Öğretmenlerin İş Performanslarının Yordayıcıları Olarak Mesleki Stres ve Mesleki Dayanıklılık

Year 2025, Volume: 54 Issue: 248, 1869 - 1904, 01.11.2025

Veysel Şimşek , Ümit Dilekçi

https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1666077

Abstract

Mevcut araştırma öğretmenlerde algılanan mesleki stres, mesleki dayanıklılık ve iş performansı (görev performansı, bağlamsal performans, uyumsal performans) düzeylerini ile öğretmenlerin mesleki stres ve mesleki dayanıklılık düzeylerinin iş performansını yordama gücünü ortaya koymaktadır. 2024-2025 eğitim ve öğretim yılında Batman ilinde görev yapan öğretmenler araştırmanın evrenini, söz konusu evrenden uygun örnekleme yöntemiyle ulaşılan 512 öğretmen ise araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak “Demografik Bilgi Formu”, “Öğretmen İş Performansı Ölçeği”, “Algılanan Mesleki Stres Ölçeği” ve “Öğretmen Mesleki Dayanıklılık Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Kullanılan ölçme araçlarının daha önce öğretmen örneklemleri üzerinde geçerlik ve güvenirliği kanıtlanmış olduğundan mevcut araştırmada yapı geçerlikleri doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ile ortaya konmuştur. Güvenirlik analizi kapsamında ise Cronbach’s Alpha iç tutarlılık katsayısı hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, ölçeklerin geçerlik ve güvenirlik ölçütlerini karşıladığını göstermiştir. Araştırma amacı doğrultusunda nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden betimsel ve ilişkisel tarama modelleri benimsenmiştir. Veri analizinden önce veri setinin dağılımı kontrol edilmiş ve normal dağılım varsayımının karşılanmadığı değerlendirilmiştir. Bu nedenle uç değerler kutu grafiği yöntemiyle belirlenmiş ve 14 katılımcıya ait veri analiz dışı tutulmuştur. Betimsel istatistikler kapsamında minimum, maksimum, aritmetik ortalama ve standart sapma değerleri; karşılıklı ilişkileri ortaya koymak amacıyla Pearson Momentler Çarpım Korelasyon Katsayısı ve yordayıcı ilişkileri ortaya koymak amacıyla yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, katılımcıların araştırma değişkenlerine yönelik algıları nispeten olumlu olup algılanan mesleki stres ile öğretmen iş performansı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı, negatif yönde ve düşük düzeyde; öğretmen mesleki dayanıklılığı ile iş performansı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı, pozitif yönde ve orta düzeyde ilişkiler mevcuttur. Algılanan mesleki stres ve mesleki dayanıklılık değişkenleri öğretmen iş performansını istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir biçimde yordamaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular mevcut alanyazın temelinde tartışılmış ve bulgulara dayalı olarak uygulayıcılara, araştırmacılara ve politika yapıcılara birtakım öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

İş performansı , mesleki stres , mesleki dayanıklılık , öğretmen

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmada Yükseköğretim Kurumları Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Yönergesi’nde belirtilen kurallara uyulduğunu ve bilimsel araştırma ve yayın etiğine aykırı eylemlere dayalı hiçbir işlem yapmadığımızı beyan ederiz. Aynı zamanda tüm yazarların çalışmaya katkıda bulunduğu, yazarlar arasında herhangi bir çıkar çatışmasının bulunmadığını, tüm etik ihlallerde tüm sorumluluğun makale yazarlarına ait olduğunu beyan ederiz.

