Kimya Eğitiminde Sorgulamaya Dayalı Öğrenmenin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Year 2024, , 1357 - 1386, 01.08.2024

Sezgi Ayna , Şenol Şen

https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1242967

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada kimya eğitiminde sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme yönteminin kullanımına ilişkin bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak araştırma alanının yapısını ve gelişimini ortaya çıkarmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç kapsamında Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında 15 Kasım 2022 tarihine kadar kimya eğitiminde sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme yönteminin kullanımı ile ilgili yayınlanmış 875 makale, performans analizi ve bilim haritalama kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Betimsel analiz sonucunda; en çok çalışma yapan yazarın Ellen J Yezierski olduğu ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Bilim haritalama bulgularına göre; en etkili dokümanın Abd-El-Khalick vd. (2004), en etkili kaynağın ‘Journal of Chemical Education’ ve en etkili ülkenin ABD olduğu belirlenmiştir. En etkili ilk üç yazarın Joseph S. Krajcik, Ronald W. Marx ve Fouad Abd-El-Khalick olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Birlikte en fazla atıf alan yazarlar; National Research Council (NRC), Avi Hofstein ve Barbara A. Crawford iken; birlikte en fazla atıf alan referanslar ise NRC (1996), Hofstein ve Lunetta (2004) ve NRC (2000) şeklindedir. Ayrıca en fazla kullanılan anahtar kelimenin; ‘inquiry based/discovery learning’ olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın hem literatüre katkı sağlanması hem de bu alanda yeni olan araştırmacılara yol gösterici olması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

Sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme, kimya eğitimi, bibliyometrik analiz

