Öğretmen Çocuklarının Gözüyle Eğitim Fakülteleri

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, öğretmen çocuklarının perspektifinden eğitim fakültelerinin tercih nedenleri, beklentileri ve karşılaştıkları durumlar incelenmiştir. Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan durum deseni ile yürütülen çalışmaya, 20 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, öğretmen çocukları eğitim fakültelerini idealist nedenler, kişisel ilgi, kariyer perspektifi, ailevi ve ekonomik faktörlerden dolayı tercih etmektedir. Fakültelerden beklentileri arasında nitelikli ve uygulamalı eğitim, kişisel ve mesleki gelişim desteği, kariyer rehberliği, çağdaş yaklaşımlar ve destekleyici sosyal çevre yer almaktadır. Katılımcılar, eğitim süreçlerinde teknoloji kullanımındaki yetersizlikler, akademik-idari sorunlar, sosyal ve kişisel deneyimler ile fiziki altyapı eksikliklerinden kaynaklanan zorluklarla karşılaştıklarını belirtmiştir. Bununla birlikte, motivasyonlarını artıran sosyal bağlantılar ve mesleki farkındalık gibi pozitif deneyimler de yaşamışlardır. Sonuçlar, öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının uygulamalı eğitim ve inovatif yaklaşımlarla zenginleştirilmesi gerektiğini vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca, dijital teknolojilerin entegrasyonu ve öğretmen adaylarına yönelik kariyer destek hizmetlerinin artırılması önerilmektedir. Bu bağlamda, eğitim fakültelerinin mevcut yapısının yeniden yapılandırılması, öğretmen adaylarının mesleki gelişimlerinin desteklenmesi ve eğitim-öğretim kalitesinin yükseltilmesi açısından stratejik bir önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışma, öğretmen çocuklarının eğitim fakültelerine yönelik tercihleri, beklentileri ve deneyimlerini çok boyutlu bir perspektifle inceleyerek, öğretmen yetiştirme politikalarının iyileştirilmesine yönelik kuramsal ve uygulamalı düzeyde özgün katkılar sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

• Eğitim Fakülteleri
• Öğretmen Çocukları
• Öğretmenlik Mesleği

Ethical Statement

“Öğretmen çocuklarının gözüyle eğitim fakülteleri” başlıklı çalışmanın yazım sürecinde bilimsel kurallara, etik ve alıntı kurallarına uyulmuş; toplanan veriler üzerinde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmamış ve bu çalışma herhangi başka bir akademik yayın ortamına değerlendirme için gönderilmemiştir. Gerekli olan etik kurul izinleri Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Etik Kurulu, Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu’nun 13.06.2024 tarih ve 09/09 sayılı kararıyla alınmıştır.

Thanks

Araştırmanın hedef kitlesi olan öğretmen çocuklarının ebeveynleri olan öğretmenlerimize teşekkür ederim.

Faculties of Education through the Eyes of Teachers' Children

Abstract

In this study, the reasons for choosing faculties of education, expectations, and encountered experiences are examined from the perspective of children of teachers. The research was conducted using a qualitative case study design, and 20 prospective teachers participated. According to the findings, children of teachers prefer faculties of education due to idealistic reasons, personal interest, career perspectives, as well as familial and economic factors. Their expectations from these faculties include high-quality and practical education, support for personal and professional development, career guidance, contemporary approaches, and a supportive social environment. Participants stated that during their education, they faced challenges such as insufficient use of technology, academic and administrative problems, personal and social difficulties, and inadequate physical infrastructure. However, they also reported positive experiences that increased their motivation, such as social connections and increased professional awareness. The results emphasize the need to enrich teacher training programs through practical education and innovative approaches. Furthermore, the integration of digital technologies and the enhancement of career support services for prospective teachers are recommended. In this context, restructuring the current framework of faculties of education is strategically important for supporting the professional development of teacher candidates and improving the quality of education. This study aims to provide original theoretical and practical contributions to the improvement of teacher training policies by examining the preferences, expectations, and experiences of children of teachers toward faculties of education from a multidimensional perspective.

Keywords

• Faculty of Education
• Children of Teachers
• Teaching Profession

Ethical Statement

During the writing process of the study “Faculties of Education through the Eyes of Teachers' Children” scientific rules, ethical and citation rules were followed. No falsification was made on the collected data and this study was not sent to any other academic publication medium for evaluation. In addition, permission was obtained from the Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Graduate Education Institute Ethics Committee, Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committe (Date: 13/06/2024 and Decision no: 09/09) to conduct the research.

Thanks

I would like to thank our teachers, who are the parents of teacher children, who are the target group of the research.