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

Occupational Stress and Occupational Resilience as Predictors of Teachers’ Job Performance

Abstract

This study reveals the perceived occupational stress, occupational resilience and job performance (task performance, contextual performance, adaptive performance) levels of teachers and the predictive power of teachers' stress and resilience levels on job performance. The sample of the study included 512 teachers working in the city of Batman (Türkiye) during the 2024-2025 academic year. The participants were reached through a convenient sampling approach. Data were collected using a "Demographic Information Form," the "Perceived Occupational Stress Scale," the "Teacher Professional Resilience Scale," and the "Teacher Job Performance Scale." The validity and reliability of these scales had previously been established on teacher samples; thus, in this study, construct validity was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). On the other hand, Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated to test the reliability. The study employed descriptive and relational survey models, which are among quantitative research methods. Prior to data analysis, the distribution of the data was checked, and the findings suggested that the data did not have a normal distribution. Thus, using box plots outliers were identified and data of 14 participants were excluded from the analysis. Descriptive statistics such as minimum, maximum, arithmetic mean, and standard deviation were calculated, while Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient was used to examine the associations between variables, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to identify predictive relationships. The findings indicated that the teachers’ perceptions of the study variables were positive. There was a statistically significant, positive, and moderate-level association between teachers’ professional resilience and job performance. On the other hand, a statistically significant, negative, low level relationship was found between perceived occupational stress and job performance. Perceived occupational stress and professional resilience were statistically significant predictors of teachers’ job performance. The findings were discussed based on the previous literature and some recommendations were provided for practitioners, researchers and policymakers.

