of cheating and cheating attributions: Does classroom context influence cheating and blame for cheating? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(4), 477-492.
  • Nazir, M S., & Aslam, M. S. (2010). Academic dishonesty and perceptions of Pakistani students. International Journal of Educational Management, 24 (7), 655-668.
  • Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69-77.
  • Olafson, L., Schraw, G., Nadelson L., Nadelson, S., & Kehrwald, N. (2013). Exploring the judgment-action gap: College students and academic dishonesty. Ethics & Behavior, 23(2), 148-162.
  • Orhan, F. ve Günay, A. (2014). Üniversite öğrencilerinin internet tabanlı akademik usulsüzlük nedenlerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, (15)1, 176-190.
  • Özden, M. ve Özdemir Özden, D. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerine dayalı olarak akademik usulsüzlük davranışlarının belirlenmesi, Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 5(1), 88-98. doi: 10.5961/jhes.2014.00x.
  • Özgüngör, S. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinde öğretmene ilişkin algıların ve öğrenci özelliklerinin kopya çekme davranışlarıyla ilişkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(149), 68-79.
  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students - literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488. doi: 10.1080/02602930301677.
  • Park, E.-J., Park, S., & Jang, I.-S. (2013). Academic cheating among nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33, 346–352. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.12.015.
  • Perry, B. (2010). Exploring academic misconduct: Some insights into student behaviour. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 97-108. doi: 10.1177/1469787410365657.
  • Preiss, M., Klein, H. A., Levenburg, N. M., & Nohavova, A. (2013). A cross-country evaluation of cheating in academia - A comparison of data from the US and the Czech Republic. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11, 157-167. doi 10.1007/s10805-013-9179-6.
  • Rawwas, M. Y. A, Al-Khatib, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (2004). Academic dishonesty: A cross-cultural comparison of U.S. and Chinese marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 89-100. doi: 10.1177/0273475303262354.
  • Schmelkin, L. P., Gilbert, K., Spencer, K. J., Pincus, H. S., & Silva, R. (2008). A multidimensional scaling of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 587-607.
  • Selçuk, Z. (1995). Bir eğitim ve rehberlik sorunu: Okullarda kopya çekme. Eğitim Yönetimi, 1(3), 397-418.
  • Seven, M. A. ve Engin, A. O. (2008). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin kopya çekmeye duydukları ihtiyaç ve kopya çekme sebepleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(1), 111-136.
  • Smyth M. L., & Davis, J. R. (2003). An examination of student cheating in the two-year college. Community College Review, 31, 17-32. doi: 10.1177/009155210303100102.
  • Swift, C. O., & Nonis, S. (1998). When no one is watching: Cheating behavior on projects and assignments. Marketing Education Review, 8(1), 27–36.
  • Szabo, A. & Underwood, J. (2004). Cybercheats: Is information and communication technology fuelling academic dishonesty? Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 180-199. doi: 10.1177/1469787404043815.
  • Tayfun, A. ve Yazıcıoğlu, İ. (2008). Öğrencilerin kopya hakkındaki görüşleri üzerine bir araştırma. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6, 375-393.
  • Tekin, H. (2000). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. (On dördüncü baskı) Ankara: Yargı Yayınları.
  • Topçu, Y. ve Uzundumlu, A. S. (2011). Yüksek öğretimde öğrencilerin kopya çekme motivasyonu ile ilgili tutum ve davranışları. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 303-313. [Online]: http://www.insanbilimleri.com
  • Trost, K. (2009). Psst, have you ever cheated? A study of academic dishonesty in Sweden. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, (34)4, 367-376. doi: 10.1080/02602930801956067.
  • Underwood, J., & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic offences and e-learning: individual propensities in cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4), 467-477. doi: 10.1111/1467- 8535.00343.
  • Ünlü, H. ve Eroğlu, C. (2012). Beden eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının kopya çekmeye yönelik tutumları. Spormetre: Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, (3), 101-106.
  • Wei, T., Chesnut, S. R., Barnard-Brak, L., & Schmidt, M. (2014). University students’ perceptions of academic cheating: Triangulating quantitative and qualitative findings. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12, 287-298. doi:10.1007/s10805-014-9219-x.
  • Whitley, B. E., Nelson, A. B., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 41(9-10), 657-680.
  • Yang, S. C., Huang, C.-L., & Chen, A-S. (2013). An investigation of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty, reasons for dishonesty, achievement goals, and willingness to report dishonest behavior, Ethics & Behavior, 23(6), 501-522, doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.802651.
  • Yangın, S. ve Kahyaoğlu, M. (2009). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının kopya çekmeye yönelik tutum ve görüşleri. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(21), 46-55.
  • Yeşilyurt, E. (2014). Academic locus of control, tendencies towards academic dishonesty and test anxiety levels as the predictors of academic self-efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(5), 1945-1956. doi: 10.12738/estp.2014.5.1841.
There are 76 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Muhammet Özden

Döndü Özdemir Özden

Baykal Biçer

Publication Date June 22, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Özden, M., Özdemir Özden, D., & Biçer, B. (2015). Akademik Usulsüzlük: Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşleri ve Deneyimleri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.43453

Once articles are published in the journal, the publishing rights belong to the journal. All articles published in the journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which permits sharing by others.