Okullarda Örgütsel Dertleşmeye İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri

Abstract

Bu araştırma, daha önce Türkçe alan yazında ilk defa kavramsal bir çalışmayla gündeme gelmiş olan “Örgütsel Dertleşme” kavramının öğretmenler tarafından nasıl algılandığını belirlemeye yöneliktir. Bu bağlamda örgütsel dertleşme kavramına ilişkin öğretmenlerin görüşlerini ortaya koymak hedeflenmiştir. Nitel olarak yürütülen bu çalışmada araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Muş il merkezinde bulunan bir ilkokul ve ortaokulda görev yapan farklı branşlardan 11 öğretmen oluşturmuştur. Araştırma soruları, öğretmenlerin örgüt içerisinde sevinçlerini, hüzünlerini ve örgütsel problemlerini paylaşma açısından tercihlerini ve algılarını anlamaya yöneliktir. Verilerin çözümlenmesi için betimsel analiz yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğretmenlerin, kendi düşüncelerini, fikirlerini, deneyimlerini başka bireylere anlatırken bilişsel bir süzgeçten geçirdikleri söylenebilir. Ayrıca öğretmenlerin çoğunlukla yöneticilerle dertleşmekten çekindikleri ortaya çıkmıştır. Yöneticilerin örgütsel gerçeklikleri fark edebilmek ve örgütsel değişimleri gerçekleştirebilmek için örgütsel dertleşmeye uygun zemin hazırlamaları ve örgütsel dertleşmenin gücünden yararlanmaları önerilebilir. 

Keywords

• Dertleşme,Örgütsel dertleşme,Mesleki dertleşme,Okul yönetimi

The Views Of Teachers Related To Organizational Narrative Conversation At Schools

Abstract

This research is aimed to determine the reflections of the concept of “Organizational Narrative Conversation” which came up for the first time in Turkish literature before with a conceptual study. In this context, it was aimed to reveal the views of teachers about the concept of organizational narrative conversation. In this qualitative study, the study group consisted of 11 teachers from different branches working in a primary school and secondary school in Muş city center. The research questions are aimed at understanding the preferences and perceptions of teachers in terms of sharing their joys, sadness and organizational problems within the organization. Descriptive analysis was performed to analyze the data. As a result of the research, it can be said that teachers pass a cognitive filter while telling their thoughts, ideas and experiences to other individuals. In addition, it was revealed that teachers were mostly hesitant to complain to the administrators. As a result, it is seen that professional narrative conversations were rarely performed by teachers. It is understood that teachers' professional conversations reflect very little to their professional areas. In addition, it can be understood that women's exchange of information on professional issues is more than that of men in professional narrative conversations. In order to realize organizational realities and realize organizational changes, managers may be able to prepare the appropriate level for organizational narrative conversation and to benefit from its power.

Keywords

• Narrative conversation (unburden one’s heart),Organizational narrative conversation,Professional narrative conversation

References

1. Barth, R.S. (2006). Improving relationships within the school. Improving Professional Practice, 63(6), 8-13.
2. Beer, M. &Eisenstat, R. A. (2004). How toHave an HonestConversationAboutYour Business Strategy (HBR OnPointEnhanced Edition). Harvard Business Review. http://hbr.org/product/how-to-have-an-honest-conversation-about-your-busi/an/5925-PDF-ENG. (05/04/2018).
3. Bogdan, R. C., ve Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Brown, J. &Isaacs, D. (1997). Conversation as a Core Business Process. The Systems Thinker Newsletter. Vol. 7, No. 10:1-9.
5. Bushe, G. R. (2009). Learning From Collective Experience: A Different View of Organizational Learning. OD PRACTITIONER.Vol. 41, No. 3. 19-23.
6. Choudhury, T. & Pentland, A. (2003). Modeling Face-to Face Communication using the Sociameter. Interactions. http://wearables.cc.gatech.edu/paper_of_week/modelingFace2Face.pdf(06/04/2012).
7. Cohen, L.,Manion, L. ve Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th Ed.). London, New York: Routledge Falmer.
8. Çetinkaya, E., Kemer, G., Bulgan, G., & Tezer, E. (2008). İkili ilişkiler güven ölçeği’nin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(29), 65-77.