Keywords

Job performance , occupational stress , occupational resilience , teacher

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

References

• Ainsworth, S., & Oldfield, J. (2019). Quantifying teacher resilience: Context matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 117-128. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.012
• Asaloei, S. I., Wolomasi, A. K., & Werang, B. R. (2020). Work-related stress and performance among primary school teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 352-358. https://doi. org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20335
• Aydın, İ. (2018). Öğretmenlik kariyer evreleri ve öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi. Journal of Human Sciences, 15(4), 2047-2065. https://doi.org/10.14687/ jhs.v15i4.5450
• Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2013). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40(1), 48- 99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488210
• Barnova, S., Gabrhelová, G., Krásna, S., Hasajová, L., & Barna, D. (2023). Teacher resilience and coping with teacher stress in vocational schools. Societies, 13,204. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13090204
• Bian, H., & Jiang, H. (2025). Alleviating occupational stress in Chinese junior high school teachers: The role of mindfulness-based interventions. Frontiers in Psychology, 16,1479507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1479507
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley. https:// doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. N. Schmitt and W. Borman (Eds.), in Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). JosseyBass Publishers.
• Botou, A., Mylonakou-Keke, I., Kalouri, O., & Tsergas, N. (2017). Primary school teachers’ resilience during the economic crisis in Greece. Psychology, 8(1), 131-159. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.81009
• Buttler, T., & Engelbrecht, A. (2024). Teacher occupational resilience: Reimagining the occupation of teaching. In K. MacKinnon (Ed.), Transformative change through educational leadership: stories, models, and wonderings. Canadian Scholars.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Kahveci, Ö. & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
• Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (Eds.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 687- 732). Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Can, S. ve Zafer-Güneş, D. (2023). Ortaokullarda görev yapan yöneticilerin sergiledikleri liderlik stillerinin öğretmenlerinin iş performansına etkisi. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 52(240), 2663-2680. https://doi.org/10.37669/ milliegitim.1178130
• Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(3), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/ cjas.232
• Chen, J., & Chi-Kin Lee, J. (2022). Teacher resilience matters: A buffering and boosting effect between job driving factors and their well-being and job performance. Teachers and Teaching, 28(7), 890-907. https://doi.org/10. 1080/13540602.2022.2116574
• Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
• Chu, W., & Liu, H. (2022). A mixed-methods study on senior high school EFL teacher resilience in China. Educational Psychology, 13,865599. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865599
• Clarà, M. (2017). Teacher resilience and meaning transformation: How teachers reappraise situations of adversity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.010.
• Çalışkan, A., & Köroğlu, E. Ö. (2022). Job performance, task performance, contextual performance: Development and validation of a new scale. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 8, 180-201. https://doi. org/10.29131/uiibd.1201880
• Çiçek, İ., Sipahioğlu, M., & Dilekçi, Ü. (2025). The mediating role of occupational self-efficacy and resilience in the relationship between occupational stress and subjective well-being in teachers: Validation of the Turkish version of the Teacher Occupational Self-Efficacy-Short Form. Psychology in the Schools, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.70073
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.14507/ epaa.v8n1.2000
• Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2013). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge Press. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203578490
• Díaz-Vilela, L. F., Delgado Rodríguez, N., Isla-Díaz, R., Díaz-Cabrera, D., Hernández-Fernaud, E., & Rosales-Sánchez, C. (2015). Relationships between contextual and task performance and interrater agreement: Are there any? Plosone, 10(10), e0139898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0139898
• Dilekçi, Ü., & Sezgin-Nartgün, Ş. (2020). İş performansının bir boyutu olarak uyumsal performans: Kuramsal bir çerçeve. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 53(1), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.30964/ auebfd.560443
• Dilekçi, Ü., Kaya, A., & Çiçek, İ. (2025). Occupational stress, burnout, and change fatigue as predictors of quiet quitting among teachers. Acta Psychologica, 254,104812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104812
• Ebersöhn, L. (2014). Teacher resilience: Theorizing resilience and poverty. Teachers and Teaching, 20(5), 568-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406 02.2014.937960
• Ekinci, S. (2018). Profesyonel öğrenme topluluğu, psikolojik sahiplenme ve bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişki [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi
• Erduran Tekin, Ö., & Çayak, S.(2024). Examining the relationship between teachers’ patience levels and professional resilience. International Journal of Academic Studies in Technology and Education (IJASTE), 2(1), 22-39.https://doi.org/10.55549/ijaste.25
• Esen, D. (2023). Hizmetkâr liderliğin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisinde öğretmen özerkliğinin aracılık rolü. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 14(27), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1245874
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using Spss. Sage Publications. Fonte, R. J., Yazon, A., Tan, C., Buenvinida, L., & Bandoy, M. (2021). Distance learning delivery modalities implementation, resilience quotient and work performance of teachers: A correlational study in the Philippines. IJTAESE, 3(2), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijtaese.v3i2.684
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.
• Hamid, Z., Bisschoff, C., & Botha, C. (2015). Work stress and its influence on the work performance of Swaziland teachers in the Swaziland school education system. Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 142-157. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09764224.2015.11885532
• Hasan, A. (2014). A study of occupational stress of primary school teachers. Educationia Confab, 3(4), 11-19.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Kaur, H. (2017). A study of teacher effectiveness in relation to occupational stress and life satisfaction among teacher educators. International Journal Advances in Social Science and Humanities, 5(8), 1-9.
