Yerel üretim algısı ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Year 2026, Volume: 31 Issue: 1, 111 - 126, 11.03.2026

Şafak Ünüvar , Huzeyfe Ay , Sümeyye Karagöz

https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1778057

https://izlik.org/JA66TS75WC

Abstract

Yerel üretim ülkelerin sahip olduğu kültürel değerlerin korunması ve gelecek nesillere aktarılması aynı zamanda ekonomik kalkınmanın sağlanması açısından önemli bir konudur. Günümüzde yaşanan küreselleşme, iklimsel sorunlar ve buna bağlı doğal kaynakların azalması başta akademik camia olmak üzere birçok kesimin yerel üretime yönelik ilgisinin artmasına neden olmuştur. Çalışmada Merlino ve ark. (2022) tarafından, tüketicilerin bakış açısıyla yerel üretimin ne olduğu ve bu konuyla ilgili düşüncelerini belirlemek amacıyla geliştirilen on madde ve üç faktörden oluşan Yerel Üretim Algısı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlama çalışmasının yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklem grubunu, Konya’da faaliyet gösteren yöresel yiyecek içecek sunan işletmelerin müşterileri (n=514) oluşturmaktadır. Ölçek uyarlama aşamasında dil geçerliği için üç akademisyen tarafından İngilizce ve Türkçe uyarlama karşılaştırması yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin dil geçerliğinden sonra ilk olarak madde toplam korelasyona, aritmetik ortalamalara, standart sapma değerlerine bakılmış ikinci olarak ölçeğin güvenirlik ve geçerlik (AFA-Açıklayıcı Faktör Analizi) analizleri ve ölçeğin tekrar güvenirlik ve geçerlik (DFA-Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi) analizleri yapılmış, son olarak maddeler arası korelasyon (pearson) değerlerine bakılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda Yerel Üretim Algısı Ölçeği’nin, “sağlık ve kalite” ve “sürdürülebilirlik” olmak üzere sekiz madde ve iki faktörden oluşan formunun Türkçe alanyazında yapılacak çalışmalar için geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Yerel Üretim , Yerel Üretim Algısı Ölçeği , Ölçek Uyarlama , Güvenirlik , Geçerlik

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma için etik onay ve izin, Selçuk Üniversitesi Turizm Fakültesi Bilimsel Etik Değerlendirme Kurulu tarafından verilmiştir. Onay yazısı numarası 192/03 olup, tarihi 03/02/2025’dir.

Local production perception scale: adaptation into Turkish, validity and reliability study

https://izlik.org/JA66TS75WC

Abstract

Local production is an important issue in terms of preserving the cultural values of countries and passing them on to future generations, as well as ensuring economic development. Today's globalization, climate issues, and the resulting depletion of natural resources have led to increased interest in local production among many groups, particularly the academic community. This study aims to adapt the Local Production Perception Scale, developed by Merlino et al. (2022), which consists of ten items and three factors, into Turkish to determine what local production is from the consumers' perspective and their thoughts on this issue. The sample group for the research consisted of customers (n=514) of businesses offering local food and beverages operating in Konya. During the scale adaptation phase, three academics compared the English and Turkish adaptations to ensure linguistic validity. After the linguistic validity of the scale, item-total correlations, arithmetic means, and standard deviation values were examined. Subsequently, reliability and validity analyses (EFA-Exploratory Factor Analysis) and repeat reliability and validity analyses (CFA-Confirmatory Factor Analysis) of the scale were performed. Finally, the inter-item correlation (Pearson) values were examined. The results of the analyses revealed that the Local Production Perception Scale, consisting of eight items and two factors, namely “health and quality” and “sustainability,” is a valid and reliable measurement tool for studies to be conducted in the Turkish literature.

Keywords

Local Production , Local Production Perception Scale , Scale Adaptation , Reliability , Validity

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval and permission for this study were granted by the Scientific Ethics Evaluation Board of the Faculty of Tourism at Selçuk University. The approval letter number is 192/03, dated 03/02/2025.