References

1. Argote, L. (2013). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Springer.
2. Ball, D.L., & Forzani, F.M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511.
3. Balsemão Oss, D.I. (2018). The relevance of teachers’ practical knowledge in the development of teacher education programs. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 20(1), 167-178.
4. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
6. Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
8. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). Sage.

9. Brim, O.G. (1966). Socialization through the life cycle. In O. G. Brim & S. Wheeler (Eds.), Socialization after childhood: Two essays (pp. 1-49). Wiley.
10. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
11. Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 677-692.
12. Dearman, C.C., & Alber, S.R. (2005). The changing face of education: Teachers cope with challenges through collaboration and reflective study. The Reading Teacher, 58(7), 634-640.
13. Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.
14. Filippin, A., & Paccagnella, M. (2012). Family background, self- confidence and economic outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 31(5), 824-834.
15. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.
16. Futrell, M.H., Gomez, J., & Bedden, D. (2003). Teaching the children of a new America: The challenge of diversity. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 381-385.
17. Gabdulсhakov, V. F., & Khairullin, I. T. (2018). Integration Of Theoretical And Practical Teacher Training. In V. Chernyavskaya, & H. Kuße (Eds.), Professional Сulture of the Specialist of the Future, vol 51. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 23-31). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.02.3
18. Gibson, D.E. (2004). Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 134-156.
19. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
20. Giddens, A. (2013). Sociology (7th ed.). Polity Press.
21. Ginzberg, E. (1952).Toward a theory of occupational choice: A restatement. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 1(3), 38-43.
22. Gomez, M.L. (1993). Prospective teachers' perspectives on teaching diverse children: A review with implications for teacher education and practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 200-210.
23. Grusec, J.E., & Hastings, P.D. (2015). Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
24. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151-182.
25. Hargrove, B.K., Creagh, M.G., & Burgess, B. L. (2002). Family interaction patterns as predictors of vocational identity and career decision- making self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 185-201.
26. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (2004). Intergenerational differences in individualism and collectivism: A study of Turkish and American college students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 93-108.
27. Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 257-272.
28. Kosharna, N. (2021). Modern European experience of practical teacher training. Educological Discourse, 32(1), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2021.1.10
29. Kurban, A. (2021). Devlet okullarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin çocuklarını özel okullara kayıt yaptırmasının nedenleri. Asian Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.933354
30. Kyriacou, C., & Coulthard, M. (2000). Undergraduates’ views of teaching as a career choice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(2), 117-126.
31. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
32. Lent, R.W., & Brown, S.D. (2020). Career decision making, fast and slow: Toward an integrative model of intervention for sustainable career choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103448
33. Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.
34. Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997).Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 91-103.
35. Luguetti, C., & Oliver, K.L. (2020). “I became a teacher that respects the kids' voices”: Challenges and facilitators pre-service teachers faced in learning an activist approach. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(2), 124-138.
36. Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F. (2009). Experience, theory, and practical wisdom in teaching and teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 225-240.
37. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2013). Öğretmenlik Mesleği Yeterlikleri. Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
38. Namlı, A. (2016). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenleri çocuklarının düzenli spor yapma durumlarının tespiti. [Yüksek lisans tezi, Bartın Üniversitesi]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
39. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
40. Oreopoulos, P., & Salvanes, K.G. (2011). Priceless: The nonpecuniary benefits of schooling. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(1), 159– 184.
41. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Routledge.
42. Richardson, P.W., & Watt, H.M. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 27-56.
43. Richardson, P.W., & Watt, H.M. (2010). Current and future directions in teacher motivation research. Advances in Teacher Education, 3(2), 139-157.
44. Rothland, M., König, J., & Drahmann, M. (2015). Lehrerkinder–Zur Bedeutung der Berufsvererbung für die Berufswahl Lehramt. Zeitschrift Für Bildungsforschung, 5(2), 129-144.
45. Schulenberg, J.E., Vondracek, F.W., & Crouter, A. C. (1984). The influence of the family on vocational development. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46(1), 129-143.
46. Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
47. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
48. Sikes, P. (1998).Parent teachers: reconciling the roles. Teacher Development, 2(1), 87-105.
49. Super, D.E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50. Şeker, G., & Çapri, B. (2020). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin meslek seçiminde etkili olan faktörler. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 651-663.
51. Tarman, B. (2010). Global perspectives and challenges on teacher education in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2747-2762.
52. Vautero, J., Silva, A.D., & Taveira, M.C. (2021). Family influence on undergraduates’ career choice implementation. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 21(4), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-020-09453-0
53. Watt, H.M., & Richardson, P.W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT- Choice scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167-202.
54. Whiston, S.C., & Keller, B.K. (2004). The influences of the family of origin on career development: A review and analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 32(4), 493-568.
55. Wilson, S.M., & Ball, D.L. (1996). Helping teachers meet the standards: New challenges for teacher educators. The Elementary School Journal, 96(4), 507-521.