• Kholis, N., Rohma, H., & Maesaroh, I. (2024). Work stress, work environment and teacher performance in Islamic high schools. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 12(4), 6112-6123. https://doi. org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i04.em06
• Klassen, R. M., & Durksen, T. L. (2014). Weekly self-efficacy and work stress during the teaching practicum: A mixed methods study. Learning and Instruction, 33, 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. learninstruc.2014.05.003
• Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet, H. C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1097/ JOM.0b013e318226a763
• Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
• Lester, P. E., Inman, D., & Bishop, L. (2014). Handbook of tests and measurement in education and the social sciences. Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi. org/10.5771/9781610484312
• Li, L., Deeprasert, J., & Kanchanapoom, K. (2025). Unveiling the factors shaping teacher job performance: Exploring the interplay of personality traits, perceived organizational support, self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. BMC Psychology, 13,14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02324-1
• Li, S. (2023). The effect of teacher self-efficacy, teacher resilience, and emotion regulation on teacher burnout: A mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14,1185079. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185079
• Limon, İ. (2022). Öğretmenlerin mesleki dayanıklılık kapasitelerinin çeşitli demografik değişkenler bağlamında incelenmesi. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 51(236), 3253-3274. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.953186
• Limon, İ., & Sezgin-Nartgün, Ş. (2020). Development of teacher job performance scale and determining teachers’ job performance level. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 13(3), 564-590. http://dx.doi. org/10.30831/akukeg.642340
• Liu, H., & Chu, W. (2022). Exploring EFL teacher resilience in the Chinese context. System, 105,102752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102752
• Makovec, D. (2018). The teacher’s role and professional development. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 6(2), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802033M
• Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2015.11.016
• Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Price, A., & McConney, A. (2012). Don’t sweat the small stuff: Understanding teacher resilience at the chalkface. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 357-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2011.11.001
• Marcatto, F., Di Blas, L., Luis, O., Festa, S., & Ferrante, D. (2022). The perceived occupational stress scale: A brief tool for measuring workers’ perceptions of stress at work. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38, 293-306. https://doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000677
• Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (3rd Edition). Sage Publications.
• Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. Sage Publications.
• Mohammadi, M. (2021). Dimensions of teacher performance evaluation by students in higher education. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(2), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i2.3673
• Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1
• Näswall, K., Malinen, S., Kuntz, J., & Hodliffe, M. (2019). Employee resilience: Development and validation of a measure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(5), 353-367. https://doi:10.1108/JMP-02-2018-0102
• Nor, N. (2020). Occupational stress, job satisfaction and job performance among teachers: A research framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 919-924. https://doi. org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i5/7323
• Nwachukwu, K. (2024). Psychosocial variables and job performance among secondary school teachers in rivers state. Canada Journal of Education Research, 9(2), 1-22.
• OECD (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Education and Training Policy, OECD Publishing, https://doi. org/10.1787/9789264018044-en
• OECD (2024). Education policy outlook 2024: Reshaping teaching into a thriving profession from ABCs to AI. OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/ dd5140e4-en
• Pakarinen, E., Kiuru, N., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., Siekkinen, M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2010). Classroom organization and teacher stress predict learning motivation in kindergarten children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212- 010-0025-6
• Papazis, F., Avramidis, E., & Bacopoulou, F. (2023). Greek teachers’ resilience levels during the covid‐19 pandemic lockdown and its association with attitudes towards emergency remote teaching and perceived stress. Psychology in the Schools, 60(5), 1459-1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/ pits.22709
• Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624. https://doi. org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749105
• Singh, K. (2007). Quantitative social research methods. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9789351507741
• Şanlı, Ö. (2017). Öğretmenlerin algılanan stres düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(61), 385- 396. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.304681
• Şengür, D. (2024). Öğretmenlerin istismarcı yönetim algıları ile stres düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Journal of History School, 16(66), 1886-1905. https:// doi.org/10.29228/joh.71833
• Yıldırım, M., Dilekçi, Ü., Marcatto, F., & Gómez-Salgado, J. (2024). Validation of a Turkish translation of the perceived occupational stress scale and measurement invariance across Turkish and Italian workers. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 17, 261-268. https://doi. org/10.2147/RMHP.S437312
• Yildirim, M., Dilekçi, Ü., & Manap, A. (2024). Mediating roles of meaning in life and psychological flexibility in the relationships between occupational stress and job satisfaction, job performance, and psychological distress in teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15,1349726. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2024.1349726
• Yonghong, C., & Chongde, L. (2006). Theory and practice on teacher performance evaluation. Frontiers of Education in China, 1, 29-39. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11516-005-0004-x
• Zhang, M. (2021). EFL/ESL teacher’s resilience, academic buoyancy, care, and their impact on students’ engagement: A theoretical review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12,731859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731859
• Zhang, S., & Luo, Y. (2023). Review on the conceptual framework of teacher resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 14,1179984. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2023.1179984
• Zhao, W., Liao, X., & Li, Q. (2021). The relationship between teacher job stress and burnout: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12,784243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784243