References

• Alashiq, S., & Aljuhmani, H. Y. (2025). From sustainable tourism to social engagement: A Value-Belief-Norm approach to the roles of environmental knowledge, eco-destination image, and biospheric value. Sustainability, 17(10), 4353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104353
• Allen, P. (2010). Realizing justice in local food systems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(2), 295–308.
• Alpar, R. (2020). Uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik: Spor, sağlık ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle (5. baskı). Detay Yayıncılık.
• Annunziata, A., & Mariani, A. (2018). Consumer perception of sustainability attributes in organic and local food. Recent Patents on Food, Nutrition & Agriculture, 9(2), 87–96.
• Arabska, E. (2021). From farm to fork: Human health and well-being through sustainable agri-food systems. Journal of Life Economics, 8(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.8.1.02
• Arsil, P., Sularso, K. E., & Mulyani, A. (2018). Factors influencing consumer preferences for locally produced food: A comparison between traditional and modern markets. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30).
• Banerjee, R., & Quinn, B. (2022). Exploring consumer constructions of local food: Meanings and influences. European Journal of Marketing, 56(5), 1269–1300.
• Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi-squared approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296–298. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2984057
• Benson, S. G., & Dundis, S. P. (2003). Understanding and motivating health care employees: Integrating Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, training, and technology. Journal of Nursing Management, 11(5), 315–320.
• Bilgin, Y., & Pabuçcu, T. (2023). Yerli üretim algısının algılanan marka değerine ve satın alma niyetine etkisi: Türk menşeili beyaz eşya markaları üzerine bir araştırma. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(49), 133–151.
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
• Campbell, C. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on local government stakeholders’ perspectives on local food production. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 10, 71–88.
• Carfora, V., & Catellani, P. (2023). Psychosocial drivers influencing local food purchasing: Beyond availability, the importance of trust in farmers. Frontiers in Nutrition, 10, 1204732.
• Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (2. bs.). Pegem Akademi.
• Deka, T. R. (2020). Gandhi’s vision of Swadeshi and its relevance. International Journal of Management, 11(10), 2587–2593.
• Dematteis, G., & Giorda, C. (2013). Territorial values and geographical education. Journal of Research and Didactics in Geography, 1, 17–32.
• Denver, S., & Jensen, J. D. (2014). Consumer preferences for organically and locally produced apples. Food Quality and Preference, 31, 129–134.
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
• Feldmann, C., & Hamm, U. (2015). Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: A review. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 152–164.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
• Goodman, D. (2003). The quality “turn” and alternative food practices: Reflections and agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 1–7.
• Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 44, 177–189.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
• Hristov, H., Erjavec, E., Pravst, I., Juvančič, L., & Kuhar, A. (2023). Identifying differences in consumer attitudes towards local foods in organic and national voluntary quality certification schemes. Foods, 12(6), 1132.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Ilbery, B., & Maye, D. (2005). Food supply chains and sustainability: Evidence from specialist food producers in the Scottish/English borders. Land Use Policy, 22(4), 331–344.
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
• Kang, S., & Rajagopal, L. (2014). Perceptions of benefits and challenges of purchasing local foods among hotel industry decision makers. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 17(4), 301–322.
• Kondoh, K. (2015). The alternative food movement in Japan: Locally embedded alternative food networks. Local Environment, 20(9), 1037–1053.
• Köse, Ş. G. (2024). Sustainable food consumption within the scope of green economy: A research on consumer perspective. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 74–92.
• Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople’s commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026
• Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), 424–438.
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
• McCann, R. G. (2012). The local food movement: Definitions, benefits, and resources. Utah State University Cooperative Extension.
• Merlino, V. M., Sciullo, A., Pettenati, G., Sottile, F., Peano, C., & Massaglia, S. (2022). Local production: What do consumers think? Sustainability, 14(6), Article 3316.
• Naspetti, S., & Bodini, A. (2008). Consumer perception of local and organic products: Substitution or complementary goods? The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3(1), 111–120.
• Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• O’Hara, S. U., & Stagl, S. (2001). Global food markets and their local alternatives: A socio-ecological economic perspective. Population and Environment, 22(6), 533–554.
• Oğuz, S., Ballı, E., & Buzcu, Z. (2020). Yerel halkın sokak lezzetlerine karşı algıları: Adana örneği. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 7(2), 107–121.
• Ortez, M., Thompson, T., Kilders, V., & Widmar, N. O. (2024). Quantifying demand and willingness to pay for local food production. Q Open, 4(1), qoae006. https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae006
• Pirog, R. S. (2004). Ecolabel value assessment phase II: Consumer perceptions of local foods. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture.
• Sanye-Mengual, E., Orsini, F., & Gianquinto, G. (2018). Revisiting the sustainability concept of urban food production from a stakeholders’ perspective. Sustainability, 10(6), Article 2175.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
• Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. Blond & Briggs.
• Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
• Sonnino, R., & Marsden, T. (2006). Beyond the divide: Rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(2), 181–199.
• Stein, A. J., & Santini, F. (2021). The sustainability of “local” food: A review for policy-makers. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 102(1), 1–13.
• Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2006). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (5. baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Tran, D., Schouteten, J., Gellynck, X., & De Steur, H. (2024). How do consumers value food traceability? A meta-analysis. Food Control, 162.
• Trujillo, C. A. (2023). The future of sustainable consumption after the pandemic: Optimism or pessimism? IntechOpen.
• Ur Rahman, S., Chwialkowska, A., Hussain, N., Bhatti, W. A., & Luomala, H. (2023). Cross-cultural perspective on sustainable consumption: Implications for consumer motivations and promotion. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25, 997–1016.
• Van Ittersum, K., Candel, M. J. J. M., & Meulenberg, M. T. G. (2003). The influence of the image of a product’s region of origin on product evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 215–226.
• Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194.
• Viciunaite, V. (2023). Alternative food networks on digital platforms: Consumer preferences for platform versus local food attributes. Journal of Rural Studies, 100, 103017.
• Wittman, H., Chappell, M. J., Abson, D. J., Kerr, R. B., Blesh, J., Hanspach, J., Perfecto, I., & Fischer, J. (2017). A social–ecological perspective on harmonizing food security and biodiversity conservation. Regional Environmental Change, 17(5), 1291–1301.
• Woods, M. (2013). Regions engaging globalization: A typology of regional responses in rural Europe. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 8(3), 113–126.
• Yarıcı, A., & Cömert, M. (2015). Mardin ilindeki restoranların yerel ürün kullanımındaki avantaj ve dezavantajları ile ilgili algı düzeyleri. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(37), 793–804.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2024). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yılmaz, V., & Çelik, H. E. (2009). Lisrel ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (SEM): Sosyal bilimler için bir uygulama. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 47–61.
• Zepeda, L., & Li, J. (2006). Who buys local food? Journal of Food Distribution Research, 37(3), 1–11.
• Zhang, N. (2023). Product presentation in the live-streaming context: The effect of consumer perceived product value and time pressure on consumer’s purchase intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1124675. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124675