References

• Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok‐Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., and Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118.
• Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., and Galán, J. L. (2006). Co-Authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957-983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x.
• Al, U., ve Tonta, Y. (2004). Atıf analizi: Hacettepe üniversitesi kütüphanecilik bölümü tezlerinde atıf yapılan kaynaklar. Bilgi Dünyası Dergisi, 5(1), 19-47. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2004.497.
• Alake-Tuenter, E., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H., Wals, A. E. J., Oosterheert, I., and Mulder, M. (2012). Inquiry-based science education competencies of primary school teachers: A literature study and critical review of the american national science education standards. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2609-2640. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.669076.
• Alkan, F. (2018). The effect of inquiry based chemistry laboratory on critical thinking. Proceedings of ICES 2018 – 1st International Congress on New Horizons in Education and Social Sciences, April 9-11, 2018, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Andres, A. (2009). Measuring academic research how to undertake a bibliometric study. Chandos Publishing. Aslancı, S. (2022). Araştırma sorgulamaya dayalı öğrenme: bibliyometrik bir analiz. Scientific Educational Studies, 6(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.31798/ses.1068633.99.
• Barnea, N., Dori, Y. J., and Hofstein, A. (2010). Development and implementation of inquirybased and computerized-based laboratories: reforming high school chemistry in Israel. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005471M.
• Bayram, Z., Özyalçın Oskay, Ö., Erdem, E., Dinçol Özgür, S., and Şen, Ş. (2013). Effect of inquiry based learning method on students’ motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 988 – 996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.112.
• Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., and Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72, 30-33. Bellibaş, M.Ş., ve Gümüş, S. (2018). Eğitim yönetiminde sistematik derleme çalışmaları. K. Beycioğlu, N. Özer, ve Y. Kondakçı (Eds.), Eğitim Yönetiminde Araştırma (s. 505- 509). Pegem Akademi.
• Block, J., and Fisch, C. (2020). Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research. Management Review Quarterly, 70, 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00188-4. Bruck, L. B., and Towns, M. H. (2009). Preparing students to benefit from inquiry-based activities in the chemistry laboratory: guidelines and suggestions. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(7), 820-822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed086p820.
• Bybee, R. W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell and E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (s. 20-46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
• Cai, S., Wang, X., and Chiang, F. K. (2014). A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31- 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.
• Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., and Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235.
• Capps, D. K., and Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about natüre of science: Are they happening?. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497-526.
• Chase, A., Pakhira, D., and Stains, M. (2013). Implementing process-oriented, guided-inquiry learning for the first time: Adaptations and short-term impacts on students’ attitude and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(4), 409-416.
• Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., and Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166.
• Crawford, B. A., Zembal‐Saul, C., Munford, D., and Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers' ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry‐based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 613-637.
• DeBoer, G. (1991). History of idea in science education implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Demir, E., ve Çelik, M. (2020). Fen bilimleri öğretim programları alanındaki bilimsel çalışmaların bibliyometrik profili. Türkiye Kimya Derneği Dergisi Kısım C: Kimya Eğitimi, 5(2), 131-182. https://doi.org/10.37995/jotcsc.765220. Diodato, V. (1994). Dictionary of Bibliometrics. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
• Doğan, M. (2022). Kimya eğitiminde sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve yeşil kimya üzerine yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi [Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
• Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 543. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p543.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., and Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
• Fansa, M. (2012). Araştırma dayalı öğrenme yönteminin ilköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin maddenin değişimi ve tanınması ünitesindeki akademik başarı, fen dersine karşı tutum ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi [Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Hatay.
• Farrell, J. J., Moog, R. S., and Spencer, J. N. (1999). A guided-inquiry general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 570-574. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p570.
• Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., and Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2004). Design‐based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20040.
• Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., and Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasiexperimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206.
• Gaddis, B. A., and Schoffstall, A. M. (2007). Incorporating guided-inquiry learning into the organic chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(5), 848-851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed084p848.
• Galloway, K. R., Malakpa, Z., and Bretz, S. L. (2016). Investigating affective experiences in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory: Students’ perceptions of control and responsibility. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(2), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00737.
• Gilardi, S., and Lozza, E. (2009). Inquiry-based learning and undergraduates’ Professional identity development: assessment of a field research-based course. Innovative Higher Education, 34(4), 245-256.
• Glänzel, W. (2001) National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010512628145.106
• Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M.Á., Moral-Muñoz, J.A., Herrera‐Viedma, E., and Cobo, M.J. (2017). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence, 48, 1275-1287. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y.
• Gülmez, D., Özteke, İ., ve Gümüş, S. (2021). Uluslararası dergilerde yayımlanan Türkiye kaynaklı eğitim araştırmalarının genel görünümü: bibliyometrik analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 206, 213-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.9317.
• Gürler, G. (2021). Bibliyometrik Araştırmalarda İlgili Literatüre İlişkin Veri Setinin Oluşturulma Süreci. Öztürk, O. ve Gürler, G. (Eds). Bir Literatür İncelemesi Aracı Olarak Bibliyometrik Analiz. (s. 53-66). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Hein, S. M. (2012). Positive impacts using POGIL in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(7), 860-864.