9. Degner, R. K. (2010). Prevalence of Communication Apprehension at a Community College. The International Journal of Inter disciplinary Social Sciences. Vol.5, No 6:184-192.
10. Demir Yıldız, C. & Dönmez, B. (2017). Örgütsel Dertleşme. Ekev Akademi Dergisi. 21 (72). Ss. 59-66.
11. Dooley, J. (2009). Conversation, The New Sciences, And The Unlearning Organization. Citeseer.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.135.9569&rep=rep1&type=pdf ( 22 Mart 2012).
12. Evans, M. (2017). Workplace Career Conversations: aligning organizational talent management and individual career development. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Loughborough University Institutional Repository.
13. Ford, J. D. (1999). Organizational Change as Shifting Conversations.Journal of Organizational Change Management. 12 (6), 480-500.
14. Haigh, N. (2005). Everyday Conversation as a Contextfor Professional Learning and Development. International Jopurnal for Academic Development. Vol. 10, No. 1: 3-16.
15. Hervey, G. W. (1853). Rhetoric of conversation: or, Bridles&spurs for the management of tongue. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.
16. Hurley, T. J. & Brown, J. (2010). Conversational Leadership: Thinking Together for a Change. Oxford Leadership Journal: Shifting The Trajectory of Civilisation. 1 (2), 1-9.
17. Graham, P. (2007). The Role of Conversation, Contention, and Commitment in a Professionally Learning Community. OpenStax-CNX module: m14270 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1066767.pdf (23.10.2018)
18. Larzelere, R. E. ve Huston, T. L. (1980). The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(3), 595-604.
19. McDrury, J. & Alterion, M. (2002). Learning through story telling: using reflection and experience in higher education contexts. Palmerston North, NZ: DunmorePress.
20. Metin, H. (2011). Empatik İletişim ve Yönetişim. İletişim, Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi. Bahar, Sayı 32:177-203.
21. Neuman, W. L. (2010). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri: Nitel ve Nicel Yaklaşımlar.(4. Baskı). İstanbul: Yayın Odası.
22. Paulo, G. (2011). ‘Conversation-Oriented Decision Support Systems for Organizations’ in Cruz-Cunha, M. M. &Varajao, J. (Eds.). Enterprise Information Systems Design, Implementation and Management: Organizational Applications. IGI Global, (pp.1-622). doi:10.4018/978-1-61692-020-3.
23. Patrick, P. L. (2002). Discourse and conversation. Course Materials, Department of Language and Linguistics. Retrieved 21 May 2002 from http://courses.essex.ac.uk/lg/lg/lg432/Conversation.html.
24. Pepkins, D. (2003). KingArthur's roundtable: How collaborative conversations creates mart organizations. New Jersey: John Wiley&Sonss.
25. Powell, W. &Kusuma-Powell, O. (2009). Leadership for learning: conversations that matter. International Schools' Journal.Vol XXVIII, No.2:45-56.
26. Sole, D. & Wilson, D. (2002). Storytelling in organizations: The power and traps of using stories to share knowledge in organizations. http://lila.pz.harvard.edu/_upload/lib/ACF14F3.pdf. ( 05/04/2012).
27. Şenel, Ö. (2006). Personel Güçlendirmenin Örgüt Kültürüne Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. İzmir.
28. Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: how women's and men's conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets credit, and what gets done at work. New York: William Morrow.
29. Türk Dil Kurumu [TDK]. (2012). Genel Türkçe Sözlük..http://www.tdk.org.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.4fac11e12b99a2.68164961 ( 05/05/2012).
30. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (7. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
31. Wang, M.C. &Haertel, D.G. (2001). Teacher relationships Adigest of research from the Laboratory for Student Success. No. 309, No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). http://www.state.nj.us/education/title1/tech/module4/relationships.pdf. received on 06/10/2018