• Hofstein, A., Shore, R., and Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 47-62.
• Hofstein, A., and Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106.
• Khan, M.S., Hussain, S., Ali, R., Majoka, M. I., and Ramzan, M. (2011). Effect of inquiry method on achievement of students in chemistry at secondary level. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 955-959.
• Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. (2006). Why unguided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
• Korkman, N., and Metin, M. (2021). The effect of ınquiry-based collaborative learning and inquiry-based online collaborative learning on success and permanent learning of students. Journal of Science Learning, 4(2), 151-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.29038.
• Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., and Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20240.
• Kurutkan, M. N., ve Orhan, F. (2018). Bilim haritalama, bibliyometrik analiz ve kitap ile ilgili genel hususlar. M. N. Kurutkan ve F. Orhan (Eds.), Sağlık Politikası Konusunun Bilim Haritalama Teknikleri ile Analizi. İksad Publishing House.
• Lee, H. S., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., and Liu, O. L. (2010). How do technology‐enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 71-90.
• Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., and Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literatüre reviews and bibliyometrik analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175- 194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678.
• Lopera-Perez, M., Maz-Machado, A., Madrid, M. J., and Cuida, A. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of the international scientific production on environmental education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(3), 428-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.428.
• Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., and Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318-1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20191.
• Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690121307.
• Martin, D. J. (2009). Elementary science methods: a constructivist approach. USA: Delmar Publisher, An International Thomson Publishing Company.
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., and Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347.
• Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Netherlands: Springer. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.112
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• Noyons, E. C., Moed, H. F., and Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American society for Information Science, 50(2), 115-131.
• Purwandari, I. D., Rahayu, S., and Dasna, W. (2022). Inquiry learning model in chemistry education: a systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(2), 681-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp681-691.
• Roehrig, G. H., Kurdziel, J. P., Turner, J. A., and Luft, J. A. (2003). Graduate teaching assistants and inquiry-based instruction: Implications for graduate teaching assistant training. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(10), 1206.
• Roehrig, G. H., and Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000070261.
• Russell, C. B., and Weaver, G. C. (2011). A comparative study of traditional, inquiry-based, and research-based laboratory curricula: impacts on understanding of the nature of science. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90008K.
• Sadeh, I., and Zion M. (2012). Which type of inquiry project do high school biology students prefer: open or guided? Research in Science Education, 42, 831-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9222-9.
• Saka, T., ve İnaltekin, T. (2021). Araştırma-sorgulamaya dayalı öğretime yönelik akademik çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi (2000-2020). OPUS–Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(40), 2408-2449. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.865502.
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G. and Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88, 610-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128.
• Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406.
• Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:93.3.CO;2-7.
• Sönmez, Ö. F. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of educational research articles published in the field of social study education based on web of science database. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 216-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.20.30.7.2.
• Sugano, S. G. C., and Nabua, E. B. (2020). Meta-analysis on the effects of teaching methods on academic performance in chemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 881-894. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13259a.
• Şeref, İ., and Karagoz, B. (2019). An evaluation of Turkish education academic field: bibliometric analysis based on web of science database. Journal of Language Education and Research, 5 (2), 213-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.31464/jlere.578224.
• Şimşek, P., and Kabapınar, F. (2010). The effects of inquiry-based learning on elementary students’ conceptual understanding of matter, scientific process skills and science attitudes. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1190–1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170.
• Şimşir, İ. (2021). Bibliyometri ve Bibliyometrik Analize İlişkin Kavramsal Çerçeve. Öztürk, O., ve Gürler, G. (Eds). Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz. (s. 7- 32). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Tosun, C., Şenocak, E., ve Taşkesenligil, Y. (2021). Probleme dayalı öğrenmenin kimya eğitiminde kullanımına yönelik makalelerin bibliyometrik ve betimsel içerik analizleri. Türkiye Kimya Derneği Dergisi Kısım C: Kimya Eğitimi, 6(2),133-164. https://doi.org/10.37995/jotcsc.926720.
• Trout, L., Lee, C., Moog, R., and Rickey, D. (2009). İnquiry learning: What is it? How do you do it? S. L. Bretz (Ed.), Chemistry in the National Science Education Standards: Models for Meaningful Learning in the High School Chemistry Classroom (s. 29-45).
• Ulu, S., ve Akdağ, M. (2015), Dergilerde yayınlanan hakem denetimli makalelerin bibliyometrik profili: Selçuk iletişim örneği. Selçuk İletişim, 9(1), 5-21.
• van Raan, A. F. J. (2005) Measuring science. Moed, H. F., Glanzel, W., and Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of quantitative science and technology research, chap. measuring. Springer, Netherlands, pp 19–50.
• van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., and Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education: Scaffolding pupils’ self-directed learning in open inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2461-2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1388940.
• Varma, T., Volkmann, M., and Hanuscin, D. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceptions of their understanding of inquiry and inquiry-based science pedagogy: influence of an elementary science education methods course and a science field experience. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03182354.11
• Wallace, C. S., and Kang, N. H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936-960. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20032.
• Zan, B. U. (2012). Türkiye'de bilim dallarında karşılaştırmalı bibliyometrik analiz çalışması [Yayınlanmış Doktora tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Župič, I., and Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.